

Why Cars Still Don't Have Airless Tires, Yet (jalopnik.com) 70
Twenty years after Michelin introduced the Tweel in 2005, airless tires remain absent from passenger vehicles despite their promise to "eliminate nearly 200 million scrap tires a year caused by flats and underinflation," according to Michelin's internal testing cited in a Jalopnik report. Current prototypes "tend to transfer more road noise and vibration into the cabin than traditional radials -- making the ride harsher, especially at highway speeds." Heat dissipation poses additional challenges as "airless designs -- particularly those with internal webbing or solid cores -- have fewer ways to shed thermal load." The added structural mass "can affect fuel economy and increase unsprung weight -- bad news for handling and suspension tuning." Federal regulations compound these technical barriers since vehicle tires are subject to rigorous performance standards, many of which assume air pressure as a baseline.
This oil change could have been an email. (Score:2, Insightful)
Tires come right off, and new ones can be put right back on. It's pretty easy; my elderly aunt used to do it. If this technology is really superior, we don't need a big concerted push to transition to it. We can just offer people a choice, and see what they choose over the long term.
These new tires may last much longer, and never go flat, but eventually they are going to get thrown away. Are they any better for the environment if they last four times longer but contain eight times as much rubber?
Re: (Score:3)
Need to dig to get past the misdirection (Score:2)
There are repeated examples of misdirections in cars and consumer products, much so that even environmental activist groups fault the EV for overpolluting.
https://www.sierraclub.org/sie... [sierraclub.org]
EVs Have No Tailpipe Pollution, but There Are Still Problems When the Rubber Meets the Road
Tires shed significant amounts of metallic particles, microplastics, and chemical compounds when the rubber meets the road.
The heavier the vehicle, the more particulate matter its tires release. That means electric vehicles, which we
Re:This oil change could have been an email. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: This oil change could have been an email. (Score:2)
For a truck tire you can do it with a bubble level and balancing beads. I wouldn't do it with a passenger car tire.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Same reason it's trivial to change a mountain bike tire but hard to change a road bike tire. The size, the profile, the shape all make it easier to manipulate one vs the other. The resulting use of the tire makes precision less important. You don't need to worry about balancing or perfectly mounting a tire on a truck, but you run into a massive insurance risk if your tire comes off doing 95mph on the autobahn and you were caught changing it yourself. A large tire on a small rim can be put in place redneck s
Re: (Score:1)
Re:This oil change could have been an email. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: This oil change could have been an email. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This oil change could have been an email. (Score:4, Informative)
Please shut the fuck up.
Oh shut up you fuckstick. [slashdot.org]
Shut up you moron. [slashdot.org]
Shut the fuck up. [slashdot.org]
You're a moron. [slashdot.org]
Shut up you fucking moron. [slashdot.org]
shut up you fucking moron. [slashdot.org]
Seriously, why are you even here? I gave up after 5 pages of the same useless crap as above. Literally not even a single attempt at a comment that wasn't an obvious troll.
Ah, the whore had to jump in. Don't you have anything better to do with your time? [slashdot.org]
That one at least gave a mild chuckle, the exhibited lack of self-awareness was a bit humorous.
Re:This oil change could have been an email. (Score:4, Insightful)
Mental illness is real.
Re: (Score:2)
And it must be a full blown mental illness. Typically trolling gets boring after a while. You don't typically see that kind of posting from someone who has been on this site for 20 years. The poor guy needs professional help.
Tread Wear, not Puncture (Score:4, Insightful)
These new tires may last much longer
Will they last longer? Everytime I have replaced tyres it has been because the tread became too worn, not because they got a puncture. Why will an uninflated tyre's tread last longer?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's a good point. I mean, if I were designing it, I would make the tread thicker. But that would make these more expensive still, so probably they didn't do that.
There are limits to how deep you can make the tread before "squirm" becomes a problem.
Re: Tread Wear, not Puncture (Score:2)
Having had mud tires on a pickup before I know that you can run a pretty thick tire before it's a real problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Tread Wear, not Puncture (Score:4, Insightful)
I believe the thinking goes;
"Of all tire failures, X% of them can be attributed to punctures or improper inflation (e.g. excessive sidewall stress or premature tread wear). Therefore, airless tires can reduce tire failures by approximately X%."
So it's less about one specific set of tires lasting longer, it's about the *average* service life of the tires, and a bit of safety.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Punctures through the tread are usually repairable. Punctures in the sidewall are not.
The tread is still going to wear out and the tire will still need to be replaced. I'm not seeing much advantage here.
Re: (Score:2)
> Punctures through the tread are usually repairable.
Sure. If they are not catastrophic (e.g. just a nail/screw and not something that causes a gash) and you catch them in time (e.g. not driving on a flat tire which will destroy the sidewalls).
And if the tire can't lose air you don't even need to get the puncture fixed at all.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
Big hole pretty close to the wall. And I was almost already driving on the rim by the moment I could safely stop on the 80KM/h road (it was empty within a minute)
Re: (Score:2)
Everytime I have replaced tyres it has been because the tread became too worn, not because they got a puncture.
Lucky you. For me it's been 50/50. Usually I need to fully replace 1 tire (2 since you never do just one), every two wearouts due to a flat. I'm currently driving on a repaired tire.
Re: (Score:2)
These new tires may last much longer
Will they last longer? Everytime I have replaced tyres it has been because the tread became too worn, not because they got a puncture. Why will an uninflated tyre's tread last longer?
As a former S15 Silvia owner, you can go through the tread on a set of tyres pretty effing quickly... An afternoon isn't difficult.
We already have uninflated tyres, they're called run flats (well they can run uninflated) and have some serious drawbacks, not the least of which are how incredibly hard they are leading to a very harsh ride and that's as a person who revels in a hard riding sports car. A decent sidewall will smooth out a rough road and still maintain a good amount of feedback for the driver.
Yeah (Score:3, Informative)
Too bad about the highway noise.
But there are tons of places that airless wheels/tires can do a lot of good, like mountain bikes, wheelbarrows, offroad fun vehicles like quads/dirtbikes/side-by-sides, low-speed municipal work vehicles, construction vehicles, farm vehicles, etc that aren't used at highway speeds.
Heck even my baby's stroller has pneumatic tires.
(To be fair, you can already buy airless tires for a lot of these things)
I hope they eventually crack the nut that can lead to airless tires usable at highway speeds on passenger vehicles.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Yeah (Score:3)
Re: Yeah (Score:4, Interesting)
MTBs are NOT a good place to use tweels, you absolutely need a pneumatic tire to get maximum grip. All of those other places are very applicable, though
For my part I want them for a bus to RV conversion. They will have much longer lifespans than pneumatic because the sidewall is what fails on very old tires, and the sidewall on a tweel when there even is one is just there to keep crap out of the spokes. And there is enough engine noise (the vehicle in question has an 8.3 liter Cummins) that any additional is just irrelevant. It's also riding on air, so a slightly harder ride doesn't matter either.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been seeing more and more farm equipment with airless. Skid loaders are particularly well suited to them. Some smaller tractors. Though the bigger tractors are moving to rubberized treads/tracks rather than airless tires. Construction equipment is much the same outside of those big dirt scrapers. The ones that weren't already prone to metal tracks, anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Construction Vehicles (Score:2)
Airless tires work better at below highway speeds (45mph / 72kph). The best market for airless tires is construction vehicles.
We Need Hovercraft. (Score:1)
Fuck tires!
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck tires!
I've never seen a quiet hovercraft. If you can generate lift without generating massive piles of noise, I'd agree with you.
I have airless tires on my Craftsman lawn tractor (Score:2)
Re: I have airless tires on my Craftsman lawn trac (Score:3)
It won't matter for heavy trucks (unless they are going off road) and buses. They already run high pressures and the high mileage tires also have hard compounds.
It's a big drawback for passenger cars.
Would work great against (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've been thinking about this and what I came up with is barbs on the spikes. Once they penetrate the treadwall the whole strip can stick and fuck the whole wheel area all up. I've read that some of them are barbed but the pictures I've seen were involved more conical shapes. Still, perhaps some will be good for this already.
wood wouldn't (Score:3)
Covered wagons had wooden wheels. That is the best choice, because it is a renewable resource.
Re:wood wouldn't (Score:5, Funny)
I really really wood knot want to corner on wooden wheels. They'd turn to Ash and would be a Birch to fix.
Re: (Score:2)
That doesn't stop me for Pining for them, though.
Re: (Score:2)
Because Pneumatic Tires are Just Better (Score:3)
Some things can't currently be improved upon. The standard bicycle, for example, has been only minimally improved upon since the introduction of the Safety Bicycle in the 1880s-- and it works so well in part due to pneumatic tires.
The article explains the problem that airless tires have:
1. Shock absorption
2. Tire weight
3. Tire cost
4. Heat buildup
Flat tires are annoying... but they're the best of the problems.
Re: (Score:3)
Some things can't currently be improved upon. The standard bicycle, for example, has been only minimally improved upon since the introduction of the Safety Bicycle in the 1880s-- and it works so well in part due to pneumatic tires.
The article explains the problem that airless tires have:
I run tubeless tires on my MTB, with the sealant inside. Works great, punctures self-seal pretty quickly, requires annual maintenance though. I think they do have some level of self-sealing available on car tires now but I've never tried them.
Re: (Score:2)
I think they do have some level of self-sealing available on car tires now but I've never tried them.
There's Slime, and then there's more hardcore compounds, like the stuff they put into military tires to seal bullet holes. Tire shops hate Slime, let alone anything thicker and more voluminous. Slime will seal nail punctures and the like. The thicker stuff will seal almost anything, but a) you will still need to add air in some cases, which is normally done with CTIS on relevant vehicles in the field, and b) it is a balance issue so it can only be done with large vehicles on large tires and at low speeds.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.michelinman.com/au... [michelinman.com]
I suspect tire shops will hate those too, but like I say I have never tried them.
Re: (Score:1)
Tannus Airless road bike tires are just awesome. They're heavier, but I don't carry a pump or patch kit anymore and was running fairly heavy gatorskin tires before, so the extra weight nets out about even. Feels like a 110PSI inflation, maybe a little slower ride - wouldn't wanna race them - but not slow enough that I'm ever going back to pneumatic tires. The rubber isn't exactly solid, it's more like a very very dense closed-cell foam, so there's lots of air bubbles to create rebound energy that makes t
Re: (Score:2)
Everything sounds like it can't be improved on until someone comes up with an improved way.
But really are you talking about the entire bicycle? If so, sorry but you're incredibly ignorant about bicycles. Even leaving aside technical innovations such as electric motors, gears (which themselves also had many technical improvements), brakes, etc, even the safety cycle itself had major innovations since its first introduction. It was a full decade before they developed raked forks.
But bicycle tires are worlds a
Design issue (Score:4, Insightful)
Actual problem with tires (Score:2)
None of the problems tires have are to do with air or air pressure.
- they require a lot of natural rubber (latex) which is a limited resource.
- natural rubber degrades and can't be un-degraded. It's like rotten wood. You have to replace it eventually. Dry rot and wear is what makes most tires unusable.
- They're really difficult to recycle into anything but dirty rubber chips.
We haven't found a better material for tires in 150 years. They've added other polymers to the compounds to make them run longer or gr
Re: (Score:2)
they require a lot of natural rubber (latex) which is a limited resource.
Correction, rubber is a renewable resource. Literally. It comes from trees.
Re: (Score:2)
It comes from one type of tree that grows only in Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, India and Vietnam at this point. The large Amazonian rubber plantations were killed off by blight. Blighters. Bugs and such.
Re: (Score:2)
None of the problems tires have are to do with air or air pressure.
Go let all of the air out of your tires and try to drive somewhere. Let us know how it goes.
Add higher speed active suspension (Score:2)
If the active suspension can react fast enough, the tire transmitting vibration won't matter.
use run-flats (Score:2)
Never happen...and here is why! (Score:1)