

China Announces Generative AI Labeling To Cull Disinformation (bloomberg.com) 20
China has introduced regulations requiring service providers to label AI-generated content, joining similar efforts by the European Union and United States to combat disinformation. The Cyberspace Administration of China and three other agencies announced Friday that AI-generated material must be labeled explicitly or via metadata, with implementation beginning September 1.
"The Labeling Law will help users identify disinformation and hold service suppliers responsible for labeling their content," the CAC said. App store operators must verify whether applications provide AI-generated content and review their labeling mechanisms. Platforms can still offer unlabeled AI content if they comply with relevant regulations and respond to user demand.
"The Labeling Law will help users identify disinformation and hold service suppliers responsible for labeling their content," the CAC said. App store operators must verify whether applications provide AI-generated content and review their labeling mechanisms. Platforms can still offer unlabeled AI content if they comply with relevant regulations and respond to user demand.
I think they meant to say (Score:4, Funny)
Unwanted disinformation
Re:I think they meant to say (Score:4, Funny)
Competing disinformation.
While you are certainly correct (Score:2)
I'm sure that's fine though. Americans are extremely smart and they wouldn't possibly fall for any form of misinformation. And I'm sure it's fine that one of the most hostile nations to the United Sta
Re: While you are certainly correct (Score:2)
I have to hand it to the Chinese that they at least have the common sense to prevent foreign governments from spreading misinformation unchallenged. Here in America we literally just shut down the office that's in charge, or rather was in charge, of preventing information warfare being engaged on Americans.
There is not and never was such an office in charge of that in the US. Nor should there be. The closest there ever was only existed during WWII called the office of censorship, and it was purely voluntary, the press was not required to do anything it said. Even then, information warfare cannot be prevented, only mitigated.
Instead we rely primarily on an honor system of sorts. We call it freedom of speech. I get it, you've repeatedly claimed that free speech is fascist because you have it in your head that N
Re: While you are certainly correct (Score:2)
I don't deal in conspiracy theories.
Re: (Score:2)
So Cull Means To Manufacture Now? (Score:1)
I guess I missed that change.
China (Score:2)
Limiting disinformation? ... Bwahahahaha
File it under: Even China has Common Sense (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd much rather people be duped and learn from their mistakes. Some of that learning experience may be painful, but a society that develops a habit of ques
I wonder if ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm wondering what these videos were pretending to be. The only AI-generated content Youtube has served to me has been some fake 1970s soul tracks, and that's something I specifically went looking for.
Same old, same old... (Score:1)
If I agree with it, it is the truth. If I disagree, it's misinformation.
Yes, this applies to China, USA, UE, Russia and everybody (including you and me).
Re: (Score:2)
No. Calling out a lie is not disagreeing. You're correcting. That's what misinformation is. A lie.
Don't need AI to do this in China (Score:1)
If [name of current Fearless Leader] does not approve, then cull it.
That's the way it's been done since before modern computers were invented, and it's effectively the way it's going to be done for as long as China has a Fearless Leader.
Lather, rinse, repeat for any other autocracy/dictatorship/similar.
Good idea + Can we add photoshopped content? (Score:4, Interesting)
There's no going back from the massive enshittification that's coming from AI. The least we can do is make it illegal to attempt to fraud people with fake product images or fake clickbait articles. I am sure it won't get followed too well, but it will at least make respectable businesses think twice before using it to mislead customers.
Cull Disinformation? Right! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Meanwhile in Soviet.. err *checks notes* America (Score:1)
https://www.wired.com/story/ai... [wired.com]
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has issued new instructions to scientists that partner with the US Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute (AISI) that eliminate mention of “AI safety,” “responsible AI,” and “AI fairness” in the skills it expects of members and introduces a request to prioritize “reducing ideological bias, to enable human flourishing and economic competitiveness.”
The information comes