Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
EU Transportation

EU Carmakers 'Days Away' From Halting Work as Chip War With China Escalates (theguardian.com) 116

Carmakers in the EU are "days away" from closing production lines, the industry has warned, as a crisis over computer chip supplies from China escalates. From a report: The European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA) issued an urgent warning on Wednesday saying its members, which include BMW, Fiat, Peugeot and Volkswagen, were now working on "reserve stocks but supplies are dwindling."

"Assembly line stoppages might only be days away. We urge all involved to redouble their efforts to find a diplomatic way out of this critical situation," said its director general, Sigrid de Vries. Another ACEA member, Mercedes, is now searching globally for alternative sources of the crucial semiconductors, according to its chief executive, Ola Kallenius. The chip shortage is also causing problems in Japan, where Nissan's chief performance officer, Guillaume Cartier, told reporters at a car show in Tokyo that the company was only "OK to the first week of November" in terms of supply.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EU Carmakers 'Days Away' From Halting Work as Chip War With China Escalates

Comments Filter:
  • by Brain-Fu ( 1274756 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:24PM (#65761784) Homepage Journal

    Our ancient ancestors had a means of building cars without computer chips. I wonder if this lost technology can be re-discovered, and greatly alleviate these economic woes.

    • by jfdavis668 ( 1414919 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:26PM (#65761788)
      Our ancestors also built cars without anti-lock brakes and air bags. Many of them didn't survive using them.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by PPH ( 736903 )

        Our ancestors also built cars without anti-lock brakes and air bags.

        I know. I drive several of them. The trick is just not to drive like a jackass with my nose in my phone.

        • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:48PM (#65761892)

          That doesn't really solve the problem where the OTHER driver drives like a jackass, though.

          • Can I choose my own level of risk? Or do you get to decide for me because I committed the crime of being born into your society where you get to define risk for everyone based on some abstraction that says a lot about you and little about me?

            • by PPH ( 736903 )

              Can I choose my own level of risk?

              No. You will have a car with the requisite number of air bags, automatic seat belts, overly wide A pillars for roll protection (and shit visibility) and crumple zones too expensive to justify body repair should you get into a fender-bender.

              Now pardon me while I jump on my E-bike with the hacked controller and join the unlicensed 15 year olds on the highway.

      • by zmollusc ( 763634 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:38PM (#65761844)

        Don't need chips for antilock brakes or airbags, but i get what you mean.

        • by thsths ( 31372 )

          While there are mechanical airbags, they would not pass a modern crash test.

          And mechanical antilock brakes existed for the railway, but I don't think they were ever popular on cars.

          ESP is now a requirement, which would really stretch the capability of a mechanical gyro.

          And then there is eCall - surely that needs electronics?

          • by 0123456 ( 636235 )

            Jensen used mechanical ABS in the 1960s. It wasn't as good as modern electronic systems (I think it was limited to cycling about 3 times a second) but car reviewers seemed to love it.

            The car wasn't allowed in the US for "safety reasons". AFAIR it was either because there were protruding switches on the dash or the headlights were "too low".

          • Do you know that Toyota puts a shutter on headlights that blocks light just at the spot where testers test? Are your tests doing what you think or are car companies gaming them?

          • I would implement eCall with carrier pigeons and Extra Sensory Perception predates electronics.

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Many of them didn't survive using them.

        But most of us did

      • And fuel injection. Cars will not get the mandated fuel economy without computerized injection systems.
      • by larwe ( 858929 )

        Many of them didn't survive using them.

        Has to be said: those of us alive to read this are the descendants of those who _did_ survive.

    • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

      Ford Pintos for all!

    • Our ancient ancestors had a means of building cars without computer chips. I wonder if this lost technology can be re-discovered, and greatly alleviate these economic woes.

      Cars, like everything else now, are mostly made to be data collection devices. You can't collect data on every possible thing without lots of chips, man. Get with the program. How is the AI going to simulate us once it wipes us out if it doesn't collect every possible datapoint it can now? Come on. It's like you don't even WANT humanity to sacrifice itself for the betterment of the universe!

    • You should show them the way by example. Mail in your opinion on the subject to a newspaper editorial column, instead of using the newfangled computer on the internet. The way our ancient ancestors used to.

      Cars without computer chips suck. That means no infotainment system, but more importantly, it means a *really shitty unreliable car* just like they used to be: what's wrong with it? No OBD to find out. Incredibly inefficient cars that waste fuel on every cycle because the fuel injection system isn't tuned

      • My 50yo car begs to differ, as do the cars made in the 80's and 90's before engineered obscelence got factored in.
        • Yay for your anecdotal evidence. Here's mine: I drove cars made in the 80s and 90s, when they had to live in the repair shop. But I haven't had any problems with my cars in 20 years. The only times I've upgraded was because I wanted new features, and after an accident. Which I got to walk away from, because they're also safer. If I had been in a 90s car, I'd have been dead.

          Now for the non-anecdotal data. Cost of car maintenance has fallen [independent.co.uk], which is making public transport less competitve. And in the US, ave

      • I wonder how good my dad's ear-based tuning was? Remember how bands used to self-equalize?

    • Nope (Score:5, Informative)

      by JBMcB ( 73720 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @01:02PM (#65761950)

      Microcontrollers are used to reduce weight. Instead of a thick bundle of wires going to the door locks and power windows and power mirrors and door open switch and any lights that happen to be there - you have a couple of data and power wires going into the microcontroller unit that controls all the door stuff.

      This goes for everything electronic, and there is a *lot* of this stuff in modern cars. Tail lights, rear climate and entertainment controls, radar parking aids, tire pressure monitors, heated seats, cabin lights, cabin temperature sensors, microphones, etc... Overall weight savings are in the dozens of pounds.

      This is all done to drop weight to make CAFE standards. You could standardize on a different microcontroller, but these things are purpose-built and a full environmental TA soak can take years. You don't want one of these things to fail and have to tear doors apart to replace them in a recall.

    • Re:I have an idea... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by taustin ( 171655 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @01:16PM (#65761998) Homepage Journal

      I seriously doubt that it is technologically possible to build a car without computer chips that would meet the various legal, emission and safety requirements to sell in the US.

      • by 0123456 ( 636235 )

        You can just scrap those requirements.

        It will happen before long because we won't be able to build cars full of computers for much longer.

        • by taustin ( 171655 )

          You can just scrap those requirements.

          Congress could, but right now, they can't even agree on who is paying for lunch. So yeah, hold your breath on that, blue is your color.

          It will happen before long because we won't be able to build cars full of computers for much longer.

          Nice revenge fantasy you're masturbating to there, Skippy. Be sure to use lots of lotion. Wouldn't want to chafe.

        • by cpurdy ( 4838085 )
          You Luddites are just creepy.
      • The Chinese firm is a spinoff from Phillips, maker of light globes and CRT screens reborn. They do basic bread and butter - low value add stuff, made in china using obsolete litho - but bigger may be more reliable. everyone one was happy, results at a low price The stupid takeover just proved a well run Phillips could have been marginally profitable. Now you have to give it back to the Chinese - OR spend billions with more billions in recalls to maintain production. GM just did a huge engine and transmissio
        • Three Stooges, Groucho and Co, F-Troop, Lassie and Rin Tin Tin could have done better diplomacy than the current lot. Nowadays Gillette Bud Beer and Disney are smarter than the Dutch. Really loose windmill cogs, and wooden clogs for brains.
    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

      We still make them for vintage/hobbyist things.

      They're awful. You need to actually manually tune them every time you start, and change the setting as engine warms up to ensure approximately correct mix is fed to the engine and so it can generate power appropriately. Ever heard of a "choke"? As someone who had a car with manual choke, let me tell you about amazing adventures of starting it in the winter.

      And by amazing adventures, I mean utter shit show.

      Those engines are really easy to make. No one but classi

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        We still make them for vintage/hobbyist things.

        They're awful. You need to actually manually tune them every time you start, and change the setting as engine warms up to ensure approximately correct mix is fed to the engine and so it can generate power appropriately. Ever heard of a "choke"? As someone who had a car with manual choke, let me tell you about amazing adventures of starting it in the winter.

        And by amazing adventures, I mean utter shit show.

        Those engines are really easy to make. No one but classic collectors want them, because they're horrible from driver's perspective. You want an engine with proper ECM, that just makes it run for you, instead of having to manually adjust choke, being really careful with throttle depending on the current oil temperature, and not having a clue what's going on with the engine until it blows up.

        There was a whole bunch of cars between manual choke and computer controlled fuel injection systems. I owned two in my early driving days. Step on the gas before turning the starter, it sets the choke itself, and self-adjusts as the car warms up. Oh, the horror.

        It's like people have whatever the opposite of rose colored glasses is when it comes to looking at the past these days. Everything *HAD* to be awful, and there could *NEVER* have been anything good about it. Except, uh, not really.

        • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

          Automatic chokes remain a thing on motorcycles and such. Modern are all ECM based (solenoid).

          One you describe didn't work off a pedal. It worked off a thermocouple in the flow, that tried to determine what temperature of the engine was and open or close the choke accordingly. It's essentially a very simple analogue computer. They're generally avoided because they have severe issues in extreme cold compared to both manually choked cars and ECM driven solenoid chokes in modern carburetors.

        • by kackle ( 910159 )
          I've wrenched cars for decades. Yes, engine electronics are a dream, until they aren't; then they're a nightmare, sometimes an expensive one. My trouble with carburetors and points have been at least an order of magnitude less/easier than EFI (its invisible software, its intermittent black holes). Further, with simpler control, you usually get much warning (performance) about an issue before any engine stall.

          The other thing that bugs me is that none of the pollution politics consider the environmental
      • by 0123456 ( 636235 )

        Have you ever head of an "automatic choke?" All but the very first car I owned had one.

        Pre-computer cars were higher maintenance, but nowhere near as bad as you make out. And, unlike my current car, a failed transmission didn't cost $13,000 to replace because it's full of complicated computer-controlled parts and can't really be repaired.

        I've been looking at new cars lately and it appears I now have to pay for the car to send data to the manufacturer all the time and for a camera which watches me while I'm

        • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

          Hint: automatic chokes between manual and ECM were fucking awful in cold weather, because they had poor edge case adaptation. They were better than manual at getting choke valve angle mostly right once you get the car actually started. Essentially, those are a really small analogue computer that switches the angle of the choke based on temperature return from a powered thermocouple. That's why they needed outside power to work, and needed tuning to work properly in the first place.

          This is why everyone switc

          • My 35yo diesel still has a million KM before it needs a rebuild. Truck engine put in to a car though.
            • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

              Truck engines are built to much higher reliability standard since they have to survive driving for very long times. And they cannot fail, because that costs fleet operator a lot more than just repairs.

              Also diesel, has to be overbuilt due to compression ratio involved.

              Gasoline from same time period still had the OG "magic smoke" moment when seals finally blow due to wear and tear. And then car loses most of its power, and drives with that hilarious amount of burning oil smoke until you rebuild the engine. If

          • by kackle ( 910159 )
            Maybe things were different in Europe, but carbs. and points weren't much of an issue here...as long as proper maintenance was followed. And the average wrench monkey could understand and repair them.

            In the US, (the more expensive) ECM systems took over because they were mandated by our pollution laws.
            • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

              Yes, there's indeed a reason why manual choke lasted a century, analogue automatic choke didn't even last a decade, and ECM controlled chokes have lasted until today.

              It's almost like it's telling you something. But believe what you want.

              • by kackle ( 910159 )
                Congress enacted pollution/fuel-efficiency laws in the 1970s [wikipedia.org] and EFI is a less-polluting and more fuel-efficient system, a way to meet those requirements. There was no choice. Heck, I remember that truck manufacturers held on to those cheaper/easier carburetors and points for years after cars had transitioned.
                • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

                  We seem to be talking about different things then, because I can find images of new cars sold in US, and they clearly have manual chokes in late 1980s.

                  If this was banned by regulation, these shouldn't exist.

                  • by kackle ( 910159 )
                    Perhaps we are talking about different things as I've never seen a manual choke (with its dashboard control knob) in the US, outside of a classic car show. I've owned cars from the 1960s and 1970s, and they all had automatic, thermostatic chokes on the carburetor warmed by the engine--they worked fine in my experience. In the 1980s, I started seeing automatic, thermostatic chokes warmed by electricity before the engine completely heated up. By the late 1980s, I started seeing electronic fuel injection sy
                    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

                      If you're living in a warm area, thermostatics work fine.

                      If you live in a place where it actually gets cold, thermostatics are utterly awful. "Engine won't start to go to work after a cold night" level of awful. Their purpose was to make a gradual choke closing mechanism as engine warms up to level off the curve of the choke closing rather than manual which was usually "on/off" in spite of it being a full analogue push stick in most cases. And so they had a nasty tendency to get ice crystals form after engi

                    • by kackle ( 910159 )
                      I live in the Midwest where we get both temperature extremes. I don't recall having any such issues unless the choke was actually broken (in the very cold, it was more battery problems than anything).

                      When cold, the carburetor's air intake should be closed, which usually happened after the person stomped the accelerator pedal during starting. Then the choke is supposed to gradually open the intake as the engine warms.

                      Either way, if the pollution laws demanded better, then I don't see how the manufa
                    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

                      I live in a place that is really cold in winters, so we have oil heating/battery charging/interior heating outlets for cars to make them start better in winter (and be more comfortable to get into in the first place). Those with money even get remote coolant heaters that burn fuel for a few minutes pre-ignition to heat the engine coolant up.

                      Early automatic chokes were a very common point of failure. To the point where those cars were just shipped out to warmer climates when sold as used, because no one want

                    • by kackle ( 910159 )
                      Can you point me to one of those 1970s to 1980s car photos so I can learn--I certainly didn't see every car available at the time. And foreign cars were still "foreign" (as in, unusual in our area) until, I'd say, the early 1990s.
                    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

                      So I tried and apparently I enshittified my own google search, since it's now feeding me diagrams and conversion kit images and there's maybe one image of an actual car in total.

                      FML.

                      Latest I recall was of some kind of a Korean car from the late 1980s. Most were from 1970s and 1980s.

                    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

                      Decided to try if mainline (not image) search would do better, and it got me results like this:

                      https://www.pistonheads.com/ga... [pistonheads.com]

                      Seems to mostly confirm automatic chokes being very temperamental and needing adjustments/maintenance even in 1990s with general recommendation being "just switch to manual to eliminate problems". But that could be from a European or Japanese model.

                    • by kackle ( 910159 )
                      That would explain it: Until the 1990s, I only knew of one foreign car in our area, owned by my friend (and I never worked on it). So, I might not have seen cars with manual chokes out in the wild.

                      I asked my father and he said manual chokes disappeared in (US) cars around the 1950s.
    • There is a solution that is simple, elegant and wrong.

      Our ancestors cars polluted to the point where you couldn't see the city skyline and were only affordable to drive because of oil and gas prices that are unimaginable today. Computers don't just make your phone play music through your car radio dude. They make your car do what you wanted to do and what you needed to do.

      This is before the reams of safety functions built into the computer especially for big honking SUVs that tend to tip over
      • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        As you usual ignorant and wrong about everything. In inflation adjusted terms gas prices are not significantly higher if higher at all now than at any previous point.

        So no fuel efficiency has not been the driver in terms of making driving affordable. However the cost of car big enough for the entire family on the other hand has increased a lot. Inflation adjusted you could have had a 55 Bel air for something like 25k.

        Find a 25k car that you can five people in today, with any degree of comfort.

        So no 'chip

        • When I started driving gas was 80 cents to 99 cents a gallon. That was in the early 90s because I was a very late bloomer to say the least.

          In today's money that's around $2 to $2.50 a gallon. The average right now is about $3 a gallon and it is unusually low at the moment due to a variety of factors. That's the average in many places it's over $4 a gallon.

          So yeah gas was cheaper when I was a kid. Just the facts.

          A large part of what makes gas cheaper is that we have been pushing higher fuel econo
      • How come they took away CD players? Is it so they can sell me Sirius XM?

    • by sinij ( 911942 )
      None of the purely mechanical automobiles would be able to pass modern emission tests or meet mandatory safety equipment standards. The solution to chip shortages is building foundries, and not necessary ones that capable of most advanced process, locally for the purpose of national security.
      • Building fabs and assembly lines for devices outside of China is what really should be happening. With the way things are going its a matter of when not if there is a WW3 involving China and they cut off the world from everything they produce.
    • by ukoda ( 537183 )
      While your post is tongue in cheek all modern cars do worry me about parts lock in when they are out of warranty. In theory BEVs should be pretty simple but in reality they are currently just as bad as modern ICEV. Aptera look to be the most open of the bunch but until they are in production that doesn't mean much.

      If you ignore the complications of global safety regulations and just looked at what it would take to make a practical BEV it could be done with common interchange parts using open source des
    • Your car won't run without computers. Take your catalytic converter (CC) as an example. When your engine runs lean the exhaust has extra oxygen, the CC captures those atoms. When the engine runs rich the exhaust has extra carbon. The CC uses it's stored oxygen to turn the exhaust into CO2 and H2O. Your engine constantly moves from rich to lean and back again. If they do that for smog control, what do you think they can do with ignition timing, variable valve timing, and all the other doo dads they can
  • by PackMan97 ( 244419 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:34PM (#65761820)
    Diversity makes us stronger. Sourcing critical parts from a single (quietly hostile) country is never a good idea. Everyone looking to shave pennies off the price of a part or chip in order to make more money is now seeing their chickens come home to roost.
    • by PDXNerd ( 654900 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:42PM (#65761866)

      The ironic part is that ASML is a dutch company. The most advanced lithography process is created in the Netherlands, but its just not economical to *make the chips* there.

      • This is only partly true, you need several other machines to actually make the chip then and tuning all these machines to work together is such an effort that Taiwan is pretty much the single bottleneck for actually producing the most advanced chips. And THEY have outsourced the crappy old ones to China.
        So asml matters a lot in this equation, but not nearly as much as you might think.

        • This is only partly true, you need several other machines to actually make the chip then and tuning all these machines to work together is such an effort that Taiwan is pretty much the single bottleneck for actually producing the most advanced chips. And THEY have outsourced the crappy old ones to China.
          So asml matters a lot in this equation, but not nearly as much as you might think.

          Actually ASML arguably matters more than TSMC. China and SMIC have already waved huge sums of money to lure away top TSMC executives and specialists. What they don't have is the semiconductor manufacturing equipment. China throws around claims of already finding domestic replacements for ASML, but they also claim to have domestic replacements for Nvidia. Of course, none of these claims are credible. If the claims were true, then not only would China be producing and making their own chips, they would h

      • by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @02:30PM (#65762260)

        The ironic part is that ASML is a dutch company. The most advanced lithography process is created in the Netherlands, but its just not economical to *make the chips* there.

        ASML has zero impact on the car chip industry except maybe the vision computers in Teslas. Car chips are made on processes 2 orders of magnitude larger.

        This does however have a lot to do with another Dutch manufacturer, Nexperia which is the actual centre of the current chip crisis (and no they don't use ASML gear).

      • Most automotive modules aren't using cutting-edge nodes anyway. There are still plenty of chips being made on 40-90nm processes.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      I think what people are referring to is Second Sourcing of parts. Part of the reason that AMD got access to the x86 instruction set is that IBM insisted that there be a second source for all the intel chips in in their PCs, particularly the CPU

      For the long term, if the EU doesn't have the ability to create and build chips within their own borders, they'll always be in a position where their economies are at risk.

      • by YuppieScum ( 1096 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @01:39PM (#65762086) Journal

        For the long term, if the EU doesn't have the ability to create and build chips within their own borders...

        There are a number of fabs in the EU (and UK, for that matter) and have been for many years. However, they use very old/large "nodes" compared to TSMC, Samsung and Intel, or even the fabs in China, and so are unsuitable for the products auto-makers need.

        It doesn't help that these same auto-makers cancelled pretty much all of their wafer-start contracts at the beginning of COVID, so Apple bought them up for their in-house CPUs and also took multi-year options on future production, which left the car-makers floundering for second- and third-tiers fabs when post-COVID production ramped up again...

    • China was rather boring until someone learned the definition of tariff. Remember a year ago when things were boring and running smoothly? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

    • It's interesting that China is purportedly able to turn the US-led embargo of high-end processors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment into a strength that encourages it to speed along the inevitable domestic production of products that will eliminate any dependence on Western goods. However, the reverse logic somehow doesn't work for rare earths or car chips outside of China.

      • Rare earth mining is messy business. There are plenty of sources of rare earths outside of China, but nobody really wants to go through the process of digging up and refining all those minerals.

  • Simple! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by zmollusc ( 763634 )

    Retrieve all the money paid as bonuses to the people who got rid of the warehouses and installed just-in-time systems and use that cash to buy alternate chips.

    • They're mostly retired and rich now. They sold us out.

    • Retrieve all the money paid as bonuses to the people who got rid of the warehouses and installed just-in-time systems and use that cash to buy alternate chips.

      They literally aren't running JIT systems. That's why they have reserves, that's why they were able to continue producing vehicles for months despite chip shipments being halted thanks to the Nexperia fight. The fact they don't use JIT is right there in the summary. There's only so many warehouses you can store stuff in.

  • Those who do not learn from history should be sacked.

    This happened five years ago.
    Car manufacturer CEOs who let this happen again should be resigning en masse.

    From the 3rd International Conference on Electronic Engineering and Informatics (EEI 2021) June 18-20, 2021 in Dali, China:

    https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1971/1/012100/meta
  • I thought Europe was just one walk-able metro that didn't need cars anyway? They can just ride their bicycles, right? How about just repair those used cars instead, it's better for the environment. /s

    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      What Americans who have never been to the EU need to understand about it is this: It is mostly like the US except everything is not as good, but the entire population pretends real hard they don't have problems and has a sense of superiority that makes American exceptionalism seem understated.

      Basically if you have never been, don't bother it isn't worth it. The entire Eurozone has nothing to offer you can't get here better, cheaper, faster, and pick all three!

      • But I really do want to go visit Ireland one day. It looks like such a scenic country. Scotland as well. A lot of the other places seem like tourist traps. I'll just do the locals a favor and not visit, there by not making things even worse there. Living in San Diego, I already have enough tourist to deal with, so I by and large don't want to go to some super popular, overwhelmed area. Sounds bad for me and the locals.

    • Eh?

      There's plenty of car brained idiots in Europe, let assure you. It's just that for a variety of interesting reasons, they didn't get to win completely, bulldoze cities to make them car dependent hellscapes and then cement that with the force of law to prevent you building anything nice.

      But you know instead of just being randomly angry at Europe for not completely prostrating themselves at the altar of the automobile you could just get on a plane from America and visit. You might even learn why some peopl

    • Even older cars need microchips for repairs and replacement parts. Unless you mean old-old cars, like a model T :p

  • by oumuamua ( 6173784 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:51PM (#65761898)
    How did this all start? from TFA

    Beijing banned exports of Nexperia chips near the start of the month in response to the Dutch government’s decision to take over the Netherlands-headquartered company on 30 September and suspend its Chinese chief executive after the US flagged security concerns.

    This Nexperia takeover also covered on Slashdot: https://yro.slashdot.org/story... [slashdot.org]
    So in sum, actions taken in fear of China restricting a critical resource actually cause China to restrict that resource. The consequences were not well thought out.

    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 ) on Thursday October 30, 2025 @01:29PM (#65762042)

      What actually happened is embodiment of the meme: "America designs, China builds, EU regulates".

      Here EU's regulatory supremacy made bureaucrats at all levels believe that it's the bureaucrats within every organization that matter, not the people being managed by bureaucracy that actually produce things. So when confiscating Nexperia... they confiscated the HQ. The place with the company bureaucracy.

      Chinese took one look at this idiotic confiscation of bureaucracy that never touched any productive parts of the company, did a "are you really this fucking retarded" double take, concluded that yes, European bureaucratized leadership is in fact fucking retarded, and simply ordered the production facilities in PRC to... stop taking instructions from HQ.

      Because bureaucracy is utterly worthless without someone to actually do things they order. It's not a producer of anything. It's a necessary evil. A symbiote at best, and a parasite at worst. Which can in fact be simply cut out and replaced rapidly, as long as productive parts of the company remain, because there's plenty of comparable symbiotic systems out there. But there are very few if any producers.

    • The consequences were not well thought out.

      Actually it seems the consequences were every bit as everyone expected which is why there is a move to work to reverse it in the first place. By the way there was good reason to do what was done. Since the Nexperia takeover a *LOT* of shit has been uncovered about how China was undermining western chip production.

      • Western chip production undermined itself. China just doesn't want to aid the West in their war against China.
        • If you ignored that Nexperia's CEO was instantly replaced by a Chinese puppet during the takeover, who then spilled trade secrets from all of Europe's manufacturing partners to China, who then purposefully shut down European manufacturing from Nexperia (which at the time did still exist), and that the Chinese government entrenched itself so deep into the business that they told the company to ignore its own instructions, then sure. It's the west's fault.

          The west's war. They are the bad ones. Nothing to do w

  • I can't find which kind of chips... heavy duty chips like ECUs are certainly differently made than infotainment systems.
      Europe has a few fabs around that definitely can do at least 90nm parts.

    • Literally every piece of electronics in modern cars talks on the CAN bus. In the old days your headlight switch ran 12 volts directly to them. Today the LED drivers get their on signal from the CAN bus.

      • Very old indeed, the slightly less old used a relay and the switch itself only needed to handle low current to power the relay.
    • by Tailhook ( 98486 )

      Europe has a few fabs around that definitely can do at least 90nm parts.

      While I wonder if that's actually true, it wouldn't help. Nexperia, the supplier at the heart of this debacle, makes power and analog stuff: GaN FETs, bipolar, power diodes, etc. These aren't ECU MCUs. They're big power devices, using specialized materials: silicon carbide and gallium nitride, for example. You can't make these in just any old 90nm processor fab.

      It's great to see all this. Consequences of the the romper room mentality of EU technocrats and citizens dwelling under the umbrella of secur

      • Thank you. That's the info I was after.

        > While I wonder if that's actually true

        Just checked.
        GlobalFoundries' FAB1 was reportedly refitted to do 12nm. I remembered it at 45nm.
        So yes, but no at the same time.

        • by Tailhook ( 98486 )

          So yes, but no at the same time.

          GlobalFoundries' FAB1 is strictly silicon-based CMOS stuff: small audio amps, LED drivers, smartcard chips and other low power RF devices. No SiC or GaN production. So FAB1 can't help with the Nexperia embargo at all. GlobalFoundries does make such devices, but those foundries are in the US.

  • It has four diverse representatives in distinct clothing. Like Unity Linux.
  • Don't steal Chinese companies if you have Chinese supply chain dependencies.
    • You have it backwards. The lesson to China is: DO steal European companies (and their secrets). DO make the EU more dependent on Chinese industry.

  • Teach you to put computer chips in automobiles. Suffer wimp while your chi.com enemy laughs ! Have any cars been more fun to drive than the 1954-1970 crop of 4/5 speed manual with mechanical distributor and over-drive ( so my TR-6 had 5-speeds ! lucky me ). Granted, computer car functions save some Darwin-Award-winning drivers from fulfilling their destiny. Too bad. 

"Love your country but never trust its government." -- from a hand-painted road sign in central Pennsylvania

Working...