IBM Installs World's First Quantum Computer for Accelerating Healthcare Research (insidehpc.com) 44
It's one of America's best hospitals — a nonprofit "academic medical center" called the Cleveland Clinic. And this week it installed an IBM-managed quantum computer to accelerate healthcare research (according to an announcement from IBM). IBM is calling it "the first quantum computer in the world to be uniquely dedicated to healthcare research."
The clinic's CEO said the technology "holds tremendous promise in revolutionizing healthcare and expediting progress toward new cares, cures and solutions for patients." IBM's CEO added that "By combining the power of quantum computing, artificial intelligence and other next-generation technologies with Cleveland Clinic's world-renowned leadership in healthcare and life sciences, we hope to ignite a new era of accelerated discovery."
em>Inside HPC points out that "IBM Quantum System One" is part of a larger biomedical research program applying high-performance computing, AI, and quantum computing, with IBM and the Cleveland Clinic "collaborating closely on a robust portfolio of projects with these advanced technologies to generate and analyze massive amounts of data to enhance research." The Cleveland Clinic-IBM Discovery Accelerator has generated multiple projects that leverage the latest in quantum computing, AI and hybrid cloud to help expedite discoveries in biomedical research. These include:
- Development of quantum computing pipelines to screen and optimize drugs targeted to specific proteins;
- Improvement of a quantum-enhanced prediction model for cardiovascular risk following non-cardiac surgery;
- Application of artificial intelligence to search genome sequencing findings and large drug-target databases to find effective, existing drugs that could help patients with Alzheimer's and other diseases.
The Discovery Accelerator also serves as the technology foundation for Cleveland Clinic's Global Center for Pathogen & Human Health Research, part of the Cleveland Innovation District. The center, supported by a $500 million investment from the State of Ohio, Jobs Ohio and Cleveland Clinic, brings together a team focused on studying, preparing and protecting against emerging pathogens and virus-related diseases. Through the Discovery Accelerator, researchers are leveraging advanced computational technology to expedite critical research into treatments and vaccines.
The clinic's CEO said the technology "holds tremendous promise in revolutionizing healthcare and expediting progress toward new cares, cures and solutions for patients." IBM's CEO added that "By combining the power of quantum computing, artificial intelligence and other next-generation technologies with Cleveland Clinic's world-renowned leadership in healthcare and life sciences, we hope to ignite a new era of accelerated discovery."
em>Inside HPC points out that "IBM Quantum System One" is part of a larger biomedical research program applying high-performance computing, AI, and quantum computing, with IBM and the Cleveland Clinic "collaborating closely on a robust portfolio of projects with these advanced technologies to generate and analyze massive amounts of data to enhance research." The Cleveland Clinic-IBM Discovery Accelerator has generated multiple projects that leverage the latest in quantum computing, AI and hybrid cloud to help expedite discoveries in biomedical research. These include:
- Development of quantum computing pipelines to screen and optimize drugs targeted to specific proteins;
- Improvement of a quantum-enhanced prediction model for cardiovascular risk following non-cardiac surgery;
- Application of artificial intelligence to search genome sequencing findings and large drug-target databases to find effective, existing drugs that could help patients with Alzheimer's and other diseases.
The Discovery Accelerator also serves as the technology foundation for Cleveland Clinic's Global Center for Pathogen & Human Health Research, part of the Cleveland Innovation District. The center, supported by a $500 million investment from the State of Ohio, Jobs Ohio and Cleveland Clinic, brings together a team focused on studying, preparing and protecting against emerging pathogens and virus-related diseases. Through the Discovery Accelerator, researchers are leveraging advanced computational technology to expedite critical research into treatments and vaccines.
So much for Watson. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Watson is still useful. But it is more like a more mature, exact (no hallucinations) and real-time update capable version of ChatGPT. A lot less eloquent sounding though.
A S/360 Moment (Score:3)
IBM Q is the company's new S/360 moment. They can decide to bet it all on a new technology, or play it safe and slowly wither away. Bold decisions are needed but so far the company has quickly stopped and shy-ed away from projects at the slightest sign of non-profitability. Watson comes to mind.
Re: (Score:1)
nonsense, IBM's normal machines use tech that is bleeding edge. Wintel crap is utter garbage next to POWER line, for example.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah that's the thing. I remember back in 2011 when Samsung Securities migrated from AIX on IBM p570 (POWER) to Linux on x86. The p570 servers had better throughput, but cost far more and used more power. It's also easier to hire developers and system administrators with Linux experience as the barriers to entry are lower so more people have used it at home, at smaller businesses, or on smaller projects. It just wasn't worth t
Re: (Score:1)
No, IBM has higher performance per dollar if fully utilized, even at low end it does four times as much for database. There is reason big corporations use the stuff (and for even bigger loads mainframe), it is cheaper
https://www.itjungle.com/2022/... [itjungle.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That comparison is only valid if you're using DB2 where the licensing fees on x86 are a lot higher. Samsung Securities weren't using DB2 - the vast majority of the software stack was developed in-house, and the third party dependencies didn't have significantly different pricing for Linux/x86 vs AIX/POWER.
Re: (Score:1)
False.
IBM has about 2.5 times performance / dollar as Intel's best on common business workloads if the machine is fully utilized.
x86-64 is just what fanbois who know no alternatives have at home so they think its the best. There are even higher performing machines for common business use than POWER but that's another discussion
Re: (Score:2)
Everything IBM has tried to do since then has been chasing everyone else.
No current application (Score:5, Insightful)
It sounds like there is no current application, just a bunch of hand waving about things that might be. I hope the Clinic had the sense to make sure IBM's PR department is footing the bill.
Even IBM's own website just shows the frame being assembled, "Oooooh, look, shiny things".
Re: (Score:2)
That sounds like a fair assessment to me. Hand waving and some virtue signalling but no substance at all.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: No current application (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Considering how cold it has to keep the qbits, I'm guessing the power bill for the refrigeration alone is quite 'impressive'.
Quantum computing (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
wondering myself. The article says in IBM Q system one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
But I can't quite tell what it is even from the wikipedia page.
In particular I can't tell whether it is quantum annealing or something that looks like a universal quantum computer. Seems like it is programmed in qiskit. So it seems like it is more like a UQC.
Re: (Score:3)
My main observation is that they avoid telling you anything concrete. I tried to find out how few effective qbits those 400 raw qbits claimed really are (raw qbits are basically useless and effective ones are a _lot_ fewer), but found nothing. Methinks IBM is trying rather hard to trick the public into thinking they have anything worthwhile when they do not.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is there a practical use for quantum computers? (Score:4, Interesting)
I know that Shor's algorithm can factorize integers (and thus break RSA encryption), and Grover's algorithm can find an answer in O(sqrt(N)) instead of O(N), but are there any practical applications beyond codebreaking?
I've heard hand-waving claims about drug discovery, but is algorithmic complexity really the limiting factor? And is quantum computing a viable solution? Grover's algorithm doesn't seem like enough of an improvement to be worth the hassle.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
At the moment the limiting factor is both effective qbits (a _lot_ less than the raw qbits) and calculation dept. Both seem to have a really bad impact on coherence being kept and if you lose coherence during a quantum computation, you lose everything and need to start from the beginning. By really bad, I mean potentially exponential effort to get them higher. And that means these machines may never scale to any useful size or calculation dept. Just to give you an example, to break RSA 4096 (current recomme
Re: (Score:2)
Software neural networks are basically in their infancy, and they pale in comparison to biological neural networks. The closer we get to replicating the physical (hence chemical) structure of biological neural networks, the more powerful they will become.
Let me know when it does some actual computing (Score:2)
The article reads like a list of every vaporware hype tech in existence - the latest in quantum computing, AI and hybrid cloud to help expedite discoveries in biomedical research.
Smokescreen (Score:2)
They still do not have anything that really works or does anything useful. So they are now faking it and throw "healthcare research" as a virtue signal in there. Pathetic.
Quantum BS (Score:2)
What does this even mean? (Score:2)
Someone forgot to mention NFTs (Score:2)