Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Social Networks

Bluesky Grows to 30 Million Users. Threads Adds 20 Million More Just in January (techcrunch.com) 70

Star Wars star Mark Hamill, science fiction author William Gibson, XKCD cartoonist Randall Munroe, and The Onion have joined millions of others bringing Bluesky's user count to 30 million, reports CNET. In fact Bluesky has added over 14 million users in the last three months, and for a few days in early November was adding over one million users a day. "That rate equals about 12 new users per second. The 30 million user mark compares to 9 million users in September."

But meanwhile Meta's social media site Threads — launched 19 months ago — "now has 320 million monthly active users," reports TechCrunch, "up from 300 million last month. The app had 275 million monthly active users in [early] November." That's a 16% grow rate in just three months. In comparison, Bluesky is experiencing a slowdown in growth, with an increase of less than 10% month-over-month in December 2024, following a remarkable 189% growth in November, according to analytics firm Similarweb. Bluesky now has a total of 26.44 million users. Additionally, Zuckerberg noted that Threads is adding more than 1 million daily signups [while presenting fourth-quarter earnings on Wednesday].

Bluesky Grows to 30 Million Users. Threads Adds 20 Million More Just in January

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Would be nice if the fine summary mentioned what exactly this is.
    • Re:Bluesky (Score:4, Informative)

      by waspleg ( 316038 ) on Saturday February 01, 2025 @12:48PM (#65135009) Journal

      Not Twitter. People leaving Twitter because of musk.

    • A Twitter Clone (Score:1, Insightful)

      by Kunedog ( 1033226 )

      Would be nice if the fine summary mentioned what exactly this is.

      It's a Twitter clone attempting to recapture the glory days of 2020, when all major social media networks could be counted on to participate in a widespread news blackout of an inconvenient national story.

    • Re:Bluesky (Score:5, Informative)

      by hort_wort ( 1401963 ) on Saturday February 01, 2025 @12:49PM (#65135015)

      It's an alternative to X that is meant to be a place for Democrats to gather. Whether it proves to be helpful or hurtful to their cause, only time will tell.

      • Re:Bluesky (Score:4, Informative)

        by Comrade Ogilvy ( 1719488 ) on Saturday February 01, 2025 @04:32PM (#65135391)

        It is a place for people who want control of their feed, rather than let their personal attention be whored by a corporate owned algorithm.

        And because it is easy to block trolls, the childish attention getting antics common to most social media work poorly.

        People who abhor civil discourse are quick to claim that civil discourse is some kind of "Democrat" thing. They may be right about that.

  • I don't care about trends or pop culture, I have specialized interests.
    Bluesky appears to have very few who I find interesting.
    Alternate platforms are fine for those who want mainstream crap.
    Getting a critical mass of users in an obscure specialty is nearly impossible.

    • This is absolutely true.

      But it's also absolutely true that in order to BUILD that community or critical mass, people also need to make the step.

      Good for you, now continue to encourage others. It'll be better before you know it. Just takes a little work.

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Saturday February 01, 2025 @01:08PM (#65135035)
    The effects of Elon musk's stewardship of twitter. By all accounts Twitter has lost half of its user base. And an equivalent number of advertisers. More really because so many of the advertisers left are the really dodgy ones like penis pills and other natural male enhancements. These guys don't pay nearly as much as somebody like Nestle or one of the major car companies.

    And yes some of them have come back to do a little bribery but it'll be just enough to get attention from the administration. Not the kind of long-term ad campaigns.

    You can't just fire half your staff and then start barking orders and expect things to go well. Yeah they've managed to keep the website from completely collapsing, mostly thanks to you ridiculously overworked H1B employees. But the actual site is dying. And if it wasn't for its utility in politics and propaganda it would be shutting down in a few years. The company owes $1.5 billion a year in interest payments alone let alone the value of the debt itself. And best case scenario it's revenue is half what it was when it was already unprofitable. There's only so much you can make up by firing people. Especially when it costs you users and customers.
    • Not all accounts. I read that Shitter now has 375 million users, which "by all accounts" is nearly 2x what they had before Leon bought it. I don't know who to believe. Actually, I do know who to believe, and that is nobody. What I take away from Shitter still being a thing, still up and working, is that Leon was actually right <gag> ... the company was 75% fat. So apparently he fired 75% of the staff aaaaaand.... its still running.

      So where we are now: Shitter still runs. Shitter still has users. Shit
      • And every single estimate says they're down to about half that..

        The site runs but has frequent issues and tons of features just don't work. They are completely focused on the bare minimum needed to keep the propaganda flowing.

        You are absolutely right though about the propaganda value. It helped Trump win and without Trump Musk while not in the poor house won't have any companies anymore. SpaceX is a national security risk and Tesla is only functional because of a $8,000 government subsidy applied at
      • Certainly there are more bots arguing with each other than ever before. Actual users? Far fewer. I used to see news stories that were essentially Twitter posts linked together. Those are fewer and further between because so many fewer content makers use the platform.

        • If somebody gets counted as a user because they see a Twitter post embedded in a web page that's not real. Those kind of "users" never see any advertisements on the site. The only reason embedding is allowed is because it's basically free advertisement for your platform but it's not bringing in new users anymore because of the bad reputation Twitter has now
  • The zuck bent the knee and capitulated to the MAGAts not too long ago himself. The nastiness has already been spreading throughout Facebook. And with the zuck and the muskrat now united and goose-marching lockstep on the same side, united under their worship of and fealty to dear leader, what happens to threads? Is the zuck more of a capitalist at heart who will see a market niche and let threads remain a neutral and non-toxic alternative to the trumping propaganda machine that twitter/x has become and F

  • I used to get banned for dumbnshit all the time on twitter , you know like questioning whether or not a aptop was real, or calling men men instead of women..... With x I can now simpl follow thoss i want and ignore everything else if I want an echo chamber. I get a whole lot less bots hitting my page I get actual engagement that matters and community notes is the best thing that's shown up as you can see even Facebook is now stealing community notes I'm not gonna go join another random thing it's like they

It is difficult to soar with the eagles when you work with turkeys.

Working...