Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime Youtube Piracy

YouTuber Sentenced To Over 5 Years and Ordered To Forfeit $30 Million in Large-Scale Cable Piracy Case (inquirer.com) 72

A YouTube star who built a sizable following with slickly produced videos flaunting his fleet of luxury and sports cars, collection of diamond-encrusted bling, and his spacious Swedesboro home will be forced to give up nearly all of it after he was sentenced Tuesday to 5 and a half years in prison for the illegal business that allowed him to amass those trappings of success. From a report: Bill Omar Carrasquillo -- better known to his more than 800,000 online followers as "Omi in a Hellcat" -- pleaded guilty last year to running one of the most brazen and successful cable TV piracy schemes ever prosecuted by the U.S. government. As part of his sentencing Tuesday, he was ordered to forfeit more than $30 million in assets, including nearly $6 million in cash; cars including Lamborghinis, Porsches, Bentleys, and McLarens; and a portfolio of more than a dozen properties he'd amassed across Philadelphia and its suburbs.

"Thirty million dollars is a lot of money [but] tangible objects aren't everything," U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III said in announcing the punishment during a hearing in federal court. "You have a large following and there may be people who think if you can get away with it, they can too." Carrasquillo, 36, apologized to his family, his employees, and the cable companies he'd cheated through his business, which illegally sold content hijacked from cable boxes to thousands of online subscribers paying fees as low as $15 a month. "I really didn't know the significance of this crime until I was picked up [by the FBI] at my home," he said. "I feel like I let everybody down." But while prosecutors described Carrasquillo's crimes -- which included counts of conspiracy, copyright infringement, fraud, money laundering, and tax evasion -- as serious, much of Tuesday's hearing focused on Carrasquillo's remarkable rags-to-riches story.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

YouTuber Sentenced To Over 5 Years and Ordered To Forfeit $30 Million in Large-Scale Cable Piracy Case

Comments Filter:
  • by whoever57 ( 658626 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @03:48PM (#63354189) Journal

    From the article: he must pay "an additional $5.7 million to the IRS for unpaid taxes."

    How many criminals have been brought down by for failing to pay taxes?

    • by Major_Disorder ( 5019363 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @03:49PM (#63354191)

      How many criminals have been brought down by for failing to pay taxes?

      Al Capone, for one.

      • by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:00PM (#63354225) Homepage Journal
        Yup.

        If he'd not been so greedy and got out of it with $X million...AND didn't publicly brag about it....and just paid taxes, maybe just labelling it "Misc"...he might have gotten away with it.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by Tablizer ( 95088 )

          Someone in law enforcement once told me that most criminals are not very bright, otherwise they wouldn't be criminals. After all, you can be shady in sales and marketing without being illegal.

          • Someone in law enforcement once told me that most criminals are not very bright, otherwise they wouldn't be criminals

            I am sure that's true for the criminals that are caught. Perhaps not so true for the criminals that get away with their crimes.

          • Most people as a whole are not very bright either. Humans are a short step away from being herd animals. Just having common sense puts one in a top tier, and there are enough with common sense that the species as a whole doesn't collapse. Every so often there's a great leap forward when a genius comes along and says "Rocks? Why are we eating rocks?"

            • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

              The trick is to listen. Nobody knows everything and we have to be willing to have difficult discussions to understand different perspectives.

              One guy with a PhD in Computer Science just kept recommending things are weren't practical from a business perspective. He judged everything through "most logical design", but users and managers are not always logical, and the system needed to work with such. He was "fuck money, make it right!". Not his money, though.

          • by nightflameauto ( 6607976 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:54PM (#63354399)

            The list of available career paths for those who are shady and/or without a moral compass, yet enough of a sense of self-preservation to want to avoid breaking the law is a lengthy one.

            • Marketing
            • Sales
            • Lawyer
            • Creative "industry" executive (steal from those that can, give them pennies, grow fat for utilizing the above three categories)
            • Police Officer
            • Politician

            And somebody with a moment's time and a bit of a sick mind can come up with literally dozens more without much effort. I mean, there's entire business categories today built on the premise that you can steal from anybody, so long as they can't afford to sue and/or prosecute you for it.

        • He would have, if it wasn't for those meddling Feds!
        • Yup.

          If he'd not been so greedy and got out of it with $X million...AND didn't publicly brag about it....and just paid taxes, maybe just labelling it "Misc"...he might have gotten away with it.

          And where is he going to get the T4?

          To be able to pay taxes you need to make the money seem legit. And for that you need to start money laundering.

        • I dunno why crooks of this magnitude stick around instead of moving to Cape Verde or somewhere.

    • From the article: he must pay "an additional $5.7 million to the IRS for unpaid taxes."

      How many criminals have been brought down by for failing to pay taxes?

      If criminals pay their taxes, the IRS doesn't care. Line 8z on the current form 1040 [irs.gov] is for any other types of income not declared elsewhere. IRS Publication 17 (2022) mentions this [irs.gov]. If you look through the list of other income, you will also see bribes. If, as an elected official, you receive a bribe, you are supposed to include it on your tax form. Embezzled funds should also be reported.

      Pay your taxes is the name of the game.

      • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        IANAL but there have been case around this the 16th amendment and 5th amendment being basically in conflict. Supposedly you can report additional income as 'illegal activities' and the IRS wont narc on you!

        • by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

          Supposedly you can report additional income as 'illegal activities' and the IRS wont narc on you!

          Your declared unlawful income cannot and will not be used against you in a criminal proceeding based on your tax records. On the other hand, the 5th amendment does not protect one from civil asset forfeiture proceedings, where the "accused" is the allegedly unlawfully obtained property. So your choices boil down to "get indicted for tax fraud" or "have your tax return used as a roadmap to seize your assets." Door #3 is "launder the money" which is itself a crime and carries its own set of problems (chief

          • Which, if you think about it, is quite a smart catch-22 by the Government to facilitate nailing people for illegal earnings.

            This isn't a case of the taxman crushing an honest worker, it's the Government having multiple avenues to curtail activities that arguably destabilise society.
            In this case, someone making themselves very wealthy off the back of the work, effort, and investment of others.

          • Even if they don't use it in court, it's a parallel construction freebie. They tip off LEAs, LEAs start investigating you and find admissible evidence, lying about what triggered the investigation... random traffic stop, anonymous tip line, non-existing informant, etc.
      • by mspohr ( 589790 )

        I used to work in international development. I never came across a case of fraud, bribery or embezzlement but a colleague told me the story of him being asked for a bribe one time. The colleague said I need a receipt for the money... The bribe didn't get paid.

        • This is pure genius. Won't always work out to your favour (they might agree, or they might disagree but not be so nervous about it that they don't get in your way - they actually had SOME leverage when they asked for the bribe). Still, it's a great idea.

    • Being a criminal does not earn you a tax discount. If he earned money, he owes taxes. Legality of the income generating activity is the court to decide upon, as a separate matter.

    • the taxes are small potatoes compared to that. He's like to be alive.
  • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:00PM (#63354229)

    ... until I got caught.

    • by suutar ( 1860506 )

      I was thinking "significance of the crime" in this case means "how much trouble I could get in"

  • by plate_o_shrimp ( 948271 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:00PM (#63354231)
    "I really didn't know the significance of this crime until I was picked up [by the FBI] at my home,"

    Yeah, right.

    Insignificant but bought him "more than $30 million in assets, including nearly $6 million in cash; cars including Lamborghinis, Porsches, Bentleys, and McLarens; and a portfolio of more than a dozen properties he'd amassed across Philadelphia and its suburbs."

    Got any other good howlers you want to tell us, Omi?
    • oh you think profitability determines magnitude of crime?

      You can shoot a homeless person who creates no wealth in the head for fifty cents, that must be lesser crime?

      he only did copyright infringement if he paid his taxes

      • by Calydor ( 739835 )

        Profitability determines the lower bound of the magnitude of crime.

        There is no way to do something illegal that nets you 30 million dollars and getting away with a slap on the wrist. At least if you're a single person.

    • how many folk do you know with a solid understanding of copyright law? Do you read that FBI warning every time you start up a DVD? It's not like he stole a car. If anything it probably felt like competition to him. Rebroadcasting.
  • by Powercntrl ( 458442 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:01PM (#63354239) Homepage

    In case you don't want to have to read TFA just to figure out what was meant by "cable piracy", it was that he took a bunch of legitimate linear TV cable service subscriptions and re-broadcast them as a paid IPTV service. Basically, he ran the bootleg equivalent of DirecTV Stream.

    What surprises me the most about this is that there were enough people willing to pay for a sketchy service that this guy ended up making millions. If you don't have any moral objections to piracy, the usual pirate's code is don't pay for a pirated copy. I guess his customers were people who really wanted linear TV and weren't satisfied with torrents.

    • by war4peace ( 1628283 ) on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:06PM (#63354257)

      IPTV is a way to gain access to TV channels you otherwise can't. And I don't mean "financially can't". There are lots of people willing to pay for a TV channel (or more), but they are unlucky enough to live in areas those channels don't broadcast, and there are no legal ways for those people to watch those channels.
      Geoblocking prompts illegal activities.

      • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

        by bradley13 ( 1118935 )

        I was just reading an article the other day that pointed out how MBA programs rever the idea of setting up a business that sits between producers and consumers, and collects rent in return for doing nothing. That's what Amazon does. It's what eBay does. It's largely what Facebook and Google do. And it is exactly what's happening here.

        And that's exactly what's happening here: Some people created (say) a movie. Whoever did so would love for consumers to pay to see it. Consumers want to pay and see it. But, n

        • by PPH ( 736903 )

          That's what Amazon does. It's what eBay does. It's largely what Facebook and Google do.

          Those outfits are middlemen for content created by peons. This guy's mistake was to skim off the top of Mickey Mouse (studios). He wasn't big enough. Had he been, he could have gotten into the business of skimming as a large ISP. Want to stream that Netflix, Hulu, Britbox or whatever content? Pay us our cut. Or no customers. Net neutrality laws? Bwah, ha, ha, ha.

        • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

          I was just reading an article the other day that pointed out how MBA programs rever the idea of setting up a business that sits between producers and consumers, and collects rent in return for doing nothing. That's what Amazon does. It's what eBay does. It's largely what Facebook and Google do. And it is exactly what's happening here.

          And that's exactly what's happening here: Some people created (say) a movie. Whoever did so would love for consumers to pay to see it. Consumers want to pay and see it. But, no

      • I've always wanted to just buy a small plot of land in Japan and set up a tiny data center that would stream Japanese domestic television to my house in the US. When the pirates provide more features and an easier service to use it is no wonder the cable industry is dying.
  • From the article:

    "A product of North Philadelphia, he was raised as one of 38 children. His mother was deported and died of an overdose when he was still a child. His father dealt drugs and trained Carrasquillo at age 12 to cook crack cocaine.

    He ping-ponged between relatives’ homes and foster care, including a stint with one caretaker who intentionally had him committed to a mental health facility for access to prescription narcotics he could later sell on the streets. He spent much of his teena

    • It used to be a fairly common thing for people on Twitch to plug their HDMI capture card (with a HDMI splitter to strip HDCP) into their cable box and stream sporting events. This guy just decided to make a business out of it. He didn't do anything particularly interesting, he just made a lot more money than you'd expect, before he finally got caught.

    • The “Son of Sam” law prevents you from profiting off of stories about your crime.

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • If you're gonna live a life of crime, at least have the brains to not publicly flaunt your wealth...

  • by arQon ( 447508 ) on Thursday March 09, 2023 @05:19AM (#63355375)

    Large-scale cable corruption case goes ignored for two years before being permanently swept under the rug.

    I know which of the two has done more harm, and it's not the YouTube idiot. (He paid more in net taxes though, since the government didn't routinely give him billions of dollars with no strings attached in return for his tax evasion).

  • I see the guy is working on a come back as a comedy artist.

  • To me, this was the biggest crime that's mentioned: thousands of online subscribers paying fees as low as $15 a month.
    That's criminal, the fact that USD 15 per month is thought to be low...!
  • Are they now going after the 100,000+ subscribers that were paying him. With a payment history, I have to assume there is an audit trail of some sort. Cut the issue off at its head.

"For the love of phlegm...a stupid wall of death rays. How tacky can ya get?" - Post Brothers comics

Working...