Facebook and Instagram Offer UK Users an Ad-Stopping Subscription Fee (bbc.com) 24
"Facebook and Instagram owner Meta is launching paid subscriptions for users who do not want to see adverts in the UK," reports the BBC:
The company said it would start notifying users in the coming weeks to let them choose whether to subscribe to its platforms if they wish to use them without seeing ads. EU users of its platforms can already pay a fee starting from €5.99 (£5) a month to see no ads — but subscriptions will start from £2.99 a month for UK users.
"It will give people in the UK a clear choice about whether their data is used for personalised advertising, while preserving the free access and value that the ads-supported internet creates for people, businesses and platforms," Meta said. But UK users will not have an option to not pay and see "less personalised" adverts — a feature Meta added for EU users after regulators raised concerns...
Meta said its own model would see its subscription for no ads cost £2.99 a month on the web or £3.99 a month on iOS and Android apps — with the higher fee to offset cuts taken from transactions by Apple and Google... [Meta] reiterated its critical stance on the EU on Friday, saying its regulations were creating a worse experience for users and businesses unlike the UK's "more pro-growth and pro-innovation regulatory environment".
"Meta said its own model would see its subscription for no ads cost £2.99 a month on the web or £3.99 a month on iOS and Android apps," according to the BBC, "with the higher fee to offset cuts taken from transactions by Apple and Google."
Even users not paying for an ad-free experience have "tools and settings that empower people to control their ads experience," according to Meta's announcement. The include Ad Preferences which influences data used to inform ads including Activity Information from Ad Partners. "We also have tools in our products that explain 'Why am I seeing this ad?' and how people can manage their ad experience. We do not sell personal data to advertisers."
"It will give people in the UK a clear choice about whether their data is used for personalised advertising, while preserving the free access and value that the ads-supported internet creates for people, businesses and platforms," Meta said. But UK users will not have an option to not pay and see "less personalised" adverts — a feature Meta added for EU users after regulators raised concerns...
Meta said its own model would see its subscription for no ads cost £2.99 a month on the web or £3.99 a month on iOS and Android apps — with the higher fee to offset cuts taken from transactions by Apple and Google... [Meta] reiterated its critical stance on the EU on Friday, saying its regulations were creating a worse experience for users and businesses unlike the UK's "more pro-growth and pro-innovation regulatory environment".
"Meta said its own model would see its subscription for no ads cost £2.99 a month on the web or £3.99 a month on iOS and Android apps," according to the BBC, "with the higher fee to offset cuts taken from transactions by Apple and Google."
Even users not paying for an ad-free experience have "tools and settings that empower people to control their ads experience," according to Meta's announcement. The include Ad Preferences which influences data used to inform ads including Activity Information from Ad Partners. "We also have tools in our products that explain 'Why am I seeing this ad?' and how people can manage their ad experience. We do not sell personal data to advertisers."
That's step three (Score:5, Insightful)
Of enshitification
Re: (Score:2)
No Thanks (Score:5, Insightful)
As soon as ad blockers top working, I will stop using the platform.
I prefer to deal with real humans.
Okay. (Score:1)
People you know (Score:4, Insightful)
Will the fee also stop Facebook's AI slop, reels and other crap from people you don't know?
Never mind, it still won't bring me back. I take a look once in a while and it's 99% crap. Even people I'm interested in who do post don't show up in my feed, which totally defeats the purpose of the bloody thing.
FB is dead and it doesn't attract young people at all anymore. Insta will follow in due course.
Re: (Score:2)
Will the fee also stop Facebook's AI slop, reels and other crap from people you don't know?
Never mind, it still won't bring me back. I take a look once in a while and it's 99% crap. Even people I'm interested in who do post don't show up in my feed, which totally defeats the purpose of the bloody thing.
FB is dead and it doesn't attract young people at all anymore. Insta will follow in due course.
Insta will follow when it's filled with all of the parents who have "graduated" from Facebook.
That being said, I wonder if paying for no ads includes no tracking across the internet, and no selling of the user's data. After all, the "if it's free you're the product" mantra doesn't (heh...shouldn't) apply any more.
Re: (Score:2)
> That being said, I wonder if paying for no ads includes no tracking across the internet, and no selling of the user's data. After all, the "if it's free you're the product" mantra doesn't (heh...shouldn't) apply any more.
Of course. Just trust the Zuckbot.
Pay to end the most obvious abuse (Score:3)
whether their data is used for personalised advertising
If you pay, your data won't be used for advertising purposes. But rest assured it will be used some other way.
Because crucially, the one thing Facebook isn't saying is that paying will stop the data collection.
Of course, the best way to avoid Zuckerberg collecting your data is not patronizing any Zuckerberg site.
Just invest in a proper system-wide adblocker (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Just invest in a proper system-wide adblocker (Score:5, Informative)
https://www.fbpurity.com/
Re: (Score:2)
FB Purity is fantastic. It made Facebook bearable for me when I was on it. And the developer is super-responsive when FB makes changes that break FB Purity.
I've since ditched Facebook... even with FB Purity, it became far too annoying.
Re: (Score:3)
So, the obvious (Score:1)
I don't see ads on Facebook (Score:3)
1. I look at only my feed by adding ?filter=all&sk=h_chr at the end of Facebook's URL
2. On the rare occasions (twice a year) that FB starts sneaking in "Sponsored" ads, I report every one as sexually inappropriate.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't see ads on Facebook either, because I don't do Facebook.
Re: (Score:2)
3. Delete your account
Plugins (Score:3, Informative)
I was going to say goodbye to Facebook over a decade ago, but it proved a convenient way to stay in touch with family overseas when my father became terminally ill around that time, so I stuck around. For many years I have been using the FBPurity, Facebook Container and uBlock Origin plugins with Librewolf, and I never see ads. If you stay there for any reason, I would recommend those.
Yeah but (Score:2)
Good make users pay up. (Score:2)
DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT (Score:2)
That and blocking fuckerbook properties at the firewall are the only way to be free of these ghouls.
I blocked ads for free! **Click to see more!** (Score:2)
....and it cost me nothing.
Secret: I never use those shitty sites.
Next up:
linkedin
youtube
x.com
Really? No joke here? (Score:2)
Story seems like a rich target for humor, but Slashdot couldn't find any?
Actually wish I had seen the story when it was fresh, but now it's stale and about to disappear. My angle involved the good side of making Facebook responsive to the suckers AKA users. If you are actually paying Facebook to handle your personal data properly, there is a theoretical reason for FB to stop the raping.
Disclaimer needed? Someone assassinated my Facebook account back in 2022. Pretty sure it was a political hit, but I'd alrea