Drones Collide, Fall From Sky in Florida Light Show, Seriously Injuring 7-Year-Old Boy (yahoo.com) 48
"Drones collided, fell from the sky and hit a little boy after 'technical difficulties' during a holiday show..." reports the Orlando Sentinel.
They note that a press release from the city said the 8 p.m. show was then cancelled: The company behind the drones, Sky Elements, was in its second year of the contract with the city, the release said. Sky Elements said they operate drone shows throughout the country with millions of viewers annually and are committed to maintaining FAA safety regulations, the company said in a statement released Sunday afternoon. The organization wished for a "speedy recovery" of those impacted by Saturday's show at Lake Eola, the statement said. "The well-being of our audience is our utmost priority, and we regret any distress or inconvenience caused," the statement said. "We are diligently working with the FAA and City of Orlando officials to determine the cause and are committed to establishing a clear picture of what transpired."
The show is in its third year, often drawing crowds of roughly 25,000, according to the city. But there has never been an incident before. The Federal Aviation Administration regulates drones and light shows and permitted the Holiday Drone Show at Lake Eola on Saturday. Now they are investigating the incident which they said began as drones collided and fell into the crowd at the park, spokesperson Kristen Alsop said in an email... Eyewitness videos on social media show multiple green and red drones falling from the sky.
The mother of the 7-year-old boy hit by a falling drone told a local TV station that the holiday show "ended in nightmares," adding that it happened just days before Christmas. She believes big-audience drone light shows need more safety precautions. "This should not happen. No family should be going through this." She added on Facebook that her 7-year-old son is now "going into emergency heart surgery off of just trying to watch a drone show."
She adds that the city of Orlando and the drone company behind the light show "really have some explaining to do." Responding to comments on Facebook, she posted two hours ago: "Thank you everyone. He is still in surgery."
They note that a press release from the city said the 8 p.m. show was then cancelled: The company behind the drones, Sky Elements, was in its second year of the contract with the city, the release said. Sky Elements said they operate drone shows throughout the country with millions of viewers annually and are committed to maintaining FAA safety regulations, the company said in a statement released Sunday afternoon. The organization wished for a "speedy recovery" of those impacted by Saturday's show at Lake Eola, the statement said. "The well-being of our audience is our utmost priority, and we regret any distress or inconvenience caused," the statement said. "We are diligently working with the FAA and City of Orlando officials to determine the cause and are committed to establishing a clear picture of what transpired."
The show is in its third year, often drawing crowds of roughly 25,000, according to the city. But there has never been an incident before. The Federal Aviation Administration regulates drones and light shows and permitted the Holiday Drone Show at Lake Eola on Saturday. Now they are investigating the incident which they said began as drones collided and fell into the crowd at the park, spokesperson Kristen Alsop said in an email... Eyewitness videos on social media show multiple green and red drones falling from the sky.
The mother of the 7-year-old boy hit by a falling drone told a local TV station that the holiday show "ended in nightmares," adding that it happened just days before Christmas. She believes big-audience drone light shows need more safety precautions. "This should not happen. No family should be going through this." She added on Facebook that her 7-year-old son is now "going into emergency heart surgery off of just trying to watch a drone show."
She adds that the city of Orlando and the drone company behind the light show "really have some explaining to do." Responding to comments on Facebook, she posted two hours ago: "Thank you everyone. He is still in surgery."
Still saver then aviation (Score:1)
Re:Still saver then aviation (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Still saver then aviation (Score:4, Interesting)
And fireworks also cause injuries and death. Because shells filled with explosive gunpowder are expected to be safe...
Fireworks are safer than drones for now, but that is just because they are a more mature tech. But this will be handled just like the occasional (and tragic) fireworks injury is handled.
Re: (Score:2)
Fireworks explode safely in the air. Except when they don't. Fireworks start fires, explode too early or too late, Most problems are caused by individuals being idiots, but even professional fireworks cause damage or injuries. I'm assuming you didn't bother to research firework problems before writing your comment.
I mean, by your "logic", drones are perfectly safe since they have rotors to counteract gravity before they have a chance to fall on our heads. Don't tax yourself trying to overthink it.
But it
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah and one of my close friends was injured as a kid during a professional firework show. Mind you his family invested the payout they got into a fund for his future so he's not complaining, but he was effectively crippled for 3 years of his school life unable to move his right arm and spent years in recovery.
Re: (Score:1)
The light show serves a useful purpose: the reward in theory is economic for the city and value for residents which encourages people to keep living in the area or visit there.. which is the only way it makes sense for them to be using their municipal taxes paid by residents to fund the show. Localities put effort into creating attractions which ultimately serve to bolster the local economy.
There also should in theory be no reason they can't operate a drone light show safety. They can start by observi
Re: Still saver then aviation (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Lol... "It doesn't matter that this boy died, at least businesses made money!"
Nobody died.
The kid was injured.
Re: Still saver then aviation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just to be clear... very badly injured.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, by that logic we should ban boating, fishing, swimming, surfing, SCUBA diving, hiking, rock climbing, spelunking, skiing, hang gliding, bungee jumping, skydiving, motocross, car racing, martial arts, boxing, football, soccer, baseball, horse riding... the list is nearly endless.
These are all things that don't serve a purpose like a medivac helicopter, but businesses make money off of them because people are currently allowed to weigh the risks vs the enjoyment that they get and make a choice on whethe
Re:Still saver then aviation (Score:4, Interesting)
"...going into emergency heart surgery off of just trying to watch a drone show."
If he's in "heart surgery" after being hit by something then I'm playing my pre-existing condition card.
Getting hit by a drone causes cuts and bruises, not heart trauma.
Re: Still saver then aviation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Still saver then aviation. Just saw a medivac helicopter in Turkey crashed recently. But there's no concerted effort to get them banned.
A better point is that drone shows are safer than fireworks.
and Sky Elements can just go away with the victims (Score:2, Flamebait)
and Sky Elements can just go away with the victims left holding the bag for the doctor bills
Re: (Score:3)
Why do you say that? They can obviously be sued for personal injury damages caused by the company's operation or their drones. Which should include not only the doctors bills but all the other damages related to pain and suffering as well as mental anguish, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
The FAA is mostly concerned with airplanes/helicopters/etc. Their regulations are chiefly aimed at preventing drone operators from providing airborne hazards to manned aircraft.
You can still comply with FAA regs and screw up something in your drone swarm, resulting in an injury on the ground.
Re: (Score:2)
I look forward to our President-elect privatizing airline security.
Nice troll.
Regarding the drone operators, future President Musk can't extort money from them, so they will be banned. Also, Christmas festivals.
Re: (Score:2)
Because privatizing under el Bunko means that he sells off whatever agency or service to his billionaire friends who return the favor for favoring their companies by pumping up el Bunko's "companies". It is merely another twist on pay to play. He's for sale; I wonder how much his minder in the Kremlin will pay him for Ukraine.
Seems that it is still safer than fireworks. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I could also see potential as a military weapon(s), but I don't want to go there right now.
How very intellectual of you to see the potential use of drones as weapons while the rest of us Neanderthals just have to read about the actual use of drones by the military since the Vietnam war.
This shouldn't be possible. (Score:4, Insightful)
Just like you fence off a large fireworks pit, you shouldn't have crowds collecting anywhere your drone show might have a drone crash.
Re: (Score:3)
Florida dereg. Welcome to Donnville, 'Murica!
-5 Political
"Lake Eola" (Score:4, Insightful)
Wait wait wait... Let me get this straight, because I know how we do things up here in WA, but no idea what the fuck they do down in FL.
You have a lake. YOU HAVE A LAKE.
You literally have a protected area which prevents people from walking (unless they're Jesus or some shit?)
And you DIDN'T use this for the show!?
Up here, we do barge based fireworks and light shows, or have protected areas (ex: one sports stadium has a light show where the drones are actually over the other stadium for both a staging area and safety area)
Drone shows require staging areas. So you already have protected space under the drones. WTF where people doing there !?
Re:"Lake Eola" (Score:4, Informative)
https://x.com/MosquitoCoFL/sta... [x.com]
Apparently this is a video of the drone swarm undergoing partial failure. As you can see, they aren't necessarily flying over the water, though the geese certainly seemed agitated by drones hitting the shore.
Re: (Score:2)
Until some kid gets maimed for life because people like you feel they can externalize the consequences of their stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
And you DIDN'T use this for the show!?
Australia used a lake: When the drones malfunctioned, many 'landed' on the water and sank.
Re: (Score:2)
That's exactly the point. They hurt themselves, NOT people.
I'm not saying it's aliens, but (Score:1)
...it's XiPutin!
flying over the crowd? (Score:3)
Were these drones flying over people? My drone license is very clear about that, you don't intentionally fly above people.
Re: (Score:2)
They were not flying over people. But not all drones fall straight down in a perfect vertical line when something goes wrong. That said it sounds like your drone license is very clear about what *you* are licensed to do. Just like I have a drivers license that said I'm now allowed to drive a heavy semi-trailer. There are definitely drone licenses for flying over crowds.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That is from page 517, paragraph B, clause 2, subclause 1.1 of Project 25.
Re: (Score:2)
Do your parents know you're off your meds?