

Google Chrome To Continue To Use Third-Party Cookies in Major Reversal (digiday.com) 18
An anonymous reader shares a report: In a shocking development, Google won't roll out a new standalone prompt for third-party cookies in Chrome. It's a move that amounts to a U-turn on the Chrome team's earlier updated approach to deprecating third-party cookies, announced in July last year, with the latest development bound to cause ructions across the ad tech ecosystem.
"We've made the decision to maintain our current approach to offering users third-party cookie choice in Chrome, and will not be rolling out a new standalone prompt for third-party cookies," wrote Anthony Chavez, vp Privacy Sandbox at Google, in a blog post published earlier today (April 22). "Users can continue to choose the best option for themselves in Chrome's Privacy and Security Settings." However, it's not the end of Privacy Sandbox, according to Google, as certain initiatives incubated within the project are set to continue, such as its IP Protection for Chrome Incognito users, which will be rolled out in Q3.
What's shocking? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you using Android?
Re: (Score:1)
So this was always a antitrust issue (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
^THIS^
While there certainly are legitimate privacy concerns around third party cookies, Google's interest in the subject was hardly the public good.
The entire thing was about making it more difficult for their competitors to track ad impressions and user behavior with as much accuracy as Google via their other telemetry.
It was about Google being able to charge both higher rates for ad placement, and charge more for confirmed impressions and click troughs. This is slashdot though were people will write a wal
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, I think this is more about preserving market share than profiling though. The advertisers in the US already have learned to live with the work arounds.
Lots of companies probably mandate Chrome so their antiquated sites aren't broken by Safari. When people need to use it for their job on their iPhone, they are more likely to stick with it.
Whatever... (Score:1)
Re:Whatever... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Security (Score:3)
Welcome to the future..... we're closer to having flying cars than we are to having a secure browser.
Privacy Badger (Score:5, Informative)
Just use Privacy Badger:
https://www.eff.org/pages/priv... [eff.org]
Not a mystery (Score:2)
Manifest v3 next? (Score:2)
I'm a bit disappointed. I've been looking forward to 3rd party cookies disappearing from the surface of the Earth, and I think I'm not the only one. Useless piece of... dough.
On the other hand, what we really need to bring back is the Blocking Request API. Something that is actually useful but been recklessly removed against our will.
Re: (Score:2)
Google sold us (Score:2)
I just hope they got paid handsomely for it, I'd hate it if they sold me and my data for cheap. I am worth a lot. Just knowing that I buy Cheetos Puffs is valuable information.
EU Regulations and Anti-Trust did this (Score:3)