AM Radio to Be Dropped in All Ford New Models Except Commercial Vehicles (freep.com) 145
It's not just the Ford Mustang that's losing its AM radio. The Detroit Free Press reports:
"We are transitioning from AM radio for most new and updated 2024 models," Ford spokesman Wes Sherwood told the Free Press. "A majority of U.S. AM stations, as well as a number of countries and automakers globally, are modernizing radio by offering internet streaming through mobile apps, FM, digital and satellite radio options. Ford will continue to offer these alternatives for customers to hear their favorite AM radio music, news and podcasts as we remove amplitude modulation — the definition of AM in this case — from most new and updated models we bring to market." Commercial vehicles will continue to offer AM radio because of longstanding contract language, Sherwood said....
"In essence, EV motors generate a lot of electromagnetic interference that affects the frequencies of AM radio and make it difficult to get a clear signal," said Mike Ramsey, an analyst with Stamford, Connecticut-based Gartner Research Group, which specializes in digital transformation and innovation. "It could be shielded, but given the diminishing listening habits to AM, the automakers haven't chosen to do it. Most of the content there is available through other means, including podcast and internet streaming. In my view, this isn't that different from automakers discontinuing 8-track players, cassette players and CD players. Technology has advanced. The idea that it is a critical safety channel is a bit suspect given that almost all critical communication now is sent through mobile phones...."
Veteran analyst John McEloy, host of "Autoline After Hours" webcast and podcast said automakers don't need to get rid of AM radio. "It's happening because automakers would love to get rid of the cost of an AM radio," he told the Free Press. "Some of them, like Ford, are using EVs as an excuse to get rid of it. GM shields its AM radios in its electric cars to they don't get any interference."
But the article also quotes a spokesperson for GM saying they're "evaluating AM radio on future vehicles and not providing any further details at this time."
Last month U.S. Senator Markey noted that seven more top automakers have already removed AM radio from their electric vehicles — BMW, Mazda, Polestar, Rivian, Tesla, Volkswagen, and Volvo.
"In essence, EV motors generate a lot of electromagnetic interference that affects the frequencies of AM radio and make it difficult to get a clear signal," said Mike Ramsey, an analyst with Stamford, Connecticut-based Gartner Research Group, which specializes in digital transformation and innovation. "It could be shielded, but given the diminishing listening habits to AM, the automakers haven't chosen to do it. Most of the content there is available through other means, including podcast and internet streaming. In my view, this isn't that different from automakers discontinuing 8-track players, cassette players and CD players. Technology has advanced. The idea that it is a critical safety channel is a bit suspect given that almost all critical communication now is sent through mobile phones...."
Veteran analyst John McEloy, host of "Autoline After Hours" webcast and podcast said automakers don't need to get rid of AM radio. "It's happening because automakers would love to get rid of the cost of an AM radio," he told the Free Press. "Some of them, like Ford, are using EVs as an excuse to get rid of it. GM shields its AM radios in its electric cars to they don't get any interference."
But the article also quotes a spokesperson for GM saying they're "evaluating AM radio on future vehicles and not providing any further details at this time."
Last month U.S. Senator Markey noted that seven more top automakers have already removed AM radio from their electric vehicles — BMW, Mazda, Polestar, Rivian, Tesla, Volkswagen, and Volvo.
A funny song about AM radio (Score:2)
Re: A funny song about AM radio (Score:3)
I was tuning in the shine on the light night dial
Doing anything my radio advised
With every one of those late night stations
Playing songs bringing tears to my eyes
I was seriously thinking about hiding the receiver
When the switch broke 'cause it's old
They're saying things that I can hardly believe
They really think we're getting out of control
Radio is a sound salvation
Radio is cleaning up the nation
They say you better listen to the voice of reason
But
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Indeed, it must be another conspiracy so people are kept more and more in the dark about what is really happening. AM radio reaches far more people than FM due the wave frequencies used.
As well, our own renowned wannabe Slashdot influencer in chief says his father's car radio only had two radio stations; country and news.
So sad that all those fond memories will definitively be over now!
What a shame! Sad, so sad...
Re: (Score:2)
Probably made a sweet deal with the satellite radio companies...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
AM radio causes cancer. They're just trying to sweep it under the rug before it becomes a matter of public outrage.
Re: (Score:2)
Huh? Since when does truth matter when it comes to how something gets modded?
What's true doesn't matter anymore, what matters is how it feels.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? Someone here might actually believe that AM radio causes cancer? (It actually does, you know.) haha SARCASM. Happy?
Re: (Score:2)
That was my thought. The AM circuit has got to be basically free. There's some design and QA effort but that has got to be trivial too. Hardly seems worth the effort to drop, given lots of people still listen to AM talk radio.
Or maybe they don't. Anyone know AM listener stats? Maybe talk radio has largely converted to streaming and Sirius XM.
Re:These guys are total morons (Score:5, Informative)
It's EVs that are killing AM radio. It's much harder to prevent interference from the motor controllers and motors affecting the AM radio reception.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Been driving an EV for about three years now and I listen to AM radio frequently on longer drives for traffic and weather info and it's never been a problem.
Oddly, the AM station comes in better than the FM station they also broadcast on, except when driving under bridges.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:3)
Came here to say something very similar.
I don't listen to AM radio very often, but when I do, it's while I'm driving, for updated traffic reports and highway alerts. There's nothing like that anywhere on the FM band where I live that I know of.
It seems to me that there is a legitimate safety issue here, and it's absolutely ignorant that Ford is taking away a feature that I'm sure many drivers besides myself rely on for their peace of mind while driving.
Re: (Score:2)
It's EVs that are killing AM radio. It's much harder to prevent interference from the motor controllers and motors affecting the AM radio reception.
Not really. It's the fact that few people listen to AM radio that is killing AM radio. Heck what's a radio? Us CarPlay Android Auto Spotify streaming young kids are dying to know about this old boomer thing!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that's the claim from manufacturers. Perhaps it really is BS.
https://www.theverge.com/23633... [theverge.com]
Clear BS (Score:3)
Well, that's the claim from manufacturers. Perhaps it really is BS.
It's clearly BS because, if it were an EV interference effect then logically they would only remove AM radio from their EVs, not every vehicle they make.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that's the claim from manufacturers. Perhaps it really is BS.
https://www.theverge.com/23633... [theverge.com]
If it was the case then all IC cars would still have it, as there's no reason to remove it in such cases, and no EV's would have it, as this shielding issue is such a roadblock, right?
And yet, the very quoted article mentions 2024 Ford Mustang (IC) not having AM, whilst Ford Mustang Mach-E (EV) has AM, the same as e.g. Chevy Volt, the same as many other EVs.
The quoted article - considering the content and the title - sounds fishy and the argument of shielding problems falls apart against the evidence of EVs
Re: (Score:2)
The way it was solved in 40's and beyond was to put the radio in a faraday cage made of steel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Granted I live in a city which is not dominated by 1 or 2 corporate station owners. Competition is great.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I listen to the radio, granted FM, not AM. Currently, mostly just on the 5 minute drive to the commuter train station and back on the two days a week I work in the office, almost always the classical music station. When I used to drive more often and longer trips, I often listened to the radio in the car, either one of the local NPR stations I can get (I can usually get either or both Milwaukee and Chicago) or the classical rad
Re: (Score:2)
I occasionally listen to musical FM stations for variety.
AM stations on HD2, HD3, etc. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People with dashcams listen to AM radio. Or at least that's what I've determined by watching thousands of car crash videos on youtube.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd rather be able to buy a car with AM and without that useless Sirius XM. It was kinda kewl to listen to satellite radio 20 years ago when it was the new cutting edge thing, and when cellular coverage was not ubiquitous, and data was slow & expensive and, and music streaming apps had petty collections. The thing is I would have actually subscribed to satellite radio IF they made cancelling easy.
Re:These guys are total morons (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
If only he had a popular radio program that he could have used to share his message...
Re: (Score:2)
It costs too much to filter out all the EMC that the electric motors creates. That's the real reason.
So there are bean counters that calculate every cent.
Add to it that there's almost nothing to listen to on the medium wave band anymore. Soon AM radio is only for airline pilots that are required to have an AM radio.
Re: These guys are total morons (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Not "nothing". Probably having an AM antenna that works halfway decent is not trivial. And it has to be fairly large to work decently.
Re: (Score:2)
Everything interferes with AM radio today. Switching power supplies, led drivers, CAN bus, etc. All right in the AM band or spewing harmonics into it. That’s the reason.
Re: (Score:2)
AM radio costs nothing to include. I wonder what they are hiding.
Electric motors aren't friendly to AM radio.
All cars will be EVs? Well then no AM radio.
Re: (Score:2)
I call BS on the interference (Score:5, Informative)
I've driven a Chevrolet EV for more than 5 years and over 150K miles. I listen daily to one of our local AM stations. I drive from the country into the city and only have a problem when I enter a fairly long tunnel downtown. It fades but there is no interference.
I'm a broadcast engineer and know interference when I hear it. My old gas cars would interfere, but not diesel and so far none with my EV.
I suspect they don't want to buy chips needed to do Amplitude Modulation reception. That relies on level and and frequency or phase.
So call it for that, but don't lie about interference. Then again maybe Ford has bad electronics that are noisy.
Re:I call BS on the interference (Score:5, Interesting)
The chips are inconsequential. Really.
There simply is no interest. FM is barely hanging on in some markets. People want Bluetooth or a 3.5mm jack. Virtually everyone rolling down the road has their phone linked to their car. If it's not "FM" quality (and no, you're a broadcast engineer and know the quality of most AM station stinks-- especially during a thunderstorm), it's not being played in most all cars these days.
Many of the AM stations play either religious or political focused content that people often find easy to turn off, too. As the FM bands become more rife with religion and politics, people are turning that off, too. Sat users can at least have a variety-- if at a cost. And the revenue from that cost gets kicked back. AM radio in no way pays the car makers.
Re: (Score:3)
The only time I've switched to AM in the past 25 years is by mistake. Terrible quality audio and it's all politics or religious. If they shut if off people's blood pressure will probably go down.
Re: (Score:3)
The funny thing is that I pretty much haven't listened to the radio since I got my Tesla, precisely because it has no AM, and XM, FM, and live Internet-based radio don't carry well enough in the mountains to be viable, with the exception of music streaming services that buffer ahead by several minutes at a time.
Before that, I mostly listened to KCBS AM.
Re: (Score:2)
LOL...
KCBS was the last AM station I listened to as well. Until CarPlay and maps with live traffic, I kept up the hope upon hope that their traffic reports would help me find my way around jams.
After KCBS started (or, after I discovered they have it) their FM simulcast, the only times I've switched to AM have been by mistake. These days, I barely even tune into that... all three of the big map apps route around traffic jams now. And between Apple Music, podcasts, and Audible; give it a few more years and
Re: (Score:2)
I routinely listen to a AM radio station but rarely AM radio. There is a AM station that has local news and sports but the signal is just horrible. But they have a icecast server set up so I can listen on my phone. The quality of the icecast feed is near perfect.
Re: (Score:2)
The car makers might do well to introduce a pseudo-AM band where they offer the Internet links to the live feeds for each frequency in range. Most of that is well defined by government regulation of broadcast power, and you'd get a clear "signal" out to the theoretical boundary of the radio signal.
Re:I call BS on the interference (Score:5, Informative)
Dude....
In my market - Chicago - all the baseball games are on AM radio. Without it, you need to pay $150 per year for an MLB.com subscription that gets blacked out if you're local.
There are 3 sports talk stations on my regular AM dial, plus a general talk station (WGN) that's been there for eons.
I'm on AM more than FM these days.
Re: (Score:2)
The Venn diagram of the intersection of the sets, $AM_Radio_Sports_Listeners and $New_Ford_Owners will be a null set. I don't think Ford cares.
Re: (Score:2)
Have I got a deal for you [amazon.com]. Costs less than a $35,000 car and you can take it anywfere - even inside a car.
Re: (Score:2)
I pay something like $20 a year to MLB to stream all the available audio (usually each teams' English and Spanish radio broadcasts) for every game.
But I still miss Bob Murphy. :(
Re: (Score:2)
"People want Bluetooth or a 3.5mm jack."
IPod connected by USB for me, but the same idea.
When the iPod finally dies I'll have to change to something else. I'll worry about it then.
Re:I call BS on the interference (Score:4, Informative)
Chips that can receive AM and demodulate it are indeed cheap, but the cost to design AM reception in is not.
On the electrical side you need an antenna that is suited to AM. You also need antennas for FM, DAB, maybe satellite, Cellular, and GPS. Actually not just GPS, you want Galileo, GLONAS, and Compass support as well.
You can combine some of those into a single antenna, but needing to keep AM in there makes that more difficult. You will probably end up with an extra antenna, which means more space needed in the shark fin, more cable connecting it to the head unit.
Then you need to test it. Every time you make any change. Not just to the head unit, to things like the power supply to the head unit, position of other stuff that could interfere and so forth.
It probably doesn't add a huge amount of cost, but it's certainly non-zero. Hopefully people vote with their wallets in this instance. Same with the removal of CarPlay from yesterday. AM is still very useful.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've driven a Chevrolet EV for more than 5 years and over 150K miles.
From the summary, "GM shields its AM radios in its electric cars to they don't get any interference."
In case you're not aware, Chevrolet is a GM brand.
I felt a great disturbance in the Electric Field (Score:4, Informative)
You have no idea about interference close to RX.
The problem is that the EMC standards are meant to prevent interference in a 1970's world, with electronics equipment spaced 10's of meters (especially receiving antennas), while today, you have your receiving antenna of your car radio just a few centimeters away from the next module with crazy microcontrollers, and other noisy window motors.
The level of interference is at least 40dB worse than what FCC is regulating.
It does not cost much to add an AM receiver in a car.
but it cost much more to add filters on every little electronics device that can interfere with the receiver, so that you don't get a deafening scream in the speaker each and every time the wiper goes on.
That is the biggest cost you can save.
>> I've driven a Chevrolet EV for more than 5 years and over 150K miles.
I felt a great disturbance in the Electric Field, as if millions of Electronics Engineers suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
The fact that you could drive the Chevrolet EV that long without interference from all the switching circuits in the car in the car is owed to automotive electronics engineers like me some time ago, working overtime to respect the extremely stringent outgoing interference spec from auto OEMs, which target all the receiving frequencies with extremely low levels allowed.
Also, outside of USA, nobody listens to AM radio any more.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're already doing FM radio, you may or may not need another chip to do AM — depending on whether the FM radio is in a SoC, or you're using a stand-alone radio chip. But the manufacturer would rather steer you towards a satellite radio system from which they get a kickback, so they don't care how good the AM quality is.
I'm a broadcast engineer
My understanding (from the last time this came up, and some browsing I did then) is that if you don't need another chip, and possibly even if you do, the cost of the external compo
Re: (Score:2)
I've yet to heard any noticeable radio interference on AM, and my oldest vehicles are from the late 1970s and early 1980s - all gasoline-powered.
That includes a vehicle with a "traditional" distributor-wires-plugs setup. As well as some with early electronic ignition systems, which likely are far noisier than modern electronics.
I would imagine a modern coil-on-plug (COP) system would be much less noisy. While EVs should also have enough shielding to prevent interference.
Re: (Score:2)
That's BS. Modern car radio chips are SDR based - I've used chips that combined did AM, FM and DAB in a single chip - it was just contorlled over I2C or SPI and the decoding happened via the firmware programmed on it. Oh yeah, that chip also had I2S inputs in order for audio playback from the infotainment system, as well as I2S outputs for audio captured via the microphones for
Re: (Score:2)
I've driven a Chevrolet EV for more than 5 years and over 150K miles. I listen daily to one of our local AM stations. I drive from the country into the city and only have a problem when I enter a fairly long tunnel downtown. It fades but there is no interference.
I'm a broadcast engineer and know interference when I hear it. My old gas cars would interfere, but not diesel and so far none with my EV.
I suspect they don't want to buy chips needed to do Amplitude Modulation reception. That relies on level and and frequency or phase.
An alternate theory is they intend to skimp on EMC to reduce BOM and don't want to field resulting complaints by people who listen to AM radio.
Re: (Score:2)
As a Ford Truck owner, they have bad electronics. Sometimes I think my speakers are for engine noise.
Re: (Score:2)
Even worse is most of these radios are DSP/SDR...so it's literally just lines of code needed to do AM demodulation.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not the spark that generated the interference. It's the high voltage needed to create said spark.
High voltage that is omnipresent in EV motor coils with far more energy behind it.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not the spark that generated the interference. It's the high voltage needed to create said spark.
High voltage that is omnipresent in EV motor coils with far more energy behind it.
It's as much the current as the voltage. Remember it's Electro Magnetic radiation. It's the current that creates the magnetic component.
FCC asleep? (Score:5, Insightful)
I was under the impression that Part 15 of the FCC rules prohibited interference with licensed spectrum usage. If these EVs are actually noisy in the AM band, shouldn't the FCC step in?
Re: (Score:2)
If you haven't already, you might want to read "blastards" comment, which appears immediately below yours. It addresses your remarks directly.
Re: (Score:2)
I was under the impression that Part 15 of the FCC rules prohibited interference with licensed spectrum usage. If these EVs are actually noisy in the AM band, shouldn't the FCC step in?
Could be. But I'm pretty sure there are range limits on that. I recall a short-range AM* microphone thing I had as a kid, from Radio Shack. It broadcast on AM so you could listen to yourself on your radio. It had a range of something like ten feet.
* A little research suggests what I had was similar to but not actually a Mr. Microphone, which was FM. It's possible what I had was also FM, but the point remains that there are limits to FCC interference ranges and they probably apply to both AM and FM.
Re: (Score:2)
EVs don't really broadcast interference, the effect it highly localized. It's not that hard to make an EV with a working AM radio, but it's not worth the effort since most people wouldn't use it.
Re: (Score:2)
EMC rules aint that easy. (Score:3)
>> I was under the impression that Part 15 of the FCC rules prohibited interference
Nope, does not work that way. Your impression is wrong.
EMC rules try to limit interference to a reasonably low level.
It's a compromise between cost of filtering electronics, and inconvenience.
The problem is that the EMC standards are meant to prevent interference in a 1970's world, with electronics equipment spaced 10's of meters (especially receiving antennas), while today, you have your receiving antenna of your car r
Highway alert radio...???? (Score:5, Insightful)
What about highway alert radio? Those are ALL low-power AM stations that broadcast a short range signal targeted at traffic. Around me, there are billboards with the AM frequency and flashing lights if there's something going wrong on the highway.
Yeah, AM is essentially worthless for everything else, but those seem like a pretty important reason for cars to have AM radios.
Re:Highway alert radio...???? (Score:4, Informative)
I was thinking about that too. Around here (Washington state) it's not uncommon to see those stations being used - sometimes for significant highway construction, sometimes for big special events (concerts) that will impact traffic, and especially for mountain pass road reports during the winter.
Re:Highway alert radio...???? (Score:5, Funny)
come on guys, I'm sure spotify and apple music with pick up the slack
Re: (Score:2)
The flashing lights probably contain most of the value; if you in addition replace one in four of the billboards with a low-resolution matrix display then you could summarise the problem for the benefit of everyone who doesn't want to or can't use the radio. It works in plenty of other places...
Low powered FM transmitter? (Score:2)
Would the answer to this be a low frequency FM transmitter which is often used as a lowest common denominator? It isn't as good as having it built in, but at least it would be an option.
Or mandate AM/FM in cell phones? (Score:2)
At some point during an emergency you may be walking.
Re: (Score:2)
I think that's reasonably common on phones with a headphone jack. Though it requires a pair of wired headphones to act as an antenna.
Still, what's a cheap transistor radio cost these day? Like a dollar?
We should start telling kids about this cool way to get music for free "without wifi". It could save radio.
Re: (Score:2)
Even my flip phone has FM, but you need an external antenna, usually the headphone.
Wait until the next big emergency (Score:2)
A single AM station can broadcast for 100 miles (and multiples of that at night), FM is limited to visible horizon and cell towers have comparatively tiny range. If things go bad, don't you want to be able to communicate with affected population?
Re: (Score:2)
A single AM station can broadcast for 100 miles
Far more, though I gather longwave radio isn't really a thing in America?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Almost. There are dedicated clear channel (not to be confused with the radio broadcasting company) AM stations running at the maximum transmission power even at night for the express purpose of long range communication. The local AM stations were deliberately held at reduced power to avoid interfering with them, especially at night.
Whether it still makes sense to maintain AM clear channel broadcasting capability is another question.
Clear channel AM stations won't like this... (Score:2)
As a born and raised St. Louisan, AM 1120 KMOX feels like a "staple" of our region. Since it has a clear channel license, it's been known for decades as one of the radio stations you can pick up across a large part of the country when conditions are right.
Sure, it's just another "talk / news" format station, which may younger people have no interest in. It caters to the "boomer" generation, quite clearly. But it's also the "go to" when people want to hear radio broadcasts of Cardinals baseball games. And ov
Which is stupid (Score:2)
Not a smart choice, IMO (Score:2)
Isn't this kind of thing an emergency prep hazard? (Score:5, Insightful)
Suppose there's a serious disaster capable of destroying tons of infrastructure - like Katrina or the 1906 SF earthquake. Afterwards, you need to get crucial disaster relief information to a million survivors.
To get that information to everyone by radio, you need to get a power source and a well-placed broadcast transmitter.
To get that information to everyone by cellular internet, you need...
OK, I don't know cell networks well enough to be sure what's required. But the infrastructure we normally use in a large city involves thousands of access points and thousands of miles of fiber backhaul and
In an emergency, if significant amounts of infrastructure have been destroyed, all you need to get radio transmission back in working condition for a city of millions is a power source for one broadcast transmitter.
To get emergency
Re: (Score:2)
darn it, problem with the comment form. trying again
Re: (Score:2)
There's no singular emergency broadcast. Emergencies are broadcast across all systems precisely because (and this is the important part) there's no assumption that one broadcast reaches everyone.
So your car doesn't have AM? No worries. You can get cellular. Oh that's not working? Well there's FM, and Sirus as well. And if you actually live in a disaster prone area then you'd be insanely bone headed to rely on your car as a communications medium.
No emergency response agency in America says "you got a car, yo
Re: (Score:2)
Last two San Diego State Basketball wins (Score:2)
Isn't this kind of thing an emergency prep hazard? (Score:2)
Suppose there's a serious disaster capable of destroying tons of infrastructure - like Katrina or the 1906 SF earthquake. Afterwards, you need to get crucial disaster relief information to a million survivors.
To get that information to everyone by radio, you need to get a power source and a well-placed broadcast transmitter.
To get that information to everyone by cellular internet, you need...
OK, I don't know cell networks well enough to be sure what's required. But the infrastructure we normally use in a la
Re:Isn't this kind of thing an emergency prep haza (Score:4, Informative)
A serious disaster happened earlier this year in New Zealand with Cyclone Gabrielle. "Old-fashioned AM radio was an information lifeline for many during Cyclone Gabrielle when other sources wilted without power" https://www.rnz.co.nz/national... [rnz.co.nz]
Motivation? Hmm ... (Score:2)
AM stations, ... are modernizing radio by offering internet streaming through mobile apps, FM, digital and satellite radio options. Ford will continue to offer these alternatives ...
+ AM -- free to receive
+ FM -- free to receive
+ Streaming / mobile apps -- extra cost to receive
+ Digital -- extra cost to receive
+ Satellite -- extra cost to receive
I wonder why they're ditching AM in favor of the other options...?
Seriously, dropping AM radio capability will save them, probably literally, a nickel.
"In essence, EV motors generate a lot of electromagnetic interference that affects the frequencies of AM radio and make it difficult to get a clear signal," ...
I wasn't aware that all their vehicles will be EV only. Still, they could still support it and include a disclaimer about reception quality, if they seriously can't shield a radio ante
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If they aren't going to bother with shielding, then why bother with a part that they know will just cause endless dealership visits for 'AM radio just buzzes'.
Re: (Score:2)
"Commercial" ventures are out of the loop when the AM/FM broadcast simply goes out blind.
Streaming/Mobile/Digital/Satellite is negotiated. They are in the loop. To "authenticate", to track, whatever.
They're just "modernizing" the same as everything else - phoning home and keeping control in their hands, not yours.
Ditching FM (Score:2)
I wonder if these manufacturers provide DAB receivers in the Norwegian market?
Driving through Norway 5 years ago was a surreal experience, nothing could be heard on either FM nor AM. They've switched off both and now it's all digital.
Re: (Score:2)
Driving through Norway 5 years ago was a surreal experience, nothing could be heard on either FM nor AM.
Some parts of Norway can receive Radio 4 Longwave, so you can still get the cricket.
It's not about shielding or cost saving... (Score:2)
It's just the first salvo of removing non-subscription generating content from the infotainment system. FM will be next. If you want music (even AM or FM) you'll have to subscribe to that mobile broadband plan for N dollars a month and have it delivered that way. They already take a cut if you subscribe to satellite content.
Next they'll bounce Carplay, Android Auto, and even the ability to mount your own media to play your own content.
Coming soon.
Re: (Score:2)
You're a couple days late...
https://tech.slashdot.org/stor... [slashdot.org]
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
Gotta love the slippery slope https://owl.excelsior.edu/argu... [excelsior.edu] .
There's no way auto manufacturers will get rid of Carplay or Android Auto. Unlike AM radio there are far too many people who use it.
Austria did away with AM Radio in the 1970s (Score:2)
Personally, I would rather see the spectrum removed from radio use and put to something more useful. What exactly that is, I don't know, but I'm sure the 1.2MHz of bandwidth could be useful to someone in that long-transmission-length spectrum.
Traffic alerts (Score:2)
You don't subscribe to it (Score:2)
News Flash! (Score:2)
News Flash! Ford to cut costs by eliminating customers.
Re: (Score:2)
If you are among the tiny few who care buy an AM emergency radio which has the advantage of better reception and portability in an emergency which may include your vehicle being disabled.
If you go that far away from civilization an EPIRB and a CB are even better ideas along with a Motor Carriers Road Atlas and compass (all my vehicles get the map and compass since they're dirt cheap).