CBS News Was Just Taken Over By a Substack (theverge.com) 248
Paramount has acquired The Free Press, Bari Weiss's Substack-born media outlet, for $150 million and appointed Weiss as editor-in-chief of CBS News. The move effectively places a conservative-leaning Substack writer at the helm of a legacy news network, following the FCC's approval of the Skydance-Paramount merger, which required CBS to feature a broader "diversity of viewpoints from across the political and ideological spectrum." The Verge reports: Before starting The Free Press, Weiss worked as an op-ed and book review editor at The Wall Street Journal from 2013 to 2017 and later became an op-ed editor and writer at The New York Times to expand the publication's stable of conservative columnists during Donald Trump's first term. She resigned from the NYT in 2020, citing an "illiberal environment."
Weiss started a Substack newsletter in 2021, called Common Sense, which later evolved into The Free Press, touting itself as a media company "built on the ideals that were once the bedrock of great American journalism." As noted in the press release, The Free Press has grown its revenue 82 percent over the past year, while subscribers increased 86 percent to 1.5 million, 170,000 of which are paid subscriptions.
Weiss started a Substack newsletter in 2021, called Common Sense, which later evolved into The Free Press, touting itself as a media company "built on the ideals that were once the bedrock of great American journalism." As noted in the press release, The Free Press has grown its revenue 82 percent over the past year, while subscribers increased 86 percent to 1.5 million, 170,000 of which are paid subscriptions.
Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:2, Interesting)
CBS claims election fraud
CBS charged with slander,
CBS owes millions
Weiss fired!
Substack sold at loss
Taking bets - how many of these headlines will come true?
Which will come first?
Re:Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:4, Insightful)
CBS claims election fraud
After alleged election irregularities trump calls for election to be cancelled
Supreme court appoint trump to a 3rd term
major stroke rendres president trump a vegetable
Supreme court appoint trump to a 4th term
Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd term (Score:4, Insightful)
Now I don't think the American people are stupid enough to elect Trump a third time but I don't think the heritage foundation and project 2025 are planning to give the American people a choice.
We have Rock solid evidence that approximately 7 million Americans got denied the right to vote using common voter suppression tactics last election.
We also have a couple dozen deep blue districts where Kamala Harris didn't win a single vote. It doesn't take a super genius or a political PhD to figure out what the fuck happened there.
And the old farts that put Trump in for a second term are going to be even more bitter and more angry than they have ever been because their lives are going to keep getting worse and they're going to keep getting older and more bitter and angry because that's what bitter angry old men and women do.
If the left wing can pull their heads out of their asses and actually help the centrists out then we might have a chance but I think the left wing is going to spend the entire time ripping into the centrists and ignoring the fascists just like they did last year.
In a few years as our entire empire collapses we will do whatever he collapsing empire does and invade other countries to loot them and fill our coffers.
That will start with Canada and Mexico and the rest of South america. It's possible China will intercede for South America and trigger world war 3 and it's also possible that they will back off but eventually we're going to take Europe and Russia and then we're going to find out whether or not those nuclear weapons still work.
But hey look over there! There's a trans girl playing sports!
Re:Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd t (Score:5, Interesting)
Obama can't run for a 3rd term (Score:5, Informative)
Republicans can do anything. Democrats can't. There is always an excuse and they don't matter.
Because 1/2 the people on this forum would let Trump shit in their mouths if it meant a liberal had to smell it.
Re: (Score:3)
because his 2 terms were consecutive. See how that works?
There is no limit to the number of times someone can hold office. They just can't be elected to it more than twice per the 22nd amendment.
The obvious solution is to make whoever you want to become president speaker of the house and encourage the president and vice president to resign (or impeach them).
Re: Obama can't run for a 3rd term (Score:5, Interesting)
A Faustian bargain if there ever was one. But then again most political contests are like that.
I'm a bit curious, what sort of national security were you looking for? Is there a particular enemy you're concerned about? As far as your neighbors go, our nations are much less secure now that it appears the United States of America is as likely to invade as some other foreign power.
Who is this "you" you are referring to? I've heard a lot of conservative voices talk as if there's some sort of cohesive liberal group or ideology, but no such thing exists. I mean there's the Democrat party, but they are really neither liberal nor some unified ideology. I'm an extremely conservative person, but I'm sure you'd probably want to stick me in the "liberals" label. Before Trump came along, I was hard pressed to see any real difference between the GOP and the Democrat Party in terms of any policies that actually mattered to the country.
I'm not sure who "most conservatives" are, but if you are correct, that seems to indicate there's a distinct lack of empathy among such people. Perhaps you should think about liberals more and why they might feel the way they do. I know plenty of "liberal" people who would do well to do the same thing. They can all still disagree but at least knowing why they disagree is helpful and you might find you agree more than you disagree.
Re: (Score:2)
The enemy within is always the biggest concern.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The enemy within is always the biggest concern.
I'd agree with that, assuming you are referring to Trump, Lutnick, Bondi, and Miller.
I didn't include Hegseth in that group, since he's more the court jester than anything else.
Re: Obama can't run for a 3rd term (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
On national security, I wanted him to get us out of Ukraine entanglements and end the war in Gaza, and start no new wars. So far he's doing well.
Biden didn't get us involved in any wars in his 4 years in office and we're giving Trump credit for 1?
We're still very much involved in Ukraine with Trump even verbally amping up pressure on Russia in recent weeks (as shocking as that is)
Israel is reacting to the rest of the first world abandoning it, not on anything Trump is doing. Notice how it was only after several major first world nations started showing greater support for the Palestinians that Israel stopped with the kicking all Palestinians out of
Re: Obama can't run for a 3rd term (Score:5, Insightful)
Honestly most conservatives do not think about liberals at all
No shot, you can't even believe this. Oppositional and reactionary politics has been the brand since Limbaugh and Roger Ailes turned it into an art form.
Re: Obama can't run for a 3rd term (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Then you are a sucker. Trump isn't good on any of those issues and he will prove it further.
As far as immigrants, they are not the top job killers; that is I.T. (for over a decade) and then probably outsourcing; AI will make the list soon. Trump isn't helping except on outsourcing. Also not top for crime either. Also not eating cats (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/video-headlines-immigrants-eating-cats/.)
If conservatives weren't so racist and sexist we'd not have to force quotas on you sneaky fucks. As
Re: (Score:3)
Most of the people I know who voted for him had a few simple reasons in mind: the economy, immigration, and national security.
You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know... morons.
Re: (Score:3)
I voted for Trump because, as a Californian, I've been a constituent of Kamala "carpet bagger" Harris, and I'd rather gouge my eyes out with a red hot titanium spork than see her in the White House. Charles Manson's rotting corpse is more qualified for public office.
Yeah, her putting away all those child molesters while she worked for California was a really bad thing wasn't it?
You know that's one of many things she did here that makes her more qualified then our current president, right? She even had a 90% conviction rate so it seems she was rather good at it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Now that her book has burned bridges with the party, and her speech writers are wiping the axle grease off their faces from being thrown under the bus, go listen to the woman speak without being prepped. She can barely form complete sentences, and when she can, she sounds as demented as Joe Biden.
So have you never heard Trump speak or are you just delusionally hyper partisan?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The supreme court would simply write their usual shadow docket rubber stamped with NO if Obama tried to run.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The supreme court would simply write their usual shadow docket rubber stamped with NO if Obama tried to run.
Or Justice Alito would just use a loose interpretation of something from 16th century British Law and assert that it applies to support his desired interpretation of The Constitution, like he (basically) did to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
I LOLd. What you have is rock solid evidence of 7 million fraudulent votes in 2020 when all 50 state election systems were in chaos.
Re:Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd t (Score:5, Interesting)
I LOLd. What you have is rock solid evidence of 7 million fraudulent votes in 2020 when all 50 state election systems were in chaos.
If that happened in 2020, then I would imagine the losing party would have gone to the courts. And you know what? They did. More than 60 times. And they lost every case, except for one that addressed a minor technicality that did not change the outcome.
If you find "rock solid evidence" for what you claim, then get in touch with Rudy Giuliani. I think he'd be interested.
They did go to the courts (Score:5, Insightful)
There are state laws that could be used but the Democrats are competent administrators but they don't have the bloodthirsty rage needed to force through the application of those laws.
If you've ever heard the phrase the machine with regards to Democrat politics in Chicago that's what's needed to outmaneuver the Republicans like that.
The Republicans know that and every time the Democrats start to build one up they attack them with the federal government like how they shut down acorn
I know you know probably know all this and I know you think you're going to be part of the club when Trump gets his third time.
Better start picking out your favorite flavor of cat food because you're going to be homeless soon. You are not part of the club.
Re: (Score:2)
If you find "rock solid evidence" for what you claim, then get in touch with Rudy Giuliani. I think he'd be interested.
I'm sure that "rock solid" evidence will be presented just after the GOP replacement for the ACA and "Infrastructure Week". :-)
Re: Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd (Score:5, Insightful)
Same rules apply to 2024. Dems did not go to court because they had nothing. Republicans should have done the same in 2020.
You're saying Republicans should not have gone to court in 2020? Yeah, that's not all.
Their guy should not have called the Georgia Secretary of State, telling him to "find 11,780 votes".
Their guy (through his subordinates) should not have tried to send fake electors to Congress for the meeting of the Electoral College.
Their guy should not have fomented an insurrection on January 6, 2021, in an attempt to stop the ratification of the election of Biden/Harris.
Their guy should not have stayed silent for hours as the Jan 6 crowd stormed the capitol, chanted "Hang Mike Pence", and made congressmembers and others fear for their lives.
I'm sure there's more they shouldn't have done.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd (Score:4, Interesting)
Oh and they all got pardoned, and the killed cops got no honors for their service.
But again, "back the blue"
Re: Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd (Score:4, Informative)
The only person who died from direct violent action at the capitol on January 6th was Ashli Babbitt, when she was shot by capitol police. No law enforcement was killed there.
Officer Brian Sicknick was assaulted with a chemical spray and died one day later after suffering several strokes.
Other officers died by suicide in the months that followed.
Three other civilians died on Jan 6 besides Ashli Babbitt. Two from apparent natural causes and one from accidental acute amphetamine intoxication.
Re:Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd t (Score:5, Insightful)
Wow! That's amazing that you actually believe that. The mind boggles. You really are afraid of democracy aren't you. When Trump calls up the secretary of state for a US state and asks him to "find me votes" that is what election fraud looks like, had the guy come through for trump. It really is hard for you to believe that many others in the country feel and vote differently than you do. Look, the democrats lost the first Trump election and also lost this last election (at least in the Electoral college which is what counts). You don't hear any of them saying millions of republican votes were fraudulent! You do hear people rightly expressing concern and even fighting widespread republican efforts to gerrymander districts to get more permanent seats. That's not voter fraud but it sure is fraudulent in its own right. It's certainly dishonest and unethical. You do find opposition to republican efforts to make voting harder for people they know will vote against them. Again that's not voter fraud, but it is its own form of fraud and dishonesty.
7 million fraudulent votes? Nope. But definitely 7 million people were convinced in some way not to vote. Which suits you just fine doesn't it. You really don't know what you're losing, do you? And you won't until it's far too late to get it back. I suggest you travel the world a bit. See for yourself what is happening in places like Russia, Hungary, Turkey. Study a bit of history. History doesn't repeat but it sure rhymes. My grandfather's generation fought a war to preserve the very things you are throwing away.
And for anything your man Trump does, consider: would you want a Democrat to be able to use those same powers? I sure don't. If you don't also, why would you want Trump to use them?
I watched the voting Rights act get struck down (Score:3)
I do think the actual cheating didn't put Trump in the White House but it probably did put a few close state legislatures in the Republican hands.
The voter suppression is pretty well understood. You can find some videos on YouTube if you care to be bothered I'm not going to waste time linking them here.
It's always the same three tricks. First close voting locations and or send a broken voting machines on election Day so that you have multi-hour wait times t
Re: (Score:2)
Even so... next election, what would you people vote for?
Open borders?
Re:Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd t (Score:5, Interesting)
And the supreme Court is absolutely going to let him do it using the flimsy excuse that the terms won't be consecutive.
The 22nd Amendment states that he can't be elected to a 3rd term, consecutive or otherwise.
But perhaps the key word is ... "elected."
Best argument for a 3rd term (Score:3)
Hold an election where the Republicans win the Presidency and a majority of the House of Representatives.
Congress appoints Trump as Speaker of the House.
President dies/resigns
VP dies/resigns
Trump = President
Note, the VP by law must be eligible to President, so you can't just elect/appoint Trump VP. But there are no rules about who can be Speaker of the House.
The problem with this is two-fold:
1) There is no one in the GOP that has anywhere near the elect-ability of Trump. Trump created a cult around him,
Re: (Score:2)
NOPE. The keyword is "interpretation." Which means any pathetic embarrassment for a reason or even unjustified ruling (they are not required to give any explanation) can destroy pretty much anything written no matter how clear.
The 2nd Amendment does not give the right to arms; if you have reading comprehension, you can see that it's for a well regulated militia not individuals. That was misread into the BS it is today in the most blatant fraud before the presidential immunity ruling. See an honest chief jus
Re: (Score:3)
Also remember that the Bill of Rights is not intended to be a complete list of the rights of the people. The complete list of rights is everything not specifically assigned to the States or the Federal government in the constitution. Many of the founders indeed argued against including the Bill of Rights because they expected some idiot in the future to read it as a complete list rather than a summary of the most important rights reserved to the people.
Re: (Score:3)
He wasn't supposed to be elected a 2nd time either, but Republicans are too cowardly (lots of death threats) or too greedy (threats to finance campaigns against them or think they can manipulate Trump for their own gain) to uphold their oaths and enforce the 14th Amendment (can't hold office after insurrection or rebellion).
Re: (Score:3)
And the supreme Court is absolutely going to let him do it using the flimsy excuse that the terms won't be consecutive. They have already shown repeatedly they could care less what the Constitution says.
Note that there is nothing in the Constitution that restricts what the Supreme Court is allowed to interpret the Constitution to mean. The Republicans realized this some time ago, leading to their frenzy to stack the federal courts and especially the Supreme Court.
How dangerous is this? Consider that the one part of the Constitution that is usually considered bullet-proof from future amendments, the equal suffrage in the Senate provision. The Supreme Court could simply interpret that provision away. The
Re: Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd (Score:2)
"supreme Court is absolutely going to let him do it"
They should be more careful. The Supremes don't get Secret Service protection.
Re: Unless Trump dies he's going to run for a 3rd (Score:3)
Sounds like another leftist death threat.
You guys just can't resist.
Re: (Score:2)
Ahh, the left-wing has to drop everything and obey the centrists. You sound like the right-wing.
The centrists had power not too long ago and while they worked tirelessly to impeach Trump, everyone knew that Mitch McConnell would kill it: Making the entire activity, pointless. The centrists did nothing to stop the real problem: The glorification of Trump's dishonesty and thuggery.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump signs executive order 103997 demanding the name Epstein be scrubbed from all paper and electronic media.
Re:Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:4, Insightful)
I remember as a teenager, when my peers learned about projecting guilt for misdirection. It manifested as farting and blaming others as farting. Variations on the expression "whomever smelt it dealt it" caught on fast (and before I ever heard it in pop culture.)
What is amazing is how many morons there are; who are adults but can't think beyond the teenage mind (the definition of moron,) like Trump... Trump being a teenager who learned the tactic and the followers being teens who have not yet still learned the tactic. Those who do, see it as a clever smart trick:
"totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; ... they had known all along that the statement was a lie"
The Origins of Totalitarianism 1951
Re:Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:4, Informative)
full quote
"Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness."
The Origins of Totalitarianism 1951 p382
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
So they are upset with liberal pedophiles bec
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see "Profit!" in the list.
And rightly so.
Re:Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:5, Insightful)
In seriousness, Trump will never cancel elections. Elections are primary tools used by authoritarian dictators to maintain power and legitimacy. Putin loves elections. Even Xi loves elections. Carefully choreographed elections with predetermined outcomes. Mussolini, like Trump, came to power in a legitimate election. He quickly worked to neuter electoral opposition. But even as he declared himself dictator, he continued to hold elections where he won the vast majority of the vote. Putin too continues to pull in 90% of the vote. Which makes sense when your choice is vote for Putin or volunteer to die in Ukraine (or just rot in jail). Trump's methods are not quite as brutal (yet), but just as effective. Gerrymandering, voter suppression, DOJ persecution of politicians and activists opposed to Trump. We will see Democrat candidates prosecuted (and jailed) before we're done. Remember the strict rule of law is very important to these types of leaders. More and more journalists will simply be sued by Trump himself into silence since he has the whole DOJ on his side; he has no problems using the federal government for his personal attacks and the GOP part of the supreme court is happy to let him.
Other current authoritarian leaders are also employing the same playbook. Viktor Urban of Hungary, and Erdogan of Turkey. It's just that Trump managed to do in less than 10 months what took both of these guys over 10 years to do.
Re:Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Remember people, vote early, vote often.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:2)
Lol. I find it hilarious that you think there are enough federal agents to watch all the polls. They'd spread themselves so thin, they'd just be asking for rioters to send them packing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course he will. He knows he's going to jail if he doesn't stay in power so there's no reason not to try everything. He's too old to outlive his jail sentence so there's no risk of anything worse happening if he fails.
Re: Headlines 3 years from now: (Score:4, Insightful)
Lol. I find it hilarious that you think there are enough federal agents to watch all the polls. They'd spread themselves so thin, they'd just be asking for rioters to send them packing.
Why watch "all" the polls? Suppress the vote in a few key states in a few key precincts where your opponent's supporters are clustered. Job done.
We've learned a lot from Turkey and Hungary (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Two Big Companies "own" local news now (Score:5, Insightful)
Jesus Christ that is freaky double speak (Score:4, Insightful)
The news media in the '90s leaned a little on the left wing for a handful of social issues. Mostly because the evidence is on the side of the left wing cause for the social issues. Trans folk are real, gay people are gay because they're born that way and abortion is healthcare. Those are just facts. And anyone with a education knows that so it's no surprise journalists knew it and reported it accurately.
But take away those handful of social issues and focus on the economics and CBS like everybody else was way right of center.
Go look up how they covered the affordable Care act and the public option. Look up their coverage of Donald Trump in the lead up to his first election. Or their coverage of the handful of left-wing politicians like Bernie Sanders.
Here diversity of opinion is a code word that means they're going to stop reporting reality when it comes to social issues.
That also means science is right out the door because has the saying goes we already has a left-wing bias. So expect anti-vaxxers to get a boost and expect more anti-intellectualism and general attacks on higher education and learning in general.
And holy fucking shit can you imagine how triggered the right wing here at
That's why the right wing desperately needs to take complete and total control of all forms of media like they did in Russia and North Korea.
If you're a nerd go look up Russian science fiction. Not the cool stuff that came out of the Soviet Union when people were able to evade the sensors but the shit being put out today. It is the freakiest weirdest hypernationalistic psycho right-wing propaganda you have ever witnessed in your entire fucking life.
In 10 years that'll be the only thing you can get in america. You can kiss your video games goodbye. It'll all be freaky right-wing propaganda.
Maybe some of the weird old farts floating around here will like that.
Re:Jesus Christ that is freaky double speak (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Jesus Christ that is freaky double speak (Score:5, Insightful)
Proof of what exactly? A large number of Americans support Trump regardless of what he does and he just finished telling the military they were going to be used against the enemy within, meaning fellow citizens of the United States. That's not opinion. That's fact. If you support this sort of action, would you also support it if a Democrat president did it? I certainly wouldn't.
A couple of particular things Trump has done have chilled me to the bone. First was when he patted Justice Roberts on the back and said, "I won't forget what you've done for me." And then this meeting with the generals where he made his intention clear to use the military against American citizens who oppose him. If those actions don't chill you also, I don't know what will.
Re:Jesus Christ that is freaky double speak (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Not a large numbers of Americans support trump, maybe 33%.
Well, that's still a large number. Large enough to be concerned. And overall I think it's actually slightly larger, and changes with the issue.
I know Trump and MAGAs repeat shit like that over and over and over again like propaganda, like they want the sheep to follow them.
It appears even the MAGAnauts have their limits. I heard about a recent poll that found 57% of MAGA Republicans do not want the ACA's enhanced tax-credits for health insurance to expire. And the current government shutdown is due to a budget that will allow those credits to do just that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It should have been a scandal that Trump took the oath of office WITHOUT using the bibles his wife was holding. It was a scandal when a Muslim used the Koran to take his oath... and when Obama used two bibles... Many would say he didn't actually take the oath. Not that he couldn't break his oath. again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Jesus Christ that is freaky double speak (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely true about where the US media was on the spectrum. This is not a troll comment, mods. It's fact.
Was it you that pointed out that abortion wasn't even a social issue until the final desegregation push in the 70s? Thanks for educating me on that. I had no idea previously.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ignorant people just make us all have to repeat history's mistakes forever. Humanity is so doomed... once a people get ignorant and lazy enough they undo progress and that cycle keeps humanity's potential limited. Just look at the USA for a live ongoing example.
You can't stop imaginary drug cartels when you believe everything you're told about them. As far as actual real problems, you can't stop sex or drugs completely and the pursuit of perfection is a road to hell.
I could solve the problems, but "It requi
Re: (Score:3)
^^ What a wonderful summary of American politics in 4 simple lines..
If it'll clean up those cities (meaning: protect those cities from drugs, gangs, violence)... then, yes!
This is the: "It's okay if *my* party does it" approach. Conservatives believe in Federalism, democracy, and the rule of law. MAGAs are Authoritarians so they just believe in force. 1 year ago ago MAGA pundits warned that Democrats were going to send the national guard into cities, and that was Fascism! Today, Trump sends the national guard into cities and that's.... suddenly a great idea!
Maybe the current tactics aren't the best way to go about it... but, at least someone grew a pair and got the ball rolling.
This is where the observer erroneously thinks th
Re: (Score:3)
None of our crime problems will be solved by sending the National Guard into a city for a few weeks. The only thing that this achieves is the destruction of states rights and possibly escalation toward civil war.
Proposal: Instead, fund and train law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, schools, and social workers. The first 3 address crimes that happened, the last 2 prevent them.
The best way to keep 'little Suzy' from walking past child molesters is to make sure her school isn't near the White House or Congre
Re:Jesus Christ that is freaky double speak (Score:5, Interesting)
Well, gee, thanks for defining the facts so now it's clear that everyone who disagrees with you can be nothing but wrong.
Facts have a way of existing and being right whether you like it or not. Trans people literally exist. This is a demonstrable fact. It's not a matter of opinion. You can think it's stupid, which is a matter of opinion, you can wish they didn't exist (also a matter of opinion), and you can wish harm on them (again a matter of opinion), you can wish they were excluded from society and denied rights (also an opinion), but none of those change the fact that such people exist.
Likewise being gay is not a choice. Conversion therapy has been proven to be ineffective. You can choose to hate gay people, wish they didn't exist, want to force them into hiding, advocate to ban relationships etc etc, those are all opinions. But the fact, one for which there is no counter evidence, is that it is not a choice.
And so on.
It is opinion culture like yours that makes the world dislike lefties
Reality has a well know liberal bias. Disliking reality will naturally make you right wing.
Ring wing propoganda is a threat (Score:3)
This is insanity. CNN and NBC are the only independent news networks left not owned by Murdoc and the Nationalists!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What purge? Too many Nazi escaped and began the movements that became today's Fascists in the USA (Italian style,) Russia (Putin with his franchise of it,) and light on the extreme racism in the next gen implementations. Also, faked democracy is the modern form of most despotism; that way you keep the lower IQ portion placated and even supportive.
Re:Ring wing propoganda is a threat (Score:5, Insightful)
Weiss is a dumb c*** (Score:2)
and a rabid genocide apologist
Re: (Score:2)
Is what Hamas wants you to think, and oh look.. it worked. Which means they'll do it again, Israel will respond the same way, and so on forever.
Oh look, another propaganda mouthpiece for MAGA (Score:3)
Because Fox "news" just wasn't enough for them.
Re:Excellent! (Score:5, Insightful)
Would you take a wild guess at what the most watched cable news channel is? https://www.purdueexponent.org... [purdueexponent.org]
By definition, Fox is "MSM".
Re: (Score:3)
What? Fox News and their cohorts aren't enough for you?
If you want "raw honest analysis" then these may help:
https://adfontesmedia.com/ [adfontesmedia.com]
https://ground.news/ [ground.news]
https://www.snopes.com/ [snopes.com]
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Bary Weiss is a bisexual Jewish moderate, too conservative for the left and too liberal for the right.
Her face isn't female enough. Are you sure she's not really trans? https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/... [msnbc.com]
Oh wait, we can't say that about conservatives?
Re: (Score:2)
Bary Weiss is a bisexual Jewish moderate, too conservative for the left and too liberal for the right.
Her face isn't female enough. Are you sure she's not really trans? https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/... [msnbc.com]
Oh wait, we can't say that about conservatives?
So liberals consider “trans” to be an insult, and aren’t happy with less feminine females. Huh.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
She merely pointed out that he made jokes about burning Israeli babies. It was follow-up shit-posters (like you I imagine) that made the death threats.
Re: (Score:3)
1 - you're lying or just pretending to be naive. She picked one comment Refaat made on a debunked hoax - https://thegrayzone.com/2023/12/06/scandal-israeli-october-7-fabrications/ [thegrayzone.com] - fully knowing her followers it would paint a target on his back, as you can see by the death threats made by her followers - https://x.com/itranslate123/status/1719150855021064671 [x.com].
2 - the only shit-posters are hasbara trolls like you, repeating paid-for lies like the "burned israeli babies" and defending a despicable person like
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
60 minutes has always been the gold standard
That gold standard just yesterday lead with a piece about people with vaccine injuries.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Rounding errors should be rounded off. It's nuts when people make a huge deal out of a few people with complaints while ignoring 10k who die of something viewed as harmless. Hydrogen Dioxide kills a ton of people each year and do we even bother giving any time to those who bitch about the dangers of having it around?
How many of us know people who leave a bad review for something because they were too stupid to realize the product needed batteries or to be plugged in? Just because somebody has a problem do
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Bari Weiss (Score:2)
"Rounding errors should be rounded off"
Ahh, yes, the fudge-the-numbers-that-make-me-wrong brand of science.
Re: (Score:2)