Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications United Kingdom

The Rich Country With the Worst Mobile-Phone Service 43

Economist: Britain has long been a pioneer in telecoms. In 1837 it built the world's first commercial telegraph; the first transatlantic call was placed from London in 1927; in 1992 a British programmer sent the first text message to a mobile phone. Today it lags rather than leads. According to figures provided to The Economist by Opensignal, a research firm, Britain ranks 46th for download speeds out of the 56 developed and developing countries for which there are data. That gives it the worst mobile service in the rich world.

Some of this is due to demand. Over the past three years data usage on mobile devices has doubled as people stream films and play games. The busiest parts of cities often lack mobile reception because the system is at capacity. But mainly it is an issue of supply. British users of 5G are only on it 11% of the time. That puts Britain 43rd out of the 56 countries. This lacklustre performance is caused by a combination of government U-turns, insufficient investment and sclerotic planning.

The Rich Country With the Worst Mobile-Phone Service

Comments Filter:
  • I'm sure that will fix it, it's definitely the immigrant's fault.

    • Re: Brexit (Score:1, Flamebait)

      Yes. If you announce to the world that anyone can just show up and be eligible for free shit, then it will cause all kinds of weird problems as society reallocates its resources to make that free shit happen for the large numbers of people who show up from all over to claim said free shit.

      Insurance premiums will go up as hospitals cover the costs of free care to the uninsured. Uber and Lyft prices will rise as state, local, and private charity organizations begin to book rides for migrants who cannot pay fo

      • OK, but:

        a) since it's "taxpayer-funded", not "free" :

        b) are the British telecoms rolling all the additional subscriber funds into additional infrastructure and there's just deployment latency, or is the whole program a massive cash-grab from the Treasury and they intend to dash the economy upon the shoals?

        I can see how the country will quickly go bankrupt but are the telecomms also?

        Or is the government screwing the telecomms out of funds like the taxpayers?

    • All the cell companies brought back roaming charges the instant Brexit was official.

  • by dskoll ( 99328 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @02:48PM (#64948529) Homepage

    I thought for sure it would be Canada!

  • .. was banned from use (because their eavesdropping is worse than the 5-Eyes or whatever), and so the majority of 5G-based installations were halted in their tracks. We now have the worst 5G in the developed world.

    Great work, guys!

    https://www.eureporter.co/busi... [eureporter.co].

    https://www.theguardian.com/te... [theguardian.com]

    • How the fuck was I modded Troll on this? It's literally what happened. The IQ level on Slashdot really does mirror the general lack of intelligence shown by the US as a whole at the moment.

      Enjoy your new era of preventable diseases and right-wing idiocy, fuckwits.

  • by Oxygen99 ( 634999 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @02:51PM (#64948535)
    I live almost in the centre of a reasonably large UK conurbation and mobile coverage is garbage. The infrastructure is a bin fire fuelled by grasping companies overpromising and underdelivering. Still. At least it's not railways, or water companies or...
    • by mjwx ( 966435 )

      I live almost in the centre of a reasonably large UK conurbation and mobile coverage is garbage. The infrastructure is a bin fire fuelled by grasping companies overpromising and underdelivering. Still. At least it's not railways, or water companies or...

      A large part of this will have been the switching off of the 3G networks recently. Phone call stability has dropped like a brick in my home in the London borough of Reading, it used to be rock solid now I have to hold my head at an unnatural angle or the call drops.

      Another part is that the UK has a very dense population. So towers are easily overwhelmed with a lot of people using their phones in a popular area like a town centre, Tesco or Boris' mum. Add to this that a lot of the "speed" in 4 and 5 G co

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The UK has been plundered. Everything of value sold off cheap, the population turned into a cash cow. Many key industries loaded up with debt and asset stripped.

  • UK, especially England, is a dying shithole. Stuck in it's past glory, sniffing it's own farts. Doesn't even know it's irrelevant. Wonder what they'll call it once it's eventually taken over by another country because they won't be able to defend it? Or the whole area will turn into United Scotland or something. But the current pattern is just a cargo cult mentality, it won't last.
  • There has to be some kind of first mover disadvantage to tech. If you're first, you get to make all the mistakes, and your system has time to be entrenched. Newcomers can learn from your mistakes and not make them, or just skip the system entirely, like countries going directly to cell phones without running copper.
  • Yep (Score:4, Informative)

    by jrnvk ( 4197967 ) on Friday November 15, 2024 @03:55PM (#64948729)
    Can confirm. A summer trip there this year made me question if my phone was broken whenever I was anywhere near a tourist destination. And I travel a lot, so I know what bad networks are like.
  • Britain has a fairly high population density. Maybe a fibre network back end with ISPs using wifi to connect to devices would help.
    • I was thinking about this myself. I live in South California, our cable isp Cox.com has wifi built into the router/cable modem combo they provide. Anyone that has credentials for cox.com can sign into one of those wifi networks for high speed access.

      If we had more residential and business mixed zones I imagine the strategy John mentions would work well for everyone.

  • What's with mentioning the government ? All mobile phones companies in the UK are private enterprises, they bear the responsibility for any lack of investment in their own infrastructure
    • Governments in all countries intervene in telecommunications. They are very much a public service. Some countries have sold off their public service to private companies but they're still a public service & economies depend on it. If you don't kick 'em up the arse every now & again -- & I mean really kick them up the arse -- they stop meeting growing demand & have detrimental effects on economic growth & citizens' well-being. That's the job of governments.
  • If they controlled fewer people they could handle more calls.

  • I live in a small city in Yorkshire and mobile service has gone completely to shit. It seems to get worse every time they upgrade their networks to the latest G. While getting more expensive ever year not cheaper as they used to claim.

  • ... can be blamed for a lot of things, but this isn't one of them.

  • ...& make mobile internet & data so expensive that very few people can afford to use it much.

FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A cucumber is not a vegetable but a fruit.

Working...