Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Windows Hardware Technology

PC Sales Explode In Q3 As Windows 11 Deadlines Force Millions To Upgrade (nerds.xyz) 103

BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz: IDC says global PC shipments jumped 9.4 percent in Q3 2025, reaching nearly 76 million units. Asia and Japan led the growth thanks to school projects and corporate refreshes tied to Windows 10's end of support. North America was the weak link, with tariffs and economic unease keeping buyers on the sidelines even as aging fleets strain under Windows 11 pressure.

Lenovo kept its top spot with 25.5 percent market share, followed by HP at 19.8 and Dell at 13.3. Apple and ASUS both posted double-digit growth. IDC's takeaway is clear: the PC market is not surging on flashy new features, it is being pulled forward by deadlines, old batteries, and the reality that five-year-old laptops do not cut it anymore.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

PC Sales Explode In Q3 As Windows 11 Deadlines Force Millions To Upgrade

Comments Filter:
  • by mr.dreadful ( 758768 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:47PM (#65713192)
    Try Pop OS, its nice.
    • by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @06:51PM (#65713264)

      Try Pop OS, its nice.

      In the process of switching to using other system full-time that's running Mint... So far, have just been lazy. All my systems are (technically) too old to run Windows 11, but all run Linux (or BSD) just fine. Thank you MS for forcing me to switch!

      • by Shugart ( 598491 )
        I've been considering upgrading my tower pc to Pop! OS. Just too lazy to pull the trigger.
        • Shifting data around can take effort, if it's too much effort, get a new PC anyway and put Pop! OS on that. If you don't get on, put Windows on it then, less invested that way.

    • by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @06:58PM (#65713274) Journal

      I'd contribute to a mass Linux ad campaign to agitate the hell out of Microsoft.

    • by BroccoliKing ( 6229350 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @07:08PM (#65713280)

      Try Pop OS, its nice.

      Seconding Pop OS. It just works. Even the touchscreen just works. Which I didn't even know I had.

    • Not until they fix SecureBoot support.
    • by Torodung ( 31985 )

      And there it is. Nobody who doesn't have me to set it up (or similar) wants to run Linux.

      If I set up a desktop for someone, I can configure it for them. Most Windows users can even run pacman.

      And that's why the Year of The Linux Desktop never seems to happen.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        ChromeOS is a better option. On supported hardware. I've had zero tech support calls since switching people to that.

    • Upgraded my decade old TPM non-compliant but still going strong stationary to Linux Mint LMDE, and it's been great. I was preferred to sacrifice PC gaming alltogether in the process. Turns out Steam runs Windows games in my library using Proton quite nicely (have only tested a few though). Really happy with ditching Win 10, rather than resorting to shenanigans like logging in with the M$ account, enabling OneDrive backup to get one additional year of free support, and probably having to deal with a lot more

      • I was preferred to sacrifice PC gaming alltogether in the process. Turns out Steam runs Windows games in my library using Proton quite nicely

        I've been skeptical about the "Windows games on Linux" thing, but I'm hearing nothing but good things about Proton. If it is indeed as good as advertised, it could truly a way for young men to finally get out of the Windows world.

        I would have moved my parents to Google's Chrome OS Flex, but while it's super fast and does a few things extremely well, its lack of support for things like DVD playback is a killer in the "Upgrade for Grandma" department.

        • Young men? likely not. They want the "newest" games. New titles are a lot more hit and miss with proton then established titles 5+ years old. Steam w/ proton does run a fairly large amount of games though.

          Also, just because someone is a gamer doesn't mean they know shit about computers. I use to think that but I've just come across way to many people that know nothing that are gamers. Gaming isn't just for nerds anymore.

    • It may never be a better time, but this is a huge reason why there will never be a "year of the Linux desktop". When Microsoft cuts support, most people will just knuckle under and buy new machines, even if they're happy with what they've been using. They bitch. They threaten. They shake their fist and tell Microsoft they'll go to something else. But most just give in and write the check.

      • by nashv ( 1479253 )

        There is a reason for that called Microsoft Office. And Photoshop. And a million other niche applications that are Windows only (I work with scientific lab equipment) because not enough people wanted or cared about Linux support. Heck, companies selling hardware to labs will bundle a free Windows workstation rather than port their complex app to Linux.

        And no, Libreoffice is not good enough if you are a person who uses Office specifically rather than any random Word processor. Writer is ok. Calc is incompati

    • I'd vastly prefer the masses to stay on Windows, it's truly the finest OS for mass marketing crap to happy consumers and I fear for the mutations greed will force on Linux should their spending power ever transfer here.

  • I wonder if these retards will ever figure out that paying for Windows is like paying for a beating. It's not even a BDSM beating it's more like a fucking Jussie Smollet beating.
    • by dohzer ( 867770 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:57PM (#65713204)

      It's not even a BDSM beating

      Blue Death Screen Malfunction?

      • by Torodung ( 31985 )

        Actually, it's black death now. They got rid of the "blue screen." It actually does look a lot better, even if it is a kernel panic.

    • by caseih ( 160668 )

      There are those that think we're masochists for running Linux. I disagree with them of course. But whatever.

      • Then there are those of us who think Linux is too soft and squishy for dumb-users over power-users and coders. I'm one of them. I'm totally okay with normies staying the fuck out of and away from Open Source. They've done nothing but taint it with politics and stupidity. The "Code of Conduct" phase was a great example. You let in enough safety cultists and they'll ruin anything (and demonstrably/historically do so). I'll stick with BSD. Let Windows & MacOS users drool & pee on themselves. Let Linux
    • Reminds me of canings/paddlings they used to (some US states stll do) give out in school for malfeasance.

    • by Brain-Fu ( 1274756 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @07:20PM (#65713300) Homepage Journal

      Microsoft has been publicly and loudly called-out and shamed for creating an ocean of needless e-waste, and forcing people to buy new PCs that they would not otherwise need (and in many cases cannot afford) or to continue using out-of-support software (with resulting risks of malware or lack of support from other software vendors).

      Microsoft's response has been to laugh all the way to the bank, hand-in-hand with their hardware partner vendors.

      I understand why technicians would think that people are "retarded" for choosing Windows (I run Linux and Apple myself), but the greater retardation is the continuing and widespread belief that we can modify the behavior of wealthy industry moguls by trying to make them feel guilt.

      They are incapable of feeling guilt. They aren't normal people; they just pretend to be. Normal people with normal moral compasses don't ever attain positions of such wealth and power, as they are at far too much of a competitive disadvantage against these "natural leaders."

      If we want to change their behavior, words will not work. We must apply force (in the form of legislation and/or boycott). These are not easily done, but they are the only things that will work.

      • People like will complain that Microsoft only supports hardware for a minimum of 9 years and complain about e-waste, while boasting they use Apple who will only support their computers for 7 years....
        • Agreed - and lets not forget that Apple owners pay a premium for their Macs with their shorter useful life.

          • Macs with their shorter useful life.

            I don't know about a shorter useful life. There are enough people who, especially with the advent of OCLP, have been effectively using Macs that are 15+ years old. These same Intel Macs will also run Linux once OCLP ages out.

        • People like will complain that Microsoft only supports hardware for a minimum of 9 years and complain about e-waste, while boasting they use Apple who will only support their computers for 7 years....

          The difference is, Apple gradually replaces the old with the new; especially since "Non-Updateable" does not mean totally unsupported, especially for Security Patches. Also, Apple has forever turned a blind eye toward "Mac Life Extension" Projects by DOSDude and the Open Core Legacy Patcher; which have allowed Mac Owners to quite easily Install macOS versions significantly past the "Officially Supported" Age.

          That's very different from what MS is doing. . .

        • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

          Microsoft doesn't support hardware for any number of years, unless you mean their peripherals or tablets. They make Windows and they decide what the hardware requirements for new versions are going to be.

          Windows 11 requires an 8th generation Intel processor and roughly the same for AMD. The 8th generation was released in October 2017, 8 (not 9) years ago. The 7th generation was released in August 2016, BUT, Intel kept manufacturing it until October 2020, 5 (not 9) years ago. And their various resellers kept

      • by kenh ( 9056 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @09:08PM (#65713432) Homepage Journal

        This is a bit silly, there wont be tens of millions of 5-15 year-old PCs being tossed in the local dump by Nov. 1st.

        The VAST majority of home users running machines incapable of running Win 11 will simply keep running Win 10 (they really don't care, and they'll be happy to be free of Patch Tuesday).

        The real shift will be corporations that are not quite big enough to lease their computers and refresh them every three years.

        The real consternation will be the small business users - Dr offices and small businesses that really just need something to run quickbooks on and surf the web... and their 5-10 year-old computer certainly may be "good enough", but honestly, it may just be time to upgrade...

        • The real shift will be corporations that are not quite big enough to lease their computers and refresh them every three years.

          There's no such thing. The scale of a corporation scales with their user requirement. If you have 70000 employees you need to replace 70000 laptops, but I'm sure you can dip into your billions of dollars revenue to cover that cost. If you have 7 employees you need to replace 7 laptops, you can put that on your credit card.

    • Yeah nothing every has made a case better than calling people who are perfectly fine with their choice retards for making that choice.

      To be clear, you're the problem with Linux and alternate software. If we ever want to convince people to move away from Windows we need to start by getting rid of toxic arseholes like you and actually make the alternate environments welcoming.

      Stop supporting Microsoft by making alternate ecosystems look so shit. Let someone more capable represent and market them.

      • Nah, fuck those people (and you, but that's another matter). They need to STAY OUT. Fuck being welcoming. That's how you get Linux and System===D and other horseshit. I'm totally on board with Theo De'Raadt style "FUCK YOU GO AWAY AND DIE" style BSD attitudes. It's clear to me now where that came from and why they have it.

        If you want to have a rainbow hug session and make sure your build a "welcoming" and "inclusive" environment you're going to end up with Windows or Linux and all their gay-boy choices wi
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @06:01PM (#65713210)

    Microsoft is pleasing their OEM partners. TPM 2.0 requirements also giving them what they want. When it's in every PC, Microsoft will start locking down Windows starting with games, which will be seen as a benefit to large publishers who will say it's in the name of stopping cheats, but it will also stop modding and other ways consumers get after-market value out of their software.

    • That's only if you run Microsoft's slop. Free your mind as Kuato would say.

    • by blackomegax ( 807080 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:35PM (#65713370) Journal
      With TPM 2.0, your computer isn’t fully yours anymore. It gives companies the power to block certain software, prevent you from installing different operating systems, and limit what you can change. It’s slowly turning personal computers into closed devices that only run what they approve.

      They call it protection, but it’s really control. TPM 2.0 isn’t a safety measure, it’s a soft reboot of Palladium. Microsoft wanted that control decades ago, when they tried to make every program require approval, every file be signed, every action traceable. They failed then because people still believed computers should belong to those who use them. Now they’re trying again, quietly, under the banner of “security.” it is about ending free computing. It is about strangling the last breath of the general purpose machine and replacing it with an appliance that obeys orders from Redmond, not you. A locked future where Bitcoin miners, hackers, modders, and creators must beg permission to compute in their own homes.
      • by DamnOregonian ( 963763 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @09:00PM (#65713420)
        The TPM does no such thing.

        Your EFI does (or does not) do that.
        The TPM is used to securely store the keys that will (or will not) lock you out of your machine.

        Currently, no motherboard vendor is shipping an EFI that doesn't have the PK completely in your control, meaning you can lock Microsoft out.
        The fact that MS locks down their OS using SecureBoot (which game makers can then leverage to make sure you aren't fucking with their address space) doesn't make the fucking trust root the bad guy.

        You're spreading FUD and misinformation.
        • by Torodung ( 31985 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @10:00PM (#65713488) Journal

          More like ignorance. The TPM can be used for good or ill. Windows otoh, will use it for ill.

          • Absolutely.
            They'll find a way to use everything they can for ill. They're a fucking multi-trillion dollar corporation.

            However, TPMs and SecureBoot guarantee the security of the boot process of your machine.
            They are a net good if you give a fuck about being confident the code running in your kernel is actually what was shipped by the distributor of that kernel, and not something patched by some shitware you ran while you were drunk.
            It offers boot-to-desktop security that is completely under your control
            • The place where TPMs potentially get toothy is remote attestation. As a purely local matter having your boot path determined to be what you think it is/should be is very useful; but, by design, you can also request that from a remote host. Again, super useful if you are dealing with a nasty secure orchestration problem(Google has a neat writeup of how they use it); but also the sort of thing that is potentially tempting for a relying party to use as part of authentication decisions.

              We've seen hints at re
              • I agree that remote attestation sucks.
                But that's not the fault of the TPM.

                Remote attestation existed long before TPMs did, and would still exist if they didn't. It would just be a little bit more defeatable.
                • It can certainly be done otherwise; but it's not exactly unrelated when, in practice, a TPM is the industry standard mechanism for making a PC or PC-like system capable of cryptographically secure remote attestation; and when TPMs quite specifically mandate the features you need to do remote attestation rather than just the ones you would need to seal locally created secrets to a particular expected boot state. They are certainly can do that, and it's presently the most common use case; but locking down rem
                  • The Attestation Key and PCRs aren't just used for remote attestation.
                    They're used for local attestation as well.
                    They can be used to detect that a system was booted, for example, with SecureBoot disabled, letting you know the machine was started up in an untrusted state. BitLocker uses this.

                    Again, I agree that remote attestation, as most people are likely to encounter it, is bad.
                    But the TPM simply supports attestation- and that has a local security purpose.

                    Also- you are free to wipe your TPMs attestat
          • Everything can be used for good or ill. The point is the user is in control. There is nothing about TPM 2.0 that locks you into Microsoft. It just doesn't work like that.

        • The fact that MS locks down their OS using SecureBoot (which game makers can then leverage to make sure you aren't fucking with their address space)

          HahahahAHAHAHAhahaha lol, roflmao, omg hahahahahahahahah lol hahahHAHAHAHAH lol omfgwtfbbq

          *cough* These tools are clearly keeping the cheaters and pira .... lol hahahahaha lol rofl lol hAHAHahahAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahaha

          Ahem

          These tools are clearly keeping che lol HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA lol rofl omfg hahahaha fuck me

          Sorry. It is hard to keep a straight face here while making the statement.

          Ahem

          These tools are clearly keeping cheaters and pirates from doing *cough* *giggle* doing the things they do. I am so glad fo

          • Christ, I swear you get fucking dumber by the year. Hey- don't worry about it. TPMs have what PCs crave, dude.
            • I think you missed the point; however, it is not surprising that I am getting dumber by the year. *shrug*

              The point was that all of these shenanigans do nothing to stop cheating or piracy. A TPM that is under the control of the user is a good thing, but, whatever.

              • The locks are already tight.

                They could have been made to exclude us at any time.
                They still can.

                TPMs are an implementation of ISO/IEC 11889.
                Manufacturers don't need to use a fucking open standard to implement lockdown if that's what they desire.
                See: every fucking arm part made.

                TPMs exist specifically to give you the control.
        • TPM 2.0 can be used to achieve the same goals that the old Palladium project envisioned by serving as the foundation for a trusted computing environment where the hardware enforces software integrity. With TPM, each system can cryptogrphically verify that its firmware, bootloader, and operating system are unmodified before running, allowing for remote attestation of trust to external services. Combined with secure boot, measured boot, and attestation protocols, TPM 2.0 enables a computing model where only a
          • The TPM is a key store, period.
            Remote attestation is done by software running on your machine.
            Cryptographically verified firmware is a good thing.
            Using it to lock people out is a bad thing.

            In the year of our lord 2025, in spite of decades of SecureBoot existing, still not a single implementation of it exists in the wild that does not have the PK in your control.

            So yes, FUD.
    • Ah, yes. The SecureBoot off crowd. There will always be some amount of you fucking morons.
    • That lock-in used to be called the Microsoft/Intel devil alliance.

      Anyway, Steam is gaining users and many of them will be Linux/proton users.

  • by couchslug ( 175151 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @06:27PM (#65713230)

    After this long commercial users will have planned for a hardware refresh. Their discards will be a feast far larger than the potential Linux user market (burp!) as always. I consider it a friendly Linux user hardware subsidy.

    Home Windows users will amble on as usual. Clueful users (the tiny few who perform their own installs) long ago figured out how to run W11 on unsupported hardware and how to multiboot and/or run VM if they want W10 for something.

    W10 VMs run fine on Linux hosts.

    • by hwstar ( 35834 )

      "Their discards will be a feast far larger than the potential Linux user market (burp!) as always."

      For a while, until more and more websites start enforcing passkeys which require tpm2.0. Also some authoritarian governments may not even allow isp's to permit pc's to connect to the Internet unless they do a TPM signed certificate exchange identifying the user.

      • What are you talking about ... which websites? AFAIK passkeys can be generated and stored in software (i.e. bitwarden) without TPM ... on Linux for instance.

    • by leonbev ( 111395 )

      Yeah, basically every PC and laptop made in the last 5 years can be upgraded to Windows 11. Many of the older ones still have spinning rust hard drives that are due to fail soon, so those end users are probably better off upgrading their systems anyway.

      Sure, they could just replace that failing slow hard drive with an SSD and just switch to Linux instead... but if they were willing or able to actually do that, they've probably already done it.

      • by cristiroma ( 606375 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:26PM (#65713366)

        My 10-year Intel i7-6700K w/ NVME, 32GB RAM is not rusty at all. It's actually running containers, VMs and IDEs - all at the same time! Capacitors are also doing fine, btw. It also running fine on Linux.

        Wonder why M$ does not mention some people might be able to install a TPM 2.0 module on their MB? Windows/M$ are crap.

    • W10 VMs run fine on Linux hosts.

      Win 10 also runs just fine on older hardware - exactly what problem does running Win 10 in a VM solve?

      It still needs a license/COA.

      It still won't get security updates.

      And running Win 10 in a VM on a Linux box requires a level of sophistication and motivation many/most casual Windows 10 users don't have.

      It's a shame Microsoft only gave users, what, 4 or 5 years notice before dropping support for Win 10...

      In other news, every Intel-based Mac except a few very particular models, are no longer supported by the

      • by LVSlushdat ( 854194 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @10:05PM (#65713496)

        It still needs a license/COA.

        It still won't get security updates.

        Windows 10/11 runs just fine withOUT a license/COA. The only thing is you can't customize it. Big F'ing deal...

        As for "no security updates", try 0patch.com (thats a digit zero, not the letter o". They charge $24/year for security patching Windows10, 8.1, 7 and believe it or not, XP... Check it out
        www.0patch.com

  • Weird brain (Score:5, Interesting)

    by devslash0 ( 4203435 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @06:30PM (#65713236)

    In my 90s head, PC will forever mean a desktop to me, and laptops will subsequently never mean a PC, despite being the same class of devices.

    Just a weird brain. Some signals must have got mixed up in my childhood.

    • In my 90s head, PC will forever mean a desktop to me, and laptops will subsequently never mean a PC, despite being the same class of devices.

      Just a weird brain. Some signals must have got mixed up in my childhood.

      I had the opposite experience. To me, a workstation was a linux/unix machine. When I finally got a laptop (big and slow Toshiba), it was a Windows machine. Of course, starting about 20 years ago, the workstations went away. I had servers and workstations in the lab, and those all ran linux, but the office desktop went away and was replaced by a Windows laptop with a docking station and a monitor.

  • by caseih ( 160668 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @06:36PM (#65713246)

    They are small, cheap, pretty fast, and run Linux well. And Windows 11 decently if you have to. Most of them come with Windows 11 Pro (licensed in the firmware). $200 USD for 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD. Perfect for those that are forced to upgrade their old desktop PCs.

    • by SeaFox ( 739806 )

      You can buy a refurb workstation off eBay with an old i5 [cpubenchmark.net] for the same and get better performance and higher-quality components.

      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        Sure bit if you do need to run Windows 11 the old i5 might not have the TPM 2, and probably is bigger and consumes more power.

        • Every corporate mini PC going back to 6th gen has TPM 2.0. 8th gen stuff is all but guaranteed. They aren't really bigger at 1L in size either. Power is debatable, an 8500T draws 35W under peak load, but also finishes tasks quicker than an N150 for "race-to-idle" power savings. My dell mini 8500T idles at 3W package power and 5W from the wall. My N100 mini PC idles at 8W from the wall. Corpo boxes have better VRM components and don't draw as much waste energy as the chinesium N100 type boxes do.
    • A mini PC isn't that far from a laptop with a broken screen. They both need DC input, rather than AC, so if it fits your needs, you can use an old laptop rather than a mini PC, it even comes with UPS in the form of onboard battery.

      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        No these computers plug straight into 110v (or 220v). Yes they are modern laptop components inside. If you're replacing an old desktop computer and already have a screen, these are way more economical than a laptop. Have you looked at cheap old laptops lately? You can buy them on Amazon for a song, but they are all 10 years old. These mini PCs are simply a better buy. I use them for mini servers. They may be 10 times more expensive than a Raspberry Pi, but with 10 times more utility in my opinion. For

  • For those who use Linux or FreeBSD (or OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc). Will there be dirt cheap but still good used PCs to purchase?

    • It wouldn't surprise me one damn bit if Microsoft is secretly funneling money to companies to ensure their perfectly good "old" PCs never make it to the used market but instead get shredded. Nadella is an asshole.

      • by kenh ( 9056 ) on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @09:25PM (#65713448) Homepage Journal

        MS doesn't care - the gravy train is corporate software assurance contracts, they aren't concerned about the fate of machines that don't run a supported version of windows - they just aren't.

        Wells Fargo has 20,000 desktops, and they pay $50/year for each desktop to cover Windows and Office license subscriptions, and there store literally thousands of companies like that who pay millions in fees every year.

        They aren't sitting around hoping your grandmother's 10 year-old tower PC doesn't turn into a Linux workstation...

    • Never noticed it in the past "forced" HW upgrades. There was the XP -> vista movement, then windows 7... it goes on.

      The HW manufacturers that matter have had years to prepare, so their old stock that matters has been priced to sell, sort of.

      The only thing that changed anything was covid, there were lots of new desktop/laptop sales. Ryzens jumped in performance around that time too, probably OEMs demanding chips faster meant AMD could invest more. Maybe just speculation.

    • The thing is, you can get a new mini-PC in the $250-$400 range that's more capable than the typical decade-old dust bucket.

  • by ledow ( 319597 )

    That's right.

    I put a pre-order down on a Framework laptop so I don't have to use Windows 11.

  • Since I suppose a lot usable machines that will not work with Windows will flood second hand sites.

  • Kinda like the year 2000 bug where everyone bought new PC's.
  • I had that on my pc, find out how to upgrade and it was basically buy a new pc. Just another reason I don't want it.
  • It's incredible that Windows of the modern era can still have such a chokehold on homes that you are "forced" to upgrade.

    It's been 22 years since I ran Windows as my home PC OS. I don't game on PCs and all the business I conduct on a computer absolutely has not required Windows.

    Anyone "forced" in this way should seriously evaluate their relationship with computers as tools and entertainment.
  • Posting this from a non-intrusive Windows 7.
  • Who believes this ?

    and the reality that five-year-old laptops do not cut it anymore

    I am on a 10 year old Laptop running Slackware. It is fast and very useful. I would say no one would see a speed difference between my system and any new Laptop. Maybe heavy GPU gamers might see some difference.

    Me, I am looking forward to very cheap used laptops :)

  • Talk about throwing good money after bad.

  • The Mac Mini is ideal for a user just coming up from Windows hell. It can use your existing monitor, mouse and keyboard and can be surprisingly cheap if you buy a year-old unit from the "official" refurb store. This will be your first experience of booting up without that ten-minute wait cursor as the PC rattles away doing Gates knows what.

    • by nashv ( 1479253 )

      It will also be their first experience in buying/installing third party apps for everything from scrolling up on the mouse and maximising a window properly.

  • i went to settings, updates etc and a notice appeared offering me security updates for another year. for free no less. i accepted, then did the same with 3 other PCs including a 5th gen trackpoint carbon. none of which go to 11. not sure what i'll do next october but in the meantime i'm covered. i love my thinkpad. hate to lose it. just wrote this on it.

    - js.

Excessive login or logout messages are a sure sign of senility.

Working...