
Extreme Heat Spurs New Laws Aimed at Protecting Workers Worldwide (nytimes.com) 56
Governments worldwide are implementing heat protection laws as 2.4 billion workers face extreme temperature exposure and 19,000 die annually from heat-related workplace injuries, according to a World Health Organization and World Meteorological Organization report.
Japan imposed $3,400 fines for employers failing to provide cooling measures when wet-bulb temperatures reach 28C. Singapore mandated hourly temperature sensors at large outdoor sites and requires 15-minute breaks every hour at 33C wet-bulb readings. Southern European nations ordered afternoon work stoppages this summer when temperatures exceeded 115F across Greece, Italy and Spain.
The United States lacks federal heat standards; only California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon and Washington have state-level protections. Boston passed requirements for heat illness prevention plans on city projects. Enforcement remains inconsistent -- Singapore inspectors found nearly one-third of 70 sites violated the 2023 law. Texas and Florida prohibit local governments from mandating rest and water breaks.
Japan imposed $3,400 fines for employers failing to provide cooling measures when wet-bulb temperatures reach 28C. Singapore mandated hourly temperature sensors at large outdoor sites and requires 15-minute breaks every hour at 33C wet-bulb readings. Southern European nations ordered afternoon work stoppages this summer when temperatures exceeded 115F across Greece, Italy and Spain.
The United States lacks federal heat standards; only California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon and Washington have state-level protections. Boston passed requirements for heat illness prevention plans on city projects. Enforcement remains inconsistent -- Singapore inspectors found nearly one-third of 70 sites violated the 2023 law. Texas and Florida prohibit local governments from mandating rest and water breaks.
115F? (Score:3)
Is there a maximum limit to the number of times you can say Celsius in a paragraph before an American's head explodes? Is that why the units were mixed in the most braindead way while talking about a group of countries that explicitly don't use Fahrenheit?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because then you have to think a second before saying things like:
28C? That's what we call a nice day in Florida!
Re: (Score:2)
But this article is about Europe. Do people in Florida even know a world exists outside of Florida?
Re: (Score:2)
Florida is literally mentioned right there in TFS. The hilarious part is just that the use of Celsius makes you have to stop and think for a second that what Japan considers too hot is someone else's rather pleasant weather.
Re: (Score:2)
They're also mixing wet bulb and normal temps. In any case, the Japan wet bulb temp of 28C they mention is pretty uncomfortable without some kind of active cooling.
Re: (Score:2)
There are only three temperatures mentioned in the summary (C,C,F) and two in the NY Times article (F,F). I think this is more of a YOU problem. Roughly every country in the world uses Celsius other than the US.
Rough Celsius conversion can be done by doubling the Celsius value and adding 30. It isn't perfect but it's close. Another datapoint is 37C = 98.6F Ever wonder why our US body temperature standard is such a strange decimal fraction? For the rest of the world it is a convenient integer.
20C = 68F
3
Re: (Score:3)
and two in the NY Times article (F,F).
For a long while now, I've desperately wished for the mainstream U.S.-based newspapers to start adding dual dimensions, at least in their sci-tech articles. I'm sure the reporters are tired of, say, writing about things that are 0.6 mi or 330 feet, when any scientifically-literate person knows that's actually code for 1 km or 100 m. Or trying to muddy the distinction among the different versions of ton.
Instead, I propose a new editorial standard for them: just put in the dual dimensions. Along the li
Workers, workers, workers, workers,... (Score:2)
Reading the article
Notice how they only refer to "workers" and never that 90% (USA and other countries) workplace fatalities are men.
They spend roughly a thousand words avoiding saying that men are most affected, men are most vulnerable, men are doing worse.
There are two types of narratives from politicans, the media, UN, WEF, NGOs:
- It's "women and girls most affected" if the statistics show it
- It's generic workers, generic people if the statistics show that men and boys are doing worse or negatively affe
Meanwhile... (Score:5, Informative)
The US was doing something [dol.gov]. That effort appears dead now.
Instead, states like Florida and Texas [kut.org] are heading the other direction, making it impossible for local government to protect people.
I'm sure your foreman will allow you have water every 2 hours, he's a nice guy, right? Not that like that last jerk.
Re: (Score:3)
This doesn't mean the company can't give their workers breaks, just that it is no longer mandated. How many do you think no longer give these breaks?
Re:Meanwhile... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's real. Texas has banned it. A state run by so-called "pro-life" "Christians" who espouse "small and limited government" have, once again, overturned a life saving measures enacted by local city governments.
https://thehill.com/opinion/he... [thehill.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've never heard any say there are too many people on the planet. I do often hear them say there are too many of certain types of people, too close to them.
There does seem to be a sincere (sincerely dumb!) desire among some of them to pump out as many babies as possible. "Pro-life" is still a misnomer though, obviously. It's just pro-birth. They don't really think about the consequences that follow the birth.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If a woman can simply have an abortion, or have birth control, then men have less control over women.
What if the baby, er fetus, is determined to be of biological sex female. Probably would be best to abort those things until a male who can support the family blood lines is available. Nothing wrong with that, pro choice.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They also like to control the child. That is part of the attractiveness of the arrangement, and their obsession with it. These are people who take a special joy in manipulating others.
Re: (Score:2)
I do often hear them say there are too many of certain types of people, too close to them.
Then wouldn't they favor abortion? I mean if they really don't care about life to increase their population, they would be advocating for subsidized and encouraged abortion. And wouldn't that be okay? It's not a life so why not prevent lives of poverty. Win, win.
Re: (Score:2)
"pro-life" just refers to people who believe every baby conceived should be carried to term. Once they're born, most pro-lifers do not care about that person anymore. That's the only justification I can see in forcing women to carry babies to term, but opposing things like gun control, vaccine mandates, and other things that might help prolong the life of said people they brought into the world.
Want to have fun? Ask them when they stop caring - the will proudly say life is precious, etc, but ask them when t
Re: (Score:2)
And I call Godwin! [wikipedia.org] All that happened over 80 years ago and it's still not long enough that it's acceptable to use that as a generalized insult. Next time, try showing a little imagination and come up with something a bit more original and appropriate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You made a legitimate comparison so it stands, some people don't like comparisons so call "Godwins" to censor.
"In 2023, Godwin published an opinion in The Washington Post stating "Yes, it's okay to compare Trump to Hitler. Don't let me stop you." In the article, Godwin says "But when people dra
Re: (Score:3)
Texas Republicans have really ramped up the attack on local governance in the past few years. They've transferred school districts from local to state ownership. They passed a law restricting cities from ever decreasing their police budgets (only increases are allowed now, by law). They withheld hurricane recovery funds from cities for years, pursuant to a political vendetta.
Oftentimes these laws are written so that they only restrict specific cities, but there are enough attacks on local governments gener
the plutocracy (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
we hate people, and we're proud of it! (Score:1)
Texas and Florida prohibit local governments from mandating rest and water breaks.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
bugs bunny (Score:1)
> Texas and Florida prohibit local governments from mandating rest and water breaks.
bugs bunny should update the animation ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] )
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
> Texas and Florida prohibit local governments from mandating rest and water breaks.
bugs bunny should update the animation ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] )
Trump will cancel this cartoon because it says "Gulf of Mexico."
Eh? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In tropical climes, buildings, work-flow and sometimes, clothes, are already calibrated for the dangers of dehydration, exhaustion and sunburn. Colder climates aren't, resulting in sick people. The government is trying to prevent that by forcing relevant safety rules upon entities who have an interest in ignoring them.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The "wet bulb" [wikipedia.org] part is very important, because it means that humidity is the issue. Humans need to sweat to stay alive in hot climates, but if the surrounding air is already at 100% relative humidity then sweat can't evaporate. If you can't sweat then you can't maintain body temperature and there's a very real risk of heatstroke and/or death. Dehydration too, come to think of it.
Um (Score:2)
Doesn't America hate Americans?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm honestly surprised not to see any Libertardians here claiming that if all the workplace safety rules were just done away with workers would be living in an employment Nirvana.
but are gig workers not workers so the rules don't (Score:2)
but are gig workers not workers so the rules don't cover them?
Cold is worse, why don't we care? (Score:2, Insightful)
Extreme cold kills 7x-20x the people that extreme heat does every year.
Why are we fixated on heat deaths only? Why not work to mitigate all extreme temperature deaths?
Re: (Score:2)
Neither is the earth getting meaningfully warmer outside of what would expect coming out of an interglacial, but that doesn't stop you saying stupid shit, does it?
Re: (Score:2)
So present other data, you tendentious chud.
Re: (Score:2)
You dumb fuck already complained that "I was only talking about a study of northern cities" so it's a little hard to claim that you don't know precisely what data I was referring to.
Although I will agree you're pretty convincing at playing stupid.
Is this really new? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
not in Calitopia (Score:2)
Just had my roof replaced over 2 days in 100 degree heat. Was there anything to protect the workers? Nope, but they did have water and gatorade. Oh, did I mention that all of them were Mexican? I wonder if that has anything to do with it.