Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
EU Advertising Privacy Slashdot.org

Meta Pledge To Use Less Personal Data For Ads Gets EU Nod, Avoids Daily Fines (reuters.com) 17

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: Meta's proposal to use less personal data for targeted advertising in its pay-or-consent model that will be rolled out next month won the approval of EU antitrust regulators on Monday, signaling the company will not face daily fines after all. [...] The U.S. tech giant has been locked in discussions with the European Commission after getting hit with a $233 million fine in April for breaching the Digital Markets Act aimed at reining in the power of Big Tech. The violation covered Facebook and Instagram in the period from November 2023 to November 2024, after which Meta tweaked its pay-or-consent model to use less personal data for targeted advertising.

The EU executive has been examining the changes to see if they comply with the DMA, with Meta risking daily fines of as much as 5% of its average daily worldwide turnover if found to be still in breach of the law. The tweaks are in wording, design and transparency to remind users of the two options. Meta did not plan on any substantial changes to its November proposal despite the risk of EU fines, people with direct knowledge of the matter had told Reuters. The Commission, which acts as the EU competition enforcer, acknowledged Meta's November proposal, saying that it will monitor the new ad model and seek feedback, with no more talk of periodic fines. "Meta will give users the effective choice between consenting to share all their data and seeing fully personalized advertising, and opting to share less personal data for an experience with more limited personalized advertising," the Commission said in a statement.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Meta Pledge To Use Less Personal Data For Ads Gets EU Nod, Avoids Daily Fines

Comments Filter:
  • by Big Bipper ( 1120937 ) on Monday December 08, 2025 @06:34PM (#65844459)
    Sounds like somebody's palm got greased.
  • They are still raping everyone's privacy.
  • Oh, shit, that was someone else. never mind.
  • by marcle ( 1575627 ) on Monday December 08, 2025 @06:52PM (#65844497)

    I'll bet they had their fingers crossed behind their back.

  • Meta Pledge To Use Less Personal Data For Ads

    One base pair from an uninteresting part of each user/shadow-user's DNA.

  • Maybe it is just synchronicity, or maybe these mega corporations like Google and Faceplant share way too much of our data.

    I was using tent heater reviews on Youtube, lo and behold, the very brand I was gravitating towards on YT, shows up in my FB feed. Other times, similar things happen.

    I don't consider it a huge invasion of privacy, but the creepy level goes up to 11 that I'd much rather not have. I hate to see how much of that happens with a computer that isn't battened down hard.

    • Maybe they are just reading each other's cookies?
      • Maybe they are just reading each other's cookies?

        I thought of that, but I dump cookies on exit. So unless they've found a new place to sneak them onto my machine, that probably isn't it.

  • ... and Meta _always_ strictly abides by their privacy deals! (See the number of times they have violated their consent decree with the FTC by violating the established privacy rules.)
  • Meta has lots and lots of information about me and my friends.
    But the ads I see on Facebook are utterly bewildering.
    I get ads for software to run my dental practice, law firm, or church.
    I get ads for preparation services for some social-work exam I've never heard of.
    I get ads for audio engineering tools.
    I get ads for addiction treatment services.
    The list goes on and on. None of this stuff has the slightest relevance to me.
    If you're paying to advertise on Facebook, I say you're probably getting ripped off.

In any problem, if you find yourself doing an infinite amount of work, the answer may be obtained by inspection.

Working...