Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
United States

US Strips Ocean and Air Pollution Monitoring From Next-Gen Weather Satellites (cnn.com) 121

An anonymous reader shares a report: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is narrowing the capabilities and reducing the number of next-generation weather and climate satellites it plans to build and launch in the coming decades, two people familiar with the plans told CNN.

This move -- which comes as hurricane season ramps up with Erin lashing the East Coast -- fits a pattern in which the Trump administration is seeking to not only slash climate pollution rules, but also reduce the information collected about the pollution in the first place. Critics of the plan also say it's a short-sighted attempt to save money at the expense of understanding the oceans and atmosphere better.

Two planned instruments, one that would measure air quality, including pollution and wildfire smoke, and another that would observe ocean conditions in unprecedented detail, are no longer part of the project, the sources said.

US Strips Ocean and Air Pollution Monitoring From Next-Gen Weather Satellites

Comments Filter:
  • by fjo3 ( 1399739 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:15PM (#65608050)
    If we just ignore the problem, it will go away. That's how science works, right?
    • by Anonymous Coward

      If we just ignore the problem, it will go away. That's how science works, right?

      Seems to work. https://www.yahoo.com/news/tru... [yahoo.com]

    • by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:23PM (#65608084)

      Back in 2020 Trump said "If we stop testing we'd have fewer cases" in regards to CV19

      A staple of fascistic governments is that everything has focused around aesthetics. That's why the flashy ICE raids in public and propaganda videos. The appearance of what you are doing is far more important than the actual thing.

      This is related to Umberto Eco's point #3 of fascism The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”

      • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:58PM (#65608224)
        Right wingers will just avoid this thread. It's not just that they get a ton of bad information, they do, but they actively avoid good information.

        They have to stay inside a bubble and a safe space because otherwise reality comes crashing down and they're just not prepared to deal with that. Too many Hang-Ups from when they were kids
        • by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @01:03PM (#65608242)

          The most devastating question you can ask a Republican today is "What sources do you trust and get your news from"

          • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

            by Anonymous Coward

            "Oh, I don't trust anything I see. I do my own research. It's all out there if you look."

            No, they don't have the skills necessary to understand the contradiction there. You can't reason with an idiot ... especially one who is proud of being an idiot.

            • > "Oh, I don't trust anything I see. I do my own research. It's all out there if you look."

              The wisest thing that's been posted, or is likely ever to be posted to this thread.

              Didn't bother quoting any of the garbage you posted, anon.

          • by shanen ( 462549 )

            <Raises hand>
            I know, I know. The AI told me!!!

            • There's a reason Musk had to force Grok to give conservative answers to questions instead of expecting it to come to them naturally through facts and history.

              • Is that just trying to tweak it to be a little more conservative, not even right-wing, and it immediately starts praising Hitler.

                That's because to the training model a right winger is indistinguishable from a Neo-Nazi. The two of them were using the same talking points and dog whistles. Because it's all part of the same pipeline. And it all ends at the same place
                • "it immediately starts praising Hitler."

                  Citations, please.

                  to the training model a right winger is indistinguishable from a Neo-Nazi

                  Again, citations please.

          • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @04:54PM (#65608994)
            On his journey to becoming a Fox News lunatic. He moved away before it was complete but it was inevitable.

            He would watch Fox News I would ask him why and point out that it was going to rot his brain. He would tell me it was just entertaining.

            That's the real problem with right-wing propaganda. They have highly skilled professionals so to a lot of people consuming it is entertaining in and of itself. Even if you start watching it in a tongue-in-cheek manner the fact that you're being entertained by it means it will gradually get into your skull.

            It's not 24/7 crazy after all. They will pepper in a little bit of reality and things that you can legitimately agree with here and there. It's part of the pipeline to move you along and get you ready to accept the crazier shit.

            It's the exact same trick Scientology uses and for the same reason.
            • by sconeu ( 64226 )

              My ex-GF started watching Faux News during the pandemic because "It was the only place she could find info on getting her small business loan".

              Soon, she had it on in her kitchen whenever she was awake. Then she started on the hard stuff -- OANN and NewsMax.

              I broke up with her post Jan 6.

              • Yeah a lot of people have lost friends and family to right-wing extremism. It's a cult so it isolates people by design.
        • They have to stay inside a bubble and a safe space because otherwise reality comes crashing down and they're just not prepared to deal with that.

          The point were "deal with it" is going to be a harsh one then. A lot of people may even die, and from that standpoint the Darwin crowd may see it as a self-correcting problem.

    • by sconeu ( 64226 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:45PM (#65608168) Homepage Journal

      Exactly. It's not an ill-advised attempt to save money, it's an attempt to sweep any pollution problems under the rug.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Worse still, even if Trump doesn't get a third term, those satellites are expensive and supposed to last a lot longer than one term. Whoever inherits what's left of the US will have to decide between launching new ones with the proper equipment, or trying to make do with what other countries are willing to share. Which fortunately is a lot.

        • by ukoda ( 537183 )
          Yes, this will be another case of where the USA has willingly given up its lead to other countries, who will take up the slack out of need.
    • Works with COVID.
    • It's getting harder to call science a hoax with all the data they amassed. It's time for fair and balanced reporting, for that to happen both sides need to operate on ignorance and a lack of solid facts to back up their arguments.

    • Wow, they list me half-way into the second paragraph:

      The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is narrowing the capabilities and reducing the number of next-generation weather and climate satellites it plans to build and launch in the coming decades, two people familiar with the plans told CNN.

      This move â" which comes as hurricane season ramps up with Erin lashing the East Coast â" fits a pattern in which the Trump administration is seeking to not only slash climate pollution rules, but also reduce the information collected about the pollution in the first place.

      The satellites we are discussing are going to be "planned and built over the coming decades", WTF does that have to do with a hurricane heading toward the U.S. coastline THIS WEEK?

      The reporter is acting like DJT ran out to the launch pad and started ripping sensors off the weather satellites as they were ready to launch - these things are just specifications and goals written down to secure federal funding.

      As best as I can figure, these satellites won't

      • by cusco ( 717999 ) <<moc.liamg> <ta> <ybxib.nairb>> on Saturday August 23, 2025 @12:26AM (#65609702)

        You don't know how congressional funding works, I take it. Once something is removed from a program it's pretty much impossible to add it back in unless there will be a dramatic cost saving (and not normally even then.) Anything that raises the cost of a program, no matter how much it will improve it, is DOA.

        The obvious glaring exception is any military program, which can add all the cost overrides that can be poured into it without anyone blinking an eye. I suspect that is at least in part because every military contractor has a list of the home addresses of all the congresscritters.

    • That's not how science works, but it really is how Trump works. This is the guy who made drunk Hegseth fire the DIA chief because the intel assessment of the Iranian bombing wasn't loyal enough.

      He wants his underlings to lie to him. If you tell Trump the truth about something, it makes him angry. Wouldn't pollution censors on a satellite also pose a risk of seeing something Trump disagrees with?

      It raises the question: why are any sensors being tolerated at all? Aren't temperature and moisture readings jus

  • Three Orangutans (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:16PM (#65608052) Journal

    "See none of our evil, hear none of our evil, speak about none of our evil"

  • by turp182 ( 1020263 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:21PM (#65608072) Journal

    If you stick you head too far in the sand, you will suffocate.

  • Exactly how is this supposed to be good for "We the People?"
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Tablizer ( 95088 )

      SCUTOS ruled corporations are people, and they are bigger and have more money than you little people, so STFU and worship the Profits.

      • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

        Correction: SCOTUS, or more like SCROTUS

      • No, SCOTUS did not rule that. They didn't need to - the word "corporation" literally means "person".

        What the Citizens United ruling really said was that humans didn't lose their political and first amendment rights when they work together with other humans using a structured organization.

        • Re:what value? (Score:4, Insightful)

          by garyisabusyguy ( 732330 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @01:08PM (#65608254)

          Yeah buddy, don't forget that spending cash is a form of free speech, that cannot be hindered (or even tracked apparently)

          Citizens United is a direct assault on the American Public, and we are seeing he results

        • Re:what value? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by MarkWegman ( 2553338 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @01:25PM (#65608292)
          Corporations are for making money. They are not organized for political causes. They make a profit, which can be distributed to people, who are then taxed and who can then give money to political causes. Scotus's ruling prevented me as a stockholder from deciding whether I wanted to join some cause, unless I want to give up my investment. Moreover, there's no reason to believe that the drafters of the first amendment, intended that corporations, which only in Latin mean person but does not in English should have free speech. SCOTUS should have given deference to Congress in determining this, but as the Guardian points out, Roberts is an umpire who has chosen a side.
          • by cpurdy ( 4838085 )
            Technically, corporations are for avoiding liability. But I have the advantage in this conversation because I've owned a few of them ... and studied law.
            • by Rinnon ( 1474161 )
              It sounds to me like you're talking more about privately owned corporations, which are definitely about protecting yourself from liability (and ensuring that the performance of contracts survive an individuals death, among other things); while the parent is likely talking about publicly traded corporations, which it is reasonable to say are about making money. I say it's reasonable because the voting shareholders, in all likelihood, have one thing in common: they want the corporation to profit so that they
              • by cpurdy ( 4838085 )
                I also serve on several boards of directors. It's nice that the legal corporate structure protects shareholders from pretty much all liability, but serving on a board does incur some liability, which is why you should never serve on a board that does not provide D&O coverage automatically.
        • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

          didn't lose their political and first amendment rights when they work together with other humans using a structured organization.

          Limiting corporations doesn't limit what they can still do as individuals. Their individual rights don't go away if they form a corporation. Sorry, but Walmart is NOT a fucking "person"!

        • by dryeo ( 100693 )

          Are corporations also citizens? Most countries limit non-citizens political rights, no voting or political contributions for example. Mobility rights are another one that is limited to citizens and perhaps permanent residents in many countries.

    • by Burdell ( 228580 )

      Remember that the people who wrote/signed "We the People" were mostly rich white men who owned not only property but also people. All men are created equal, but some are more equal than others.

      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        So? Despite that now the descendants of rich, poor, enslavers, enslaved, are all benefiting from this rich framework. True it took far too long to get to this point, but nevertheless, it did happen. In other words it was the people and the application of their principles that were wrong, not the principles themselves.

        Sadly it appears the current regime is out to destroy it all, including the very principles themselves.

      • "not only property but also people"

        Your claim is that the writers and signers of our Declaration of Independence, and/or our Constitution, were slaveholders?

        You have a source for this assertion?

        • by Burdell ( 228580 )

          LOLwut? Like... a history book? I know those are hard to find and read these days.

          • We'll, yeah. At least half of them had or were.

            The other half-ish? Not at all pleased. But collectively they forged a constitution that ultimately was amended and dealt with the issue. A hundred years it took, yes.

  • by UnCivil Liberty ( 786163 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:32PM (#65608118)

    If you rewind back to COVID he wanted to limit testing so that there would be less positive cases reported. Same here with pollution.

    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      When he was governor of Texas Shrub changed reporting of chemical spills from mandatory to voluntary. He then took credit for the resulting 30% reduction in reported spills as though it meant there were actually an improvement.

  • Petty and spiteful (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jenningsthecat ( 1525947 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:35PM (#65608126)

    It just occurred to me that a large part of what the Trump administration is engaged in is vandalism. These are mean, small-minded, small-hearted, short-sighted criminals who would be petty if they hadn't succeeded in winning the highest offices in the land.

    The country that used to be considered the leader of the world is now run by small-minded, cunning habitual liars whose contempt for the truth is jaw-dropping. I'm not sure that the US can ever recover from the damage currently being done.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      He's certainly solving the immigration problem. The country is becoming such a shithole that soon you won't be able to pay people to come here.

    • by ArchieBunker ( 132337 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:45PM (#65608166)

      Just look at who has been appointed to the various government agencies. They’re all DEI hires.

    • This is a comprehensive plan to roll back to a gilded age style ruling class. One that gets enforced with technology so that it doesn't break down like the last one did.
      • This is a comprehensive plan to roll back to a gilded age style ruling class. One that gets enforced with technology so that it doesn't break down like the last one did.

        That's demonstrably true. Ironically, even the senile and doddering orange stain who is the face of the movement probably doesn't realize that. But guys like Musk, Thiel, Andreesen, and Yarvin certainly have that as an explicit goal. BTW, if you're not familiar with Technocrats and their chilling idea of an American Technate, you might want to look it up. Or not - it's pretty dismal and creepy stuff.

    • Vandalism has been the Republican plan since at least Reagan: "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem."

      • Vandalism has been the Republican plan since at least Reagan: "In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem."

        Thanks - I hadn't thought of that, but you're absolutely right. It really is a "might makes right" or "divine right of oligarchs" delusion.

  • Call it what it is (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Baloo Uriza ( 1582831 ) <baloo@ursamundi.org> on Friday August 22, 2025 @12:47PM (#65608184) Homepage Journal
    Terrorism. The pattern of behavior the Republican Party has been on for the last 50 years, and especially the last 25, has done nothing except deliberately harm the US for their personal gain. This treason should be punished to the most extreme extent imaginable.
    • by cpurdy ( 4838085 )
      Yes, but the Republicans don't just use violence as terrorism, they also effectively use stochastic terrorism.
  • From the same people who said "If you stop testing for COVID the numbers will go down" This will work perfectly with his base though because they have no problem ignoring reality How many MAGA's does it take to change a light bulb? None Trump tells them it is changed and they sit in the dark applauding him
  • and we pull the trigger, over and over.

    Humanity is soooooo stupid!

  • This is what they should do in response to the WH request.

  • Hear no evil, see no evil...

    Get rid of mammograms, cancer rates will plummet.

  • by Hoi Polloi ( 522990 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @01:26PM (#65608294) Journal

    The US is taking the first steps towards handing its mantle of science leader to other nations.

    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      First? No, that was taken by Ronald 'Facts are stupid things' Reagan. This is just the culmination of a program four decades in the making.

    • by dryeo ( 100693 )

      The problem is that "Republicanism" is spreading to other countries. Here in Canada, the Federal Conservative party now seems very like American Republicans with the attacks on various social issues such as equality (gays should be attacked), science, especially climate change, along with gas lighting and basically hateful rhetoric. Last election they scored more votes then in 40 plus years and only lost due to the collapse of the left and Trump. Their leader sounds very Trump like, except not so stupid wit

  • by MarkWegman ( 2553338 ) on Friday August 22, 2025 @01:31PM (#65608304)
    Nice article, except this is not a foolish attempt to save money. This is an attempt as all Fascists regimes do to denigrate the use of facts. Once a people become unmoored from a perception of reality it is easy to get them to do what the regime wants.

    “In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. ... Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.” Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

  • Nothing like burying your head in the sand to make your troubles go away.

  • This is exactly what he did with Covid.
    If we don't count the infected people our number will be lower!

  • Trump has seemed intent on revenue gathering with all the tariffs ... so I'm slightly surprised he hasn't sent bills to other nations to pay for the services these satellites provide ... or will provide.

    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      Trump has seemed intent on revenue gathering with all the tariffs

      So now the Democrats are coming out against taxes.

      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        And the GOP is full on in favor of the biggest tax rise in decades. And the party of small government and states rights is actually the opposite. It's a bizarre world now.

  • Once government funds something, taking it away is going to be like killing babies or something, it does not matter what it is.

    For some people there will never be enough research/monitoring spending. For others we spend way too much now. This is a completely subjective personal value judgement and there is no correct answer. There are some metrics one could use to try and objectively measure value for tax dollars. They are virtually never used by any government, and certainly not by the electorate eit
  • Come on, the world only has to remain tolerably livable for the duration of the Tech Bro's lives - it's maximize profits until then.

  • (Quoting Edward Smith, captain of RMS Titanic.)

  • Can anyone point me to LoRA environmental sensors that we can mass produce in hopes of generating a citizen-sourced data set? Anyone want to help with this?

One can search the brain with a microscope and not find the mind, and can search the stars with a telescope and not find God. -- J. Gustav White

Working...