

Immigration Is the Only Thing Propping Up California's Population (msn.com) 112
California's population grew 0.6% in 2024, adding nearly 250,000 residents to reach 39.43 million, according to Census Bureau estimates. The growth came entirely from a rebound in international immigration, which surged to over 300,000 people after plunging to 44,000 during the pandemic's worst year.
Without immigration, the state would have shrunk significantly as domestic migration remained negative. The H-1B visa program alone brought nearly 79,000 skilled workers to California in 2024. Since 2010, California has added 2.7 million immigrants, with half coming from Asia and slightly more than a third from Latin America. The immigration-dependent growth model puts California at particular risk from potential federal policy changes, as more than a quarter of its population is foreign-born -- the highest share nationwide.
Without immigration, the state would have shrunk significantly as domestic migration remained negative. The H-1B visa program alone brought nearly 79,000 skilled workers to California in 2024. Since 2010, California has added 2.7 million immigrants, with half coming from Asia and slightly more than a third from Latin America. The immigration-dependent growth model puts California at particular risk from potential federal policy changes, as more than a quarter of its population is foreign-born -- the highest share nationwide.
Not "significantly" (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not "significantly" (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, doing some quick math using the numbers from TFS - the population loss without international immigrants would've been 50K people. Out of a population of 39.5 million.
Somehow I don't think LA's traffic is getting any better...
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
The resulting economic collapse would be rather ugly. The following starvation would be uglier.
Re: (Score:3)
Mmm... sources i'm finding say no more than 10% illegal immigrants in LA county and maybe closer to 6%. Though of course those are still still huge numbers compared to the population change numbers being discussed i TFA and this thread.
(and that's without counting their american born children which are relevant if we're talking population growth)
Re: (Score:2)
Good work. I get tired of people just making shit up so they can make the argument they want to make.
Re: (Score:1)
Today, approximately 1.5 million immigrants live in the City of Los Angeles, about 38% of the City’s total population
The document is about the border wall and the trump administration, tying in the illegal / undocumented nature of those cited.
Re: (Score:2)
Mmm... sources i'm finding say no more than 10% illegal immigrants in LA county and maybe closer to 6%. Though of course those are still still huge numbers compared to the population change numbers being discussed i TFA and this thread.
(and that's without counting their american born children which are relevant if we're talking population growth)
Where are your citations to back your facts?
Same thing can be said of the other poster pointing to government contracts that should be openly available to all for review.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I have a source saying you're an illegal immigrant and you should be deported.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
illegal immigrant population
The topic, both in TFA, TFS, and the post you responded to, is international migrants. Nothing illegal about that yet.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Traffic would also change overnight if you set off a nuclear weapon in the city. These are the facts. Do with them what you wish.
Also, LA's total immigrant population is 35% as of 2022. https://dornsife.usc.edu/eri/p... [usc.edu]
Given that not all immigrants are "illegal", you are a racist liar. But /. already knows that about you. These are the facts. Do with them what you wish.
Re: Not "significantly" (Score:2)
Do with them what you will.
He was referring to the numbers, nothing else. (You can put that down slowly, sir)(The cell phone, too)
Re: (Score:2)
There would be a huge traffic jam because the infrastructure would not be able to support that many busses.
Re: (Score:1)
no possible way (Score:1)
A number like that defies all logic if you've been to LA. Yes there are a lot of "illegal" immigrants but more than 1 in 3 is insane, that is simply not possible. If 37% of people in the city were "illegal" think of what that would mean in terms of jobs, banking, etc. There are only so many kitchen, carwash, construction labor etc jobs to be done. You'd hear Spanish everywhere. Also, think about what that would mean in terms of demographics - google says 47% of LA city is Hispanic, do you really think 37 ou
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Los Angeles has a 37% illegal immigrant population alone
11% according to the data I see.
https://www.uscisguide.com/sta... [uscisguide.com]
37% sounds pretty unlikely.
...These are the facts. Do with them what you wish.
Saying "these are the facts" does not make them the facts.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Los Angeles has a 37% illegal immigrant population alone.
11% according to the data I see.
[posts link saying "Today, approximately 1.5 million immigrants live in the City of Los Angeles, about 38% of the City’s total population."
That is a problem I see a lot in MAGA supporters: they use the words "immigrants" and "illegal immigrants" interchangeably.
I will also note without comment the next line in the link you posted, "Los Angeles is a great city because of the successful
integration of immigrants into its civic, social, cultural and economic fabric."
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The economy and the social contract is a Ponzi scheme that relies on an ever growing population. Even low population growth is a huge problem.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The economy and the social contract is a Ponzi scheme that relies on an ever growing population.
No, it relies on increasing consumption and sufficient taxation. People consume more, individually, than they did 100 years ago and are more productive in terms of GDP.
Re:Not "significantly" (Score:4, Informative)
No, it relies on increasing consumption and sufficient taxation.
It relies on underpaying workers so that bosses can live life close to kings.
Workers live like kings did (Score:2, Troll)
TV
Internet music
Vast range of food
Tax payer funded education till the kids are 18
That's ignorant bootlicking fuckery (Score:5, Insightful)
Work more than medieval serfs
Do as you're told and the police won't shoot you
Just enough education to be useful to low level employers for free, anything more puts even most doctors into a lifetime of debt
Come on, you can do better than that (Score:2)
Do you seriously think a medieval serf wouldn't swop their unpleasant and limited life - even if they don't work so many hours - for the benefits of modern civilisation? The women seldom die in childbirth, 50% of children don't die before they are five, and there's no smallpox, cholera, typhoid, etc. The police may not shoot you, but if you annoy your betters you will be made to suffer.
Re: Come on, you can do better than that (Score:1)
"Do you seriously think a medieval serf wouldn't swop their unpleasant and limited life"
Moving the goalposts and taping yourself to the cuck chair at the same time, impressive
Re: (Score:2)
If you honestly think that, then you haven't the slightest clue what life was like even in medieval Europe. GP barely scratched the surface.
Getting shot at by cops? Shit, I don't know whatever ass crack of a neighborhood you live in, but most people have never even been in the presence of gunfire outside an actual gun range, let alone getting shot at by anybody, let alone a cop. I've been working about ten miles from Compton for the past few years, and this hasn't happened. Shit, I was in the Army, and this
Re: (Score:2)
If you honestly think that, then you haven't the slightest clue what life was like even in medieval Europe.
That certainly was a lot of text, which at just a glance I can tell proves you don't understand the argument.
Re: Come on, you can do better than that (Score:2)
You don't understand your own argument. You have no idea what position you're coming from. The fact that you made those points to begin with only proves it, especially given your pitiful attempt at weasel wording your way out of it just now. Here's what you're really doing;
You take everything you have for granted, and despite that, you think you're entitled to even more at somebody else's expense because you've successfully convinced yourself that your life is full of undue hardship, despite how comparative
Re: (Score:2)
Damn, it must suck to be you.
It's not how our economy works (Score:5, Interesting)
Think of it this way, you know how half of Slash that will tell you that you don't need to worry about automation and AI because you can just go be a plumber?
Well actual plumbers only make about 20 to 25 an hour which isn't a hell of a lot of money in a country where a two-bedroom apartment costs $2,100 a month and up.
The big money you see plumbers making is people running their own business and employing other plumbers.
The thing is if you're going to be a plumber with your own business and a few employees under you and that's basically a pyramid scheme. You make the good money by running your own business so you can get all the money and then having a couple of employees so that you can pocket a bit of the money they are earning in exchange for stable paycheck and some experience and more importantly the know how for finding customers and running a business which plenty of people can't do.
But to make that happen you need a growing economy and population with it because otherwise what ends up happening is everyone ends up concentrated in a tiny little area and you're competing with too many other plumbers.
See those two guys you employed sooner or later are going to be happy with the $20 an hour you're paying them. That's not enough for them to afford a wife and kids.
So they're going to strike out on their own. If the population is growing we are building new cities and they're going to set up shop far enough away from you that they aren't directly competing with you. If not then they're going to set up shop in your backyard and suddenly you're all competing for the same shrinking pool of customers.
This pretty much goes for every single business and every single thing humans do. On top of that while this is going on you have private equity companies moving in to try and take over your business. In a massively growing economy they would be focused on making all their money off the growth but because the population and economy aren't growing they are going after a smaller prey than usual, you and your little plumbing business.
Now there are alternatives to endless rapacious growth as a economic system but they require social changes and discarding certain sacred cows and that's not going to happen because as your population is declining you have more and more old people and therefore they are running the show because they can outvote the young people and they don't like change. They want everything to be exactly the way it was when they were 12.
So we are basically trapped in a nostalgia fueled Doom loop and I don't see any way out of it.
Re: (Score:2)
With literally zero immigrants since 2010, California's population would have shrunk by one tenth of one percent per year. Significant only if you're trying to make some political point about the state.
It depends on which one tenth of one percent is leaving.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
That's quite a low slashdot ID for a twelve-year-old.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Wow, that was quite the cogent counterpoint. I bet you did debate in high school.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
OMG, you should run for republican office!
Re:Agolf Shittler ruining America (Score:5, Informative)
The "illegal spike" a couple of years ago was mostly caused by Don's mouth: he claimed Biden would "just open the gates", and enough believed Don.
This is a lie, of course. Within hours of taking office, Joe Biden sent his recommended immigration bill to Congress (among other things, to make the laws less accurate by replacing the term "alien" with "noncitizen", lumping aliens together with US non-citizen nationals; it also aimed to create an accelerated pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants) and issued a number of Executive Orders and proclamations to reduce border enforcement. Two months later, Biden said "Weâ(TM)re in the process of getting set up" to massively ramp up immigration numbers -- in the middle of COVID-19, before vaccines were generally available to the public. That wasn't because of what Donald Trump said or because people believed Trump; opening the borders was a high priority for the Biden administration.
Yes but is it true? (Score:2)
Merely to dismiss the comment as being that of a 'Trumper' doesn't prove it's not an accurate description of Biden actions.
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
You seem not to understand what "opening borders" means. Perhaps if you got your definitions somewhere other than Fox.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Citations or it didnt happen. I'm not going to do all the leg work to verify your mountain of claims here.
Re: (Score:2)
I was working mostly from https://www.nilc.org/resources... [nilc.org], which is pro-Biden -- some of the links from there are broken because they go to press releases that Trump took down. I think the only additional fact I added was that some Americans are non-citizen nationals (neither citizens nor aliens), as described at sites like https://travel.state.gov/conte... [state.gov] .
Denialism is an ugly look, dude.
Re: (Score:2)
that's bullshit
Re:Agolf Shittler ruining America (Score:5, Informative)
The "illegal spike" a couple of years ago was mostly caused by Don's mouth: he claimed Biden would "just open the gates", and enough believed Don. ...
i'm sorry but whatever the wisdom of legal or illegal immigration, this take is ridiculous. The "illegal spike" was not because Trump said that Biden would "just open the gates", but because Biden DID just open the gates and it started to subside when he started to close them again in the run-up to the 2024 election.
from NPR in june 2024( https://www.npr.org/2024/06/26... [npr.org] )
Homeland Security's latest report shows a 40% decrease in border arrests, three weeks after President Biden’s asylum restrictions and expedited removals executive actions took effect.
Re: (Score:1)
> but because Biden DID just open the gates
No he didn't. His policies were similar to Trump's.
> and it started to subside when he started to close them
They had to spend more resources to get it under control, including giving money/deals to Mexico to police it better.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
and wish we let at least the settled people stay
That's exactly what is happening.
Has your preferred news feeds been telling you Trump is rounding up illegals by the boat load? He isn't. They're going after criminals and activists, mostly.
Re:Agolf Shittler ruining America (Score:5, Informative)
https://www.cato.org/blog/50-v... [cato.org]
I suspect that your "preferred news feed" has not been telling you this, because there's no rational way to describe sending people to a concentration camp as "going after criminals and activists."
Re: (Score:1)
Has your preferred news feeds been telling you Trump is rounding up illegals by the boat load? He isn't. They're going after criminals and activists, mostly.
LOL. Nonsense.
That's the lie they told you. But that was tried and the numbers were way too low. So the policy was changed to open slather. Anyone you can get. Doesn't even matter all that much if they're "illegal".
And still the numbers are not what was promised.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Going after activists, that's comforting. So he's hurting the right people, right?
And if Trump were going after criminals, the easiest criminal to find is himself. 34-time convicted felon.
Re: (Score:2)
Going after activists, that's comforting. So he's hurting the right people, right?
Yep.
"I am your vengeance."
member?
Thing is, he is avenging. There is a great deal to be vengeful about. And that's your fault. You hurt a lot of people for a long time, and now we are here.
Also, it's not going to get better, for you or I. That's not how this works.
Re: (Score:1)
"Vengeance is mine, I will repay" -Deuteronomy 32:35 and Romans 12:19.
God alone has the authority to judge and punish wrongdoing. Christians are not to seek personal revenge but to trust in God's justice.
The orange one is leading you on the path to Hell.
Re: (Score:2)
The orange one is leading you on the path to Hell.
God-bothering won't save you.
Re: (Score:1)
I like the 34 time convicted felon angle a lot. Not because I'm particularly pro Trump or anti Trump. I just like that depending on which judge is doing the talking he's either a 34 time convicted felon or a man who had 34 convictions thrown out on appeal. So is he or isn't he? With the mix of judges in this country and their various loyalties the world may never know.
Re: (Score:1)
Trump's convictions were not thrown out.
upholding charges but issuing no fine, probation, or jail time..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
It's funny how people are all about Trump violating the law, while they completely support all the illegal aliens who break the law - starting with being here illegally.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump got his due process & day(s) in court - and slept through some of them
Re: (Score:1)
The only due process illegals deserve is a bullet to the head.
Re:Agolf Shittler ruining America (Score:5, Informative)
and wish we let at least the settled people stay
That's exactly what is happening.
Has your preferred news feeds been telling you Trump is rounding up illegals by the boat load? He isn't. They're going after criminals and activists, mostly.
Has your preferred news feed been telling you that Trump is mostly going after criminals and activists?
Criminals: All of the numbers I've read say that the percentage of people who are rounded up who have criminal records is in the single digit percents. In some cases, the number of legal aliens exceeds the number of those with a record. And for the bulk of them, undocumented aliens w/o any criminal record, are you one of those who equates undocumented status with criminality, despite the fact that it is a civil offense; not a crime, so they are not criminals?
Activists: Yes, they are going after activists, if your definition of activists is people who are here legally, but who say things that the current administration finds politically objectionable. You know; like dictators do?
Re: (Score:2)
And you don't even need to have committed a crime to have a criminal record. Ever been finger printed (like as a kid in case you were ever kidnapped or fell into a monster infected quicksand pit with your detached hand sitting on top)? You have a criminal record. Ever got pulled over? Criminal record. Ever had someone make a random complaint about you to the police, regardless of if they every contacted you about it or not? Criminal record.
A criminal record only means the police have a file about you,
Re: (Score:2)
"They're going after criminals and activists, mostly"
how many of each have they arrested / or deported so far?
What Californians call economic emmigrants (Score:5, Insightful)
We call them losers.
If you can't make it hear, it's for a lack of trying or a lack of competence. There are lots of opportunities.
The immigrants who come to California work quite hard and often make lots of money.
A lot of retirees leave, of course, cashing in on their houses that have dramatically appreciated.
Re: (Score:1)
The underground economy of moving drugs and traficked people around while moving dollars south seems to be doing a brisk business and bringing violent crime, drug addiction, and homelessness along with it. And the people who are getting victimized the most are those same illegal economic migrants that you're cheering for....along with the taxpayers who ultimately pay the price in high taxes and strained public services.
Congrats.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
A higher minimum wage is a good thing. They should not necessarily be statewide, though. The middle of nowhere needs a lower minimum wage than the heart of LA.
California has high unemployment relative to the rest of the country, but low unemployment historically, as 5.2%. Why? I don't know. My family are all employed if they want to be. Tech companies are laying off some as they see increased productivity from AI. That's all I can really think of.
The California poverty rate is in the average range of
Re: (Score:2)
"My family are all employed if they want to be" has two major qualifiers that put it into "cool story brah" territory.
As for poverty rate, see https://www.sandiegouniontribu... [sandiegouniontribune.com], or https://www.politifact.com/fac... [politifact.com] for an explanation of what the "supplemental" poverty rate does: it reflects a state's actual cost of living, instead of using a single number nationwide.
Re: (Score:2)
My retired parents, aunts, and uncles are not considered unemployed. Should they be? How about the child nephews and nieces? No stay at home moms here. Not cool story territory.
If we're going to attack the definition of poverty rates, we should attack the supplemental poverty rate measurement as well. My daughter shares an apartment with three other girls. She gets her own room and shares 1.5 baths. It still costs a lot of money. Is that poverty or just sensible living? Her life in the dorms was 3 g
Re: What Californians call economic emmigrants (Score:2)
Re: What Californians call economic emmigrants (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now that we've gotten you permanently out of California, let's work on getting you permanently off the internet.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Significant chance of hospitals closing if they're rural, thanks to impending medicaid cuts.
There will be closings across the country, actually, as those receiving care will receive less or no care then end up in already overburdened emergency rooms. At least the hospitals here won't collapse under the load.
Re: (Score:2)
California dropout! Loser!
And earthquakes (Score:2)
The Big One coming soon to a California city or fifty.
Re: (Score:2)
All kinds of disasters are coming, no matter where you live. Our friend's home in Texas was heavily damaged in a storm. Not a hurricane. Just a storm with huge hail and high winds. They got a new roof, some new windows, a new trailer (a day after they bought a new trailer), and more. Wonder why those insurance rates are rising. Hint: it's not just California. Also, most Californians, myself included, don't have quake coverage, because it's stupid expensive and because it doesn't give good coverage.
Doesn't even make sense (Score:4, Insightful)
Even if the numbers were significant, it doesn't make any sense. People leave California due to high housing costs. If the population ever did actually start to decline notably, the issue would be self correcting.
The Immi-taxpayer Program (Score:1)
The H-1B visa program alone brought nearly 79,000 skilled workers to California in 2024.
Well, that’s one way of describing the kind of targeted marketing it takes to sucker people into moving to California these days.
How blessed those new California taxpayers must feel to have such a grand local economy and pay hardly any tax as a result.. /s
Good (Score:1)
Live births greater than international immigration (Score:2)
There have been more than 400,000 [wikipedia.org] live births in California every year since 1979. In contrast, the article says that 300,000 people immigrated in 2024, and even plunged to 40,000 a few years earlier. Well, 400,000 is greater than 300,000 so no, immigration is far from the only thing propping up California's population.
True of the entire USA (Score:2)
The fertility rate in the USA is around 1.79, which is below the replacement rate of 2.1. So the only thing keeping population growth going in the USA as a whole is immigration.
Even the state with the highest fertility rate (South Dakota) had a rate of 2.00 in 2023... below replacement rate.
"Propping up"? (Score:2)
Unclear why one of the traditional routes of population increase in US states - for the last 425+ years in most states, closer to 525 years in what is now California - is deemed to be "propping up" the population. Almost as if there is an agenda and a narrative to declare more recent immigrants as not real citizens or not real people. As opposed to, say, a German family that immigrated to the United States in 1904.
Endless growth is impossible (Score:2)
..yet investors demand endless growth.
This is impossible. We need steady-state sustainability.
Pundits claim we need more housing to support ever increasing populations, and claim that the end of population growth is a bad thing.
Another way to look at it as that we are achieving equilibrium
demographics are destiny (Score:1)
less than 20% of the children born in california are white. and only about 35% of the current population is white.
there is no magic dirt. bringing in the 3rd world will turn california and america into the 3rd world. this country is toast, start stock piling bullets and rice.
CA and NY better hope Trump doesn't see this (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
fuKKK off!
Re: (Score:2)
Appropriate reply, frankly
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
I was with you until you had to make this a racial issue.
Disney surely is woke, and this can be demonstrated with their live action Snow White. The story of Snow White is of German origin where women with fair skin were considered to be beautiful, and in this case "fair" meant having a light complexion. They chose to interpret "fair" to mean something like legitimate, legal, righteous, or something along those lines. That may have gone over without much concern or commentary if the story of Snow White wa
Re: (Score:2)
"The Disney that was known while Walt and the rest of the original Disney family were alive and running the company did not appear to be trying to spread a racist message with their entertainment."
The Song of the South says, lol wut?