
Meetings After 8 p.m. Are On the Rise, Microsoft Study Finds (bloomberg.com) 77
Meetings starting after 8 p.m. are up 16% compared to a year ago, and at 10 p.m. almost a third of active workers are still monitoring their inboxes, according to research from Microsoft. Bloomberg: The company's annual work trends study, which is based on aggregated and anonymized data from Microsoft 365 users and a global survey of 31,000 desk workers, also found that almost 20% of employees actively working weekends are checking email before noon on Saturdays and Sundays [non-paywalled source], while over 5% are active on email again on Sunday evenings, gearing up for the start of the work week.
[...] Meetings are often spontaneous. Some 57% of the gatherings tallied by Microsoft came together without a calendar invite, and even 10% of scheduled meetings were booked at the last minute. [...] Mass emails, those which loop in more than 20 participants, are on the rise, climbing 7% from last year.
[...] Meetings are often spontaneous. Some 57% of the gatherings tallied by Microsoft came together without a calendar invite, and even 10% of scheduled meetings were booked at the last minute. [...] Mass emails, those which loop in more than 20 participants, are on the rise, climbing 7% from last year.
Haha (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah good luck with that. You want me to attend a meeting at 8pm from my home? Fine then you're getting billed for time.
Re: (Score:2)
Fine then you're getting billed for time.
Incorrect response - some manager will believe that THEIR meeting is SO important that it's worth paying for (and you said it's fine if they pay). Even if they pay time-and-a-half for extra time, it's still almost certainly not worth the intrusion into your life... living a life outside of work is worth more than some extra $$.
Which, that's kind of a privileged point of view, because I've never needed to work more than one office-hours job to survive. I've been on-call, but that's kind of a necessity in my
Re: Haha (Score:5, Insightful)
Except this is really about having meetings with India.
Re: (Score:3)
Don't be so quick to generalise. Many countries have offices around the globe. I myself host a meeting that is attended by people in US Eastern Time, US Central Time, UK time, Central European Time, Gulf Standard Time, India Standard Time, Australian Western Time, and Eastern Indonesia Time.
And those attending from India Standard Time are marked as optional, in fact the meeting I host predated us opening any India office for engineering work by a decade.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, well in my history of US-based companies doing any kind of tech work, it's always India. And in my experience, right now, due to Trump's TCJA R&D tax grenade, companies are trying to move work back to India again. Since the BBB is once again putting the R&D tax breaks on a fuse set to blow up after he leaves office, companies aren't changing course.
Re: (Score:2)
So training your replacement then? Pass.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet I kept working there longer than I should have. Sigh.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, you're salaried. No overtime for you.
Why do you *think* they list you as management, other than to call you "salaried", and not pay *anything* more. Your life is theirs.
Re: (Score:1)
Of course, I also get paid that if I work 35h a week, and the base salary is... well, embarrassingly good, so I don't feel too shitty about it.
Not good for the whole work-life balance thing, for sure, but I mean... why not burn the candle at both ends for a while if you can, if it helps you pull a top 1.5% individual income?
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, you're salaried. No overtime for you.
Why do you *think* they list you as management, other than to call you "salaried", and not pay *anything* more. Your life is theirs.
Hardly. You have to look at what you are paid. My life is definitely mine, but there are times when something needs done. Especially when we live on a globe, where it isn't the same time in each zone. If I'm dealing with ten different people in ten different zones, it just won't fit into a nice little box.
But that aside, while I don't get paid hourly, I get a lot more in my paycheck. Even compared to if I was paid overtime because if I was an hourly worker I'd be paid less.
Consider that there are peo
Re: Haha (Score:3)
And some meetings seem have weird hours because the attendants cover multiple timezones.
Re: (Score:1)
If it becomes attending the meeting or having the H-1B or B1 visa holder (it is common for companies to bring B1 visa holders over and rotate them out every 179 days) will be more than happy to take your job because he is more than happy to be earning what he does and if the B1 guy gets fired, he gets deported, so he will do what he is asked no matter what... you likely will attend the meeting.
Always funny when people say they won't, but if the job is on the line, and in this economy where people don't los
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah good luck with that. You want me to attend a meeting at 8pm from my home? Fine then you're getting billed for time.
Ah yes - I take it that you never will deal with different time zones?
For you see, it is many different time zones in this big ol globe, and by golly, we sometimes have meetings, when the meeting needs held. And there is no way that it will be worldwide at the same local time. And occasionally, it ain't even the same day! I show up for the meeting. when it is called, usually by Universal time, and if it is at a time I'm not at work, so what?
These are great things to know before hiring someone!
Re: (Score:2)
It's part of my salary package, I don't have any legal right to refuse. I can either not do it and get fired or quit.
Re: Haha (Score:2)
At double rate, at the very least. I religiously clock out at 5pm.
Nightmare Workplaces += AI Bullshit Story (Score:3)
This article describes what a nightmare workplace looks like that everybody should avoid. If you work in one of these companies, start looking for other work before you are no longer able to mentally function and the amount of prescription and non-prescription drugs overwhelms your system.
If you work in IT or do On-Call work then you will be asked to do something after hours and it's normal if there is an outage or some kind of a serious issue or a project is about to go live and you need extra preparation due to an unusual event, but if this is your constant workflow then you are screwed and also inefficient.
At the end of the article it throws the idea of being an agent boss where you use the Microsoft AI to do more useless AI slot production to help you work and produce more useless bullshit
Re:Nightmare Workplaces += AI Bullshit Story (Score:5, Insightful)
The current political situation means things aren't going to get better either. The massive tax cut going through the US Senate right now is going to spook the bond markets and lead to a deep deep recession. The people pushing the law through know this so they have scheduled it all to hit 2 weeks after the midterm elections. The 800 billion in Medicaid cuts aren't going to help either. You can't take almost a trillion dollars out of the economy and hand it to the 1% and not see a massive impact. Rural hospitals will be shutting down. And all the economic activity that goes with them.
I don't think people realize how screwed we are yet. We may be heading into a new Great depression. Basically everything is lined up for it. A pointless trade war. Multiple real wars. A shock in the bond market from out of control trickle down economics and the goal of being the first trillionaires (admittedly it was billionaires back in the day)...
And then you have climate change causing food shortages and natural disasters they're all being mismanaged plus you've got bird flu also being mismanaged by a man who literally said you shouldn't ask him for medical advice.
We put absolute lunatics and psychopaths in charge of everything. Bad things are going to happen and it can't be stopped now.
Re: (Score:2)
You have also fallen for the broken window fallacy vis-a-vis Medicaid, if we don't have fraud in Medicaid that money can be used elsewhere.
You're completely right- however, if you have any desire to look at it with an even hand- then you also recognize there's no actual intent to combat fraud. The goal is to get rid of the fraud by getting rid of the Medicaid.
You're responding to bait (Score:2)
The point I made was that removing the 800 billion dollars in Medicaid spending will devastate the economy.
What he's trying to do is ignore that and get us into a discussion of whether or not there is $800 billion dollars in fraud because he can't win discussing the point I made. Which is that rural hospitals are going to collapse along with our economy and we're all going to lose our fucking jobs.
Right wingers will always always always try to change the s
Re: (Score:2)
It'd be a pretty major kick to the ankle- for sure. Not pleasant. Devastating? Very much no.
What it *will* devastate is very fragile parts of the economy, and peoples lives who are already in a fragile state due to them not fitting well into the economy.
It's a big deal- but it's going to have precisely zero effect on the majority of people, so calling it devastating just isn't rational.
Nice bait (Score:3)
Bottom line everything Biden tried to do was stopped by Republican extremists so that American voters would blame Biden for the chaos caused by republicans.
America is in a hostage situation with the Republicans the terrorists and the Democrats trying to stop the terrorists from shooting the hostages.
And the mother fucking hosta
Re: (Score:2)
He is still butt hurt more people showed up for the "No Queens" event held back on 11/5/24 than this past weekends TDS support group gatherings, and can't admit that he really disappointed we have not experienced run away inflation due to the tariffs he promised we would.
Cut him slack though, it has to be hard being wrong about everything every time.
When you end up posting this nonsense (Score:2)
So far I've watched multiple face eating leopards devouring right wingers and I have yet to see a single one actually have a moment of clarity.
The Republican party was best summed up by a woman who said "he's not hurting the people he's supposed to be hurting"
Re: (Score:1)
Say what you want about Biden but he did more to "stimulate" and build manufacturing in the USA. Señor TACO acts tough like he is bringing manufacturing back but this completely remains to be seen. What little jobs that could come from modern manufacturing takes sincerity, capital, incentives/rebates/grants/cheap-loans, and an educated and available work force for this to happen. The administration is not inspiring me in any way on these. The modern republican party only knows how to sow the seeds of a
Re: (Score:2)
The US already manufactures a lot. Like a lot, a lot.
We employ about 1/20th as many people as China in manufacturing, to generate about 1/2 of their output. The US is a world leader in manufacturing, including, unlike the Chinese- people working in the sector making really good money, and having very high per-capita production.
But that's also the problem.
It's not that we don't have an educated and available work-force, it's that the kind of shit he wants manufactured here simply isn't e
Re: (Score:2)
That egg price spike? Caused by all the flock purges in response to bird flu.
Inaction was better than what happened this year. We could at least freely trade eggs with Canada before the tariffs wrecked that. It is far cheaper to ship eggs to Canada and import them from other parts of Canada elsewhere than to ship cross-country.
Re: Nightmare Workplaces += AI Bullshit Story (Score:2)
Medicaid fraud is quite rare, and if someone commits deliberate fraud the welfare cops can and will come after them for it. People who don't have money are eligible to Medicaid, so recovery is very possible. Remember, it's not fraud unless someone gets benefits because they lie.
Re: (Score:2)
What did you expect Biden to do about the massive purges of chickens? Hatch more himself? Why is Trump getting credit for the natural recovery of the flocks? Why isn't that the proper response?
"Fraud" in Medicaid" Show it. Go ahead. Come up with REAL BILLIONS of fraud found in Medicaid. I'll wait for your sources.
You are simply dodging the original question with some made up bullshit, like MAGA always do.
Re: (Score:1)
Because the taco (Score:2)
This doesn't mean that tons and tons of people haven't lost their jobs or the bad shit hasn't hit. Also his cuts to foreign aid have given China enormous power and the rest of the world and directly killed 300,000 people.
The problem here is you
Re: (Score:2)
Trump always chickens out.
He does- and that's what you need to not forget. The dude is a moron. His levers of power, while considerable, are not more powerful than the economic output of the United States.
In terms of "shit, this economy isn't looking good", we're not even at an interesting point historically.
You're talking about something larger than the Great Depression, when it's unlikely we'll match the Great Recession.
You're panicking- and there simply isn't a reason for it.
Re: (Score:2)
He just reversed his exemption of farms and restaurants from ICE raids.
The fact that he had a 6th sense for good showmanship and was able to engage it even after being fired upon doesn't mean he isn't a bitch who will always crumple under pressure.
Re: Because the taco (Score:2)
We never saw him get shot.
His doctor claimed he had a hole in his ear the size of a fucking penny, which is so much bullshit on every level that you have to be among the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet to believe it.
Re: (Score:2)
USD is taking a hit. https://tradingeconomics.com/u... [tradingeconomics.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Now turn that fucking map to 10Y, FFS.
Re: Nightmare Workplaces += AI Bullshit Story (Score:2)
It's going to keep getting hit as long as the orange shitgibbon is in office, and there will surely be knock-on effects, so a ten year scale is not wholly satisfying either.
Re: (Score:2)
Right now, it's not even historically interesting.
For now- a 10Y scale is perfectly satisfying, because it demonstrates that fearmongering and doomsday talk is pretty fucking premature.
Re: (Score:2)
What tax cut?
They are merely making permanent the current tax levels we have NOW...otherwise eveyrone's taxes are going to jump way up....
As for the rest of your rant...wow, you sounds like a nervous nelly, how are you able to sleep at night being so frighten the sky is falling and that climate change will send us to the Stone Age in the next year or so....
I'm still always confused at your worry about the US and how we conduct our business here, s
Re: (Score:2)
The current political situation means things aren't going to get better either.
Those under 25 might find themselves with a new job as a military conscript late next year.
Re: (Score:2)
And if so, it may well turn out to be the best thing that's ever happened to them, although they probably won't believe it at the time. Not only will they get food, shelter and a paycheck out of it, they'll come away with some new and marketable skills as well. And, once they're out, they'll have access to subsidized schooling to put a polish on those skills and low cost world-class medical care for the rest of t
Meeting some of the dumbest people (Score:2)
Yea, a great adventure. I'm sure young Russians in Ukraine would agree. The neurotoxins that riddled my uncle's body after the Vietnam War certainly shaped his adult life.
Re: Nightmare Workplaces += AI Bullshit Story (Score:2)
I don't assume that the draft age will not be expanded. Assumptions which once seemed safe now appear quaint.
Re: (Score:2)
The only thing that can save the USA at this point is a revolution. Taking Trump and his associates out and execute them publically as a reminder for the next would be dictators and incompetent fools that ruining a country carries a price tag.
Re: (Score:2)
This article describes what a nightmare workplace looks like that everybody should avoid.
You're generalising. Having calls out of hours does not mean you're working for a nightmare place. I have calls out of hours all the time. In fact I have one at 9pm tonight to deal with an issue in the USA and I have one at 5am on Friday to deal with an issue in West Papua. But I would wager I have a better work life balance than 100% of Americans on Slashdot. Just because some people are connected to meetings supporting a global engineering workforce doesn't mean we are overworking and doesn't mean we can'
Re: (Score:2)
This article describes what a nightmare workplace looks like that everybody should avoid.
You're generalising. Having calls out of hours does not mean you're working for a nightmare place. I have calls out of hours all the time. In fact I have one at 9pm tonight to deal with an issue in the USA and I have one at 5am on Friday to deal with an issue in West Papua. But I would wager I have a better work life balance than 100% of Americans on Slashdot. Just because some people are connected to meetings supporting a global engineering workforce doesn't mean we are overworking and doesn't mean we can't switch off when we need to.
I worked last Saturday. *GASP!* *SHOCK*. But that isn't the full story is it, you didn't ask me if I went to work on Monday.
Flexibility goes two ways and the article doesn't even remotely provide enough information as to whether it is a two way relationship or not.
Same here. My work schedule is all over the place, stuff happens when it happens. And I don't mind at all.
And my work/life balance is just fine. Now I don't know how your situation is, but one of the things I get in compensation for my flexibility is money. So I get to take a lot of vacations to interesting places. I get to buy a lot of my big-boy toys. That's the old work hard, play hard thing.
I think perhaps a lot of people just hate working period, so spending a second longer at work, or a late mee
Working with people in other countries/emergencies (Score:5, Insightful)
Occasional meetings, planned well in advance, with people on the other side of the world, in the late evening are acceptable.
Genuine emergency meetings at short notice, also acceptable.
Effectively being on call every evening and at the weekend (without getting paid for being on call), not acceptable
Re: (Score:1)
I'd question how pressing an after-hours emergency was. Most of them, I've found, can and should wait for the next day, but that one impatient jerk won't want to.
And if it's a scheduled meeting, it had better be for a maintenance window or with someone in a wildly different time zone. Otherwise, bite me. I don't plan on being sober that late.
And there's no way in hell I'm checking my work email on the weekend.
Go and smell grass .. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If you think the company will appricate you working evenings and weekends then you are deluded. Clock out at 05:00 and go and smell grass.
Just part of my job. Don't feel too badly though I'm well compensated. And when there's no immediate work, I'm still paid.
Don't do one extra second of work because doing nothing is the real goal.
Re: (Score:3)
Just don't inhale...
Check out at 0500? (Score:2)
Having started at 2100? ;)
Never (Score:2)
Never attended a meeting past 5PM. No will I.
Re: (Score:1)
Never attended a meeting past 5PM. No will I.
The development team I worked in for decades spanned at least 7 time zones across five continents.
There’s no way that rule would have worked.
We took turns sacrificing nights or sometimes very early mornings.
But at least weekends were off limits, and “comp time” was quite freely available.
Yes but why seven time zones (Score:2)
What added value did it have to have the team sprayed across the world?
OTOH it makes any suggestion of requiring a return to the office inconceivable.
Bargaining power (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you're good at your job you can tell your boss when you're willing to work, within reason. If you're not, in the end you'll be working under some combination of pay that's too low, a workplace that sucks, (because you don't have the proven skills to go elsewhere) bad or long hours, and/or other problems. It's universal.
There are some careers that do not fit into a week where you always start at the same time, take a break at the same time, Lunch at the same time, second break at the same time, then leave exactly at the same time. Although I've worked with people who try to do that in the past.
I have one of those jobs that just do not work with that rigid concept. Some of my days are long, and some are short. But I'm results oriented, do not consider work as anathema nor do I hate the people I work for.
And the canard
According to research? (Score:4, Funny)
Is that the research defined somewhere in the middle of the 30 pages privacy policy of a Microsoft account?
after 8 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It's up to you (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who do you think stands to land the job? The person who lays out their demands for working hours or the one who displays flexibility?
Don't get me wrong, I think it sucks some people are stuck having to spend so much of what should be personal time on their job but your advice sounds like a great way to not get a job.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not suggesting that anyone should "lay out their demands for working hours." In every position, one needs some flexibility. However, especially in white collar jobs, employment contracts are not uncommon, and these should spell out the employee's responsibilities as well as the employer's requirements. When someone is hired, it is under certain obligations for both sides. What's being described above is expectations made by the employer *after* the employee has been hired.
To look at it another way: if s
Meetings vs. email (Score:2)
I can see checking your email late, if you're part of a small shop - assuming that 1) you willingly agreed to it when you accepted the job + 2) it is balanced out by flexibility during the traditional workday. This is pretty much my situation... and I have to say no one foisted it on me, I just find it less stressful to make myself aware of any issues when they happen (in the end, I'm left to decide whether to deal with them right away or leave them for the next day) versus walking into a wall of distressed
Wait, could it be a consequence (Score:1)