A Rare Look at Google's Most Lucrative Search Queries (theverge.com) 66
An anonymous reader shares a report: Not all Google searches make Google money. Google often says that it only shows ads on about 20 percent of queries, the ones it calls "commercial queries." This week, during the US v. Google antitrust trial, we got a rare glimpse at a closely guarded secret: which search terms make the most money. The list is only for the week of September 22nd, 2018, and it is the list of top queries ordered by revenue and nothing else. Still, we've never seen anything quite like this before, and the list was only made public after long deliberations from Judge Amit Mehta, who has, over the course of the trial, begun to push both sides to be more public with information and data like this.
Okay, here are the top 20 queries for that week ordered by revenue: iphone 8, iphone 8 plus, auto insurance, car insurance, cheap flights, car insurance quotes, direct tv, online colleges, at&t, hulu, iphone, uber, spectrum, comcast, xfinity, insurance quotes, free credit report, cheap car insurance, aarp, and lifelock.
Okay, here are the top 20 queries for that week ordered by revenue: iphone 8, iphone 8 plus, auto insurance, car insurance, cheap flights, car insurance quotes, direct tv, online colleges, at&t, hulu, iphone, uber, spectrum, comcast, xfinity, insurance quotes, free credit report, cheap car insurance, aarp, and lifelock.
Easily predictable (Score:2)
Anyone who has used AdWords could have figured this out years ago. Or honestly, anyone who watches anything with advertising could tell you insurance companies advertise a ton more disproportionately than any other industry. It almost makes you wonder, if they didn't spend so much on advertising how much lower would their rates be?
Re: (Score:2)
Of course not. Everybody knows that you search for porn on Bing.
Re: (Score:3)
The highest price cost-per-click on any type of ads are for lawyer-related searches. Most specifically, a single click for asbestos and mesothelioma lawyers can run anywhere from $400 to $600. But a single case can be a payout of $1 million or more, so even if only 1 in 100 clicks results in a call to the business, it's still worth the investment.
Re:Easily predictable (Score:4, Funny)
Hmm... Wonder how many hundreds I cost lawyers then, when I was doing research for a school project on asbestos?
Not actually trying... (Score:2)
Who was I trying to screw? I did a school report on asbestos, health risks and all that. It meant that I ended up doing quite a few searches on asbestos and related terms. Due to Google shoving the ads up top, I'm sure I misclicked a few times.
Also, you say tryng to get compensation for dying people, but the poster above mentioned how the millions the lawyer firms stood to make justified paying hundreds per click. Ambulance chasers, in other words,
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing Google credits them back for bad clicks and even sends more business their way. You're helping them. Nice.
Re: (Score:2)
As I understand it, no Google doesn't "credit them back" for "bad clicks". I mean, what even counts as a bad click?+
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, probably not a lot - AdBlock and NoScript should have stopped any code on the page from sending out or receiving messages to the top few hundred advertising brokers. Before them
Re: (Score:2)
Before them, I used other tools, going back to the original Internet Junkbuster [wikipedia.org], back when I was on 36.6kbps dial-up (which is metered in this country).
I ad-blocked so ancient that I had to use a program called "proxomitron" and write individualized blocks. Basically, it acted as a personal proxy server, back before you had add-ons and such.
Of course, your very listing of internet junkbuster lists proxomitron.
That said, when I was doing the report I had to use the school's computers...
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, the local call phone bill wasn't covered by the class's budget (zero, plus paper),
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, came here to say "mesothelioma" but you were way ahead of me.
The terms "custody" and "divorce" can also cost quite a bit per search hit.
Re: (Score:2)
Hell I am clicking on every add for a lawyer now, They are rip of merchants that screw you at every turn, I would take great joy in costing them money, I think its going to be my new hobby.
Re: (Score:2)
Have fun wasting your time. Google simply credits them back for fraudulent clicks and sends even more business their way. You'd be helping them.
Re: (Score:2)
Source?
Re: Easily predictable (Score:2)
You're welcome to read up on Google and click fraud. Can say that as a Google Premier Partner I see them refund tons against fake clicks.
Re: (Score:3)
Still no source.
Look, Google *does* prevent fraudulent clicks, in the sense of "someone programmed a robot to click an ad many times, and Google caught that robot doing it".
However, it does not cover some random person clicking on a link and then leaving the site: Google has no mechanism by which I can identify that click as "fraudulent" ... because it isn't.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If I click an ad and browser the site but don't buy anything, is that considered fraud? I mean, maybe I didn't like that website. How would that be determined?
Re: (Score:2)
If it is I'm going to put lots and lots of ads on Google. Guaranteed profit.
While that would explain the ridiculous amount companies pay for advertising, it's not true.
Re: (Score:2)
If I have a reason for clicking a link which Google present to me, but it's not the reason that the people who paid Google to present the link to me, am I being fraudulent? Is Google being fraudulent for not being telepathic (my mouse doesn't have a microphone for me to tell it the reason for my click)? Is the advert-buying company being fraudulent for not asking
Re: (Score:2)
Your lawyer is a fraudulent hack lying ambulance chaser. Mine is a great guy, looking out for me always.
You get it, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Instructions understood - I should click on all ads I see for lawyers.
Re: (Score:2)
But that isn't quite the same thing. Banner and sidebar ads for mesothelioma are not 'search ads' the way TFA is focused on them.
And yes, this is that the most valuable/costly ad click, period. Has been for a long time.
Now, if you wanna know what term gets you the most ads fed to you, that's an interesting competition. I think it's 'shipping containers', but I might be wrong.
Self-driving cars will end free TV (Score:1)
When full self driving hits:
no one will need car insurance
and then no insurance ads
and then no one to buy all the TV commercials
and then no more free TV programs
Re: (Score:2)
Considering I have to pay for cable, I never considered it free TV. I've long since stopped paying for cable and now only watch a streaming service or two and that's it. I guess the OTA could go away but I haven't engaged with that in years either.
In fact, the most ads I see are during football season. When there isn't football, I'm likely not seeing any ads.
Re:at&t, hulu, uber, spectrum, comcast, xfinit (Score:4, Informative)
Maybe you don't understand how Google makes money.
Advertisers buy search terms at auction. When someone searches for those terms, the advertisers pay the auction amount to place their ads at the top of the search results. There are variations of this, some ads only make money if the user clicks, for example.
So these terms are the ones advertisers are most willing to spend money for ad placement.
Seriously? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Probably because it isn't getting iOS 17.
Re: (Score:3)
Per TFS, this was back in 2018... when the iPhone 8 was still current. And considering how omnibar searching works, it is perfectly reasonable.
iphone 8 pro searches - that would be me, my bad (Score:1)
I must've tried to load
a bazillion times on my old iPhone 4, on account of it kept not loading right.
Next time I'll use my Android 3 instead.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
SE still has a home button and is cheaper as new ones.
What about ... (Score:3)
Sorry, don't buy it (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"Anime tentacles" just gets you Comcast ads -- they assume you like being strangled to death while your limbs are pulled in different directions.
Re: (Score:2)
To paraphrase Jack Sparrow:
But you still get ads.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hm. Interesting. I think I will pass on doing that web search. Thanks for the warning.
Re: (Score:2)
Wouldn't you just get an ad for some kind of animated octopus or a giant squid? Not going to search to confirm but that would be my initial guess.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sorry I asked.
Re:Sorry, don't buy it (Score:4, Interesting)
aarp and lifelock are your clues. Boomer searches. Very likely to click on scam ads.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Identity theft protection service.
Re Lifelock: CEO choked on his own dogfood. (Score:1)
https://www.computerworld.com/... [computerworld.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The words generate revenue based on the willingness of Google's customers to buy them for ads display. Nothing else. The number of hits is entirely irrelevant.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree... only 1% of the internet is porn, but that's definitely where 99% of all the traffic goes. I'm sure google funnels a lot of people in that direction and gets paid handsomely for it.
Re: (Score:2)
I suppose but once you've found a good site, do you really need to keep searching for more?
Re: (Score:2)
Corollary : does anyone working in advertising really believe that the product they're advertising really is crap? That must be absolutely soul-destroying. Not that people have souls, but YKWIM.
Lifelock? (Score:2)
People are searching for that stuff as opposed to running in the opposite direction at the very mention of such scams?
Re: (Score:2)
You know what to do... (Score:2)
... if you want to cost these companies money. Turn off your adblocker, search for those terms and click on the ads.
Consecutive Comments (Score:2)
and by terry274 ( 1830944 ) Alter Relationship on 2023-11-01 17:55 (#63972116)
Been there, done that. Watched my connection clog up in a matter of minutes.
My time is more valuable to me than that. Maybe it's something I should do before I go to
this should help (Score:4, Interesting)
Consecutive Comments (Score:2)
and by terry274 ( 1830944 ) Alter Relationship on 2023-11-01 17:55 (#63972116)
Been there, done that. Watched my connection clog up in a matter of minutes.
My time is more valuable to me than that. Maybe it's something I should do before I go to
iphone 8, iphone 8 plus (Score:4, Funny)
Sorry, that was me, I have a 7 Plus and want to upgrade.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In the immortal (well, several times the lifetime of the universe) words of Marvin, The Paranoid Android, "It gives me a headache to think down to that level."
free credit report??? Why is that valuable? (Score:2)