Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Portables (Apple) Apple

Apple Refreshes MacBook Air With M4 Chip, Lower Pricing (apple.com) 64

Apple has refreshed its MacBook Air lineup with the M4 processor, adding a new sky blue color option and reducing prices across the board. The 13-inch model now starts at $999, while the 15-inch begins at $1,199. Both models are available to order immediately and will ship on March 12.

The updated MacBook Airs feature the same thin design as previous generations but now include the 12-megapixel Center Stage webcam found in current MacBook Pro models. Both variants come with the M4 chip, aligning them with Apple's recent Mac Mini, iMac, and MacBook Pro refreshes.

Base configurations include an M4 with a 10-core CPU and 8-core GPU, 16GB of unified memory, and 256GB of storage. Customers can upgrade to a 10-core GPU (matching the base 14-inch MacBook Pro), 32GB of RAM, and up to 2TB of storage. A significant technical improvement is the support for two external 6K displays while keeping the laptop's lid open, addressing a limitation of previous Air models.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Refreshes MacBook Air With M4 Chip, Lower Pricing

Comments Filter:
  • Seriously, Apple. WTF?

    • by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

      Does anyone other than you actually want a touchscreen on a pure laptop?

      Our standard corporate laptop has been a 13" 2-in-1 for the past six years. I can count the number of people who have used it in tablet mode on one hand, and the only comments I've gotten about the touchscreen in laptop mode have all been negative.

      Seriously, what's the use case here?

      • Yes me! That you and your co-workers don't use it is more about you and your co-workers. Where I work on our 2 in 1 devices we not only use the touch screen, we actively use the digitiser as well. I see about half the people have their laptop docked to their docking stations in tablet mode since it helps them use their pen, and you constantly see people stop typing and tap on the screen with their finger to do something in meetings.

        • by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

          Digitizer is a pretty decent use case (though it would be awkward on a pure laptop, no? As you point out, your colleagues are docked in tablet mode).

      • If I'm leaning forward, I often use the touchscreen to scroll. I also use it for when there are many checkboxes. I know I want it because when I use a laptop without the touchscreen, I repeatedly touch the screen and then have to go back to the trackpad, for obvious reasons. When I last shopped for a laptop, I asked myself if I wanted a touchscreen. Then as I found myself scrolling through a list of various ultrabooks, I realized I was scrolling with my finger on the screen. That answered the question.

      • by stripes ( 3681 )

        Does anyone other than you actually want a touchscreen on a pure laptop?

        My primary use case for Mac laptops is writing iOS and iPadOS apps for other companies (i.e. that is what they pay me for). It would definitely be nicer to be able to interact with the simulators via touch.

        That said there is a vast gulf between the simulators and actual hardware (some frameworks are unavailable in the simulators no mater how much sense it would make to have it, plus the CPUs are vastly different speeds, and sometimes the simulator just uses the Mac framework, so the sim supports some API

    • Yes, please give me a touchscreen at added expense that almost nobody will use because it's ergonomically terrible, and the laptop is so light that if you actually touch the screen, you'll either be hinging the screen back, or lifting the front off the desk.

      Also: Mac OS control widgets are not touch friendly, so using the touchscreen would always suck in comparison to the large trackpad that is right there and has none of these usability problems.

      Touchscreens on notebooks only make sense if there is a 180 d

      • This 3 lbs dell laptop that goes maybe 110 degrees, and not 360 like you actually meant, doesn't tip when i touch the screen.

        Mac OS X is not user friendly in any way. I find it frustrating and unintuitive, and I started using Macs in 1990.

        But Apple hardware is superior, especially for processors and battery life, so I'd tolerate the UI for the benefits. Alas, I hate living without touch.

        • But Apple hardware is superior, especially for processors and battery life, so I'd tolerate the UI for the benefits. Alas, I hate living without touch.

          Same boat.
          Still not a fan of the fucking UI. Hate the BSD userspace. Lack of touch screen makes me sad.

          But straight up, this is my second Apple Silicon M* Max MBP (M1 Max to M4 Max)- and I'm still intoxicated by how fucking excellently the software I'm developing runs on it.
          I don't think I could kneecap myself by going back to a PC. Strix Halo is headed in the right direction, but it still falls short.

          • This dell is 4k touch hdr, but the battery life is ass.

            • Shit, the ASUS I bought back in... 2018 or 2019... really can't remember... is 4K touch HDR.
              It's basically standard for any nice-ish laptop.
              But ya- the battery life is ass, and frankly, it takes about 4x the power to do 1/3rd the work as my MBP, which can literally go for 20 hours of use.
              Sucks. But its discrete RTX20somethingshitty does do a decent enough job on games.
      • by stripes ( 3681 )

        Also: Mac OS control widgets are not touch friendly, so using the touchscreen would always suck in comparison to the large trackpad that is right there and has none of these usability problems.

        Sure, but Apple also supplies the control widgets and has an existence proof they can do touch friendly controls, so that seems like an easy problem when you word it that way (or to be fair when I word it that way, I’m clearly strawmannirg it up here after all!)

        The real problem is MacOS uses high information density UI designs. Which automatically end up with tiny touch targets. The problem with this problem is that macOS uses high inflation density UI because people who buy Macs want high informa

    • Buy an iPad Pro if you really want a touch screen. You can get one and the same 13" size class with the same M4 SoC and pair it with a keyboard and trackpad. It doesn't run Mac OS, but a lot of applications are available for iOS.
    • There are some narrow uses cases that would benefit from a touchscreen, but those are rare and in most of those cases an iPad would be a better choice than a laptop with a touchscreen.

    • My last two laptops at work were touchscreen and I have never used it. I work mostly with databases and some Python coding. In fact I disabled tablet mode as when I first got it. Windows would randomly put it in tablet mode which was not quick to switch back.
  • I purchased a stock Mac Mini M4, added an external SSD (4 times the capacity, half the price as an Apple upgrade), and plugged in my 4K monitor and wireless keyboard combo from an older Windows box. I do audio processing including multi track work. This thing flies. What used to take minutes to render now takes seconds. Nearly-instant on. Never a hiccup.

    Apple, what I want in a laptop is a 2-in-1 laptop with a 15" or larger touch screen, running this new chip. I don't want an iPad with a keyboard, I want Mac

    • Apple, what I want in a laptop is a 2-in-1 laptop with a 15" or larger touch screen, running this new chip. I don't want an iPad with a keyboard, I want Mac OS.

      That would be fucking incredible.
      The fucking annoying part is they have the damn hardware, and the software, right now. They just refuse to put them together.

Torque is cheap.

Working...