Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
China The Internet

China Isolates Itself From Worldwide Web For Over an Hour (theregister.com) 51

A complete shutdown of encrypted web traffic isolated China from the global internet for 74 minutes Wednesday morning, blocking citizens from accessing foreign websites and disrupting international business operations that depend on secure connections to offshore servers. The Great Firewall began injecting forged TCP RST+ACK packets to terminate all connections on port 443 at 00:34 Beijing time on August 20, according to activist group Great Firewall Report.

The standard HTTPS port carries most modern web traffic, meaning Chinese users lost access to virtually all foreign-hosted websites while companies including Apple and Tesla couldn't connect to servers powering their basic services. The blocking device didn't match known Great Firewall hardware fingerprints, suggesting Beijing either deployed new censorship equipment or experienced a configuration error. Pakistan's internet traffic dropped significantly hours before China's incident, potentially connected through shared firewall technology.

China Isolates Itself From Worldwide Web For Over an Hour

Comments Filter:
  • by DesScorp ( 410532 ) on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:04AM (#65604832) Journal

    "Look, we know you spend a lot of time connecting to Western sites, but ya'll have been getting a bit uppity again. Don't ever forget who's boss here".

    • Perhaps a practice run for when China wants to flex their power and isolate themselves from external internet attacks in rebuttal....?
      • I think he deserves more credit for the opening joke than you gave him, but your version is quite plausible and I actually prefer it to the other option of their having spotted some kind of new malware and pulling the panic switch.

        Actually reading something that made me wonder if the Chinese also have the capability for regional cuts without pulling the big plug. And my own feelings are mixed. On the one hand, a lot of their motivations are bad, but on the other hand I think the whole world needs to be much

    • by Mr. Dollar Ton ( 5495648 ) on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:26AM (#65604894)

      More likely, testing the steps to invade Taiwan, now that the Trumpistan under king donold has reneged on its promises wrt defense of the status quo.

      China saw how the same king proclaimed the principle "might makes right" as the new rule of international law and sold out the allies of the country formerly known as USA basically everywhere and is preparing for a land grab.

      • by znrt ( 2424692 )

        "might makes right" as the new rule of international law

        i understand it's not nearly as much fun when you don't have the might to make right anymore but ... "new rule of international law"? come on. :o)
        https://i.imgflip.com/3bjk4l.p... [imgflip.com]

        and sold out the allies of the country formerly known as USA basically

        "it may be dangerous to be america's enemy, but to be america's friend is fatal." (henry kissinger)

        • "it may be dangerous to be america's enemy, but to be america's friend is fatal." (henry kissinger)

          A grossly incorrect quote completely out of context, but one which the trumpistan is now implementing as you've pasted it.

          • by znrt ( 2424692 )

            sorry, couldn't resist.

            indeed there is no verbatim reference to that quote (as happens with a lot of quotes we still keep using for valid reasons), but it actually fits quite well both kissinger's character and the context (selling out allies). i was pondering to add a n.b. about the quote not actually being confirmed but as i assume that's general knowledge and not really relevant i decided to keep my trolling simple for comedic value. thank you for your attention to this matter.

            "EST BREVITATE OPUS UT CURR

      • There has long been a deliberate ambiguity about how far the US will defend Taiwan, though Biden chose to ignore that approach.

        https://www.bbc.com/news/world... [bbc.com]

        Of course given how much the US failed to protect either South Vietnam or Afghanistan from their invaders, we can conclude that a US promise isn't to be taken at face value.

        • There has long been a deliberate ambiguity

          Hardly.

          There's been not much of an ambiguity - in the times when the US was able to project global power, any attempt of aggression from China was met with a demonstration of power. E.g. when China precipitated the 1995/6 crisis by shooting missiles over Taiwan in response to the 2-day visit of the then Taiwanese president, Lee Teng-huei to Cornell, the US promptly dispatched two carrier strike groups to pacify Peking.

          Back in 1955, when the PRC shelled the Jinmen and other small islands under RoC control, E

          • 'Shortly after the United States recognized the People's Republic of China, [and Jimmy Carter cancelled the US commitment to Taiwan in the treaty] the U.S. Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act. Some of the treaty's content survives in the Act; for example, the definition of "Taiwan". However, it falls short of promising Taiwan direct military assistance in case of an invasion.'

            From the Wikipedia article on the treaty you quoted.

            And note the response of the White House staff at Biden speaking out of turn

            • About a year later, Nancy Pelosi strategically and ambiguously landed in Taipei with the Chinese ambiguously threatening an attack and the whole Chinese and ruzzkie blogosphere ambiguously rooting for a fight.

              The two carrier strike groups conveniently kept in the region by the USA again pacified the bunch effectively.

              It is only under the trumpistan that the threat against Taiwan looks more and more real.

              • China is spending a lot on its military, with expenditure rising faster than GDP. Given the expansion of the Chinese economy, the effect has been that the US Navy has ceased to be the largest in the world, as well as being denied safe access to provide the sort of protection Taiwan would need. So no, Trump really isn't responsible for this situation except in as far as he's made it worse by sending mixed messages.

        • Yeah no promises, just the $571million defense contract to defend Taiwan https://www.reuters.com/world/... [reuters.com] that Biden pushed.

          By the way you may want to actually read the Taiwan Relations Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

      • Republicans have been fear mongering about China invading Taiwan for over 20 years now.

        • The story of the PRC trying to take over Taiwan begins a lot earlier than "20 years ago".

          The first massive shelling of Taiwanese islands happened in 1955, the second - in 1958, the third, in 1995, the last before the putin war - in 2022/3.

          The Xi administrations have escalated the threats for a military occupation significantly.

          Denying the official policy of PRC on Taiwan, wishing the escalation of threats isn't real or trying to present it as some "republican" subterfuge will not make it disappear.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Most likely it's just a screw up. Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence.

        If it was a test and they were competent they wouldn't need to block access for the whole country.

        • Unless it was a test if they can block the whole country.

          You know, the same kind of block that the best friend forever of the Xi regime, the putin regime, has been testing of late.

          • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

            Why would they need to test that? If it works on one firewall server, it should work on them all. Besides, it's hardly difficult to block all outside access - it happens accidentally every few years, somewhere in the world.

            And why would they test it for so long? It doesn't take that long to validate that it works, and the economic losses from such a long test must have been substantial. Think of all the financial transactions that were held up, all the orders delayed or diverted, and that's just the tip of

    • I doubt that. ~Nobody cares about sites outside China. In fact, the Web isn't used much at all in China. Ditto email. Everything is inside wechat, or perhaps alipay or one of a few other native apps.

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Nobody cares about sites outside China.

        and yet here you are

  • Requirements (Score:4, Insightful)

    by michaelmalak ( 91262 ) <michael@michaelmalak.com> on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:17AM (#65604874) Homepage
    "requiring information blackout"? As a U.S.-based website, it should read (at minimum) "prompting information blackout".
  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:21AM (#65604884)
    We will use porn as the excuse. Just like how some states are starting to force age verification it won't be long until that translates into full scale tracking and then blocking access to anything that upsets the government.

    It's frustrating to watch everything the libertarians and right wingers have been screaming about government doing happening because of the people they put in charge.
    • by Anonymous Coward

      shut up, retard.

  • On a trip to China a few years go, I found that my VPN (using OpenVPN on the standard port) would not connect, but SSH wasn't blocked, so I just used SSH tunneling to a VNC session.

    In the past, I have also used OpenVPN over port 53 (DNS). I think this was because I found a WiFi network with a paywall blocked ports 80 and 443, but not 53.

    • by ukoda ( 537183 )
      I was living in China from 2012 to 2014 and spent a lot of time trying keep a working VPN. You would get it working somewhat ok and it would stop working. Tweak things to get it work again and after a while it would fail. Switch to a different approach and it would work again and then after a while it would fail. I was spending half my spare time trying to keep a connection to the world.

      When it came time to renew my contract I turned my employer down. Dealing with the Chinese government was mentally
  • by geekmux ( 1040042 ) on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:43AM (#65604932)

    ..suggesting Beijing either deployed new censorship equipment or experienced a configuration error.

    Call it what it is already: A Test. The only suggestion needed is a reminder of the communist regime we’re talking about here. Injecting forged packets doesn’t sound like a “whoops” error. And to leave it alone for an entire hour? If that was an error, the hell were they waiting on to fix it? Was the metric fuckton of negative impact in the first 5 minutes not quite enough?

    ..while companies including Apple and Tesla couldn't connect to servers powering their basic services.

    Perhaps we’ll start to recognize the downsides of products being “designed” in America but manufactured elsewhere. I truly wonder if the AAR will validate how blind Greed can be.

  • I am in China. I never noticed any issue at all. I'm desperately trying to recall what I was doing online but I don't recall specifics. I'd probably be listening to Times Radio and reading Sky News website, neither of which are locked. Likewise, slashdot...

    I wonder if many people noticed...western sites just aren't all that important.

    • I remember I made a WhatsApp call to my mother, which worked just fine. The rumours of WhatsApp being blocked are very exaggerated. Maybe it was a different time...

    • Oh, it was at 00:34 so nobody would notice, including me...never mind.

    • I wonder if many people noticed...western sites just aren't all that important.

      Of course they're not important. That's what you've been told. If they aren't important, why would your government need to censor and block them?
  • It is a royal pita for people inside China wanting to access sites outside China - which mostly means foreigners, of course. Cloudflare blocks or challenges almost all accesses, ime.

    • by keltor ( 99721 ) *
      When I'm in China (and not using VPN to my house), I never really notice things being blocked. I can order shit from Amazon.jp, I can access all the normal stuff I use except for YouTube.

      I do normally just use VPN so that I still appear to be coming from home and every site doesn't rechallenge me.
  • by smooth wombat ( 796938 ) on Thursday August 21, 2025 @12:29PM (#65605282) Journal

    The drop in bot activity. Noticed a site I visit had far fewer spamming posts than usual.

  • by PPH ( 736903 )

    Only 65,534 ports to go.

Heavier than air flying machines are impossible. -- Lord Kelvin, President, Royal Society, c. 1895

Working...