New 'Inverse Vaccine' Shows Potential to Treat MS and Other Autoimmune Diseases (uchicago.edu) 73
This week saw an announcement from the University of Chicago's Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering. A new type of vaccine "has shown in the lab setting that it can completely reverse autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes — all without shutting down the rest of the immune system."
A typical vaccine teaches the human immune system to recognize a virus or bacteria as an enemy that should be attacked. The new "inverse vaccine" does just the opposite: it removes the immune system's memory of one molecule. While such immune memory erasure would be unwanted for infectious diseases, it can stop autoimmune reactions like those seen in multiple sclerosis, type I diabetes, or rheumatoid arthritis, in which the immune system attacks a person's healthy tissues. The inverse vaccine, described in Nature Biomedical Engineering, takes advantage of how the liver naturally marks molecules from broken-down cells with "do not attack" flags to prevent autoimmune reactions to cells that die by natural processes. Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering researchers coupled an antigen — a molecule being attacked by the immune system — with a molecule resembling a fragment of an aged cell that the liver would recognize as friend, rather than foe. The team showed how the vaccine could successfully stop the autoimmune reaction associated with a multiple-sclerosis-like disease...
Jeffrey Hubbell [lead author of the new paper] and his colleagues knew that the body has a mechanism for ensuring that immune reactions don't occur in response to every damaged cell in the body — a phenomenon known as peripheral immune tolerance, which is carried out in the liver. They discovered in recent years that tagging molecules with a sugar known as N-acetylgalactosamine (pGal) could mimic this process, sending the molecules to the liver where tolerance to them develops. "The idea is that we can attach any molecule we want to pGal and it will teach the immune system to tolerate it," explained Hubbell. "Rather than rev up immunity as with a vaccine, we can tamp it down in a very specific way with an inverse vaccine."
In the new study, the researchers focused on a multiple-sclerosis-like disease in which the immune system attacks myelin, leading to weakness and numbness, loss of vision and, eventually mobility problems and paralysis. The team linked myelin proteins to pGal and tested the effect of the new inverse vaccine. The immune system, they found, stopped attacking myelin, allowing nerves to function correctly again and reversing symptoms of disease in animals. In a series of other experiments, the scientists showed that the same approach worked to minimize other ongoing immune reactions...
Initial phase I safety trials of a glycosylation-modified antigen therapy based on this preclinical work have already been carried out in people with celiac disease, an autoimmune disease that is associated with eating wheat, barley and rye, and phase I safety trials are under way in multiple sclerosis. Those trials are conducted by the pharmaceutical company Anokion SA, which helped fund the new work and which Hubbell cofounded and is a consultant, board member, and equity holder. The Alper Family Foundation also helped fund the research.
"There are no clinically approved inverse vaccines yet, but we're incredibly excited about moving this technology forward," says Hubbell.
Thanks to Slashdot reader laughingskeptic for sharing the news.
Jeffrey Hubbell [lead author of the new paper] and his colleagues knew that the body has a mechanism for ensuring that immune reactions don't occur in response to every damaged cell in the body — a phenomenon known as peripheral immune tolerance, which is carried out in the liver. They discovered in recent years that tagging molecules with a sugar known as N-acetylgalactosamine (pGal) could mimic this process, sending the molecules to the liver where tolerance to them develops. "The idea is that we can attach any molecule we want to pGal and it will teach the immune system to tolerate it," explained Hubbell. "Rather than rev up immunity as with a vaccine, we can tamp it down in a very specific way with an inverse vaccine."
In the new study, the researchers focused on a multiple-sclerosis-like disease in which the immune system attacks myelin, leading to weakness and numbness, loss of vision and, eventually mobility problems and paralysis. The team linked myelin proteins to pGal and tested the effect of the new inverse vaccine. The immune system, they found, stopped attacking myelin, allowing nerves to function correctly again and reversing symptoms of disease in animals. In a series of other experiments, the scientists showed that the same approach worked to minimize other ongoing immune reactions...
Initial phase I safety trials of a glycosylation-modified antigen therapy based on this preclinical work have already been carried out in people with celiac disease, an autoimmune disease that is associated with eating wheat, barley and rye, and phase I safety trials are under way in multiple sclerosis. Those trials are conducted by the pharmaceutical company Anokion SA, which helped fund the new work and which Hubbell cofounded and is a consultant, board member, and equity holder. The Alper Family Foundation also helped fund the research.
"There are no clinically approved inverse vaccines yet, but we're incredibly excited about moving this technology forward," says Hubbell.
Thanks to Slashdot reader laughingskeptic for sharing the news.
These have been researched for decades (Score:5, Insightful)
They're also called tolerizing or tolerogenic vaccines. Here's an example from 2006: https://med.stanford.edu/conte... [stanford.edu]
Here's a review: https://www.frontiersin.org/ar... [frontiersin.org]
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
This could be game changing for people like me with auto-immune problems, but I have a feeling that by the time it's available most of my life will be over. I wish there was some way for people to get this stuff, pay for it, with the understanding that it's still in development.
Maybe for people with diagnosed auto-immune conditions and the agreement of their doctor?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, my guess at the timeline (outsider...no real relevant info) is a decade or so. There *WILL* be problems during development. People always tend to ignore that in their time estimates. https://www.techtarget.com/wha... [techtarget.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I'd prefer it was available on the NHS, but this year I can't even get a COVID booster on it. My government has wrecked it, deliberately.
As for ivermectin, we had proper vaccines and treatments. The people taking it tended to be also rejecting actually proven effective treatments, because they didn't want Bill Gates to put a 5G transmitter in them.
Re: (Score:2)
Stupidity still kills, even nowadays.
Downmod in 3,2,1
Re: (Score:1)
No, that's NOT what he said. But nice try to twist his words to suit your political agenda.
https://apnews.com/article/fac... [apnews.com]
Re: (Score:1)
You're talking about a paper. I'm talking about an on film interview and public statements. On video.
So, no, I'm not wrong. Your link is about a paper.
Here, because you didn't read:
> You know he's on video interviews saying those things?
Would you like to try again?
Re: (Score:2)
YouAreWayMoreLikelyToAutodarwinateThanUs
This technology should be made available to those antivaxers who hate that they were vaccinated against measles, polio, etc. as kids. This would be our way of getting rid of them and the wackjob candidate they rode in on.
Re: (Score:1)
You make no sense.
Re: (Score:1)
> As for ivermectin, we had proper vaccines and treatments.
I'm sure whatever it is you want to try for YOUR condition isn't safe and proven... so live by the sword... die by the sword. Fool.
Re: These have been researched for decades (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This could be game changing for people like me with auto-immune problems, but I have a feeling that by the time it's available most of my life will be over. I wish there was some way for people to get this stuff, pay for it, with the understanding that it's still in development.
Well, if you want to try a shortcut that probably won't help but is unlikely to hurt you, N-acetylglucosamine (an isomer of the substance involved) is available over the counter as a dietary supplement, as is phosphatidylserine (which likely has similar properties). You might try taking those two supplements and seeing if either or both makes any difference.
My guess is that because those substances won't be in any way attached to the molecule that your immune system is reacting to, it probably *won't* help
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks. If it's low risk and available over-the-counter then it's probably worth a try.
Re: (Score:3)
They're also called tolerizing or tolerogenic vaccines. Here's an example from 2006: https://med.stanford.edu/conte... [stanford.edu]
Here's a review: https://www.frontiersin.org/ar... [frontiersin.org]
The paper you linked, if my skimming is correct, consisted of using a DNA vaccine to causing your body's cells to produce more of a protein so that your immune system exhausts itself trying to fight it and gives up. It's a bit like using drops of liquid containing pollen in suspension under your tongue to reduce allergic responses. That approach can work, but if my experience with allergy desensitization is any indication, I'd expect the desensitization to take months (or years), and to just reduce its se
Re: (Score:3)
The approach in this paper actually combines the antigen with a protein that your immune system knows not to attack.
Yes, that's called a tolerizing adjuvant -- also a decades old idea: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... [nih.gov] I think the review paper I linked above mentions that technique too. Of course finding a good one is a big deal, if pGal works that's great.
I'm not saying that paper isn't an advance, it's good btw. My point was to show that it's building on a lot of work. I'm not against it, it's one of a few promising techniques to induce specific tolerance. And yeah they're making progress. I just hope all the ideas g
Re: (Score:2)
The approach in this paper actually combines the antigen with a protein that your immune system knows not to attack.
Yes, that's called a tolerizing adjuvant -- also a decades old idea: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... [nih.gov] I think the review paper I linked above mentions that technique too. Of course finding a good one is a big deal, if pGal works that's great.
I'm not saying that paper isn't an advance, it's good btw. My point was to show that it's building on a lot of work. I'm not against it, it's one of a few promising techniques to induce specific tolerance. And yeah they're making progress. I just hope all the ideas get the work and funding needed. We'd be here faster if that had happened.
+1. So many promising ideas with successful mouse testing never make it to human trials.
Re: Great tech, but be careful on implementation (Score:2)
Re: Great tech, but be careful on implementation (Score:4, Interesting)
USA definitely had some in Ukraine.
If you're going to lie, at least try something believable. However, since you've said it, show the evidence. Show us on a map where these supposed biolabs are in Ukraine. We'll wait.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I am truly hoping this is sarcasm directed at the anti-vaxxers because if it's not, someone needs to either get on their meds or get off them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Sadly, it looks like this comment sections is full of cookers.
Personally, I'm hoping this research bears fruit. It would mean I could stop taking several of my meds (azathioprine, mesalazine, allopurinol) and get something approaching a normal immune system again.
Re: Great tech, but be careful on implementation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Chrohn's disease, yeah. Fucking sucks, but my doc is on the ball and keeping it in remission. Still requires me to nuke my immune system to do.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't expect a short timeline. It took decades of work to get mRNA vaccines to start being a good choice. There WILL be problems during development.
OTOH, it seems like an extremely promising line of research, just as a non-specialist with no extensive knowledge in the area.
Re: (Score:2)
For sure. I might see this med hit the market in my twilight years, but the promise for others who deal with horrid and fucked up diseases is something I can solidly praise.
Re: Great tech, but be careful on implementation (Score:2)
I used to take allopurinol for gout before I had my kidney transplant. I'm guessing that in your case is for rheumatoid arthritis?
Re: (Score:2)
I've been on the azathioprine for over 10 years. Over time, the natural metabolites build up and cause damage to the liver. Taking a small dose of allopurinol changes the metabolic process for azathioprine to negate those negative metabolites. It's a really neat use of an otherwise cheap and low-side-effect medication to increase the effective use-duration of something else. Particularly when the next step up from azathioprine is way more serious anti-immune drugs.
antivax (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If it was something you have to buy and it's a bit hard to obtain they would get it and inject on themselves no problems.
99% of their cause is just "it's being enforced so it must be bad".
Re: (Score:2)
The antivaxers will be queuing up for these, whether they have the target diseases or not.
There are actually a wide number of fairly readily available alternatives that naturally eliminate the body’s tolerance for learned immunities. A healthy enough dose of ricin, dihydrogen monoxide, iocaine powder, or even cyanide can do the trick, for instance, guaranteeing that your body won’t respond to any of those diseases, at which point they can’t harm you.
Re: (Score:2)
What about all the ones that did pan out? Which is literally every drug developed since the 60s.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't remember exactly, but ISTM that there are some drugs that have been approved which don't work on mice. And, of course, there's warfarin, which is used to kill rats and which my wife had prescribed under a different name.
In biology the simple story is almost always wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Warfarin would kill you too, at rat-poison doses.
Re: (Score:2)
No. It's the same drug as coumadin. The difference is the dose, and being very careful about cuts and such injuries.
Anti-Vax Heaven (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The A in AIDS is for "acquired", not "auto". "Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome" is caused by a virus so it has nothing to do with this research.
Re: (Score:1)
Shame (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Have you noticed capitalist pharmaceutical research only works for those who have money, and have you noticed that it earns more by treating the disease then to cure it. You really believe there isn't a cure for cancer already? think again, there's just way too much money involved in treatments.
And when I look at China, I must say that communism isn't doing so bad. Real communism would work, but what we've seen isn't real communism, it's just people wanting to control others, just like a country like the US
Re: (Score:2)
The reason there's no cure for cancer is (a) it isn't one disease, it's hundreds, and (b) it's really really f***king hard to treat as you're trying to kill some of your cells while not killi
Re: Shame (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
"Real communism would work" is the single most ignorant statement ever written. Have you met humans?
Re: Shame (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So how do you fund the research that go nowhere?
I mean even in all public model, "at cost" just isn't a thing here. I'm extremely pro for reigning in the ridiculous amounts of money pharma makes off not treating everyone, but this post is fundamentally misunderstanding how it would work.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Shame (Score:2)
Start human trials (Score:3)
MS sufferers are chemically gouging out their bone marrow now, if they can pay for it, this can hardly be much more risky.
Looks promising (Score:2)
The PQQAT motif is bound in the same binding crevice on TRAF3 where CD40 is bound, providing a molecular mechanism for LMP1 to act as a CD40 decoy for TRAF3. The LMP1 motif is presented in the TRAF3 crevice as a close structural mimic of the PVQET motif in CD40, and the intermolecular contacts are similar. However, the viral protein makes a unique contact: a hydrogen bond network formed between Asp210 in LMP1 and Tyr395 and Arg393 in TRAF3. This intermolecular contact is not made in the CD40-TRAF3 complex. The additional hydrogen bonds may stabilize the complex and strengthen the binding to permit LMP1 to compete with CD40 for binding to the TRAF3 crevice, influencing downstream signaling to B lymphocytes and contributing to dysregulated signaling by LMP1.
Reducing 'friendly fire' would seemingly help with things like loss of feeling etc, but I don't see how it solves the root cause. Its been shown EBV i
Re: (Score:3)
It's not about solving the root cause, it's about allowing the patient to live a symptom-free live for enough years that they die a natural death from something else. That's good enough.
One Dairy Anti-Vax, please (Score:3)
I was doing hardcore keto with almost a pound of sharp cheddar a day, while dropping a hundred pounds, when I foolishly got an immune adjuvant squirted into my deltoid one November.
Within a month my gut would bleed from any dairy.
No bueno. Repair molecules would be great!
Inverse what? (Score:2)
Um, wouldn't a treatment that completely reverses a disease entirely just be a "cure", regardless of its underlying actions? What's with the new terminology?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it doesn't change your genes, you are still vulnerable to immune system overreactions.
Any hope for the gluten-intolerant? (Score:1)
What if... (Score:2)
...some virus will get it's hands on pGal and attach to it? Will it mean that immune system will ignore it?