Z-Library Releases Tor-Enabled Desktop Launcher To Improve 'Accessibility' (torrentfreak.com) 19
Pirate ebook repository Z-Library has released a dedicated desktop application that should make it easier to access the site going forward. The service is at the center of a criminal crackdown and has lost hundreds of domain names, which in part triggered the development of this new software. TorrentFreak reports: Over the past few months, Z-Library users accessed the site through a dedicated URL, which redirected them to a 'personal' domain that provided access to the library. This worked well but the entire operation could easily be wiped out by yet another round of domain seizures. The new desktop launcher, which is available on the Windows, Mac, and Linux platforms, will automatically redirect users to the right place, without being tied to a single domain name. The new desktop launcher, which is available on the Windows, Mac, and Linux platforms, will automatically redirect users to the right place, without being tied to a single domain name.
In addition to simplifying access, the new Z-Library launcher software is able to connect over the Tor network. This can help to evade blocking efforts while adding an extra privacy layer. The software may trigger a warning noting that it's from an unverified developer. According to Z-Library, this is a standard notice but, aside from the copyright infringement angle, people should always treat third-party applications with caution.
In addition to simplifying access, the new Z-Library launcher software is able to connect over the Tor network. This can help to evade blocking efforts while adding an extra privacy layer. The software may trigger a warning noting that it's from an unverified developer. According to Z-Library, this is a standard notice but, aside from the copyright infringement angle, people should always treat third-party applications with caution.
Re:No source code? (Score:4, Informative)
Hope the Z-Library Team wins (Score:4)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Thus, the efforts of Z-Library are committing or facilitating mass intellectual property theft, (A.K.A., copyright violations,)
Sorry, but no. You do not get do redefine copyright violation as theft. They are two totally different things.
Copyright had the moral high ground when it balanced the needs of creators and the common good. It not longer does, so naturally many people do not feel morally compelled to obey an unjust law.
Re: (Score:2)
Knowledge should be free. Their efforts are truly valiant. Hope they succeed
Knowledge is the result of labor. Someone went to the effort of finding something out that at some point,
Those who "labored" used their winnings to lobby to bend the government to their favor and undo the original intent of copyright (aka to preserve culture and spread knowledge). Modern corporations do neither of those things. They have renegged on the public domain big time over the past 200 years. Just look at these give aways to publishers over the last 2 centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Copyright is a publically granted monopoly and as members of the public we can rescind it by disobeying whe
Re:Hope the Z-Library Team wins (Score:5, Interesting)
In short, Z-Lib fills a gap that publishers have consistently failed to adequately fill. Or perhaps you think it's a good idea to prioritise profits & publishers' whims over access to useful information & opportunities for everyone in the world to learn.
Re: (Score:1)
Five years is a reasonable time for creators to privately profit from their creation before it returns to the public domain and everyone can benefit from the work and - more importantly - derived works it inspires.
Proper use of the copyright privilege benefits the world.
95-year terms are an ABUSE of the copyright privilege by the big corporations who bribed politicians to extend copyright terms to these ludicrous lengths.
Fair,
Re: (Score:2)
Copyright is also what protects such thing like Linux from being "locked up" like the FSF so proudly declares.
If you want to encourage piracy, then you're also encouraging companies to use GPL'd software without releasing the source code.
That's the breaks - it's why GPL and such are "copyleft" licenses - they require copyright to be functional in order to work.
I'm sure if copyright was 5 years long, companies would immediately switch to 5 year old releases of software just because they
Re: (Score:1)
Five years is a long time in software...
Re:Hope the Z-Library Team wins (Score:4, Informative)
Knowledge should be free. Their efforts are truly valiant. Hope they succeed
Knowledge is the result of labor. Someone went to the effort of finding something out that at some point,
If only some dusty old white guys [stanford.edu] had figured out some way to balance these competing interests!
Article I Section 8 | Clause 8 – Patent and Copyright Clause of the Constitution. [The Congress shall have power] “To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”
That said, the dusty old white guys thought that 7 years, renewable one time for another 7 years, was quite enough. I agree.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're advocating robbery.
No he is not.
If you want to discuss about stuff like this, you should know the meaning of legal terms.
e.g. theft, burglary, robbery, piracy.
It is not the same.
Robbery - is usually an armed - assault, taking away physical property against the resistance of the owner - hence the weapons, to subdue the owner. However ripping the handbag out of the hands of an old lady, is already against he resistance and is robbery. Taking the handbag from the side of the bench she is sitting on, wh
Re: (Score:2)
They require a login. Respect gone.
Oh shit nice (Score:2)