Questions Raised about Quality of Reddit's New Moderators After Protest-Related Purges (arstechnica.com) 131
Reddit's forum about home food canning used to have two moderators with science-related master's degrees. And Reddit's home automation forum used to be moderated by a former IT worker with decades of networking experiencing — and some training from a professional electrician.
After the great Reddit protests, all three were removed from their positions. But now Ars Technica asks whether Reddit's replacement moderators will be as capable of spotting dangerous advice? In response to concerns that the new r/homeautomation mod team could overlook posts with dangerous misinformation, one moderator requesting anonymity pointed me to the subreddit's sidebar, which has a disclaimer about the dangers of electricity. However, the disclaimer is only visible on old Reddit. The mod doesn't know why...
One of the top complaints I've heard about the Great Reddit Mod Purge is the company's alleged disregard for replaced mods' expertise. The swift, contentious nature of the mod replacements meant that old mods often didn't share advice with new mods. Meanwhile, the users Reddit chose to replace protesting mods may not have been properly vetted. That includes one of the new mods of the 3D-printing-focused subreddit r/ender3, who requested to only be referred to as the subreddit's top moderator. This person replied to a post by the Reddit employee going by u/ModCodeofConduct and requested to mod the subreddit as a "joke," they said. The user got the job despite telling me, "I have never touched a 3D printer in my life, and there is zero activity on my Reddit account related to 3D printing...." [T]hat mod will step down eventually, "as the joke is starting to wear off." But the story suggests that new mods weren't selected with the utmost care...
None of the forcibly removed mods I spoke with have worked with or plan to work with replacement mods to pass on knowledge gained through years of experience... In addition to lost knowledge, new and old mods are also dealing with the loss of third-party apps considered helpful for moderating.
After the great Reddit protests, all three were removed from their positions. But now Ars Technica asks whether Reddit's replacement moderators will be as capable of spotting dangerous advice? In response to concerns that the new r/homeautomation mod team could overlook posts with dangerous misinformation, one moderator requesting anonymity pointed me to the subreddit's sidebar, which has a disclaimer about the dangers of electricity. However, the disclaimer is only visible on old Reddit. The mod doesn't know why...
One of the top complaints I've heard about the Great Reddit Mod Purge is the company's alleged disregard for replaced mods' expertise. The swift, contentious nature of the mod replacements meant that old mods often didn't share advice with new mods. Meanwhile, the users Reddit chose to replace protesting mods may not have been properly vetted. That includes one of the new mods of the 3D-printing-focused subreddit r/ender3, who requested to only be referred to as the subreddit's top moderator. This person replied to a post by the Reddit employee going by u/ModCodeofConduct and requested to mod the subreddit as a "joke," they said. The user got the job despite telling me, "I have never touched a 3D printer in my life, and there is zero activity on my Reddit account related to 3D printing...." [T]hat mod will step down eventually, "as the joke is starting to wear off." But the story suggests that new mods weren't selected with the utmost care...
None of the forcibly removed mods I spoke with have worked with or plan to work with replacement mods to pass on knowledge gained through years of experience... In addition to lost knowledge, new and old mods are also dealing with the loss of third-party apps considered helpful for moderating.
So which is it? (Score:1)
Re:So which is it? (Score:5, Insightful)
From an engagement standpoint, civil seems to come at a cost to engaging.
Social media tends towards pissing you off so you feel obligated to fight back. It engages you by targeting your worst social instincts. Fight for that upvote, get angry about that downvote, don't let that idiot get more people paying attention to them than you when they post a faulty 'correction' to one of your posts, etc.
I would assume Reddit's goals are "get as many eyeballs as possible" and "remove content that gets in the way of that goal or has a significant legal cost associated with it". I don't think 'keep it civil' is even on their radar as something to consider. Moderators might have different personal goals, but in the end - as we've seen - they'll obey Reddit's secret rules or be replaced by someone who will.
Re:So which is it? (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think reddit's goal is to get more eyeballs. Rather, it seems to be to temporarily maximize certain arbitrary metrics until they get to an IPO. Eyeballs could be such a metric, but I don't think it is one they care about (or else they are even more incompetent than I think they are). I think they are mostly pretending to have great plans and ideas, in order to convince investors that they *will* attract eyeballs *in the future*, after the IPO.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Completely agree with this - on Reddit, in many groups if you offer a sensible-but-not-conflict-inducing opinion, you get voted down. People like the conflict, to the point where you are punished for not taking part in it.
Re: (Score:2)
Social media tends towards pissing you off so you feel obligated to fight back.
Fuck you no it doesn't ass hole... ...waiiiittttt
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe just don't log onto the site.. it's not hard.
This is why we can't have nice things (Score:3)
The trolls and griefers won, they killed /. by taking an online forum way too seriously.
Re: (Score:1)
What about the slashdot purges?
They won't even let you create a new account now!
"New user registration is now approved by Slashdot administrators. Please contact feedback@slashdot.org and let us know why you are interested in registering, and what you can add to the discussion."
So I guess you tried, and when you said "I want to repeatedly post fantasies about beating up liberals and swastika ASCII art" they denied your request?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, without Slashdot support for Unicode, there aren't that many ways to draw an ASCII-art swastika so it gets boring rather quickly.
It already got boring five years ago. Still get those posts, though.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, without Slashdot support for Unicode, there aren't that many ways to draw an ASCII-art swastika so it gets boring rather quickly.
It already got boring five years ago. Still get those posts, though.
If you don't like /. you can always troll Reddit for a moderator's job, right?
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, without Slashdot support for Unicode, there aren't that many ways to draw an ASCII-art swastika so it gets boring rather quickly.
It already got boring five years ago. Still get those posts, though.
If you don't like /. you can always troll Reddit for a moderator's job, right?
Good point-- I hear they have jobs open, and they've offering to double the pay now!
Re: (Score:2)
What about the slashdot purges? They won't even let you create a new account now!
If you are posting as an AC then you don't need ANOTHER /. account.
Or maybe /. should closely examine your account to see why you might say you can't sign up for a new account.
Re: (Score:1)
If you do keep things civil and engaging, then you are effectively controlling content.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
You tell racists to not be racists, they cant post their presented information.
The behavior is racist, the information is racist based... its the same thing.
Or, if you like. A scientist posts scientific theory and you tell them no theories are allowed only facts.
First of all, all science is theory continually tested, but secondly you are controlling behavior and information.
Feel like this is pretty basic knowledge.
What's the big deal? (Score:2)
For canning, just stuff your fruit or vegetables into a jar and simmer over low heat for a few hours.
For electical things, stick a fork in it until it's done.
Re: What's the big deal? (Score:3, Funny)
Re: What's the big deal? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I know that's a joke, but some fools might take you seriously. And that can be deadly in either case.
Re: (Score:3)
I know that's a joke, but some fools might take you seriously. And that can be deadly in either case.
Then perhaps they should have listened to someone who has experience in those two subjects rather than someone posting something on a random forum on the internet.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh my, questions raised! (Score:5, Interesting)
Before this huge turnover there was a tremendous amount of consternation by the boomers about what would happen when their collective experience walked out the door. So what did happen? Life went on. It is a lot different now. But is it worse, or better? Or does it even matter? I don't see any simple answer to the question.
Reddit, similarly, seems to be grinding on.
Reddit was never perfect (Score:4, Interesting)
But at least some people moderating cared and to some degree motivated by their passion for their forum's subject matter.
Now those people are replaced with ones whose only qualification is that they were willing to take the job and eat a shit sandwich from Reddit to do so. What could their motives be other than "for the lulz" or "to enjoy wielding arbitrary power over other Reddit users"?
If the moderation sucked before, it must be downright awful now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That sounds like some risky business.
Re: (Score:2)
You've described 99.999% of moderation on the internet both on Reddit and on other forums. The real newsworthy thing here is that there were a tiny handful of places which were moderated by experts in the field.
The change isn't significant for reddit or the internet. It's devastating for that one sub but rather that sub is now in line with what is considered normal for the rest of the internet rather than any kind of proclamation of doom.
If the moderation sucked before, it must be downright awful now.
Almost no moderators on reddit have changed. For all the news stories
Re:Reddit was never perfect (Score:5, Insightful)
"You were booted for complaining when we screwed over the tools you used to do free labour for us. If that upsets you, you're just having a snit fit, you babies".
If you lick that corporate boot much harder, you're going to wear a hole in it.
I really don't think Reddit mods were heroes, and for the most part they were power-tripping asses... but that doesn't change what happened and the changes that followed. They're not wrong to feel slighted and they're not wrong to point out why when asked.
Re: (Score:1)
Reddit management screwed up in numerous ways. Ultimately, barring a bonafide union of paid employees, they win, barring any contracts made otherwise. Reddit mods weren't going to win this one. You don't bring a knife to a gun fight.
To wail and point fingers at newbie mods would otherwise be incredulous. WTF? Yes, there is poop on the floor for Reddit management to clean up. Will they suffer? Could be. I'm not a stockholder and find the integrity of Reddit info to be the very low bar of most social media si
Re: (Score:2)
That part is true, but it doesn't follow that Reddit mods have no power.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All these folks risked quite a bit. No doubt. They came up against an institution that will not be controlled by its employees, unpaid as they were. The moderators lost.
If they don't want to lend their expertise, that's fine, the company suffers, their problem, not my problem, either.
People invested time and karma into Twitter/X, Facebook,and more, and either bent with their overlords, or didn't. Their "communities" are and were transient. That they didn't train their replacements is natural. They're in a s
Oh no! (Score:3)
What will we ever do without....checks notes....expert moderators?!?!
Re: (Score:2)
A lot less, and with lower quality, if you really want to know.
Re: (Score:2)
A lot less what?
Re: (Score:2)
What will we ever do”, you said.
A lot less”, I answered.
I totally didn't expect having to clarify that.
Re: (Score:2)
I totally didn't expect having to clarify that.
First time on the Internet?
Re: (Score:3)
No, I'm just naive that way.
Re: (Score:2)
I mean it was a very broad answer to a very sarcastic post.
Re: (Score:2)
Did it deserve anything more? :)
Re: (Score:2)
Less everything. Well more trolls and flames for sure. But less of everything else. I know it may come as to a shock to some that there are other things to do on a forum than troll and flame.
Re: (Score:2)
I have noticed zero quality change in my Reddit experience and it's probably the main website I visit every day.
Re: (Score:2)
For a moment I was worried, but as long as it's just stuff nobody gives a toss about, it should be ok.
Re: (Score:2)
What will we ever do without....checks notes....expert moderators?!?!
Take an anti-parasitic medication [imgur.com] thinking it will ward off a viral infection?
Re: (Score:2)
I call that social Darwinism.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, stupid challenges to eat detergent only work on kids, if you want to off the old folks you have to push their buttons instead.
Push button... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Go 'way...'batin...
Quality? (Score:2)
Excuse me. But Reddit mods have ALWAYS been a gaggle-fuck of assorted randos with varying motivations and adherence to quality.
Any lies you've told yourself about their "quality" are just you deluding yourself.
Re: (Score:1)
It's not lies, it's marketing. Just read it carefully:
>Reddit's forum about home food canning used to have two moderators with science-related master's degrees
Science-related master's degrees? So it's something that is utterly irrelevant to subject matter, because if it was relevant, it would've been specified.
>And Reddit's home automation forum used to be moderated by a former IT worker with decades of networking experiencing — and some training from a professional electrician.
So the first tier
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Improperly canning food can kill people. Hence the mods having science degrees.
Grandma. (Score:2)
>> Improperly canning food can kill people. Hence the mods having science degrees.
To learn how to can foods, go to grandma, not to university.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Allow me to point you to "Early History of USDA Home Canning Recommendations" for some history....
Grandma recipes were often not safe....
https://nchfp.uga.edu/publicat... [uga.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
Boah, impressive.
Some people have unreliable grandmas ????
Re: (Score:2)
"It's not lies, it's marketing."
Toe-may-toe.
Toe-mah-toe.
Simply because someone has a background in a relative (or sorta-relative) field, regardless of how extensive said background is, doesn't mean the person is qualified to ADMINISTER said forum in a fair, impartial, or even professionally correct way.
Reddit is done (Score:3)
It went from stinking, to pure shit. The quality of content has gone through the floor and most of the useful people have left the site to never come back.
Re: Reddit is done (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Hacker News.
Re: (Score:2)
It went from stinking, to pure shit. The quality of content has gone through the floor and most of the useful people have left the site to never come back.
Good thing this is slashdot where we don’t know anything about things like that.
Re: (Score:2)
One the one sub you visit sure. But back in reality nothing on reddit has changed. 100% of the well over 100 Reddits I follow had no change in moderation, no change in content and no change in activity, including technical ones.
Even when the big scary news was going on they were talking about 10-100 subs depending on the topic of discussion, out of over 100k active subs.
In other news the RPM sensor in my car died yesterday leaving me stranded on the highway. My prediction: Cars are over, they are all dead.
Re: (Score:2)
I was wondering if there is a new site that people are using.
Middle managers... (Score:2)
...are used to supervising people whose jobs they have never done. It doesn't even strike them as an oddity; they are convinced that an MBA qualifies them to act as a "leader" in any situation. So of course, they'll say yes if someone who doesn't own a 3D printer volunteers to moderate a 3D printer forum.
Also, in their heads, "moderation" means "getting rid of anything that might be offensive or that the lawyers might worry about". It has nothing to do with improving the quality of content.
Re: (Score:2)
In that case they ought to be very careful about a food canning branch.
How to get perma-banned (Score:1)
This actually happened to me. I forget the name of the subreddit, though.
The discussion was about some protest where people were blocking the roads and several of the protestors had guns and were pointing them at drivers.
So I posted, "I would have dropped my truck into four wheel drive and driven over them like speed bumps."
A couple of hours later, "You have been permanently banned from r/echochamber for inciting violence".
I consider driving over someone pointing a gun at me as self defense.
Re: (Score:2)
That's because internet tough guys are annoying and tedious.
Out of interest how did you get your truck out of your mom's basement? Is it small enough to pick up in one hand and carry up the stairs?
Re: (Score:3)
The discussion was about self defense.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
But you weren’t defending yourself. You weren’t at the protest and instead had a masturbatory fantasy about getting to kill someone.
Re: (Score:1)
Neither were you, you fucking donut.
Reddit is a toxic shithole (Score:3)
Ban everybody. (Score:2)
They could just ban everybody.
That would solve the problem.
Burn it down please... (Score:3)
They ignored their true value. Reddit is dying. And it's their fault.
Re: (Score:2)
That keeps being asserted. Perhaps it's true, but I remain a bit dubious. OTOH, I've never found it desirable enough to create an account, or even to browse frequently, so I've no way to judge whether it's getting worse. But I have a strong suspicion that those who post about it on another forum are, mmmm, a selected sample with a strong bias in the selection.
Re: (Score:2)
Reddit is dying.
This story is about one sub out of 138000 active subs. If we take every Slashdot poster's claim at face value that reddit is dying based on every story about reddit subs and assume they are all dead, we'd lose about ... 150sub a year, so you're right, Reddit is dying. We can enjoy its funeral in the year 2943.
Welcome the new boss, same as the old boss (Score:1)
Moderation sucked before and sucks after. Moderators grow power hungry over time and ban anything they don't like, making each subreddit an echo-chamber.
Reddit should learn from slashdot and simply hide unpopular comments by default, but don't ban them.
Need a way to 'vote' for mods - reddit is dangerou (Score:3)
So in my city, the city reddit group mods are wildly progressive / left wing. Posts & threads that are conservative, (or even just moderate like I am) are regularly deleted by the mods, giving the reddit a far more leftish slant than the city population actually is. There needs to be a way to vote, or unseat mods that censor groups like this.
Someone (apparently new to reddit) a few weeks ago actually posted a question asking why the city reddit was so left wing as most people in town he knew were not like this, and that he did not understand how this could be. Not surprisingly an hour later his post got mod-deleted as well.
Reddit is an important force now in shaping opinions in cities / communities, so much so that a lot of traditional media (newspapers,TV stations) draw on it for their own stories and slants.
There needs to be a way to vote for mods, so that they reflect the actual views of community and to ensure that they do not politically censor, as frequently happens these days.
Otherwise, a very small group of people can lead the direction of thought and opinions in a city (sort of like happens on the internet in China), that aren't reflective at all of what the majority of people think, or would like to discuss.
Re: Need a way to 'vote' for mods - reddit is dang (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It feels so weird to be social-democrat these days, like I am. Many people will immediately label you woke and whatnot, and I disagree with so many things these so called "lefties" stand for. I still say I am a social-democrat because I am exactly that, and the ideas I stand for are based on logic, reason, humanism.
I just wanted to say this. Slashdot is a rare place on the internet where people are still mostly reasonable so nobody will think I'm feeble minded or something for being SD. Weird, weird times.
Re: (Score:2)
There needs to be a way to vote, or unseat mods that censor groups like this.
No there doesn't. You need to understand your city's reddit isn't run or owned by your city. It is the vanity project of the person who started it, nothing more. Find another forum that discusses matters about your city and you may find a different political viewpoint.
You're literally advocating forcing your view on someone else's project. Make your own forum.
This is what 'll get you banned on Reddit (Score:2)
The girl ran away and was then sex trafficked by pedophiles. When she was found, the state took custody of her because the grandparents were not sufficiently affirming.
She was then placed as the only female in a state boys home, where she was again raped and bullied, and when she ran away from
Re: (Score:2)
Sacrificing someone else's child on the alter of a sick and woke ideology.
NYpost [nypost.com]: “A Virginia high school student ran away from home and was sex-trafficked through multiple states
"It was verbal, physical, sexually harassed with constant threats of rape by the male classmates," she said of her daughter's 2021 freshman year at Appomattox County High School [washingtonexaminer.com]. "D
Reddit is free isn't it? (Score:2)
Refund. (Score:2)
Problem is: we all want a refund.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Granted. You'll find all the money you paid in your account tomorrow.
I litterally got a thread locked when asking ... (Score:2)
The show 90 day fiance has a couple.
And I couldn't figure out if the woman was a guy (trans). So I went on the shows reddit and asked. And a mod locked my thread because it was anti LQBT or whatever.
I messaged the mod basically saying WTF. It's anti-LGBTQ to ask if someone on a show is trans?
WTF is wrong with this world. Turns out yes .... the girl is trans.
Clone subs are dominated by spam (Score:2)
I think when the main subs went dark in protest of reddit's shortsighted shiving of usability, I've noticed a lot of "clone" subs for spam content.
AITA now has clones at AITAH, amitheasshole, amiwrong.
There are more "rateme" subs than there used to be.
Some subs like wholesome, damthatsinteresting, Imthemaincharacter and other what I call "generic content" subs are at least 50% spam or automated accounts. Some users call it out but it looks like reporting it doesn't do much.
The old advice about reddit is mor
Canning... (Score:2)
/r/Canning is a fantastic resource for science based recipes.
There are tons of groups out there with dangerous canning advice and I hope /r/Canning doesn't end up like them: "well grandma never died so this recipe is ok" is a great way to end up with Botulism.....
It's a great day to be C. Botulinum...
Re: (Score:2)
What? No porn?
Moderation really sucks now.
Re: (Score:2)
Any sources you can post to verify your qanon level claims?
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't call those claims "quanon level". There is an assertion made which makes them somewhat plausible. (Whether the assertion is true or not is another question.)
I find it extremely far from convincing, but it's not outright silly.
This. (Score:2)
This. Mod Up.
Re: (Score:2)
Check out "Early History of USDA Home Canning Recommendations" for some fun stories about that time Grandma didn't make it... There is literally a 100 years of science in modern canning recommendations.
USDA approved recipes have been validated many times over accounting for variations in food density, growing conditions, elevation, equipment, with many 9s worth of safety built in.
Sure you can follow the recipe and it works out great, but that doesn't mean its trivial.
https://nchfp.uga.edu/publicat... [uga.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
We also picked up a canning hobby during the pandemic...
I can assure you there are many people giving bad advice about canning out there, there is an entire facebook group called "rebel canners" that think the USDA is full of shit and they can do whatever they want. In no world is a recipe for canned mac n cheese safe - the fats can cause the seal to fail - but if you go on any number of these "grandma" groups, they are espousing recipes like this.