Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Businesses AI

Private Equity CEO Predicts AI Will Leave 60% of Finance Conference Attendees Jobless (entrepreneur.com) 73

Robert F. Smith, CEO of Vista Equity Partners, told attendees at the SuperReturn International 2025 conference in Berlin last week that 60% of the 5,500 finance professionals present will be "looking for work" next year due to AI disruption.

Smith predicted that while 40% of attendees will adopt AI agents -- programs that autonomously perform complex, multi-step tasks -- the remaining majority will need to find new employment as AI transforms the sector. "All of the jobs currently carried out by one billion knowledge workers today would change due to AI," Smith said, clarifying that while jobs won't disappear entirely, they will fundamentally transform.

Private Equity CEO Predicts AI Will Leave 60% of Finance Conference Attendees Jobless

Comments Filter:
  • But that doesn't mean we aren't facing significant technological unemployment in the very near future.

    We already have massive amounts of technological and employment due to factories being automated. 70% of middle class jobs lost since 1980 got taken by automation and process improvement.

    Our entire civilization is built on two basic concepts. First rapid population growth and second full employment.

    Both of those pillars are collapsing and since we grew up with them we refuse to adapt or change.
    • I don't know what problem a war would solve. The right answer is to focus on space travel, since AI and automation will make it easier to build space stations and colonies.
      • by HiThere ( 15173 )

        I'm all in favor of space travel, but that's not going to solve the social problems on earth, and we don't yet have the ability to run a small self-sufficient stable society in an off-earth environment.

        I do support space habitats, but I tend to think of that as a "next century" (or after the singularity) kind of thing.

        What a large war does is kill of a large proportion of the most aggressive young males. It's one of the traditional ways the current crop of alpha-male primates keep control.

      • How will those "colonies" (that are a fantasy, as we have no technology to make them feasible) will help exactly? You think they won't carry the "AI" there if it works as advertised by the people like the speaker?

      • by gtall ( 79522 )

        Sure, how many people do you think we can transport up there for how long (before their immune systems give out)? Ah, but you say, we'll have the ground support staff to send people into space; to do what, precisely? Increase the GDP? How will that happen? Magic?

    • by MeNeXT ( 200840 )

      Our entire civilization is built on two basic concepts. First rapid population growth and second full employment.

      There are more people employed today as a percentage of the population than ever. The world population continues to grow. Not sure how you came to that conclusion.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Indeed. The thing is that we have enough productivity that most people could luve on their present level witt 10-20h of work per week. The reason most work more are inefficience, make-work, bureaucrats wanting as many subordinates as possible and the like. While "AI" cannot do real work, it can help indentifying all that wasted time. And without a reform that reduces worked hour per person, many people will be out of work, while other will continue to work much more than needed.

      Full employment is a thing of

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by guinsu ( 198732 )

      Unlimited growth is a feature of capitalist economies, not "all civilizations". Most civilizations throughout history in fact had a lot to say about excessive growth, greed and accumulation.

      As for full employment, capitalist societies are not based on full employment. They require a mass of unemployed people to discipline labor and keep wages low.

  • Certainly Mr. Smith would like for AI to replace millions of people in the finance sector. But if you eliminate 60% of finance workers and make the remaining 40% dependent on AI to do their jobs, it's going to really narrow down future training data. AI will be consuming its own output.

    • The worst part about it is, by the time it's clear to everyone there is a problem, the people left will be too stupid to figure out what that problem actually is, let alone how to fix it. It will be clear that there's massive population decline and both the economy and natural environment are non-functioning, but most of them will barely be able to spell or do basic arithmetic without the help of the massive computer cluster that's eating everything.

    • The first person AI should replace are the CEO's in companies. Look at the job. I mean, it's perfect for AI to be trained to do overall. Limited inputs, curated information, and so on meaning easy to train. You could pay for the hardware, a team of people to keep it running, and still have a TON of money left over from those fat CEO compensation packages. You could expand the people that interact with your clients, increase the pay - benefits package for them, improving customer satisfaction. Even doing tha
      • Don't forget the ability to be glib, lie convincingly, make up facts when it suits them, and a total lack of empathy. AIs would make ideal CEOs, Banksters, Politicians, or other sociopaths.
    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      AI trained on stolen data has no future. Generating that training data in other ways (but you _cannot_ use AI) is massively too much effort at this time. Hence the current AI hype will be over in a few years because this problem has no fix.

    • by Hadlock ( 143607 )

      Probably in 3-10 years there will be a handful of open, legally copyright free training sets anyone can use to train their own ~600b class model with whatever architecture is current state of the art. Researchers are already putting together 7b training sets like this. And LLMs can use tools like search now so they won't always need the most up to date news or info - they can use tools for that instead. Most of finance is analysis of documents, which LLMs have been excellent at for a while now.

  • Robert F. Smith, CEO of Vista Equity Partners, told attendees [...] 60% of the 5,500 finance professionals present will be "looking for work" next year due to AI

    ...

    Smith said, clarifying that while jobs won't disappear entirely, they will fundamentally transform.

    "You're going to lose your job.... oh but not really."

  • "60% of the 5,500 finance professionals present will be "looking for work" next year due to AI disruption."

    Super optimistic or deeply cynical take from Robert F. Smith.

    It sounds like he thinks that AI is either "primed and ready to make solid decisions and not hallucinate bankrupt Private Equity firms", or "that 60% of the people in Private Equity are so useless that hallucinating LLMs can replace them".

    Probably more thinking of keeping more of the money "in-house" with the wealth class as it seems like Pri

    • The conference is aimed at decision makers, which means they spend most of their time researching and then based on some company based formulas they decided the amount of money they are willing to risk on someone else's dream.
      that sounds like a perfect job that LLM AIs can easily do. Switch to some system programmed with your companies formulas and let review everything, impartially, and then have that last 40% doing a final review and you can see where he is removing that 60%.
    • by HiThere ( 15173 )

      Perhaps he thinks that in his field hallucinations don't matter. Perhaps he's right. I remember a famous elephant that beat the stock market. (I think it was also done with other animals.) Also see "A Random Walk through Wall Street"

    • Under-regulated capital aggregation is inherently vampiric and cannibalistic. And it gives oxygen to the accelerationist losers/terrorists.
  • These must be those car warranty scammers I keep hearing about. If that's the case, I have no issue with them being out of job.

  • by PubJeezy ( 10299395 ) on Monday June 09, 2025 @09:48PM (#65439117)
    Why would anyone care what this guy has to say? He's the Sammy The Bull of private equity. He was running a massively dirty shop and ended up being implicated in the largest tax fraud case in the history of the country. He was using his fund and offshore accounts to help a billionaire, Robert Brockman, cheat taxes.

    And this isn't my opinion. This is the DOJ's opinion. This is Robert F. Smith's own opinion. He signed a non-prosecution agreement admitting to all of this...and then Brockman's lawyer died of "suicide" and Brockman died from dementia.

    So the entire world found out that Robert F Smith wasn't an expert investor, he was a fraudster AND a snitch.

    And here it is, the non-prosecution agreement signed by Robert F Smith. This proves he isn't loyal to his clients and that he isn't honest about his business: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr... [justice.gov]
  • I was curious about what "finance professionals" do, maybe there is more variety than I realized, but no.

    An investment firm I do business with has a human agent assigned to me and he offered to perform a detailed analysis, sounded useful. The first step was data gathering. I filled out a lengthy form listing all my assets and liabilities, my risk level, my goals hopes and dreams, etc. Then we had a video meeting to discuss it. It was clear that he had plugged the form data into a software utility that gener

    • Well here's what one very specific "finance professional" did for a living: https://www.justice.gov/archiv... [justice.gov]

      The guy praising AI is a confessed tax cheat and government informant. This article is about a liar promoting a product no one wants. It's pathetic. entrepreneur.com is a marketing platform, not a journalistic endeavor.

      Slashdot needs to change it's tagline from "News for Nerds" to something like "Ads for Sads".
  • by egarland ( 120202 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @02:19AM (#65439417)

    Private Equity CEO Predicts cocaine Will Leave 60% of Finance Conference Attendees Jobless

    Robert F. Smith, CEO of Vista Equity Partners, told attendees at the SuperReturn International 2025 conference in Berlin last week that 60% of the 5,500 finance professionals present will be "looking for work" next year due to cocaine disruption.

    Smith predicted that while 40% of attendees will adopt cocaine agents -- programs that autonomously perform complex, multi-step tasks -- the remaining majority will need to find new employment as cocaine transforms the sector. "All of the jobs currently carried out by one billion knowledge workers today would change due to cocaine," Smith said, clarifying that while jobs won't disappear entirely, they will fundamentally transform.

  • it kills 99% of all known germs dead!
    • Oh, that's what Mike says he's going to get for the toilet in "The Young Ones" episode titled "Sick"! I could never quite make it out. Thought it started with a "p".
  • Finance won't be leaving the people who put the infrastructure together jobless any time soon. Too bad I refuse to work for the finance industry any more. Something about being chained to a desk while being forced to perform demeaning tricks for quarterly bonuses. They can put their 300k jobs where the sun don't shine.

  • Less 10% taker w4nk3rs all round. Sounds good. Bring it on.

  • Hallucination from AI can boost stock prices more than even President Trump. We are on the right track here. AI that ignores facts, invents evidence, and gives the requested results will make any realists, sceptics, truth sayers etc in finance a thing of the past. What could possible go wrong.

    And we know everybody in big money are very honest, and would never do anything for money, or to cover up mistakes.

    *** sarcasm off ***

    AI is great with words, can help with code. But when it comes to hard facts, then A

  • On one hand, they provide resources to businesses to grow, which is beneficial for society. On the other, they do seem to trap resources in their own little cycles and have perverse little effects on corporate behavior. Like shortened planning windows and outsized influence of fund managers.

    Adding lawyers reduces GDP according to some studies, while engineers increase GDP. Has anyone done any research on the net impact of adding more financiers?

  • ... significance if all goes well. That's a good thing, by and large. It's called post-scarcity-economy and in a perfect world it's capitalisms end game.

  • But even without AI, they should be jobless.

  • It will cost a million dollars and you owe $10k/month in health insurance fees. Air conditioning cost $300k but you can rent it instead like everyone does. Brought to you by Brawndo, The Thirst Mutilator.
  • They convince investors that they will be able to slash jobs and increase profits at the same time. This is exactly the same, but with the added phrase "using AI." Its the same old swindle.

A slow pup is a lazy dog. -- Willard Espy, "An Almanac of Words at Play"

Working...