Thousands of Subreddits Remain Dark as Reddit Protests Approach Third Week (theguardian.com) 113
"User protests against Reddit's plan to charge new fees to access its content are about to enter their third week," writes Axios.
2,503 subreddits remain dark, including at least three with more than 20 million subscribers apiece, the Guardian points out, arguing that CEO Steve Huffman "may win, but the short history of the web is littered with the corpses of predecessors who alienated their fanbases."
The New York Times adds that in an interview Wednesday, "Mr. Huffman said his goal had been to make Reddit better for newcomers and veteran users and to build a lasting business.
"He said he regretted that developers were surprised by the company's pricing changes and wished he had been more upfront about how the changes would affect them..." Reddit is now further away from a public offering than it was last year, Mr. Huffman said, but will continue building its business. He added that the community revolt was a part of what made Reddit Reddit and said he and his team planned to continue engaging with top moderators who were upset with the changes. "For better or for worse, this is a very uniquely Reddit moment," he said. "This could only happen on Reddit."
The Times also spoke to a man who moderates 80 different forums on Reddit — and has been volunteering to moderate Reddit forums for 11 years. He calls Huffman's API move "really demoralizing... I take all this abuse for you, and keep your website clean, and this is how you repay us?'"
He's now active in Reddit's "Save3rdPartyApps" subreddit, "which was formed to organize protests on the site that are allowed under Reddit's rules."
2,503 subreddits remain dark, including at least three with more than 20 million subscribers apiece, the Guardian points out, arguing that CEO Steve Huffman "may win, but the short history of the web is littered with the corpses of predecessors who alienated their fanbases."
The New York Times adds that in an interview Wednesday, "Mr. Huffman said his goal had been to make Reddit better for newcomers and veteran users and to build a lasting business.
"He said he regretted that developers were surprised by the company's pricing changes and wished he had been more upfront about how the changes would affect them..." Reddit is now further away from a public offering than it was last year, Mr. Huffman said, but will continue building its business. He added that the community revolt was a part of what made Reddit Reddit and said he and his team planned to continue engaging with top moderators who were upset with the changes. "For better or for worse, this is a very uniquely Reddit moment," he said. "This could only happen on Reddit."
The Times also spoke to a man who moderates 80 different forums on Reddit — and has been volunteering to moderate Reddit forums for 11 years. He calls Huffman's API move "really demoralizing... I take all this abuse for you, and keep your website clean, and this is how you repay us?'"
He's now active in Reddit's "Save3rdPartyApps" subreddit, "which was formed to organize protests on the site that are allowed under Reddit's rules."
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
There's a subreddit called Pokeinvest where every single post and comment pumps the value of pokemon cards. And then the mods sell access to their discord where they share "the best deals they can find" which are all at 3 retailers that have a relationship with the sub.
Re: Cry me a River (Score:2)
There are no clean user-driven websites.
I just see that if Reddit shall continue then they'll probably have to use AI moderation or paid moderators. Probably the former. So the new sport would be how to cheat an AI moderator.
Re: (Score:2)
Done right, they'd have one human processing reports of failures of the AI moderator, picking the best examples, feeding it into the training dataset, and releasing new nightly builds of the moderation system.
AI moderation doesn't require a very hefty model; you can easily run and even train that on consumer-grade hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes - one person absolutely can.
I'm not sure you understand the situation. You're no longer moderating the flood of posts. You're looking at the tiny fraction thereof for where it may have been tricked. Skimming over reports (not reading all of them), you're looking for anything that seems to be a common way to try to trick it. And then you're just adding examples of those posts into the training dataset.
You're not moderating anything; that's the AI's job. You're just "recording tricks".
And this isn't
Re:Cry me a River (Score:4, Insightful)
Um, yeah, of course that's going to happen in subs about collectibles. Next you'll complain about scams in subs about cryptocurrencies and NFTs ;)
It's a tiny fraction of the total contents on the site.
Re: Cry me a River (Score:4)
Re: (Score:1)
> Reddit is a very poor business and there isn't really a scenario where it becomes profitable while still having a community.
Then they'll die and all this protest is irrelevant.
And the internet will continue on.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Reddit wants to sell user posts to AI companies (Score:2)
I don't think Reddit will back down because there's just too much money involved there. So either the site is going to die because everyone leaves it except trolls (like what's happening to Twitter right now) for the Reddit CEO is correct and if
Re: (Score:1)
Idiot human! Nearly everything on the internet used to be free! Plus there are a bunch of federated social media platforms.
Sometimes I wish there was some way I could just eat the stupid ones.
Re: (Score:2)
The reddit community believes it is the equivalent of Wiki Media charging for access to Wikipedia
Wiki Media existed almost exclusively to support Wikipedia. Reddit is a self sustaining platform. It doesn't need to give API access to anyone. The APIs provide access to people who make a slightly less shitter interface, and some minor automation for bots (which are exempt from pricing mind you). Nothing else. It isn't necessary to use Reddit on any platform in any way.
If having a shitty interface would cause users to defect literally no popular software would still be in use.
Let me be clear. No one gives
Re: (Score:1)
“Could only happen on Reddit” (Score:4, Insightful)
I’m not even all that salty about Reddit trying to monetize their service. Their actions are completely justified. They’re a company in a capitalist economy. They exist to make a profit. Period. No further discussion. That’s what they do. That’s why they exist. The true purpose of the discussion forum they run is to make $$$ for their investors. Personally, I view the people getting all worked up about this Reddit thing as childish individuals who are deeply ignorant about how the world around them actually works.
Reddit is easily replaceable. If a bunch of people no longer like Reddit, they should vote with their feet and migrate to some OTHER chat forum. But listening to the Reddit CEO claim that they’re unique results in my eyes rolling so far back into my head that I convulse for a few seconds.
Re:“Could only happen on Reddit” (Score:5, Interesting)
People aren't upset about Reddit making money. They're upset about them deliberately pricing-out-of-existence, with a pricing scheme that they knew nobody would be able to afford to pay (except maybe AI companies), all third-party apps, including those that provide key accessibility options for people with disabilities, and those that provide extremely useful moderation tools. And then acting like a complete authoritarian mocking arse to everyone who was upset.
There was a right way to go about this (announcing that you'll be needing to enhance revenue streams, setting a price that third party apps could realistically achieve with ads or app sales, making exceptions for mod tools and features for the disabled, being respectful and working with your users and mods, etc).
Or you could... you know... pull a Musk. Which is the option he chose.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It’s critically important to remember who exactly the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If the disabled can't use the site then that's a violation of US federal refs and someone should sue them for equal access not cry that a third party app to fix their violations is no longer available.
Re: (Score:2)
To some extent. Screen readers don't work well with Reddit's native mobile app, but I haven't heard anything about them not working with the website itself. As such Reddit *is* accessible, they just need to go to the entrance with the proverbial wheelchair ramp.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The upvote and downvote buttons are not accessible/labeled for the sight impaired.
On the list of things to give a fuck about that ranks pretty damn low.
Re: (Score:1)
Not for the disabled.
We have laws about this shit for a reason. Just because someone is visually impaired doesn't mean their issues aren't I,portent because there's some other random feature sufficiently slighter people would prefer.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
all third-party apps, including those that provide key accessibility options for people with disabilities
Reddit has now said that “we’ve connected with select developers of non-commercial apps that address accessibility needs and offered them exemptions from our large-scale pricing terms.”
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Reddit is easily replaceable. If a bunch of people no longer like Reddit, they should vote with their feet and migrate to some OTHER chat forum. But listening to the Reddit CEO claim that they’re unique results in my eyes rolling so far back into my head that I convulse for a few seconds.
None of them are unique.
Twitter had the clever idea of force-limiting post length, but it's not as if nobody else could do that.
Facebook is just a glorified multi-user blog platform. They all are, really.
They just got lucky being sort of first to market and having an early lucky win in their spaces, and have been coasting from network effect ever since.
Re: (Score:1)
Facebook wasn't first.
Not by a long shot.
But they did scale better and the founder wasn't fucking his major investor's wife so there's that.
Re:“Could only happen on Reddit” (Score:4, Informative)
It keeps amazing me that after 3 weeks people keep missing the point.
It STARTED with the pricing of the API for the apps. That shitstorm that followed is why the protests continued. The issue with the API pricing is not reddit wanting money, but reddit pricing it such, and on such short notice, that all existing apps HAD to stop. That while being assured only months before that nothing big was coming, and despite asking reddit for some way to work it out (they're willing to pay).
Then the reddit CEO openly lying about supposed threats, about how unreasonable the app developers are was the next thing.%
Then the reddit AMA where the ceo was going to answer questions, only for him to answer literally nothing, and just be copy pasting canned answers, in such a lazy way that he sometimes even pasted the "A: " in front of his answers document.
Then also the total neglect of disabled communities on reddit which provide very valuable services for the blind & deaf.
Then the squashing of the protests with more lying & corporate bullshit speak ("you can't close the subreddit, you have an obligation to your users". While in most cases literally a majority of the users supports the protests)...
etc... etc... etc...
Yes, reddit should make money, it's a company. The community won't like it when that changes, but if it's done in a fair & reasonable way, sure, why not.
If it's the above shitstorm and just ignoring your users & biggest supporters.... yeaaahhhhhhh..... forget it. If this is the start of the end of reddit, i won't be surprised, a lot of its core supporters (app developers, tool developers, engaged moderators) are all leaving, that's really not good.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
All that may be true however it's just a tempest in a tea cup. It's just a message board. If it dies it'll be replaced.
This is just crazy people losing their shit in public. That one idiot has wasted 11 years of his life managing 80 subs for free? Jfc.... We're supposed to feel bad for that dumbass?
Some things worth volunteering for: feeding & building housing for the poor and homeless, taking care of injured or abandoned animals, the big brother/sister program, hanging out with the elderly who have
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
The list is right there. Reddit is not important. It's ridiculous to say that cleaning porn for free off a commercial site is important.
Your "everyone has their own view and they're all equally valuable" guilt trip attempt is noted and dismissed as the garbage it is.
Have a nice day doing free labor for a commercial site run by assholes.
Re: (Score:2)
Then also the total neglect of disabled communities on reddit which provide very valuable services for the blind & deaf.
This is desperate. The disabled have no problem using the reddit website. It's a shit website for everyone, as is the android app (can't speak for iPhone) no need to play the disabled card here. Everyone deserves something a bit better, and currently everyone is stuck with something sub-par but otherwise functional.
Re: (Score:3)
So the community for transcription for the blind leaving on july the first due to the issues the new API will cause is just them being a dramaqueen and giving up a very useful service for them for no reason?
Re: (Score:2)
I know the scale of reddit may make it seem an impossible hill to climb, but when I was part of a musician message board that had a corporate takeover go south, you know what happened? Some users got together and spun up a new message board. All the effort the users and mods are putting into trying to hurt reddit could have been expended in effort to create a new platform. It's not like it's a big, heavy lift to start the process. If reddit is really as terrible as they're saying, they'd gather enough suppo
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, cause the internet has never had any form of discussion board, chat forum or social media before Reddit.
Of course it has, but none with the unique structure of Reddit where users can come in and magic up a sub to which they are a moderator. Every other discussion board the owner is the king, not a specific class of user who creates micro-kingdoms.
Reddit is easily replaceable.
It is not. Reddit is held in stasis by the network effect. A bunch of users will leave to create something, will find nothingness, and then return. It's the same reason why people still use Facebook despite it being ... just the worst. Replacing a large social media
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't use Reddit much, but the one thing that got me there periodically has been supplanted. I like the new crowd much better. I expect more and more people are doing the same.
The CEO already lost (Score:5, Insightful)
He lost the moment he didn't negotiate. Even if it required say a couple months of development time to implement a monetized API specifically for the viewer/moderator apps (subscriber pays, with some kind of profit sharing and some heuristic detection to make sure the API keys of the app are only used for its intended purpose) that would have easily been worth it at this point.
He lost the shareholders 100s of millions in value.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's more than that. There weren't any good Reddit replacements available. Fediverse doesn't have a (non-beta) mobile app.
Wish.Com Elon has changed that. The smart and capable people are building out the Fediverse, including mobile apps. The next time WC Elon screws up (and unless he's fired, there will be a next time), there will be platforms capable of handling the migration.
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe it's not a replacement but https://squabbles.io/ [squabbles.io] feels like a really cozy place right now.
Re: (Score:2)
He lost the shareholders 100s of millions in value.
He hasn't lost anything. Value is only fixed at the point of sale. Reddit is privately owned. Until the point of an IPO or a sale no value or money has been affected.
Re: (Score:2)
Money is fixed at the point of sale, value is an opinion and used say for say debt issuance, regulatory compliance ... or for an IPO.
They can't even begin to prepare an IPO while this disaster plays out, the shareholders would be wiped out.
Re: (Score:2)
The value of something unsold and not on the market is irrelevant. Again nothing at all is lost or devalued. There's no urgent need to sell Reddit so there's precisely no impact on any shareholder involved.
Re: (Score:2)
He lost the shareholders 100s of millions in value.
He hasn't lost anything. Value is only fixed at the point of sale. Reddit is privately owned. Until the point of an IPO or a sale no value or money has been affected.
Splitting hairs.
Would you be willing to pay $X for Y% of Reddit before this all started?
Would you still be willing to pay $X today? We don't know how much shareholder value he's destroyed, but it's a lot.
Re: (Score:2)
What did he lose, exactly? Nothing of value.
If you think this is how IPO's work then you should stop commenting about business.
Re: (Score:2)
There is not going to be an IPO any time soon because of the clown CEO.
He lost Reddit the opportunity and locked up the capital of the shareholders in an asset which is now diminishing in value due to his moronic decisions ... some of them actually have to show that loss of value on their books too.
Re: (Score:1)
Inflated Investor Bubble (Score:2)
>> He lost the shareholders 100s of millions in value.
That value was inflated investor bubble value anyway.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Who determines what gets shut down, using what criteria?
Are those cesspits bothering anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the subreddits on their list are re-opened because none of this worked.
Re: (Score:2)
just because something is big (Score:2)
Doesn't mean it's not replaceable.
Huffman playing the long game because he wants to cash out. It will work, too. Won't be popular but it will work.
That Times quote (Score:5, Insightful)
>The Times also spoke to a man who moderates 80 different forums on Reddit â" and has been volunteering to moderate Reddit forums for 11 years. He calls Huffman's API move "really demoralizing... I take all this abuse for you, and keep your website clean, and this is how you repay us?'"
You've been competing with others for the right to slave away for someone trying to profit off you, for 11 years, and you are just now realizing you're given all the consideration of a readily replaceable slave.
[insert P.T. Barnum quote here]
Re: (Score:2)
You've been competing with others for the right to slave away for someone trying to profit off you, for 11 years, and you are just now realizing you're given all the consideration of a readily replaceable slave.
On slashdot the power of mod points is much less than reddittors, but it gets old after about a month.
Re: (Score:2)
Here I look at mod points as an obligation to the community, sort of like (a very unimportant form of) jury duty.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: That Times quote (Score:2)
To be charitable about it, one may presume he's really quite happy to do it; he loves those communities and gets some satisfaction from it. But he wants to be able to use tools that make the hobby less miserable.
As someone that PAYS to enter bike races and spend money on bicycles, it's like that. You want to be able to bring the tools that work with you to the race. I'd be ticked if I showed up and they told me I wasn't allowed to ride my bike anymore, they were going back to penny farthings.
The sun is setting (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
A single digit percent in drop in traffic, combined with a tiny fraction of a percent of subreddits offline isn't setting anything. At best a single cloud is in the sky causing a blemish on an otherwise perfect sunny day.
Re: (Score:2)
That is only the start
Sleazy CEO vs Power-Autist Mods (Score:2)
Steve Huffman versus "guy who imposes his personal notions of decorum across 80 widely-disparate subforums" is like seeing a fight between the jock who stuffs you in a locker after gym class and the skeev who tried to get you to sell him a pair of your sister's dirty underwear.
Re: (Score:1)
Hey, I needed pizza money and she was just going to throw them out anyway!
Re: (Score:2)
You mean that no matter what, we win?
Re: (Score:2)
So it's like an inverted Alien vs Predator?
Whoever loses
we win
Fire! Aim! Ready! (Score:3)
It's pretty simple for me.
Reddit is an unusable dumpster fire without a 3rd-party client.
They're killing third party clients.
I'm not going to attempt to use an unusable dumpster fire.
When the 3rd-party clients go, I'm going to enjoy the free time I get back from not being on Reddit anymore.
Re: (Score:1)
Why are you there at all if you can apparently live without it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not going to attempt to use an unusable dumpster fire.
If people thought like you most popular software wouldn't exist anymore. I hear you and applaud the idea that you won't use Reddit, but you'll be a rounding error in the user count. Nearly all people may use something that works better for them, but use something worse rather than boycott if that better thing is unavailable.
Nothing gained, nothing accomplished. (Score:1)
Most of the subreddits on this list are re-opened because this "protest" was a complete waste of everyone's time. Reddit will be backtracking on their business decision AAAAAny day now. Any day.
And nothing of value... (Score:3)
Let's face it, how will this end: Nobody cares. Seriously. Not even 80ish percent of the Reddit users. Either their favorite subs are not affected. Then they don't care. Or they are. Then they find some other to watch.
Who is affected is mostly moderators, who are in the game for the power trip (at least most of them are). The ones that are not will fold because they sure won't have to deal with it, the power trippers will adjust because they don't want to lose the only thing that gives their sorry life some kind of validation.
In the long run, this means that the quality of moderation will take a serious hit (yes, that's possible, believe it or not), but by then, the IPO will be over, Huff is a billionaire and doesn't give a fuck what happens to Reddit.
And that's pretty much the game being played now.
Re: (Score:2)
Not even 80ish percent of the Reddit users.
Based on the the leaked internal email that made the rounds last week, not even 94% of Reddit users. They've seen bugger all drop in traffic.
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody cares. Seriously. Not even 80ish percent of the Reddit users.
Funny thing. I cared, and almost all the subreddits I frequented went down. I was even happy to see most of those subreddits that went dark remained dark past the two day lockdown.
Get a fücïn life BuckRowdy (Score:1)
Power mods (Score:2)
They should all be banned. No one should be moderating that many subs.
Re: (Score:2)
There's no point in banning them as they could just spin up alts and in many cases having a reputation in one sub is a way of vetting you as a mod for another sub. Beyond that, their responsibilities can be divided by as many mods as they want, so it's not like putting in 1/11th the effort in each sub really makes a difference - it's basically another censor providing some casual service to your discussion group.
Now, if mods were required to register with government-issued ID and a credit card... well, at
Re: (Score:2)
Cool idea. State-sponsored spammers and astroturfers should have no problem getting a couple thousand government-issued IDs.
Then again, that's pretty much the expected outcome of the planned process of "Firing everyone, then signing up whoever yells the loudest" anyway.
Managing Expectations (Score:2)
What if? (Score:2)
Exactly right (Score:1)
What if you had a war and nobody came? This whole Reddit Blackout shows what the end result would be.
This is exactly right. Only half of the subreddits I follow went dark - a number of those are back already.
The handful that not are basically abusing moderator privilege by keep many, many old posts dark, written be people where an unknown percentage - but probably much less than 50% of people - agree with you keeping the subreddit dark.
Meanwhile people are more and more simply migrating on to other subredd
I saw a post that got shut down quickly (Score:2)
If you chase off the advertisers right it will have to back down real quick because they still need that revenue. Sure the long-term plan is to sell all the posts to AI companies but the base of the company is still advertising.
IPO Poison Pill (Score:1)
Heavy Reddit user and I haven't noticed (Score:2)
Subject says it. I haven't noticed the protests on Reddit. There is probably less in my feed, but that might be a good thing.
Imgur (Score:1)
History repeating (Score:2)
There once was a website named DIGG. Everyone used it to post messages and caturday pics. It was great. Then the people who ran DIGG decided to change it, to make it be more like Twitter, and when the users complained, they ignored it, and ignored it, and the people left. All of them left. Most went to Reddit, and that's probably the only reason Reddit is still around and Digg is long dead. Now, watch as history repeats itself. Where will everyone go this time, or is this the end?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The issue is that most of said groups polled their users, and went dark because their users wanted them to.
That's what my community did. If they had said no, we couldn't have gone dark. They not only overwhelmingly voted to go dark, but overwhelmingly voted to do so for as long as it took (I gave them three options - no participation, 24-hour participation with options for renewal, or permanent participation. The split was like 15% - 20% - 65%)
Most are now on Discord and the project's Github discussions.
Re: (Score:1)
What percentage of your users voted?
How long was your poll open?
What was the wording on the poll?
How were the events described to the users?
Re: (Score:1)
Be sure to ask this to every board that had a poll with the same result, including several I use. Hopefully you get the same answer 100% of the time and your bated nitpicks apply.
Boards in restricted mode are essentially read-only, users can still vote on posts, or "comments" as they call them.
GP is evidence that this is all just pushing people into places significantly less equipped and convenient to foster useful communication. Or in discord's case, grossly. But it has the lowest barrier to entry, and wil
Re: (Score:1)
The whole thing is ridiculous. Reddit should just dump these mods for others or take the bottom line hit and hire a mod team to take care of the bigger subs.
As they exist how they are not profitable and will die if things continue unchanged.
I and I assume you, AC, are not privy to their inner workings and privately held financial details and user activity. Maybe this was the wrong thing to do. Maybe it's brilliant. I don't know and neither do you. But the absolutely wrong thing long term was the status
Re: (Score:3)
The issue is that most of said groups polled their users, and went dark because their users wanted them to.
Most? Like do you have an actual statistical analysis to back that up? There's only two subs that I frequent which are still dark. Both of them the users voted no.
Reddit is a democracy which rivals Russia. Sure we'll have a vote, but the outcome is up to mods to decide alone. I'd like to believe people are generally good, and yeah polls were done all over the place. But I'm 2 for 2 with subs still dark *against* users wishes and votes, so I call shenanigans on that "most" part of your comment.
Re: (Score:2)
Hell yeah, that's gonna work out great.
Let's ponder for a moment, shall we? There's a Subreddit with millions of eyeballs to have. And now we'll have a vote on who gets to mod that.
Who do you personally think will win and provide the new mods? Spammers, scammers or political astroturfers?