Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Biotech China

Man Who Cryogenically Froze Late Wife Sparks Debate By Dating New Partner (bbc.com) 87

A Chinese man who cryogenically preserved his wife after her death has sparked a heated online debate after it emerged he began dating a new partner in 2020. Some argue it's natural for him to move on, while others say he's being selfish or disrespectful to both his late wife and his current partner. The BBC reports: As a sign of his devotion, Gui Junmin decided to freeze his wife Zhan Wenlian's body after she died from lung cancer in 2017, aged 49, making her China's first cryogenically preserved person. But after a November interview revealed he had been dating a different partner since 2020, Chinese social media has been torn on Mr Junmin's predicament. Whilst some asked why the 57-year-old didn't just "let go" another commenter remarked he appeared to be "most devoted to himself."

After Zhan Wenlian was given months to live by doctors, Gui Junmin decided to use cryonics - which is scientifically unproven - to preserve her body once she died. Following her death, he signed a 30-year agreement to preserve his wife's frozen body with the Shandong Yinfeng Life Science Research Institute. Since then, Zhan's body has been stored in a 2,000-litre container at the institute in a vat of -190C liquid nitrogen.

Chinese newspaper Southern Weekly revealed that although Mr Junmin lived alone for two years after the procedure, in 2020 he began dating again, despite his wife remaining in cryopreservation. He told the newspaper that a severe gout attack which left him unable to move for two days began to change his mind about the benefits of living alone. Soon after, he started seeing his current partner Wang Chunxia, although Mr Junmin suggested to the paper the love was only "utilitarian" and that she hadn't "entered" his heart.

Man Who Cryogenically Froze Late Wife Sparks Debate By Dating New Partner

Comments Filter:
  • by registrations_suck ( 1075251 ) on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @02:03AM (#65804071)

    Debate? I dunno how much debate there can be.

    It seems pretty cold to me!

  • by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @02:04AM (#65804073)

    Her wife was giving him the cold shoulder.

  • by ClickOnThis ( 137803 ) on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @02:05AM (#65804077) Journal

    Cryogenics preserved his late wife's body. It did not guarantee that she could be resuscitated. I doubt she can anyway. Even if she could, how long would he have to wait for it to be possible? Would he even live long enough to see the technology created?

    In short, his wife is dead. Let him get back on the market.

    • Cryogenics preserved his late wife's body. It did not guarantee that she could be resuscitated. I doubt she can anyway. Even if she could, how long would he have to wait for it to be possible? Would he even live long enough to see the technology created?

      In short, his wife is dead. Let him get back on the market.

      This. A man’s wife passed and they both agreed to essentially donate her body to science. He wont even be alive IF they can ever reverse her condition.

      Her body is the experiment. Not his life. People move on all the time. That’s life.

      • She already died and, depending on the definition where this happened, generally means brain death before freezing. So they have to cure stage 5 lung cancer AND brain death.

        Then again in California, even that doesn't necessarily count as dead. That's why drinkypoo is technically still allowed to receive TANF and SNAP.

        • There's yet one more problem (among many): Cryogenic freezing doesn't prevent ice crystals from forming, shattering cell membranes.
          Basically, the body is mush where it is critical for it not to be for a successful resuscitation.

          • There's yet one more problem (among many): Cryogenic freezing doesn't prevent ice crystals from forming, shattering cell membranes.

            I glanced through TFA. They mention that the body is infused with antifreeze, so removing that is yet a third problem to solve.

            C'mon, seriously folks. The tank is a 21st century crypt, not any sort of medical devices. She's as dead as can be and not coming back.

            • Even with antifreeze, attempts to thaw bodies prepared that way have resulted in massive widespread organ cracking.

              • Indeed. I'd consider it much more likely if we had a process where we could freeze and revive so much as an otherwise healthy mouse. Much less a technically and realistically already dead human.

    • by Viol8 ( 599362 )

      "It did not guarantee that she could be resuscitated"

      Once you die from cancer the secondaries have usually spread everywhere so until a seriously good cure for fatal cancers has been found then there's no point reviving her. Given his health I suspect he'll be long dead before that technology comes to pass.

      • If medical science develops to the point of reviving frozen people, treating their cancer will be childs play.
    • He's betting on becoming immortal through science, having his wife thawed, cured and brought back to life also with the immortality fix applied. But he knows that's way off in the future. I'm sure he's planning to be iced until the technology exists to make all that happen. They'll both wake up to a very different world and be happy of course because love is infinite.. But until such time as he's ready for the freezer, he needs a romantic partner to continue living his best life...
      oh wait -
      "a severe

      • Interesting. Is he really counting on his wife's resuscitation, or is he just a widower with baggage?

        I wonder whether the "utilitarian" perspective he has now will fade over time. He's being a bit of a dick right now, but if his new partner is okay with it, then I'm not sure we can argue.

        WTF dating app is this guy using. Profile:
        "I'm looking for a utilitarian relationship because my gout is terrible, and I want a nurse with benefits who I can do as I wish with"

        I didn't see anything about his dating profile in TFA, so I assume that's your speculation.

  • While freezing is a bizarre way to bury a corpse, this is still a corpse and there is no chance of revival, ever. The damage done by the freezing is exceptionally severe and irreversible, as there is no data on the "good" state.

    Hence, who cares? Stupid people doing stupid things. This is just a stupid person with money. People with money are not smarter than average.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    This is the type of article you would find in People magazine. It's not news for nerds.

    • This is the type of article you would find in People magazine. It's not news for nerds.

      Indeed. And they ignored my seriously science-y submission about Hitler possibly having had a micropenis.

    • And yet it has more comments than most of the tech articles. It's all about engagement. And by reading and posting comments on this story, we both just validated the editor's decision.
    • Cryogenic Widow Reveals the ONE TRICK He Used to Find Love Again (While His Wife is Still on Ice).

  • I call it hedging your bets
  • How is that any different from the fish sticks in my fridge?

  • What's the point of freezing a body? The water in the cells freezes, expands, and ruptures the cell membrane. The body is effectively mush at that point. Does anyone really expect medical tech to get to the point that it can repair that kind of cell damage in every cell in the body?

    • Properly done, the preservation happens immediately after the heart stops -- meaning ischemia is minimized and revival possible from that standpoint -- and includes chemicals that prevent ice crystal formation.
      • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        If the heart has stopped how do you get the anti-freeze distributed throughout the body? Do they put the person on an artificial heart for a time?

        I am curious is if there is really anything to this; or if these cryo firms are just sure, "we'll take your money and freeze your loved ones corpse, and who knows maybe the future will have nearly magic nano bots that can fix the mess we are making anything is possible right?"

        • by GoTeam ( 5042081 )

          If the heart has stopped how do you get the anti-freeze distributed throughout the body?/p>

          Bicycle pump

          • Not exactly the same thing, and I'll warn you that if you're squeamish, don't keep reading:

            In preclinical pharmaceutical animal testing, there is a chemical fixation/preservation technique known as perfusion. There are a couple of ways of doing it. Common way: a mouse is put under a deep, deep, plane of anesthesia and held there. The chest is opened. A catheter of aldehyde fixative is introduced into one of the aorta's and the one of the major ventricles cut. The heart, still pumping away, pumps the fixativ

        • The fact is, most hospitals will fight cryonics companies tooth and nail until ischemia has caused irreversible (data loss) brain damage. Doctors fear and hate perceived quackery and don't like being told someone else might help this individual they're calling dead. But when cryonics is done right the body is taken at the point of heart stoppage, an artery is opened to remove blood and another one to pump in the fluid, and chemicals are pumped through the body at gradually reducing temperatures to prevent i
  • Okay, but - has he "entered" her... um, heart?

  • Do I recall the tale correctly?

    1 nasty dwarf and 7 sleeping beauties?

    He is at his nr 2 at the moment...

    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      Yeah. The potential new Mrs Gui had better check out how large a freezer he bought.

  • Duality (Score:5, Informative)

    by fluffernutter ( 1411889 ) on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @04:52AM (#65804213)
    I have personal experience with a very similar situation. It's a sad fact when your spouse dies that people will blame the survivor for living. That is just life. Life also does not stop when a loved one dies. A human can both mourn and deeply miss the one they lost and still have.a life with another. I can't imagine any healthy marriage where a spouse would want their significant other to stop living after they were gone. It is disrespectful for anyone else to expect it, most of whom have never even been in the situation.
    • blame the survivor for living.

      No one is blaming this survivor for living. They are blaming this guy for effectively cheating, hanging on to the body of a dead wife while moving on with a new girlfriend. The blame is about his extreme selfishness. Mourn, miss, move on if you can, but also accept to be called out as a selfish hypocrite if you do all at once.

      Sorry for your loss, and fuck anyone who blamed you for living.

      • Men have a much harder time being single than women do. This was recently proven in a study. Your response is exactly what I'm talking about. If being single is not living to him, then you are doing the exact same thing. You want him to end living. And you just told yourself to fuck yourself. I am surrounded by men in their 50's and 60's that are bitter every day because they have no one. Not surprisingly, they are the most supportive in this situation. If you can't be with the one you love, love th
        • If my response is what you're talking about then you did a poor job of explaining what you're talking about. Or a poor job of reading my response. Your and my point was fundamentally different.

          • I guess so. I consider freely being able to form devoted relationships part of life. I wasn't aware there were people that didn't or that it needed to be explained. If you are preventing yourself from doing so then you are not experiencing life fully and therefore not living. It is like you have exiled yourself.

            If a person's spouse truly wished that for them, then perhaps one should honour it. But we don't know about how their relationship was before so aren't in a position to make the decision. Is
      • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

        If his new partner is okay with Ice Lady, I see no real problem. It's their issue, stop bothering them.

        • I'm not bothering anyone. I don't even know them. That doesn't mean I will agree with them or that the actions aren't hypocritical.

  • Cryo-embalming (Score:5, Informative)

    by sudonim2 ( 2073156 ) on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @04:53AM (#65804215)

    Humans are simply too large to cryopreserve like we do embryos. The body can't freeze fast enough and so always forms ice crystals. This destroys tissues at a cellular level. Just think what happens to a strawberry you freeze then thaw. That happens inside your organs.

    The technique used in cryopreservation involves replacing the blood with an antifreeze compound. The stuff is toxic and will destroy cells even if the ice doesn't get them. This is more like embalming or pickling than preserving.

    The cryopreservation process has to be done after death. If you do it to a living person, it's murder. You can't reanimate a corpse, especially not one that's been pickled.

    When frozen, a corpse has yet another reason it can't heal damage done to it. Temperature doesn't affect the decay of radioactive isotopes inside a body. The radioactive carbon and potassium alone would subject a body to LD50 doses of radiation inside of a decade.

    Cryopreservation is about preserving a corpse as a death ritual and not a legitimate attempt to preserve a life. It should be viewed more akin to ancient Egyptian mummification than a medical procedure. And it has exactly the same chance of resulting in a reanimated corpse as following the Book of The Dead.

    • Re:Cryo-embalming (Score:5, Insightful)

      by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @06:24AM (#65804269) Homepage Journal

      It's a grift, taking advantage of a grieving person's desire for it not to be so final, for there to be hope of seeing their loved one again.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by ableal ( 1502763 )

      When frozen, a corpse has yet another reason it can't heal damage done to it. Temperature doesn't affect the decay of radioactive isotopes inside a body. The radioactive carbon and potassium alone would subject a body to LD50 doses of radiation inside of a decade.

      This one gave me pause, trying to figure out how. Found a discussion mentioning that your normal repair is turned off, so the radioactive damage over the years is cumulative, as in a single dose. However just the body's isotopes may be insuficient: "While this is true, that is not going to kill you in only 100 years. The human body only emits .01 mSv per year and it tasked ~4 Sv to give you dangerous radiation poisoning. ~(100,000x more) " ( https://www.reddit.com/r/scifi... [reddit.com] )

      The googles disagree with the l

      • by coffii ( 76089 )

        Radiation poisoning is simply damage to the cells and DNA. Given we would need to repair every single cell in the body, I don't see how the radiation damage would be a problem, it is just an added complication. Cryogenics is simply a case of waiting for magic to catch up with reality.

      • There is a Q-factor when dealing with radiation poisoning. Different radiation types have differing quality of damage. For example, gamma rays have very low quality. Human bodies aren't that dense and most gamma rays can pass right through you without even touching your atoms. It take more grays of gamma rays to cause harm than grays of beta particles. Alpha particles can effectively be stopped by your skin; if you get an alpha emitter on your skin, you can just wash it off and be fine. But if the alpha emi

    • I suspect that a more fundamental problem is what you would need to preserve.

      Embryos are clearly the easier case, being small and impressively good at using some sort of contextual cue system to elaborate an entire body plan from a little cell glob(including more or less graceful handling of cases like identical twins, where physical separation of the cell blob changes requirements dramatically and abruptly); but they are also the case that faces looser constraints. If an embryo manages to grow a brain t
  • ...until the new girl trips over the freezer power line.

  • ... Wenlian is a bit of a cold fish (badum ching!).
  • The science fiction comic book "Transmetropolitan" covered this in issue #8 "Another Cold Morning".

    It's a standalone story, that deals with being revived in the future. It's a truly heartbreaking story.

    (Disclaimer: The writer - Warren Ellis - is a bit *ahem* problematic in the comics community. No shame if you decide not to support him monetarily.)

  • That any technology can revive or recover the brain of this woman.

  • Wife is as dead now as she would be if she was buried or cremated. What's it matter what he does with his life?
  • Most people who understand how cryonics are done and still oppose it do so for one of two reasons. They think technology CANNOT improve to a point it can restore a body, or sour grapes. Or some combination thereof. The first objection comes from a strange confidence that today's limitations are permanent. The second camp are people who recoil from the idea not because it is unworkable, but because they find it emotionally distasteful: the prospect of others escaping death strikes them as unfair or hubristic
  • He'll be dead before any technology exists that can even remotely come close to bringing her back. It's unlikely she survived having died and then was frozen, let alone repair the cancer AND the damage from the cancer that was severe enough to kill her.

  • nods in approval until the Batman shows up.
  • I don't know, but I've been told
    Frozen Chinese woman's pussy is mighty cold!

  • You can't blame him, his dead wife is now very frigid indeed.

    JoshK.

  • judge ye not, lest ye too be judged

  • Shouldn't that be Mr Gui?

  • I'd say you can judge the quality of a marriage by how quickly they move on after their spouses passing. Some cases it's less than 6 months, which says something
    • I would argue that if you get married quickly after your spouse dies then it is a sign you had a very good marriage. I know people who've told me that once their spouse dies, they are never getting married again because they don't want to ever get trapped again.
  • He needed someone new because his ex is too coldhearted.

  • OK, first wife is frozen, that's where it starts.

    Man finds 2nd wife, and they both choose to be frozen upon death.

    Time passes, until such technology allows the revival of all three.

    The love triangle story ensues!

  • ... a little something on the side ?

    That would never happen /s

    Stop with the fake outrage already.

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...