
'Fossil' Discovered Beyond Pluto Implies 'Something Dramatic' Happened 400M Years Ago (space.com) 63
"The distant reaches of the Solar System are still mysterious," writes ScienceAlert. "Not much sunlight pierces these regions, and there are strong hints that undiscovered objects lurk there. The objects that astronomers have discovered in these dim reaches are primordial, and their orbits suggest the presence of more undiscovered objects."
And now thanks to the giant 8.2-meter Subaru telescope at Hawaii's Mauna Kea Observatory, astronomers have discovered "a massive new solar system body located beyond the orbit of Pluto," reports Space.com. The weird elongated orbit of the object suggests that if "Planet Nine" exists, it is much further from the sun than thought, or it has been ejected from our planetary system altogether.
The strange orbit of the object, designated 2023 KQ14 and nicknamed "Ammonite," classifies it as a "sednoid." Sednoids are bodies beyond the orbit of the ice giant Neptune, known as trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), characterized by a highly eccentric (non-circular) orbit and a distant closest approach to the sun or "perihelion." The closest distance that 2023 KQ14 ever comes to our star is equivalent to 71 times the distance between Earth and the sun... This is just the fourth known sednoid, and its orbit is currently different from that of its siblings, though it seems to have been stable for 4.5 billion years.
However, the team behind the discovery, made using Subaru Telescope as part of the Formation of the Outer Solar System: An Icy Legacy (FOSSIL) survey, thinks that all four sednoids were on similar orbits around 4.2 billion years ago. That implies something dramatic happened out at the edge of the solar system around 400 million years after its birth. Not only does the fact that 2023 KQ14 now follows a unique orbit suggest that the outer solar system is more complex and varied than previously thought, but it also places limits on a hypothetical "Planet Nine" theorized to lurk at the edge of the solar system.
There's "no viable transfer mechanisms" to explain the observed orbits "with the current configuration of planets," according to the team's recently-published paper. But since those orbits are stable, it "suggests that an external gravitational influence beyond those of the currently known Solar System planets is required to form their orbits." So where does that leave us? ScienceAlert summarizes the rest of the paper — and where things stand now: Astronomers have proposed many sources for this external gravitational influence, including interactions with a rogue planet or star, ancient stellar interactions from when the Sun was still in its natal cluster, and the capture of objects from other lower-mass stars in the Solar System's early times. But the explanation that gets the most attention is interactions with a hypothetical planet, Planet Nine.
If Planet Nine exists, it has a huge area to hide in. Some astronomers who have studied its potential existence think it could be the fifth largest planet in the Solar System. It would be so far away that it would be extremely dim. However, we may be on the cusp of detecting it, if it exists. The Vera Rubin Observatory recently saw first light and will begin its decade-long Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). The LSST will find transient events and objects in the Solar System like no other telescope before it. It's purpose-built to find hard-to-detect objects, and not even an elusive object like Planet Nine may be able to hide from it.
And now thanks to the giant 8.2-meter Subaru telescope at Hawaii's Mauna Kea Observatory, astronomers have discovered "a massive new solar system body located beyond the orbit of Pluto," reports Space.com. The weird elongated orbit of the object suggests that if "Planet Nine" exists, it is much further from the sun than thought, or it has been ejected from our planetary system altogether.
The strange orbit of the object, designated 2023 KQ14 and nicknamed "Ammonite," classifies it as a "sednoid." Sednoids are bodies beyond the orbit of the ice giant Neptune, known as trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), characterized by a highly eccentric (non-circular) orbit and a distant closest approach to the sun or "perihelion." The closest distance that 2023 KQ14 ever comes to our star is equivalent to 71 times the distance between Earth and the sun... This is just the fourth known sednoid, and its orbit is currently different from that of its siblings, though it seems to have been stable for 4.5 billion years.
However, the team behind the discovery, made using Subaru Telescope as part of the Formation of the Outer Solar System: An Icy Legacy (FOSSIL) survey, thinks that all four sednoids were on similar orbits around 4.2 billion years ago. That implies something dramatic happened out at the edge of the solar system around 400 million years after its birth. Not only does the fact that 2023 KQ14 now follows a unique orbit suggest that the outer solar system is more complex and varied than previously thought, but it also places limits on a hypothetical "Planet Nine" theorized to lurk at the edge of the solar system.
There's "no viable transfer mechanisms" to explain the observed orbits "with the current configuration of planets," according to the team's recently-published paper. But since those orbits are stable, it "suggests that an external gravitational influence beyond those of the currently known Solar System planets is required to form their orbits." So where does that leave us? ScienceAlert summarizes the rest of the paper — and where things stand now: Astronomers have proposed many sources for this external gravitational influence, including interactions with a rogue planet or star, ancient stellar interactions from when the Sun was still in its natal cluster, and the capture of objects from other lower-mass stars in the Solar System's early times. But the explanation that gets the most attention is interactions with a hypothetical planet, Planet Nine.
If Planet Nine exists, it has a huge area to hide in. Some astronomers who have studied its potential existence think it could be the fifth largest planet in the Solar System. It would be so far away that it would be extremely dim. However, we may be on the cusp of detecting it, if it exists. The Vera Rubin Observatory recently saw first light and will begin its decade-long Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). The LSST will find transient events and objects in the Solar System like no other telescope before it. It's purpose-built to find hard-to-detect objects, and not even an elusive object like Planet Nine may be able to hide from it.
Sednoids (Score:3, Funny)
Swollen areas in the vicinity of Sedna's bottom.
Fifth largest planet... (Score:2)
Sednoid... (Score:1)
That's pronounced "planet".
Learn to use a calendar. (Score:5, Informative)
"400 million years ago" is not "400 million years after it's birth"
Supposed to be "news for nerds", not "news for numbskulls".
Re:Learn to use a calendar. (Score:5, Insightful)
No kidding... I read the headline and was like "Whoa, is that the late Devonian extinction?" Nope... Hadean. Before even the late heavy bombardment...
T
Re: (Score:1)
Ammonites generally are fossils, rather than being discovered by FOSSIL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
They also date back to about 400 MYA, but that doesn't excuse the headline being wrong.....
Re: (Score:2)
Ammonites generally are fossils,
Yes, exactly... And they were almost completely wiped out by the Devonian extinction. The name itself adds to the confusion...
T
Re: (Score:2)
AIs are easily confused. In fact, it's their natural state.
Holy Tom Van Flandern, Batman (Score:3)
Yeah, I read it 400 million years ago instead of 400 million years after the solar system formation, aligning it with the catastrophism theories of Tom Van Flandern.
Is it irony week again? (Score:3)
Whats so confusing about 400 years after the birth of the solar system? Seems pretty clear to me.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing would be confusing about it if that's what was written. The summary says "400m years ago" - which is apparently incorrect.
Re: (Score:3)
"400 million years ago" is not "400 million years after it's birth"
Supposed to be "news for nerds", not "news for numbskulls".
Just to put that numbskull problem into perspective, every 12-month calendar on the planet is a rounding error based on religious events that occurred a blink of an eye ago according to the bigger picture. Not sure nitpicking really matters. Especially when we find out a century from now how wrong all of our estimates were. Which has happened a lot. A blink of an eye ago every numbskull believed a God in a chariot dragged the sun across the sky, with Earth being both the center of the universe and flat.
Re: Learn to use a calendar. (Score:2)
Ok, but the error between the headline and TFA is around 3.8 Billion years, based on the current estimate of the solar system's age.
That's not a quibble, nor a rounding error.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Learn to use a calendar. (Score:2)
Ok, so in deference to you: "learn to use years". That makes more sense.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Learn to use a calendar. (Score:2)
No, you brought up "months", and didn't like that for some reason. OK, don't bring it up if you don't like it. I was fine with "calendar", which shows a number of units.
The point, as originally stated, is that the /. editor made a 3.8 billion year error. My ire is because the editing is total crap now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Planet X
Shh, keep your voice down before Handsome Musk hears you and grabs it for himself.
Re: (Score:2)
Too late. Both Duck Dodgers and Marvin the Martian have claimed Planet X.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
"That's simply how "groups" work. You pick an attribute and group similar items together under a name."
Exactly, which is why the attempt to recategorize Pluto is pointless and inane. Breaking decades of literature just because you want the 'planets' to be short list without any rational or objective reason to limit it is ridiculous. Pluto therefore remains a planet and the four or five virgins who care about the issue beyond Pluto's demotion don't get to outvote the entire rest of the population of the plan
Re: (Score:1)
Pluto never stopped being a planet, a few virgin astrologers [yes, that is the word I mean] don't get to redefine a common language term which predates even astrology let alone astronomy. Especially not because they are inclined to have a low planet count and the decision is otherwise entirely arbitrary. Either they come up with a system that is backwards compatible or they make up their own new terms without breaking existing language, learning, and writings for no practical benefit at all.
Words change [Re:Pluto is a planet] (Score:1)
Pluto never stopped being a planet, a few virgin astrologers [yes, that is the word I mean]
If you are going to pretend to be erudite about language and say that words can't change meaning, it's a bad move to start out by saying "I am going to redefine the word astrology to include astronomers [that I don't like]."
don't get to redefine a common language term which predates even astrology let alone astronomy.
To the contrary. The original meaning of planet (from the Greek planetes, "wandering star") did not include the Earth as a planet... but did include the sun and the moon. The meaning changed.
The "common" definition does not predate astrology, nor astronomy. Ceres was called a planet afte
Re: (Score:2)
"If you are going to pretend to be erudite about language and say that words can't change meaning"
Who is pretending words can't change meaning? The meaning of words is defined by consensus of usage and the popular concensus is the Pluto is a planet. Within technical, legal and scientific frameworks, no, words should not change meaning because otherwise you are retroactively changing the meaning of published work and experimentation. That's why we define new terms, so we can move forward and progress WITHOUT
Re: (Score:2)
My query was the Pluto is not a planet two pronged - one to get a bunch of experts / academic organizations names in the news and two to get ones name recorded in the history book.
Much like how a senator will vote "present" during a historic vote when their political party will easily win, so that senator's name is recorded as "and senator X voted present ..." in historical mentions of the vote.
Fuck you. (Score:5, Insightful)
NEVER start a sentence off "Fossil discovered beyond Pluto ..." .. Do you realize all the things that start spinning up in a brain when a sentence starts like that?
Re: (Score:2)
Clickbait (Score:3)
If you can answer 20 of these questions, your IQ is higher than 140.
On the other hand, if you click on the link, that pretty much puts your IQ well below that value.
Re: (Score:2)
It is actually mis-rendered, the proper representation of the project's name is FOSSIL since it is an acronym and the project uses standard acronym style.
If they had said "FOSSIL discovered ..." you would have a clue that the meaning of this is something other than its standard semantic interpretation.
If Planet 9 is ever discovered... (Score:2)
can we name it 'Actual Pluto'?
Re: (Score:2)
No, it'll be called 'Goofy'.
Re: (Score:1)
It's already actually named Pluto
Re: (Score:2)
can we name it 'Actual Pluto'?
I'd go with Pluto Two, Pluto Too, or Pluto Also. I vote for Pluto Also.
Also, don't allow a bunch of astronomers to redefine planets. Leave that to the planetary scientists (unless they also make a decision I disagree with)...
Re: (Score:2)
We'd call it "Planet 9 From Outer Space"
Stop the slop (Score:2)
Do the "editors" really think they can get away with shovelling unchecked AI slop at us ?
Re: (Score:2)
Apart from the 400 million years error, the writing here is simply rubbish.
That was 400 million years after the birth of the solar system. Not an error. Means the orbits have been stable for over four billion years, and the perturbation was before that.
Do the "editors" really think they can get away with shovelling unchecked AI slop at us ?
In this case, I'm not seeing what signature of AI is here. There have been a number of articles in other popular science media sources about this. I consider all articles about "planet 9" to be pure speculation based on far too little hard evidence (considering observational bias, orbits of four Sedna-like objects is far too few to
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That was 400 million years after the birth of the solar system. Not an error
RTFH (read the fine headline) dude.
Re: (Score:2)
Apart from the 400 million years error, the writing here is simply rubbish. Do the "editors" really think they can get away with shovelling unchecked AI slop at us ?
I posit that you already know the answer to the question you end with. And that answer is a resounding, "Yes."
Re: (Score:2)
What I find odd (Score:2)
We have tools of insane levels of precision. How come we can't find some gravity object only a few light minutes away?
Re: (Score:2)
Because it's dark out there.
Re: (Score:2)
When looking for a picture of something, you're looking for a light reflection. The planet 110 light years away is close enough to its host start that it reflects a lot of light - to the point where there's still a tiny bit visible this far away. We also know exactly where to look - from this distance its basically right beside its star.
Any hypothetic planet 9 though, is much, much farther from its parent star, and will reflect very, very little light. And what light it does reflect would have to travel d
Re: (Score:2)
That planet 110 light years away is easer to detect because of its proximity to a star. If there's a planet 9 somewhere in our orbit, it's too far away to reflect light. But it should be detectable when it crosses in front of bright objects. Researchers are "placing limits on a hypothetical planet 9's whereabouts", as per the article, and doing that lets them focus telescope and supercomputer time on areas that might provide better detection of low-albedo objects passing in front of stars and bright objects
Re: (Score:2)
How often does an object the size and distance of this planet occlude a star or other bright object ?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Revisionist Fuckers (Score:5, Funny)
Those revisionist fuckers did Pluto dirty. But, Pluto doesn't care. It's been around. It's seen some shit. It knows that things will oscillate back and it will be a planet again in less than half its orbital period.
Filthy God damned apes.
Re: (Score:2)
When? (Score:2)
''Something Dramatic' Happened 400M Years Ago'
'similar orbits around 4.2 billion years ago.'
'400 million years after its birth'
Uh, when?
Planet Nine coming soon (Score:2)
Hey (Score:2)
using Subaru Telescope as part of the Formation of the Outer Solar System: An Icy Legacy
I see what you did there.