
AirPods Pro 3 Impossible To Repair, Earn Score of 0 In iFixit Teardown (macrumors.com) 77
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors: iFixit today disassembled the AirPods Pro 3, giving us a look at what's inside and how the AirPods Pro 3 have changed in comparison to the AirPods Pro 2. [...] To get a look at other components inside the AirPods Pro 3, iFixit essentially had to destroy them because Apple didn't design them to be repaired. Since the first version of the AirPods launched, they've included a battery that is sealed shut with glue, and that hasn't changed with the AirPods Pro 3. iFixit says battery replacements are so difficult that many repair shops won't even attempt to do it. The AirPods Pro Charging Case has the same glued-in battery.
There's no way to attempt a battery repair without causing blemishes on the plastic of the earbuds and the casing, because they have to be pried open. Heat needs to be used to melt the adhesive, and there's no easy way to disconnect the flex cable that's inside each earbud. With the need for specialized equipment and the inability to repair the earbuds and the case without causing damage, the AirPods Pro 3 earned a 0 out of 10 repairability score from iFixit.
There's no way to attempt a battery repair without causing blemishes on the plastic of the earbuds and the casing, because they have to be pried open. Heat needs to be used to melt the adhesive, and there's no easy way to disconnect the flex cable that's inside each earbud. With the need for specialized equipment and the inability to repair the earbuds and the case without causing damage, the AirPods Pro 3 earned a 0 out of 10 repairability score from iFixit.
Crap product for a crap idea (Score:2, Interesting)
The idea of a 'wireless' speaker set for humans that have two ears is Dumb.
No reason not to connect the two pods - minimal weight increase, reduces chance of losing them, makes it easier to charge a battery.
Oh, and their small size means bad sound quality. I wear clunky large headphones because they a sound quality so much better that even I can easily tell the difference.
About the only advantage of that stupid, idiotic product is the fact that they are so bad at blocking outside sound you can wear them on
Re: (Score:2)
But that makes no sense to me. Why would you want that?
..eep!
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Exactly. do not be the dumb ass that thinks eh, I can hear well enough.
When you wear headphones, do it safely. Do not think hey this is good enough for me to walk around and get hit by a car.
If you wear headphones, do it where you can sit down and enjoy the music/podcast/whatever.
Re: (Score:2)
It's called "situational awareness", and it is a good thing when you are out in public.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
No. Situational awareness is when you
DO NOT WEAR SPEAKERS
What kind of freakin moron thinks 'oh well, I can hear well enough to not get hit'.
That is freakin dumb ass bound to get killed because evolution is not kind to idiots that think wearing speakers when you need to pay attention is a good idea.
Re: (Score:2)
The previous poster claimed you can hear what around, not me.
Re: (Score:2)
You do understand that you can select noice cancelation or pass thru based on what activity you are involved in, right? They're actually quite nice. The sound is amazing.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Disagree at least for me. When Bluetooth earphones in general were coming around I felt the same way, kept my wired buds for a long time, even had a set of those nice Shure ones but for out and about during your day? I am a convert, they're just handy too damn, especially for me as I do a fair amount of flying.
Pop one in your ear when walking about to hear, or turn on transparency mode, plus noise cancellation (which does work if they're a decent set and fitted correctly) and the fact that you can just pop
Re: (Score:2)
Convenience always trumps quality.
Re: (Score:2)
These [adamsstatebookstore.com] Idk what you'd describe those as. But they are connected by a large, flexible "strap", then tiny wires that run to the buds. They are useless for anything other than sitting at your desk. Any movement, from working out to mowing the lawn causes the band to shift to an uncomfortable position. I found myself tucking the whole thing into my t-sh
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
TL; DR: The ones that have a wire, or something else, connecting them together are more of a pain in the ass than they are worth. If I use an in-ear set, the true cordless ones are the ticket. Again, all my opinion.
The problem I have with the set connected by a cable is that the cable rubs slightly against my neck, and I hear the rubbing. I don't like over the ear headsets because every single one of them puts pressure against my head, and I have to adjust them every 5-10 minutes to be comfortable. The wireless sets with two unconnected earbuds works for me 99% of the time. The one downside is that they fall out sometimes, but the other problems I have with the rubbing sound and the pressure are more important to m
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
My wife hade the original pro when the batteries started to go she upgraded to the v2 Pro they have always been to small to repair and the same would go for any product in this category She likes the small size for comfort I use mine to reduce noise in server rooms and still allow conversation https://www.accessibility.com/... [accessibility.com]
the pro version has a number of noise cancellation settings including for safety transparency and co
Re: (Score:2)
No reason not to connect the two pods - minimal weight increase, reduces chance of losing them, makes it easier to charge a battery.
One more thing to get snagged, increases the odds of the wire breaking and making the hardware an expensive, irreparable brick... no, thanks.
Oh, and their small size means bad sound quality.
That's not inherently true. From a physics perspective, because earbuds are sealed against your ear canal, you can reproduce bass response with a much smaller motion of the driver, because you aren't having to compress so much air. And because the driver is small, you can still move it fast enough to get good treble response. So in theory, earbuds should be able to
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wear clunky large headphones because they a sound quality so much better
It sounds like your headphones are either beaten by a $10 set of Logitech speakers (because size is the only thing which matters right?), or that you lack even a rudimentary understanding of physics.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They don't use earbuds in recording studios.
Errrr. What? Sorry buddy but IEMs were literally developed for recording studios first. Incidentally they don't also use bigger = better in recording studios. They are smart enough to know better = better, and that when you couple a sealed pressure space between two membranes size becomes completely irrelevant.
Please put a bit more thought into what you say. Bigger != better. In this case bigger doesn't even mean louder.
Re: (Score:2)
Granted, the last time I was in a studio recording was a little over 20 years ago, but I sure remember what size headphones I was wearing.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Why would you want that?
Because these are fashion items designed for people who want to own them rather than functional items for people who want to use them.
Re: (Score:2)
Earbuds can have great sound quality. Try brands like Yuin or Sony, for example. The technology has come a long way.
You can get ones that are joined too. The keyword is "neckband". I wish Sony made its flagship ANC buds in a neckband version. The full size cans are great sounding, but not very good for portability.
It's a good thing! (Score:1)
It's a good thing I can just buy another pair of these relatively cheap, total luxury, first-world problem headphones.
Or, you know, I can just go buy a cheap pair of headphones for under ten euro: https://www.homestoreandmore.i... [homestoreandmore.ie]
Re: (Score:2)
Airpods basically ran all of those off the market. I'm not entirely sure how or why because it was a 30 to $50 headset versus a$200 pair of airpods but not long after airpods head all the decent cheap Bluetooth headsets disappeared. Motorola still
Re: (Score:3)
So buy something else. There are plenty of cheap headphones out there.
Re: (Score:2)
I've bought EarFun BT Noise Cancelling Earbuds. Cheap, good sound, good battery life.
Only down side is you cant make the case ring to find it.
Re: (Score:2)
There's plenty in the $50-100 market. Anker SoundCore headsets are extremely well regarded for their price, for example. An
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've owned 5 different models of the Anker Soundcore brand and they are fairly priced and sound pretty good. My favorite was the now-discontinued Life P3 which sounded amazing and lasted about 2 years before starting to have issues, primarily due to water ingress although I managed to repair them. They're still going strong but I had to superglue them shut. I've tried newer replacements including the P20i, P3i, P40i, and Liberty 4 NC and they all have their ups and downs. The P20i is the most basic and has
This why there is no headphone jack (Score:2)
When your earbud dies you are forced to buy a new set. An an expensive price.
If you had a jack, the only reason to buy something new is if you were clumsy enough to rip the headset off your head and tear the cable, or your cat/dog chewed on the cable. Otherwise, they just work.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When your earbud dies you are forced to buy a new set. An an expensive price.
Most people's earbuds live through several of their phones, all the while costing a small portion of them. It's just not a cost that most consumers care about. Companies chasing mass market dollars do not cater to niches. The rise of small wireless earpieces happened long before the headphone jacks were eliminated. If people cared about this they'd simply buy a phone with a headphone jack, they do exist.
Re: (Score:2)
It's just not a cost that most consumers care about.
And most consumers are dumb with their money. Surely you have heard the saying, "if your friends jumped off a bridge will you do it too?"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Fortunately, it doesn't come up very often (once every year or two). I just don't use my phone that way.
Re: (Score:2)
People repair earbuds? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is an absolutely fair point. Quality electronic devices now last nearly forever. If you don't accidentally destroy them, you are more likely to replace them when they become obsolete. No need for repairability.
Of course, then we get household appliances that - I swear - have a built-in warranty detector: fail the day after the warranty expires.
after a few of these (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
With a connector designed to break, and a cord that conveniently is placed around your arms to maximise the ability to break it.
Sorry but I think a set of wireless earbuds will last longer than your "lasts forever" cabled earbuds.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: after a few of these (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
PDFs? (Score:2)
Have the FCC published the schematics yet.
Death (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yawn (Score:1, Flamebait)
Does this kind of anti-Apple click bait still work? There was an argument about the Mac, and some for the iPhone, but EAR PODS? Who the fuck repairs ear pods?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you complaining about the price of a luxury product?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Nobody repairs Apple Air Pods, they were designed to be a disposable tech product when they break.
Slashdot seems to cater to 50+ year old tech curmudgeons, who can still remember a time where you could fix your broken headphones with a soldering iron. So, yeah, stories like this are a good way to drive engagement.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't click-bait. This is a discussion on repairability. Apple's biggest competitor (Samsung) has an entirely modular design with Galaxy Buds Live with a repairability score of 8/10. There are other buds on the market with a repairability score of 10/10 where a coin cell battery may be used.
Who the fuck repairs ear pods?
People who can't afford new ones. Check your privilege. Second hand markets for these devices exist.
Re: (Score:2)
Who the fuck repairs ear pods?
People trying to avoid unnecessary e-waste.
Does this work in the EU? (Score:2)
Aren't there now rules about making products repairable? Or will Apple just tell the EU to abolish the rules as they demand to abolish DMA and DSA?
Re: (Score:2)
People need to stop assuming what is written in laws based just on their title. Regulations are specific for certain types of products. No repairability legislation covers earbuds.
Just the way Apple likes it (Score:2)
Is that a surprise? (Score:2)
So, what is this all about? Something we shouldn't expect to be easily repaired cannot be. Just like most headphones already aren't.
Miniaturization (Score:2)
To make something that small requires a level of integration that is not conducive to repair. Using connectors, cases that can somehow open or come apart (but not coming apart too easily so they aren't actually prone to breaking more often), etc, is not something that is practical in the first place.
My grandfather used to repair CBs and amateur radio equipment back in the 70s. Then everything was comprised of discrete components (IE each component, like a transistor, capacitor, diode, etc was a separate thi
How about CPUs? (Score:1)
When are we going to go after CPU manufacturers for making it virtually impossible to swap out a bad transistor or two?
Not smart enough to design it? (Score:2)