Did Peking U. Just Make the World's Fastest Transistor - Without Using Silicon? (tomshardware.com) 57
"It is the fastest, most efficient transistor ever," proclaims an announcment from Peking University. "And most important of all, there's no trace of silicon involved," adds ZME Science.
From the South China Morning Post:
A team of researchers at Peking University claims to have shattered chip performance limits and proven that China can use new materials to "change lanes" in the semiconductor race by circumventing silicon-based roadblocks entirely.
The researchers, led by physical chemistry professor Peng Hailin, said their self-engineered 2D transistor could operate 40 per cent faster than Intel and TSMC's cutting-edge 3-nanometre silicon chips, while consuming 10 per cent less energy.... "While this path is born out of necessity due to current sanctions, it also forces researchers to find solutions from fresh perspectives," [Hailin] added.
"Peking's major innovation comes from the two-dimensional nature of their transistors, facilitated by using an element other than silicon," writes Tom's Hardware: BiâOâSe, or bismuth oxyselenide, is a semiconductor material studied for its use in sub-1nm process nodes for years, largely thanks to its ability to be a 2D semiconductor. Two-dimensional semiconductors, like 2D BiâOâSe, are more flexible and sturdy at a small scale than silicon, which runs into reduced carrier mobility at even the 10nm node. Such breakthroughs into stacked 2D transistors and the move from silicon to bismuth are exciting for the future of semiconductors and are necessary for the Chinese industry to compete on the leading edge of semiconductors.
ZME Science adds this note of skepticism. "Turning laboratory breakthroughs into commercial chips typically takes years — sometimes decades..."
Thanks to Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the article.
The researchers, led by physical chemistry professor Peng Hailin, said their self-engineered 2D transistor could operate 40 per cent faster than Intel and TSMC's cutting-edge 3-nanometre silicon chips, while consuming 10 per cent less energy.... "While this path is born out of necessity due to current sanctions, it also forces researchers to find solutions from fresh perspectives," [Hailin] added.
"Peking's major innovation comes from the two-dimensional nature of their transistors, facilitated by using an element other than silicon," writes Tom's Hardware: BiâOâSe, or bismuth oxyselenide, is a semiconductor material studied for its use in sub-1nm process nodes for years, largely thanks to its ability to be a 2D semiconductor. Two-dimensional semiconductors, like 2D BiâOâSe, are more flexible and sturdy at a small scale than silicon, which runs into reduced carrier mobility at even the 10nm node. Such breakthroughs into stacked 2D transistors and the move from silicon to bismuth are exciting for the future of semiconductors and are necessary for the Chinese industry to compete on the leading edge of semiconductors.
ZME Science adds this note of skepticism. "Turning laboratory breakthroughs into commercial chips typically takes years — sometimes decades..."
Thanks to Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the article.
lol (Score:1)
Hey EditorDavid, remember your site doesn't support unicode.
> sent from my PDP-11
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because it is Bi2O2Se with two times a subscript 2, nor BiâOâSe.
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The inability to edit posts is an intentional design decision, not due to lack of caring or skill. The problems with being able to edit a post after someone has moderated it or replied to it should be obvious to everyone here.
I'll meet you half-way, how about the ability to delete your post.
Re: (Score:1)
The inability to edit posts is an intentional design decision, not due to lack of caring or skill. The problems with being able to edit a post after someone has moderated it or replied to it should be obvious to everyone here.
A brief window of time for editing an unmoderated and reply-free post might be a reasonable compromise.
Re: (Score:2)
While that is true, it would still be nice to have the ability to edit for a certain time period or until it is moderated or replied to. I can't imagine how many stupid mistakes I have made and didn't see and wish I could have edited it a few minutes after posting.
Yes, I should have used "Preview" and then reviewed it first. My bad. Let's be honest- how many of us actually do that.
Re: lol (Score:2)
And preview is not available on mobile browsers, where unicode text (at least quotes) are most likely.
Re: (Score:2)
Not even close (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not even close (Score:5, Interesting)
On what do you base that claim? TFA doesn't even give any figures for speed, so how have you compared it to other transistors?
I'm reminded of the scepticism that other Chinese technological advances were met with. LLMs and automotive battery technology being two recent ones. The derision soon turns to claims it was stolen (with that damn time machine of theirs), and finally import bans because somehow that will fix our lack of investment in R&D.
Re:Not even close (Score:4, Insightful)
TFA doesn't even give any figures for speed
TFA (the original one) doesn't give anything more than newspaper propaganda. Maybe it is the fastest, maybe it isn't, maybe it exist, maybe it doesn't.
Not enough information for a meaningful discussion, so let's dump all known cliches on the topic of "China".
Re: (Score:1)
Has Trump gone groveling to Xi for a fix to his disastrous tariff policy yet?
Re: (Score:1)
China is the one that looks like it is bowing its head: https://www.aol.com/news/china... [aol.com]
Re: Not even close (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Also kind of weird how they are calling out "silicon" as being roadblocked. Silicon is literally a component of sand, it's available everywhere on earth in huge quantities. The roadblocks are with EUV lithography equipment, which makes me wonder how are they getting sub-1nm features on this material if they were unable to do so with silicon? Since it's "2d" are they counting the height as the smallest feature?
There's been tons of different semiconductors that are faster and more efficient than silicon in
If headline asks a question then the answer is... (Score:2)
If headline asks a question then the answer is most likely no, or so Betteridge's law of headlines tells us. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
In this case the answer could be yes because we've known of all kinds of different semiconductors for ages, we just stuck to silicon for so long because it's been proven the cheapest. Part of what keeps it so cheap is that silicon has taken such a large chunk of the semiconductor market that it takes some powerful motivations to do different, such as a need for extre
Re: If headline asks a question then the answer is (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How many more years am I going to have to keep reading comments on this site from people attempting to appear smart by constantly wielding this law of news headlines?
You will likely see comments about Betteridge's law until news outlets learn to have some journalistic integrity.
I don't know if this is a common lesson in American high schools but I can recall a lesson on how to write a news article. The headline is to summarize as best as possible who, what, when, and where, then the news article is to expand on those details. What we have now are headlines that fail to give the important details because if they gave all the important details in the headline then peopl
Re: If headline asks a question then the answer is (Score:4, Informative)
I don't know how to end the click bait headlines but it might help if Slashdot refused to highlight news articles with click bait headlines.
In this case it seems that the questioning clickbaity headline is actually something that the Slashdot editor himself came up with, because I can't find it replicated in any of the articles.
Re: (Score:2)
Forever. No old joke has stopped being funny on slashdot, no age discrimination here.
Re: (Score:2)
grumble..grumble...portman...hot grits...
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine a beowulf cluster of old slashdot jokes...
Re: (Score:3)
I think the editors do this purposely to create engagement. Or submissions with easily correctable mistakes, or missing information. If they made the perfect post, all information perfectly clear, there wouldn't be comments.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How many more years am I going to have to keep reading comments on this site from people attempting to appear smart by constantly wielding this law of news headlines?
No.
Re: (Score:2)
How many more years am I going to have to keep reading comments on this site from people attempting to appear smart by constantly wielding this law of news headlines?
3 years, 2 months and 12 days 6 hours, 10 minutes, +/- 30 seconds
Re: (Score:3)
The first question is how many times did they have to try to successfully make a second transistor? The second question is, what is the density of the transistors they can make? The third question is, how easy is it to automate the process they're using? Depending on the answers to these questions, then even if we ignore cost of materials their transistor could be 100 times faster and ten times more efficient and still be completely useless.
Re: (Score:3)
There's more to the speed of electronic devices than their transistors. There's wires that cause delays, and while that might seem trivial to those unfamiliar with microelectronics this is an issue that needs to be kept in mind during the design process.
Oh hell yeah. At present day computer speeds, the speed of light is an issue, those signals take some time to get from one place to another.And the faster the transistor, the more the wires and other devices come to play. One of the reasons for shrinking chips is to avoid some of this added time. A rule of thumb is about a foot per nanosecond - but that's just for concept.
And to complicate matters, there is Velocity Factor, or Vf. And it's different for different materials. For our work, it will be aroun
Strange coincidence... (Score:5, Funny)
I think Elon Musk has a kid with that name.
Re: (Score:2)
And it's a post-transition one, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anastasi In Tech (Score:3)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Microchip Breakthrough: World’s First Silicon-Free Processor [youtube.com]
SCMP? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"The art of art, the glory of expression and the sunshine of the light of letters, is simplicity."--Walt Whitman
The "without silicon" part is expected (Score:2)
Silicon is at the end of what it can do. What this story really shows is that China is catching up, fast. Even if the results here are overstated, in 10-20 years or so, they will be able to compete at the top. And that is bad news. Now, if they were dependent on ASML machines, but they will not be. Nice example of how trade restrictions backfire.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now, if they were dependent on ASML machines, but they will not be. Nice example of how trade restrictions backfire.
They may have a fancy new semiconductor compound to work with, but all these wafers have to be patterned to tiny structures if they are going to build competitive chips. This is where ASML machines come in, and the article suggests nothing that these were recreated or substituted or made irrelevant somehow.
May the 4th be with you... (Score:2)
The worst headlines? (Score:2)
Seriously, can it just be a /. thing, can we ban headlines with question marks in them?
It's such clickbait nonsense, every time. Just make it a policy.
so wha? (Score:3)
So what? Germanium transistors have been around for a long time. Also, other compounds. The main advantage of silicon is that manufacturing is much easier.
The mention of sanctions in a tech news release (Score:2)
The mention of sanctions in a technical news release, saying it was the driver for this purported advance, gives the release a BS smell.
I have no idea of the accuracy or significance of the release. Or even whether sanctions were in fact a driver. But the way it's phrased reduces its credibility.