Political Consultant Behind Fake Biden Robocalls Faces $6 Million Fine, Criminal Charges (apnews.com) 49
Political consultant Steven Kramer faces a $6 million fine and over two dozen criminal charges for using AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Joe Biden's voice to mislead New Hampshire voters ahead of the presidential primary. The Associated Press reports: The Federal Communications Commission said the fine it proposed Thursday for Steven Kramer is its first involving generative AI technology. The company accused of transmitting the calls, Lingo Telecom, faces a $2 million fine, though in both cases the parties could settle or further negotiate, the FCC said. Kramer has admitted orchestrating a message that was sent to thousands of voters two days before the first-in-the-nation primary on Jan. 23. The message played an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his phrase "What a bunch of malarkey" and falsely suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November.
Kramer is facing 13 felony charges alleging he violated a New Hampshire law against attempting to deter someone from voting using misleading information. He also faces 13 misdemeanor charges accusing him of falsely representing himself as a candidate by his own conduct or that of another person. The charges were filed in four counties and will be prosecuted by the state attorney general's office. Attorney General John Formella said New Hampshire was committed to ensuring that its elections "remain free from unlawful interference."
Kramer, who owns a firm that specializes in get-out-the-vote projects, did not respond to an email seeking comment Thursday. He told The Associated Press in February that he wasn't trying to influence the outcome of the election but rather wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. "Maybe I'm a villain today, but I think in the end we get a better country and better democracy because of what I've done, deliberately," Kramer said in February.
Kramer is facing 13 felony charges alleging he violated a New Hampshire law against attempting to deter someone from voting using misleading information. He also faces 13 misdemeanor charges accusing him of falsely representing himself as a candidate by his own conduct or that of another person. The charges were filed in four counties and will be prosecuted by the state attorney general's office. Attorney General John Formella said New Hampshire was committed to ensuring that its elections "remain free from unlawful interference."
Kramer, who owns a firm that specializes in get-out-the-vote projects, did not respond to an email seeking comment Thursday. He told The Associated Press in February that he wasn't trying to influence the outcome of the election but rather wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. "Maybe I'm a villain today, but I think in the end we get a better country and better democracy because of what I've done, deliberately," Kramer said in February.
Uh oh, he wrestled (Score:5, Informative)
> He told The Associated Press in February that he wasn’t trying to influence the outcome of the election but rather wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording.
> “I wrestled in college. I’m ready for the fight,” said Kramer, who is scheduled to appear in court on June 5. “If they want to throw me in jail, good luck.”
I think two things are true:
* This is a wakeup call as a concrete example of dangers of AI when it comes to elections, in a "relatively" low stake way (it alludes to he was trying to help a fringe Democratic candidate who was never going to get elected despite this manipulation attempt).
* The guy is nuts and was attempting to help election integrity in the same way a bank robber is trying to help future bank security by the act of robbing a bank.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Tell this guy. He was convicted for a meme that stupid people took seriously.
https://reason.com/volokh/2023... [reason.com]
You mean he tried to trick low-information voters into not voting?
If you try to mug someone and they kick your *ss you still go to jail.
If you try to illegally suppress voters and they don't fall for your BS you still go to jail.
Re: (Score:2)
low-information voters into not voting?
We really will bend over backwards to avoid saying "idiots".
Re: (Score:2)
low-information voters into not voting?
We really will bend over backwards to avoid saying "idiots".
Ok, he was an "idiot" for thinking that black voters who didn't follow politics closely were dumb enough to fall for his stunt.
Re: (Score:2)
aaaaaan... NO
We do not get to blame others for our ignorance - especially when we alow them to weaponize it against us.
Ignorance is a choice. Actions have consequences. Adult up.
Re: (Score:2)
aaaaaan... NO
We do not get to blame others for our ignorance - especially when we alow them to weaponize it against us.
Ignorance is a choice. Actions have consequences. Adult up.
He was part of an organized conspiracy to commit mail fraud (yes, fraud via bulk text messaging falls under mail fraud laws) as an intentional plot to deprive people of their right to vote (also a federal crime). Some lies are innocuous. Some are not. If I lie to you and tell you that a live wire is not live and you can safely touch it, and then you touch it and are killed, am I blameless? This guy (and the others with whom he conspired) committed multiple federal felonies. You're probably only crying becau
Re: (Score:2)
You're probably only crying because you agree with their politics.
A marvelous illustration of the problem at hand. You are a prime example of why the species is doomed. Ignorant. Simplistic. Angry. Incapable of rational thought or critical reasoning.
I have literally no horse in this race and could care less about the insanity of American politicking
The chuckledinks who BELIEVED this crud are not without agency and are entirely responsible for being duped. Claiming they have no responsibility is the default setting for a certain, broken, mindset.
Re: (Score:2)
You're probably only crying because you agree with their politics.
A marvelous illustration of the problem at hand. You are a prime example of why the species is doomed. Ignorant. Simplistic. Angry. Incapable of rational thought or critical reasoning.
Ow! That deeply intelligent ad hominem substituting for an actual argument stings!
I have literally no horse in this race and could care less about the insanity of American politicking
Then perhaps I was wrong about your motivation for whinging about the injustice you perceive being done here. Perhaps you are just one of those Libertarians who sees all defenses of the public's civil rights as an attack on the individual's right to infringe on the public's rights? Or maybe something else; it was a guess; hence the use of the qualifier "probably."
The chuckledinks who BELIEVED this crud are not without agency
Re: (Score:2)
If a ghost casts snipe and a brood lord attacks against each other at the same time in Starcraft 2, which attack will do damage first?
If you don't have an answer for this, is it because you don't have information about Starcraft 2 or is it because you're an idiot?
Re: (Score:2)
MSNBC doesn't broadcast much Trump-positive material. Kinda off target there.
You did write 'cult machine'.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it's more what he does. For me, given the apparent choices, he's the best of them. Yet, when you frame it as 't anyone with any common sense wouldn't like what Trump has to say', you mystify me. You can reject his intentions to 'make America great again', but if you do not agree with the general concept of making our nation 'great', or better, or changing course to change policies and obtain better outcomes, well you and I profoundly disagree.
Then again, I'm pretty sure we also are watching different
Re: (Score:2)
But he has no intention of making America Great. He had 4 years to attempt this and never once attempted to do something for any human other than himself.
Re: BIG MISTAKE (Score:2)
Look, you're not watching the same movie as I am. Tarrifs were helpful. His southern border policy reduced illegal entry dramatically. He followed the advice of the public health experts on the pandemic, and now he any I know that is a huge mistake, those policy wonks cannot be allowed to set policy again. He impacted the middle east peace prospects significantly, in a positive way. And more. Please, read up.
Re: (Score:2)
Even with Fox says something positive about Trump it really sounds like irony. Even when Trump says something positive about himself he mumbles, forgets the words, and goes into a story about some foreign dictator once praised him.
Re:Uh oh, he wrestled (Score:5, Insightful)
So he was sending a wake-up call. That's quite altruistic. I take it that the message ended with 'What you have just heard is an AI generated fake. The purpose of this call is to warn you about what can be easily faked these days. Please go ahead and vote in both, you are entitled to do so.'? No? I wonder why...
I think his 'defence' is not only going to be ineffective but actively irritate the judge.
Re: (Score:2)
Big ego, small skills and an asshole on top. A criminal asshole.
Re: (Score:2)
So he was sending a wake-up call. That's quite altruistic. I take it that the message ended with 'What you have just heard is an AI generated fake. The purpose of this call is to warn you about what can be easily faked these days. Please go ahead and vote in both, you are entitled to do so.'? No? I wonder why...
I think his 'defence' is not only going to be ineffective but actively irritate the judge.
Depends on which judge... Recent times have shown some to be quite biased when it comes to letting Republicans get away with anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah but this guys a nobody in the scheme of things, he's not gonna be as protected as he probably thinks he is. And trust me, as a former court staffer, THIS kind of defence really gets up judges noses. His lawyer is either a drooling idiot, or he's pled with the client to try literally anything else and the client said no.
Re: (Score:2)
I think his 'defence' is not only going to be ineffective but actively irritate the judge.
Judges are just as deeply prejudiced on political matters as the average non-lawyer, non-judge citizen is. I can easily see a judge who follows the Alito/Thomas type model as calling this a "freedom of speech issue, we can't do anything to punish him here" situation.
Re: Uh oh, he wrestled (Score:2)
Watch them pull out some originalism crap, it was accepted practice to mock your opponent with a falsetto voice in the 1700's, therefore the founders intended the first amendment to protect AI deepfaked misinformation campaigns.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. Seems to a really stellar instance of human intelligence. Reminds me of all the morons that claimed (including here), that storming the Capitol was not illegal and no crimes had been committed. Well, even Trump-appointed judges have been sending these criminals to prison. This guy will get a nice cell as well.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a wakeup call as a concrete example of dangers of AI when it comes to elections
How is an AI generated voice more dangerous than someone who sounds like Joe Biden doing the same thing?
Here's the call (Score:4, Insightful)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politi... [nbcnews.com]
It's an impersonation of Biden telling voters to save their vote for the November election. It would be a very concerning call if there wasn't a 100% guarantee of Biden winning the Democratic primary against what's-their-face.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politi... [nbcnews.com]
It's an impersonation of Biden telling voters to save their vote for the November election. It would be a very concerning call if there wasn't a 100% guarantee of Biden winning the Democratic primary against what's-their-face.
Long shot candidate does better than expected in an early primary, then Biden has a couple of big gaffes, and things get interesting. Things are rarely as inevitable as they seem.
Re: (Score:2)
No amount of gaffes, nor even Biden's death, nor even Biden dropping out of the race and endorsing Trump, could convince democrats to vote for the worm brain RFK Jr. running against him.
Re: (Score:2)
No amount of gaffes, nor even Biden's death, nor even Biden dropping out of the race and endorsing Trump, could convince democrats to vote for the worm brain RFK Jr. running against him.
It didn't say who the candidate was, there was a legit Democrat running against Biden at the start but he later dropped out.
I agree RFK Jr. was never winning the Democratic nomination in any circumstance.
Re: (Score:2)
For example: you might think of Kentucky as a solidly red state, and it is, but 48% of registered voters in Kentucky are Democrats. They just don't vote for Democratic politicians. Mostly. Kentucky does have a Democratic governor.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That shouldn't reduce your concern. Because THIS one being a nothing event has no implication that the next one will be.
So I take it you're not American (Score:2)
Americans are very very very much about the bandwagon effect. If we see somebody starting to lose we think they're a loser and want to abandon them least we become a loser to.
This is why Donald Trump went on and on and on and on about winning and winning to the point where any sensible per
that'l be a hard sell (Score:3)
That sounds like bringing a bull into a china shop but claiming you don't intend to break anything. Like, that was pretty much the entire point of what you did.
Re: that'l be a hard sell (Score:2)
People who lead bulls into china shops don't break dishes, bulls break dishes.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Hitler didn't personally operate the gas chambers, Trump didn't personally lead the Jan 6th insurrection...
Be afraid, be very afraid (Score:4, Interesting)
We will no doubt see many such scams in the run up to November. The candidates will deny any knowledge - they might even not be lying when they say that. However ideologues on both sides who see the other party's victory as a major problem will have little compunction about pulling such stunts, and those nice people in the Kremlin and Beijing won't be holding back either.
The UK election in July may be a testing ground; keep an eye out for the scams that emerge.
All robocallers should be thrown in jail (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously.
Re:All robocallers should be thrown in jail (Score:5, Informative)
I think I speak for the majority here in saying that.
Bleeding heart softie :D... I'd have all the telco execs who allowed it thrown into an industrial metal shredder feet first as well.
If effective, the penalty is too light (Score:4, Interesting)
If you can win an election for $6m and a fall guy... You're going to see more of this.
To a major election campaign, that's not even spare change from couch cushions.
Re: (Score:2)
Now if he was made sit in a public square and everyone he robocalled was invited to bring a stone... There might actually be a deterrent to future transgressions.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
It's buried in the linked article, but he faced hard time for impersonating an election candidate and voter suppression. It's not just a fine (potentially).
Of course, he's a white guy who did it deliberately, he probably won't get as much time as that woman who accidentally voted when not eligible on a technicality and dared to do so while black.
Re: (Score:1)
Fuck you, whoever voted that 'troll'
https://www.bbc.com/news/world... [bbc.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Seems we have at least two morons with mod points to waste today.