Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Intel Businesses Technology

Top Researchers Leave Intel To Build Startup With 'The Biggest, Baddest CPU' (oregonlive.com) 61

An anonymous reader quotes a report from OregonLive: Together, the four founders of Beaverton startup AheadComputing spent nearly a century at Intel. They were among Intel's top chip architects, working years in advance to develop new generations of microprocessors to power the computers of the future. Now they're on their own, flying without a net, building a new class of microprocessor on an entirely different architecture from Intel's. Founded a year ago, AheadComputing is trying to prove there's a better way to design computer chips.

"AheadComputing is doing the biggest, baddest CPU in the world," said Debbie Marr, the company's CEO. [...] AheadComputing is betting on an open architecture called RISC-V -- RISC stands for "reduced instruction set computer." The idea is to craft a streamlined microprocessor that works more efficiently by doing fewer things, and doing them better than conventional processors. For AheadComputing's founders and 80 employees, many of them also Intel alumni, it's a major break from the kind of work they've been doing all their careers. They've left a company with more than 100,000 workers to start a business with fewer than 100.

"Every person in this room," Marr said, looking across a conference table at her colleagues, "we could have stayed at Intel. We could have continued to do very exciting things at Intel." They decided they had a better chance at leading a revolution in semiconductor technology at a startup than at a big, established company like Intel. And AheadComputing could be at the forefront of renewal in Oregon's semiconductor ecosystem. "We see this opportunity, this light," Marr said. "We took our chances."
It'll be years before AheadComputing's designs are on the market, but the company "envisions its chips will someday power PCs, laptops and data centers," reports OregonLive. "Possible clients could include Google, Amazon, Samsung or other large computing companies."

Top Researchers Leave Intel To Build Startup With 'The Biggest, Baddest CPU'

Comments Filter:
  • Good luck (Score:2, Flamebait)

    by rsilvergun ( 571051 )
    Because you're going to need something more than luck to prevent Intel from using their Monopoly to crush you.

    On the other hand maybe you will score a few patents and get a buyout.

    With the absolute complete lack of antitrust law enforcement that's really all anyone can hope for anymore.
    • I can imagine there could be a shift of some venture capital going from AI to them.
      What better opportunity to mold a new CPU architecture to have AI support from the ground up and leave obsolete cruft behind?

      • by Anonymous Coward

        What better opportunity to mold a new CPU architecture to have AI support from the ground up and leave obsolete cruft behind?

        Everyone thinks "I'm going to start over and eliminate all the old mistakes". And they just create all new mistakes that are just as bad as the old ones. The "obsolete cruft" has been tested and refined and it works. I hope they are successful, but history says otherwise.

        • Everyone thinks "I'm going to start over and eliminate all the old mistakes".

          But they're not "starting over". They're using RISC-V, which is a mature instruction set with existing toolchains.

          • ... and a bajillion well-funded companies brimming with skilled technical people already making the things. This isn't the 1970s when anyone could whip up a CPU design in rubylith on their kitchen table, you need serious resources and funding to get anywhere, while competing with many other companies with serious resources and funding and in several cases a multi-year head start.
    • If investors thought that had a real chance of happening, they wouldn't invest.

      Besides, intel likely doesn't see this as any more of a threat than other architectures that had the same goals, like PowerPC.

      No, the world still hasn't ended. Go back to your fidget spinner, I'll let you know when you can stop.

      • Intel *do* have an interest in Risc-V - at one point they were investing in Horse Creek and exploring plans to acquire SiFive.

        But given their 'core focus' announcements of the past few months, no side project on another architecture is going to pass muster, so it may well be that Intel management encouraged the spin off startup.

        Going back to something akin to Horse Creek, what would be a likely scenario is if Ahead used their contacts within Intel to fab their designs on a compute-module form factor that co

    • Isn't this how half of Silicon Valley 1.0 started? Researchers/designers/scientists leave one company to start their own? Why is this so noteworthy?

    • prevent Intel from using their Monopoly to crush you.

      What monopoly?

      Lately, Intel has been a crushee, not a crusher.

  • by Mr. Dollar Ton ( 5495648 ) on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:45PM (#65432906)

    Big Beautiful Chip would have done it.

  • I have never been very impressed with the level of hype in Cerebras's self-promotion, but their ridiculously large [cerebras.ai] chips currently hold the title for "biggest, baddest CPU" and will not be easy to displace.

  • First, RISC-V being open source will result in widespread and extraordinary development. Much of it will be successful in enhancing performance, losing power consumption, and introducing new capabilities.

    Second, this team might be thinking of the next big leap forward, something entirely new, leapfrogging RISC-V, maybe keeping the open source advantage.

    But RISC-V will win, it will advance behind its only true competition, ARM, and leaving the other major legacy players behind.

    • 2025 = Year of the RISC-V desktop!!! ... O wait that still hasn't happened for Linux so yea not going to happen.

      • Desktop is so 90s...

      • 2025 = Year of the RISC-V desktop!!! ... O wait that still hasn't happened for Linux so yea not going to happen.

        We have already had the Year of the Linux Desktop. Surprisingly, it was the Year of Linux on the Windows Desktop. As Microsoft allowed Windows users to run various Graphical Linux distributions on the Windows Desktop using the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL2). Linux Distros install by the Microsoft App Store.

        However 2025 is The Year of the RISC-V microcontroller. $5 on the Raspberry Pi Pico 2 microcontroller. ARM and RISC-V cores.
        https://www.raspberrypi.com/pr... [raspberrypi.com]

        • No we didn't. Permission != Adoption. 99% of computer users in the world don't know what Linux is, much less use it in Windows, in a VM, or natively.

    • There's more to this than just the cpu. For a device like this to be truly useful you need a whole ecosystem around it. That means graphics, interfaces, and media extensions. If you have to pay for licenses on pieces of those, that knocks the value proposition of the open source cpu down quite a bit. When you buy x86 or ARM, you get all those things (mali, ssl accelerators, avx, pcie) that really make the modern computer so flexible and useful. If that sort of stuff gets open sourced as well, it could th
      • ARM and/or its licensees already use these elements, they license or co-license them. The premium is paid for the CPU. Of course, in mobile, the whole ecosystem needs to be considered. That's almost the easy part, unless the legacy partners (ARM, Intel, Samsung, etc) choose to leverage their positions and refuse to sell into the RISC-V market...

    • by rossdee ( 243626 )

      I'm waiting for RISC-VII
      or maybe RISC-VIII

      (Of course RISC-IX would be taken out by the Butlerian Jihad)

  • by abulafia ( 7826 )
    I gambled on bit of their stock after their big drop last year, but if their senior technical folks are bailing, time to get out.
    • by piojo ( 995934 )

      I gambled on bit of their stock after their big drop last year, but if their senior technical folks are bailing, time to get out.

      Any time you say "I see a signal so it's time to sell/buy", the actual time was weeks ago. Unless you are an electronic trader responding to freshly published information.

      That's not saying you shouldn't sell. But this news could already be built into the price, and it could be time to buy. It's really hard to tell.

  • The article doesn't say if these people were bound by some kind of noncompete agreement. If they were, that could be a big hurdle for them.

    • The article doesn't say if these people were bound by some kind of noncompete agreement. If they were, that could be a big hurdle for them.

      In Oregon the noncompetes seem to be limited, focused on trade secrets and customer relationships. So general CPU architecture design and development experience is not prohibited. The timespan is also limited to 12-months, which of course does not end an obligation to protect a former employer's trade secrets.

  • "Risc is good".

  • Start focusing on clock speed and core count again. Stop trying to make chips that go faster by predicting the future in ways that are highly exploitable by malware.

    • by drnb ( 2434720 )

      Start focusing on clock speed and core count again. Stop trying to make chips that go faster by predicting the future in ways that are highly exploitable by malware.

      They would if they could, but Physics has something to say about faster clock speeds. Intel has been telling devs for decades that future gains will mainly be through additional cores. I suppose you can add dedicated coprocessors too, like GPUs.

      • by HiThere ( 15173 )

        I think "dedicated coprocessors" are going to have longer traces, and thus be slower, unless, perhaps, you connect them with an optical link. (That, of course, has its own problems.)

    • by Jeremi ( 14640 )

      Stop trying to make chips that go faster by predicting the future in ways that are highly exploitable by malware.

      That seems like short-term thinking. A better approach would be to figure out how to do the future-prediction optimizations in ways that malware cannot exploit, so we can reap the benefits of the optimizations.

  • by drnb ( 2434720 ) on Friday June 06, 2025 @08:47PM (#65433103)
    FWIW, RISC-V is available on the Raspberry Pi Pico 2 microcontroller for $5. So getting familiar with the basic architecture will be pretty inexpensive. The Pico 2 has both ARM and RISC-V cores. I believe it recognize what software was flashed to the device and starts the appropriate cores. What would be really cool is if the next Raspberry Pi single board computer (An embedded Linux SBC) adds RISC-V too.

    "The unique dual-core, dual-architecture capability of RP2350 allows users to choose between a pair of industry-standard Arm Cortex-M33 cores, and a pair of open-hardware Hazard3 cores, giving developers a chance to experiment with the RISCV architecture in a stable, well-supported environment."
    https://www.raspberrypi.com/pr... [raspberrypi.com]
    • I believe correct. I run mine in arm mode, but this is from the datasheet. "As a result, the USB bootloader, which runs on both Arm and RISC-V, can accept a UF2 image download for either architecture, and automatically boot it using the correct processors." The pico 2 is quite a bit more complex than the old one. Pretty amazing for the few bucks. I've also picked up a wifi version for some projects.
    • Newer ESP32s also.
  • "call me Zilog" . . .

    perhaps they could call this processor the "Z80,000" :)

  • “Together, the four founders of Beaverton startup AheadComputing spent nearly a century at Intel.” .. and still can't design a MMU that can sucessfully isolate process memory.
  • These people sound very skilled and ambitious and may come up with an extra-snazzy RISC-V implementation, but there is already a lot of that out there. Maybe they can design devices that run Linux fast enough and cheap enough to sell as a commodity product. More power to them.

    The real money at this point is in Nvidia-scale hardware and the associated software. As the article stated, the "professor who teaches microprocessor design and computer architecture" is "skeptical that it can prevail as the industry

  • by RitchCraft ( 6454710 ) on Friday June 06, 2025 @10:34PM (#65433337)

    I've heard this before: Transmeta, IDT, Cyrix, NexGen, Chips & Tech, TI, UMC, etc.. They all announced the next big CPU too but most either didn't live up to their claim or were bought out by the big usual suspects.

    • by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Saturday June 07, 2025 @03:35AM (#65433543)

      Interesting name you put first. Transmeta's failure was one of timing. The thought of a processor focused on low thermal and power envelope was simply not understood and their product fobbed off as irrelevant. If they had started a decade later they may very well have become the ARM of today, a name I chose to write to demonstrate that yes it is actually possible for an outside company to enter the computing CPU market and in some cases even dominate (see Apple)

      • by Saffaya ( 702234 )

        It is my understanding that the VLIW model hinged on the compiler doing the critical work, but no one ever managed to write such a compiler.

      • I actually gave Transmeta a try years ago. I purchased a Compaq TC1000 tablet PC and the product was very well thought out. The Transmeta CPU though was hugely under powered for the task. A coworker of mine purchased the TC1100 a year later that contained a Pentium M CPU and it made the tablet amazing. His battery life was right on par with mine as well even though the Transmeta CPU was supposed to be superior in this regard. I also used a few of those Cyrix upgrade CPUs back in the 386/486 days. They were

  • RISC hasn't been new for decades.
    RISC V isn't new either. There are many players already.

    Neither can be the foundation for a major new player unless the founders are idiots and I doubt they are.

    So, whatever wrinkle will set them apart is something not disclosed in TFA or any other source I have found.

  • by Shazatoga ( 614011 ) on Saturday June 07, 2025 @02:16AM (#65433507)
    This looks to be the engineers who left Intel after Pat Gelsinger killed Beast Lake. Beast Lake was the Jim Keller design that replaced SMT with rent-able units (rent-able units are where special hardware cores combine to be a single virtual core. Think the opposite of SMT).
    • Plain old SMT does that, just not to a very large degree. It runs two threads, on shared resources where a resource can be "rented" by one thread or the other.

  • âoeThe people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.â â" Steve Jobs Best of luck to these bold and inspiring folk.
  • reads like an 80s ad.... Risc is the future Risc is so much faster, we are going to build a risc design...

  • There has always been a better way, but stubborn fascination with x86 has held the chip industry back for decades. It is definitely time to move on and I'm glad someone has taken it up.

  • Maybe there is still some room for more massively parallel processing for internet services with tiny cores or massive SMT? SPARC tried the latter but failed, but you never know.

    Just making traditional CPUs, but with different ISA, for servers is unlikely to do much. Because of all the speculation the ISA is only an abstraction, which combined with the ocean of cache makes the ISA mostly irrelevant.

In Nature there are neither rewards nor punishments, there are consequences. -- R.G. Ingersoll

Working...