Amazon CEO Says Massive Corporate Layoffs Were About Agility - Not AI or Cost-Cutting (geekwire.com) 46
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy says the company's latest big round of layoffs -- about 14,000 corporate jobs -- wasn't triggered by financial strain or AI replacing workers, but rather a push to stay nimble. From a report: Speaking with analysts on Amazon's quarterly earnings call Thursday, Jassy said the decision stemmed from a belief that the company had grown too big and too layered. "The announcement that we made a few days ago was not really financially driven, and it's not even really AI-driven -- not right now, at least," he said. "Really, it's culture."
Jassy's comments are his first public explanation of the layoffs, which reportedly could ultimately total as many as 30,000 people -- and would be the largest workforce reduction in Amazon's history. The news this week prompted speculation that the cuts were tied to automation or AI-related restructuring. Earlier this year, Jassy wrote in a memo to employees that he expected Amazon's total corporate workforce to shrink over time due to efficiency gains from AI. But his comments Thursday framed the layoffs as a cultural reset aimed at keeping the company fast-moving amid what he called "the technology transformation happening right now."
Jassy's comments are his first public explanation of the layoffs, which reportedly could ultimately total as many as 30,000 people -- and would be the largest workforce reduction in Amazon's history. The news this week prompted speculation that the cuts were tied to automation or AI-related restructuring. Earlier this year, Jassy wrote in a memo to employees that he expected Amazon's total corporate workforce to shrink over time due to efficiency gains from AI. But his comments Thursday framed the layoffs as a cultural reset aimed at keeping the company fast-moving amid what he called "the technology transformation happening right now."
Gymnasts (Score:4, Funny)
seems like Amazon should be hiring a bunch of gymnasts.
Re: (Score:2)
seems like Amazon should be hiring a bunch of gymnasts.
How many gymnasts? Choose a number.
Re: (Score:2)
How many are available? I'd like 12 just for myself.
Re:Gymnasts [are human, too] (Score:2)
Mod FP branch funnier...
But I just had an over 600 word interaction with a third generative AI engine. All three of them have failed to solve the same computer-related problem. They are not stupid. They are not not stupid. They are not. Not human, not gymnasts, just not. Period.
It's a different way of thinking and I am trying to minimize my exposures because I think it may be dangerous. And contagious.
But I'd still like to see a website that rates and compares AI on such dimensions as "quality of apology",
In other words-AI (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
There is a difference between AI being the real reason, and seeing a need to restructure due to organizational bloat. If you do an internal reorganization because there are too many layers of management to get things done quickly, you can have layoffs that have nothing to do with AI.
Remember, Amazon had that outage, and when management can't FIND who to contact to fix the problem because of the organization being bloated, that's when heads tend to roll.
Re: (Score:1)
Right but all this ignores the mid-level management if it is 'good' are at the most valuable during times of transition and in the event of calamity
Effective mid-level management would have been able enhanced the response to an outage. They would have KNOW exactly which engineers were key, and been able to quickly name them and get them excused/pulled off of whatever else they were doing, brought back from PTO, etc to get the problem solved.
Same thing when it comes to transition, good middle management kno
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
troublemakers (those that stir the pot with their activism whether thats technical, political, social or whatever)
low performers (but not quite low enough to fire outright)
misfits (talented folks who just don't quite fit the position)
Basically, you can get rid of folks without having to go through an unpleasantness of a PIP or other disciplinary actions.
Re: (Score:1)
This is more about Elon and Twitter than AI (Score:2)
But what actually happened? Twitter struggled for a month or two. Then it was fine. Most importantly to tech executives: the company continued running reasonably well with roughly half the number of employees.
That blew the minds of C-level tech executives.
Re: (Score:2)
This idea of blindly cutting people works fine at companies like Twitter that are static for technology. The software has been written and doesn't need to change much. This doesn't work for most companies that have competition and where the technology is constantly changing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
lol this is all fiction
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
yeah i didn't read the second half admittedly. but the first part, only a fucking idiot believes he's done anything constructive at twitter.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.axios.com/2025/10/... [axios.com]
Re: (Score:1)
I bet you watch presidential debates and talk to outside salesman too
Re: In other words-fear (Score:2)
Re: In other words-AI (Score:2)
He is a CEO. His words are unconnected to reality. Like sales, marketing, HR etc.
PHB-to-English Translation: (Score:4, Funny)
"Sorry, we used the wrong buzzwords & PHBese, making shareholders nervous. Therefore, we are issuing new buzzwords & PHBese to describe our shrinkage without directly admitting we are shrinking."
He's annoyingly right (Score:2)
How many times can you recall whe
Re:He's annoyingly right (Score:4, Interesting)
Alas, many (or most) of the people laid off weren't managers. Interestingly, many of the people laid off supported AWS in some way. One wonders if the loss of experienced people in AWS has something to do with the recent outage?
Personally, I don't want to be anywhere near AWS when they are finally schooled by reality that AI is actually much more expensive and less effective than a few good people.
Dr. Evil voice --- Riiiiiiiiggght. (Score:1)
Seriously though... There's going to be 2 types of engineers in the not-so-distant future. Those who embraced AI and integrated it into their workflows, and those looking for a job.
Mini-Me Thinking. (Score:2)
Seriously though... There's going to be 2 types of engineers in the not-so-distant future. Those who embraced AI and integrated it into their workflows, and those looking for a job.
I envision in the not-so-distant future the AI whisperers providing succinct enough instruction to the A(G)I hivemind will be the valued resource. At that point the job will require more a degree in whispering than engineering.
AI won't need to waste precious money-making time on memorizing math equations beating that old-fashioned mentality into a handheld calculator in hopes of passing the math final and the American History final in the same day. The 2nd year Engineering student snorting lines of Ritali
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
does the worm in your head have a name?
Administration bloat is real. (Score:2)
All that bloat just makes it harder to steer the ship while dragging down resource availability. But sure blame the greedy shareholders and not managem
So here's what it's actually about (Score:3)
So these companies are happy to fire all their people right now content and safe in the knowledge that they won't go off and build competitors that might potentially have to be bought out.
Notice I didn't talk about competition? Companies don't compete anymore. Every single company does the Microsoft embrace extend extinguish and a complete lack of antitrust law enforcement means they can do it with impunity.
We have been making trades with our voting decisions for years now and we're about to pay the piper on that.
Not what the people being laid off say (Score:3, Interesting)
Agility. Sure. (Score:2)
Nothing to do with massive overspending on AI, to where it's affecting the bottom line.
Re: (Score:2)
Now ask the visionary CEO to define "agility" and get out the popcorn. Also ask him if cutting 60k people will result in even greater agility.
Re: (Score:2)
I gather there's a "game" where you fall down a mountain. I suggest we volunteer Bezos for a live action version of that, using a broken window in a skyscraper as the top...
*sniff sniff* (Score:2)
I smell bullshit.
Zoho Eased Costs on the East Coast (Score:1)
How many (Score:2)
So, instead of a massive super tanker (Score:2)
A super tanker need a long, long, long distance to execute a turn. With this new "agility" they should be more like an aircraft carrier, and only need a long, long distance to execute a turn.