


Europe Hopes To Join Competitive AI Race With Supercomputer Jupiter (france24.com) 41
Europe on Friday inaugurated Jupiter, its first exascale supercomputer and the most powerful AI machine on the continent. Built in Germany with 24,000 Nvidia chips, the 500-million-euro system aims to close the AI gap with the US and China while also advancing climate modeling, neuroscience, and renewable energy research. France 24 reports: Based at Juelich Supercomputing Centre in western Germany, it is Europe's first "exascale" supercomputer -- meaning it will be able to perform at least one quintillion (or one billion billion) calculations per second. The United States already has three such computers, all operated by the Department of Energy. Jupiter is housed in a centre covering some 3,600 meters (38,000 square feet) -- about half the size of a football pitch -- containing racks of processors, and packed with about 24,000 Nvidia chips, which are favored by the AI industry.
Half the 500 million euros ($580 million) to develop and run the system over the next few years comes from the European Union and the rest from Germany. Its vast computing power can be accessed by researchers across numerous fields as well as companies for purposes such as training AI models. "Jupiter is a leap forward in the performance of computing in Europe," Thomas Lippert, head of the Juelich centre, told AFP, adding that it was 20 times more powerful than any other computer in Germany. [...]
Yes, Jupiter will require on average around 11 megawatts of power, according to estimates -- equivalent to the energy used to power thousands of homes or a small industrial plant. But its operators insist that Jupiter is the most energy-efficient among the fastest computer systems in the world. It uses the latest, most energy-efficient hardware, has water-cooling systems and the waste heat that it generates will be used to heat nearby buildings, according to the Juelich centre.
Half the 500 million euros ($580 million) to develop and run the system over the next few years comes from the European Union and the rest from Germany. Its vast computing power can be accessed by researchers across numerous fields as well as companies for purposes such as training AI models. "Jupiter is a leap forward in the performance of computing in Europe," Thomas Lippert, head of the Juelich centre, told AFP, adding that it was 20 times more powerful than any other computer in Germany. [...]
Yes, Jupiter will require on average around 11 megawatts of power, according to estimates -- equivalent to the energy used to power thousands of homes or a small industrial plant. But its operators insist that Jupiter is the most energy-efficient among the fastest computer systems in the world. It uses the latest, most energy-efficient hardware, has water-cooling systems and the waste heat that it generates will be used to heat nearby buildings, according to the Juelich centre.
"Europe" who? (Score:5, Insightful)
Many Europeans are hoping that this bubble will burst already ...
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
no worries, heat waves and no AC will thin the herd
Don't hold your breath, Europeans have AC too, they are just smart enough to run it on solar power instead of coal like Americans do.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Europe Hopes To Exacerbate climate change. (Score:4, Interesting)
The energy usage of AI on banks of GPU's in datacentres is a major obstacle in efforts to combat climate change.
Competing over who has the most powerful AI is only going to make this situation worse.
You might worry about losing your job to an AI , but the truth is that once again we have more confirmation that we are on the wrong trajectory. With a 5% chance of changing course to one that does not end in socio economic collase, climate breakdown and eventually mass extinction.
There is simply no chance when these are the whims and attitudes of those who are supposed to be steering this
ship to safety.
My plan is not to participate in this system i oppose wherever possible. I suggest others do the same - if only to buy yourself a little more time and build reslience for the unavoidable hardships that are just around the corner.
Re: (Score:3)
WRONG:
Data centers globally consumed around 2-3% of the world's electricity in recent years, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). However, this figure varies significantly by location, with data centers accounting for a much higher percentage of total energy use in some regions, such as over 20% in Ireland and 10% in certain US states.
Re: (Score:2)
I already minimize participation in systems i oppose , you should do the same.
Re: (Score:1)
However, this machine uses Grace-Hopper superchips and a distributed-memory network. It is more, or maybe equally, suited for computational tasks involving predictive science. As an example, predictive science includes solving classic and boring partial-differential-equations (PDEs), i.e., providing foundational training data for scientific AI. Using both predictive science and AI to solve a problem has a lot of promise and this machine is we
Re: (Score:2)
Am I ?
Re: (Score:2)
even more wrong than the previous
Data centers globally consumed around 2-3% of the world's electricity in recent years, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). However, this figure varies significantly by location, with data centers accounting for a much higher percentage of total energy use in some regions, such as over 20% in Ireland and 10% in certain US states.
"a centre covering some 3,600 meters" (Score:2)
TFS tells us this 3600 meters is about half the size of a football pitch. I also cover 3600 meters, if you use a line that is thin and squiggly enough, although I can't pitch a football that far. I don't any living human can.
Re: (Score:2)
They mean area not length, but forgot the square. It's 3600 m^2, 60 m × 60 m, or about 200 ft × 200 ft.
Re:"a centre covering some 3,600 meters" (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
People don't pass the ball in your version of American football? (Maybe I'm just a square who doesn't know how things are done these days. But at least I'm not a square meter.)
But a game centered on advancing the ball on foot might better be called "runball" or even "sportsball".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People don't pass the ball in your version of American football?
They do, but the ball has to be received by someone who has advanced down the field on foot.
Football is played on foot (Score:1)
They're called "football" games because they're played on foot, as opposed to horseball games like polo. Hence soccer, rugby, gridiron, etc. are all legitimately "football".
Re: (Score:2)
In international football, players use their feet to control the ball, hence the name “football”.
This is in contrast to quaint local games like rugby or gridiron, which are incorrectly called “football”, where players use their hands instead of their feet.
Of course, when soccer players use their heads for headers, the game is temporarily renamed headball ... because those are the universally acknowledged rules for how sports are named.
Re: (Score:2)
Yap AI is now a thing .. (Score:2, Funny)
Yet these stones’ worth was not inherent, but algorithmically assigned by a kind of proto-blockchain of collective memory, with their ownership and transaction records cryptographically secured in the oral consensus of the island
Must be really popular ... (Score:2)
Old sayings coming true... (Score:2)
so now more than ever, "boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider."