Waymo Robotaxis Are Now Giving Rides On Freeways (techcrunch.com) 28
Waymo is rolling out robotaxi rides that use freeways across Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Phoenix for the first time -- "a critical expansion for the company that it says will reduce ride times by up to 50%," reports TechCrunch. From the report: That stat could help attract a whole new group of users who need to travel between the many towns and suburbs within the greater San Francisco Bay Area or quicken commutes across the sprawling Los Angeles and Phoenix metro areas. Using freeways is also essential for Waymo to offer rides to and from the San Francisco Airport, a location the company is currently testing in.
The service won't be offered to all Waymo riders at first, the company said. Waymo riders who want to experience freeway rides can note their preference in the Waymo app. Once the rider hails a ride, they may be matched with a freeway trip, according to the company.
The company's robotaxi routes will now stretch to San Jose, an expansion that will create a unified 260-mile service area across the Peninsula, according to Waymo. The company said it will also begin curbside drop off and pick up service at the San Jose Mineta International Airport. It already offers curbside service to the Sky Harbor Phoenix International Airport.
The service won't be offered to all Waymo riders at first, the company said. Waymo riders who want to experience freeway rides can note their preference in the Waymo app. Once the rider hails a ride, they may be matched with a freeway trip, according to the company.
The company's robotaxi routes will now stretch to San Jose, an expansion that will create a unified 260-mile service area across the Peninsula, according to Waymo. The company said it will also begin curbside drop off and pick up service at the San Jose Mineta International Airport. It already offers curbside service to the Sky Harbor Phoenix International Airport.
just wait for it to try to drop someone off in the (Score:4, Funny)
just wait for it to try to drop someone off in the middle of one!
Re: (Score:2)
Waymo is (relatively) safe [futurism.com]. Someone being pessimistic and predicting disaster then being wrong is not the same as lying. Lying is a word that means an intentional deception or deviation from the truth. I'd argue that Joe_Dragon has no crystal ball and cannot predict the future with perfect accuracy. Therefor he wasn't lying, but expressing his personal opinion.
Re: (Score:1)
I think its projecting an opinion they know is misinformed - so not outright lying but staying put on the facts "the cars will never work, they're all remote controlled and are going to mow down toddlers left and right" despite knowing that there's real world data out there the contradict what they're saying. It can also come from a place where they have an agenda in that while the cars could work, they would take away jobs and therefore are railed against no matter the technical feasibility.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That probably won't happen. But what might happen is that if it gets confused, it might stop dead in the middle of one, as has happened often on the streets of SF. That could be fatal when the guy behind plows into them at 75mph. I actually saw that happen years back with presumably human drivers on 101 just north of SF on the downgrade from the bridge. Don't know what happened to either car's occupants, but it was a full speed collision.
popcorn is ready (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Pass (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
On a closed circuit i am willing to give a self driving vehicle a shot as nothing out of the ordinary can happen outside of basic mechanical failure. On open roads and at freeway speeds, youve got no chance if something goes wrong. Self preservation is an instinct no computer can possess.
Errr you have that backwards. Open freeways are by far the *easier* condition to handle. There's a reason some companies have L3 systems which have been approved for use on freeways, but not in suburbs (though not yet released in any actual purchasable product I am aware of). Even Musk will wax poetic about how "safe" FSD is based on it's long history on freeways, only to then produce a robotaxi which on its first day drives the wrong way down a lane, stops in the middle of intersections, and hits a station
Re: Pass (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Feel free to hop in and prove me wrong. ;)
Errr... gladly...? I drive daily with my hand on the wheel idly while my car basically takes me all the way to the end of a freeway without issue. In the past year I have only had an intervention at a roadwork (and that's because the lane markings were too narrow for the car to navigate). On the flip side country roads are really struggled with due to inconsistent lane markings, and local roads are too difficult for virtually all consumer systems as evident by the number of times Tesla has fucked up.
But you
Re: Pass (Score:2)
Re: Pass (Score:2)
Market Pressure (Score:2)
Could the be feeling the heat from Tesla's announcements for the Robotaxi?
Re: Market Pressure (Score:3)
Possibly a matter of catch-up. Telsa has the lead given that thusfar only Tesla has killed humans at highway speed.
Re: (Score:2)
Could the be feeling the heat from Tesla's announcements for the Robotaxi?
Could be that it's the natural progression of a product that was rolled out in a cautious and obvious way? Waymo applied for permits to start testing on highways in 2023, back when the robotaxi wasn't even announced. They started testing on highways in Jan 2024, back when the robotaxis were rumoured but everyone thought that it was going to be a Model 2.
This is what happens when you have a careful company testing products and rolling them out in a safe way.
That said I'm sure they do feel a bit of pressure.
Squirrel! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The safest choice for the passenger and other drivers is to maintain your speed, regardless of the squirrel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bring it on (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I would have to see the code architecture before I trust it at highway speeds. Of course, even that is probably not enough, since NN learning results in decisions which are opaque to understanding, as are the failure modes.
Re: (Score:2)