Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
AI IT

Neurodiverse Professionals 25% More Satisfied With AI Tools and Agents (cnbc.com) 30

An anonymous reader shared this report from CNBC: Neurodiverse professionals may see unique benefits from artificial intelligence tools and agents, research suggests. With AI agent creation booming in 2025, people with conditions like ADHD, autism, dyslexia and more report a more level playing field in the workplace thanks to generative AI. A recent study from the UK's Department for Business and Trade found that neurodiverse workers were 25% more satisfied with AI assistants and were more likely to recommend the tool than neurotypical respondents. [The study involved 1,000 users of Microsoft 365 Copilot from October through December of 2024.]

"Standing up and walking around during a meeting means that I'm not taking notes, but now AI can come in and synthesize the entire meeting into a transcript and pick out the top-level themes," said Tara DeZao, senior director of product marketing at enterprise low-code platform provider Pega. DeZao, who was diagnosed with ADHD as an adult, has combination-type ADHD, which includes both inattentive symptoms (time management and executive function issues) and hyperactive symptoms (increased movement). "I've white-knuckled my way through the business world," DeZao said. "But these tools help so much...."

Generative AI happens to be particularly adept at skills like communication, time management and executive functioning, creating a built-in benefit for neurodiverse workers who've previously had to find ways to fit in among a work culture not built with them in mind. Because of the skills that neurodiverse individuals can bring to the workplace — hyperfocus, creativity, empathy and niche expertise, just to name a few — some research suggests that organizations prioritizing inclusivity in this space generate nearly one-fifth higher revenue. "Investing in ethical guardrails, like those that protect and aid neurodivergent workers, is not just the right thing to do," said Kristi Boyd, an AI specialist with the SAS data ethics practice. "It's a smart way to make good on your organization's AI investments."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Neurodiverse Professionals 25% More Satisfied With AI Tools and Agents

Comments Filter:
  • and...? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dfghjk ( 711126 ) on Sunday November 09, 2025 @01:18PM (#65784154)

    "...neurodiverse workers were 25% more satisfied with AI assistants and were more likely to recommend the tool..."

    You know who else would be more satisfied? Stupid people. Chimpanzees would find AI unimaginably great.

    And that's not a knock on "neurodiverse workers", it's a knock on the "study". In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. What matters is what the "tool" can do, not what the deficiencies of some users are.

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Obviously the tool can help these people. I mean you can start simple. Have someone with dyslexia, they can ask the AI to write a text using simpler, easy to read words. That's a task that models can do that run on your smartphone. The result isn't too surprising. People who benefit from texts being processed for them like the tool that does that. Next you can find that people who are short on time are happy to have tools that summarize text. After that you may find, that authors like tools that find synony

      • I'm neurodivergent and I'm just thankful for the fact that AI talks properly. There are so many people who think they are using the correct words, but often words are picked that are very vague and you can think of several things they might mean. AI generally picks words very well to convey a thought.
    • I think the key to successfully using modern LLM AI code is language phrasing and describing the problem and goal successfully in order to give the AI code as much information as it can that is relevant to the issue trying to be solved. As the saying goes about computers, 'garbage in'='garbage out' (GIGO). The same goes with AI. Information going in has to be as full and complete as possible in order to get the best answer out of LLM AI code. So 'stupid people' and chimpanzees finding AI unimaginably great?
    • I think the phrase is now "in the land of people affected with low vision, the one-eyed person is monarch."

  • >now AI can come in and synthesize the entire meeting into a transcript and pick out the top-level themes.

    This guarantees its failure, not because the tool is inaccurate or useless, but because it threatens the livelihood of so many.

    To paraphrase: Bureaucrats conduct meetings both because they appear to be busy when they are meeting and because the minutes and slides, once written, immediately become proof that they were busy.
  • ... other humans.

    ADHD people don't like making eye contact? No problem, boss. You can have that camera on your laptop staring at you all day.

    • Actually, it's staring at a piece of black electrical tape all day, but what ever makes you feel safe and secure there micromanager.
  • by AmazingRuss ( 555076 ) on Sunday November 09, 2025 @04:32PM (#65784420)
    ... into 3 paragraphs of self congratulatory bullshit. People eat it up.
  • ... but now Jira has an AI that summarizes the entire ticket into bullet points at the top, and it's fairly accurate and really useful. Claude when fed documentation that I don't understand will clarify it and summarize it for me as well, it makes my dysfunction less dysfunctional.

    • How do you know that the summary is accurate?
      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        While AI is unreliable, I have to point out that human summaries aren't all that reliable either. I've read more than a few textbooks that were full of obvious nonsense and terrible advice.

        I tried AI for a web app I made for personal use. It couldn't build a working app, but it did at least get me the keywords I needed to google to build my own. Some of the tech it suggested was outdated and deprecated, so basically about as reliable as the Reddit posts it was trained on.

        • I think if my coworkers were writing Jira tickets that were too unreadable, I would ask them to write shorter tickets.
          • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

            Then you end up with vague tickets you can't act on. You can't win, and I say that from bitter experience.

            • I don't understand what people are doing that they need to summarize Jira tickets. They usually aren't very long...
  • Not exactly an Earth shattering revelation.

    • LAWL! Now tell us what you really think.

      Also, commercial AI is like crack for kids, there's no way they aren't going to make it their best friend. People with initiative will be scorned. Truly the dawn of the idiocracy, once Vance gets Trump out of the way it's silicon valley bro's, with dudes like Theil, can I say that ? and Gelsinger, paving the way to the Hand Maiden's tale future.
  • by jjaa ( 2041170 )
    As a person with ADHD and dyslexia (or is it not enough to be counted as ND?) I can see why this might be helpful for people to (finally) have a personal assistant to manage them around their difficiencies. But for me personally, and i think it's specifically because i'm a neurodivergent person, It bothers the living fsck out of me to, that the world is this happy go lucky all in on generative models for EVERYTHING, especially things which should be fact accurate, so translate 1:1 to facts, not some statis

The first sign of maturity is the discovery that the volume knob also turns to the left.

Working...