Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Google IT

Microsoft's Bing Market Share Barely Budged With ChatGPT Add-On (bloomberg.com) 48

When Microsoft announced it was baking ChatGPT into its Bing search engine last February, bullish analysts declared the move an "iPhone moment" that could upend the search market and chip away at Google's dominance. "The entire search category is now going through a sea change," Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella said at the time. "That opportunity comes very few times." Almost a year later, the sea has yet to change. Bloomberg: The new Bing -- powered by OpenAI's generative AI technology -- dazzled internet users with conversational replies to queries asked in a natural way. But Microsoft's search engine ended 2023 with just 3.4% of the global search market, according to data analytics firm StatCounter, up less than 1 percentage point since the ChatGPT announcement.

Bing has long struggled for relevance and attracted more mockery than recognition over the years as a serious alternative to Google. Multiple rebrandings and redesigns since its 2009 debut did little to boost Bing's popularity. A month before Microsoft infused the search engine with generative AI, people were spending 33% less time using it than they had 12 months earlier, according to SensorTower. The ChatGPT reboot at least helped reverse those declines. In the second quarter of 2023, US monthly active users more than doubled year over year to 3.1 million, according to a Bloomberg Intelligence analysis of SensorTower mobile app data. Overall, users were spending 84% more time on the search engine, the data show. By year-end, Bing's monthly active users had increased steadily to 4.4 million, according to SensorTower.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft's Bing Market Share Barely Budged With ChatGPT Add-On

Comments Filter:
  • by waspleg ( 316038 ) on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:10AM (#64169657) Journal

    about it. Now there are likely millions of people trying to game responses the same as SEO. It will feed on itself as well, since it scrapes from the internet and will likely find its own responses.

    There are already very controversial answers to very straightforward questions. I played with ChatGPT very briefly, it could be somewhat useful for certain limited uses, but I think the utility is dropping fast.

    Ask it a question about, say, authoritarian dictatorships such as China and it will give you pro-CCP defense talking points. It's already being fucked with.

    • by jhoegl ( 638955 )
      It seems easy to grift tech when the people that lead the industry are not technical.

      Put forth something that looks good, release a bunch of statements with current buzzwords, and let peoples ignorance do the walking for you.
  • by MindPrison ( 864299 ) on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:12AM (#64169663) Journal

    They are too worried about everything.

    Bing's in the beginning uncensored chatgpt was amazing. Then it quickly got lobotimized severely.
    In the end it would basically flag you for just about anything you asked for, you didn't have to use bad words or anything, it would just straight out refuse results, deny your results because "bad this and that", and it would be laughable in the end.

    So Microsoft just being their usual self, nothing to see here, move along.

  • ... why does Microsoft seem to have the need to frequently try to push Bing on me, when I've told Microsoft many times (oh so many times) that I am not interested in having Bing as my primary browser? Is Microsoft tacitly admitting that Bing is really not up to par?
    • my gaming laptop is Windows 11 Home. Every time I re-open Edge it tries to set itself as the default browser. It does not do this on my work issued Windows 11 Enterprise laptop.

      Mickeysoft recently overtook Apple as the most valuable company on earth. All both of them do is rent seek and try to lock you in to their ecosystems. Anti-trust is dead.

    • Maybe they are confused by the fact that Bing is a search engine, not a browser?
      • > Maybe they are confused by the fact that Bing is a search engine, not a browser?

        .

        Good catch. I meant to say... "I am not interested in having Bing as my primary search engine." Thanks for the correction.

  • Face it (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:23AM (#64169683)

    Nobody outside of board rooms gives a fuck about AI. Everyone but the CEOs of the world know it's rubbish, but shhh, such dot.com moments when you can fleece them back don't happen every decade.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Indeed. Well, there may be some niche applications. I found it to be somewhat helpful in being dishonest. Ask "How do I say [bad thing] in a positive way". But that is the extend of it. Of negative worth for other things, because you cannot trust the results.

      • by jp10558 ( 748604 )

        I find Claude2 useful for looking up command syntax when I'm swapping between different switch OSs. It is like having a friend who's an expert in that CLI who you can just ask "How do I change the management port VLAN" or whatever on a given switch model.

        I find GPT4 useful a bit with it's DALLE plugin for quick illustrations.

        Hilariously I find them most useful for speeding up my DMing in D&D - here's an image of what stuff looks like for players off the cuff, or here's a leveled NPC off the cuff. Probab

    • by tinaco ( 1727358 )
      It sure worked to pump up Microsoft's share price. As for AI, anything that makes Word's autocomplete or Excel's error detection better is good for productivity. Beyond that, it's less useful.
      • anything that makes Word's autocomplete or Excel's error detection better

        Both were immensely improved with the invention of the "turn off" button.

  • I rarely use Bing to search because the results have been so poor. Now, I know why... It has been "helping" by applying "AI" to answer queries where I only wanted sites that matched the search terms. "This is what you REALLY searched for!"

    Have to guess that's why Google results have deteriorated so far recently, as they bring their AI-ASSisted search online.

    • That's more SEO which is a service you can pay for. "Search Engine Optimization" is methodology to help your webpage show up earlier in the results, and is one of the reasons webpages are getting increasingly samey.
      • Who needs AI when we could redirect the combined brain power of SEO to real problems.

        • Yeah search engines are going to look like your inbox spam folder for a bit once the AIs get even better at SEO
          • by jp10558 ( 748604 )

            "Are going to"? Where have you been? It's basically impossible to find decent reviews of any product, or this service vs that service for the last 3 years at least. Is Going.com a useful service? How does it compare to Mighty Travels Premium? Who knows?! I guess I'll need to pay for both and compare, or just keep using traditional flight searches and hope for the best.

            Every product search is just endless "best product of 2023" lists that are junk. What's a good laser cutter? 12 best of 2024 is already out a

        • Just imagine what awesome products we could have if we pumped the money that's wasted on marketing into R&D!

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Nobody uses Bing willingly that's why Microsoft have to resort to all sorts of anti-trust tricks abusing their desktop software just to get people to visit it (much like msn.com) defrauding their advertisers in the process, and when they do this people just close the tab and move on, after all who would want to use a malware/scam infested garbage search engine run by deviant try-hards, infusing it with generative plagiarised IP which Microsoft seem to think is AI is more of an annoyance than a help (you can

  • I use Bing! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by fleeped ( 1945926 ) on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:32AM (#64169705)
    Whenever I'm on VPN and want to search something and Google starts pestering me with lots of traffic like/bike/etc captchas, I switch to Bing quickly and that's it. I'm always surprised how bad the UI is. Search result quality is as bad as Google.
  • ..that's cos all the AI bots use Google.
  • Assuming you were actually interested in AI chatbots, why would you start using Bing for anything other than a cursory query? Firstly better chatbots exist, and secondly every search engine and it's webcrawler are implementing AI now as well, so there's little reason for people to jump ship.

    • Since when do share values have to do anything with reality? It is noteworthy because usually the MBA types think that AI is the next big thing, so that the share value didn't budge is actually curious, since the intended effect was that the goofballs trading in shares should believe that it has a huge impact.

      Seems they're finally catching on that we've been bullshitting them again. Oh well, it was a nice dot.com 2.0 while it lasted.

  • How does Bloomberg believe to know which advertisement engine I'm using?
    I'm probably a false negative and a false positive, I neither use bing nor google.

  • by HalAtWork ( 926717 ) on Thursday January 18, 2024 @11:37AM (#64169885)

    Most of what people want to do with AI is create funny pictures. For any real tasks it doesn't hold up because of hallucinations, and people already know about existing resources that are helpful to accomplish what they want.

    AI is not helping the average user and is not a killer app. It's more of a toy. For businesses it's precarious and unreliable.

    • by dfm3 ( 830843 )
      The problem is that the output requires human post-processing and editing to be of any use, and not only does that take time, but the quality of the final product reflects more on the person who put their name behind it. Say for example I have AI "write me a letter about such-and-such that includes these things..." The output will be full of errors, hallucinations, and generally fall into an uncanny valley of written text. Now I could just send it off to the recipient and be done with it, but they'd catch o
      • by jp10558 ( 748604 )

        I find AI *can* be a great search, say for a question like "how do I change the management VLAN on a juniper ex4300". I used to have (for Blade switches pre us using Juniper) 3 PDFs I'd need to cross reference when we got a new model, and write up lots of docs for our specific use case. I still need docs, but for one off things I can usually get the right answer from AI without spending 30 minutes searching for the correct manual and then searching the PDF for the syntax, or searching Juniper's site and fig

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Yep, pretty much. That unreliability gives it an overall negative worth. Not that this is new. "Hallucinations" about 10 years ago is why IBM stopped trying to use Watson in the medical field.

    • I use Blender about once a year, and I use the API even less frequently. Recently, I wanted to create an animation of a hardware stack on a computer I used decades ago. Bing Chat was very helpful in getting me started. There are some formatting errors in this transcript, but you get the idea. Write me a blender script that displays a computer's stack as a series of boxes, with pointers to the base of the stack and the top of the stack. Sure, here’s a simple script that creates a stack visualization
  • by 0xG ( 712423 ) on Thursday January 18, 2024 @11:56AM (#64169943)

    I have never used chatbot because:
    - generally I have better things to do than chat with a bot
    - they want me to login with my phone?
        Sorry, I have enough data being collected on me already.

    Allow me to use it anonymously and I just *might* spend a
    Minute or two.

    The money would have been better spent on improving search results.

    • And that's the real problem with AI: It's a curiosity, nothing people really want to use.

      Recently, they added copilot at work. It was the rage for a day and people sent each other their "awesome" results. The whole hype lasted almost 'til lunch.

  • You have to register to use most of MS's AI. If they want more eyeballs, tear down the damned register wall.

  • Because Bing is still as awful today as it was when they announced it.

    • This. When I think of Bing my mind instantly goes to Chandler saying, "well you should meet my uncle Bada". Bing is the absolute dumbest name for a search engine. They might as well should have named it Poof.

  • Recently, I have tried the now forced customer chat bots. They still suck even with LLM. Now my question starts with , talk to representative. Thanks to LLM chat bots it now takes multiple requests to get to a human.
  • I expect to get back a list of links to the roughly relevant sources, and not some algorithm's word salad from the first 100 hits.

  • Why would I use Bing when I can go straight to ChatGPT

    When I need to search the web I use google, when I need to use ChatGPT I use that.

  • Well, at about the same time, Google started adding in an AI result at the top of its search results. Usually I ignore it, but I've been surprised with technical searches at just how often it gives me what I'm looking for without having to click on anything else.

    Search is a fairly sticky business. Most people won't switch no matter what you do unless it's really bad. Adding "we have AI" might get a few people to check it out, but now Google has that, too, so for most people, it's a wash. If you consiste

  • that dismiss AI as a fad or not really anything "real" people care about. I disagree. I don't have grand predictions, but I have experienced first hand how AI can help data workers and its a big deal. I also can't help but remember an elevator conversation I had at a CMS conference around 2000. There was an adjoining conference about Publishing (traditional) and I was in the elevator with several publishing executives, who on noticing my credentials, remarked to one another dismissively "ooh, open source, n
    • It's mostly based on observation.

      The older geeks here have seen this before. About a quarter century ago. We called it "dot.com". Everyone and their dog jumped onto this new thing called "the internet" and every company needed to be on it. You had an idea for a startup, you yelled "TCP!" into a bank and the question "how many millions do you need?" was the response. It was the "everyone will have a company on the internet in 5 years" time.

      Well, guess what, it wasn't. Yes, a few companies finally emerged whe

  • Microsoft didn't integrate ChatGPT (or any LLM) into Bing Search. That product is still what it's always been, lame.

    What they DID do was add a Bing Chat tab that shows up when you go to the Bing site. This is a completely separate Q&A app built on ChatGPT's LLM. It works great, and I use it a lot. But I still don't use Bing, because it's as lame as it's always been.

    So there's very little reason to expect that Bing market share would increase, because people are flocking to the AI page.

  • I wonder how much of this 1% gain should be attributed to migration to Win11 with Edge as the default browser (with Bing as default Search Engine,) over the same time period? My guess is those account for most of the gains, not ChatGPT integration.

  • Haven't tried Bing's Copilot add-on but, Google's AI responses to searches aren't anything better than Wikipedia articles, I've found. I typically ignore it and just go straight to the old-school search results.

    Generative AI is good at generating code blocks, press releases, product descriptions, etc. Which is very different than indexing/cataloging -- which is what searching does.

    I don't see how generative AI can enhance search results.

The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..." -- Isaac Asimov

Working...