AI Slop Ad Backfires For McDonald's (futurism.com) 56
McDonald's has pulled an AI-generated Christmas commercial from YouTube after viewers pushed back on what they called a distasteful, "AI slop"-filled take on the holidays. The 45-second ad, titled "It's the most terrible time of the year," was a satirical look at holiday chaos -- people tripping while carrying overloaded gift bags, getting tangled in lights, burning homemade cookies, starting kitchen fires -- and ended with a suggestion to ditch the madness and hide out at McDonald's until January.
The ad was created for McDonald's Netherlands by agency TBWA\NEBOKO and production company Sweetshop, whose Los Angeles-based directing duo Mark Potoka and Matt Spicer shot the film. After the backlash, Sweetshop said it used AI as a tool but emphasized human effort in shaping the final product. "We generated what felt like dailies -- thousands of takes -- then shaped them in the edit just as we would on any high-craft production," the company said. "This wasn't an AI trick. It was a film."
The ad was created for McDonald's Netherlands by agency TBWA\NEBOKO and production company Sweetshop, whose Los Angeles-based directing duo Mark Potoka and Matt Spicer shot the film. After the backlash, Sweetshop said it used AI as a tool but emphasized human effort in shaping the final product. "We generated what felt like dailies -- thousands of takes -- then shaped them in the edit just as we would on any high-craft production," the company said. "This wasn't an AI trick. It was a film."
The AI slop/backlash (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Right MCD is just looking over at KO and going us too.
A few loud people online and embittered animators are complaining about their ads. That handful of people might be mad about it. Meanwhile in terms of numbers that matter everyone else going out of their way to watch the ads, like seeking them out, just to see what all the fuss is. So they get tons of free ad impressions, and if they are lucky a few of those people say "gee haven't had a Coke in while, sounds pretty good, maybe I'll buy a case."
I haven'
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, they goofed up on the Coke Vitamin D deficiency awareness campaign there. They really should have gone with "Go get some sun, get a tan!" instead.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm not mad at Coke for their ads, but they've earned my lifelong boycott for telling their employees to be less white.
Waiter: Anything to drink?
You: Pepsi, please.
Waiter: Sorry, we don't have Pepsi, is Coke okay?
You: No. I'm boycotting Coke for the rest of my life for something they didn't actually do.
Waiter: Oh, I see -- you're a sad little bitch. Would the sad wittle bitch wike some chocwate milk and some cwayons to dwraw wif?
You: Goo-goo, ga-ga
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Coca-Cola told Newsweek that the video and images "are not part of the company's learning curriculum." Coca-Cola said it has a "Better Together" training initiative that includes access to the LinkedIn diversity lesson but that it "was not part of the company's curriculum. We will continue to listen to our employees and refine our learning programs as appropriate." On Tuesday, Coca-Cola sent an additional statement to Newsweek that read: "The video in question was accessible on a third-party platform and was not part of the company's curriculum, so it was not required. Our overall diversity, equity and inclusion training is required and received input from employees reflecting a wide range of backgrounds, views and expertise."
Was the article too many words for you to understand? Do you need it spelled out for you?
1) Coca-Cola subscribed to the Linkedin Learning training platform
2) Subscriptions to LinkedIn Learning get access to all of the content in the platform. Subscribers don't pick and choose with videos they get access to.
3) Coca-Cola's diversity training used videos in the Linkedin Learning platform, but that video was not one that was part of their trainin
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The class in question was given IN PERSON.
lol, no it wasn't. If it was, you'd have a "receipt", lol.
I didn't carefully review the article
lol, no shit.
but that happened.
no it didn't. If it happened, the stories about it on conservative media would have referenced it, but they ALL refer to the LinkedinLearning video, not an in person class.
Anything about Linkedin Learning is a deliberate decoy
The entire story is about the content of the "Confronting Racism" video by Robin DiAngelo that was on LinkedinLearning
This is my last post on the topic.
lol, no shit. Because I proved you're a lying, little bitch. Well that, and it's time for you to queue up CockGobblers IV: The Voyage Home (To Gob
Re: (Score:3)
MCD? KO? WTF are you talking about?
Re: (Score:2)
KO = Coca-Cola Company's stock ticker symbol.
And it's about the PR brouhaha of these companies' AI Sloppy adverts... in case you couldn't connect the dots.
Spreading some cheer (Score:2)
In the same spirit as the commercial, here is another variant of the song: Most horrible time of the year [youtube.com]
Trigger warning: horror, seafood.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's so bad, it's good.
The medium is the message.
I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
I always thought big mac patties were made of worm castings.
Re: The AI slop/backlash (Score:2)
It's so bad, it's good.
A shame that the same canâ(TM)t be said for the food.
Re: (Score:2)
Same for Coca Cola. They had their "backlash" last year and their attention. They did the same this year. I wonder what they might do next year ...
The interesting part of these ads seem to be that one can see how the quality increases outside of benchmarks and hobbyist's comparisons. In the Cola ad, you see how good someone can use these tools when they pay people with actual design experience to use them.
You can steer recent AI pretty well, but an artist education helps you to know which direction you want
Re: (Score:2)
I see nothing wrong with the ad, sure its no masterpiece but most ads are not. For goodness sake we have infomercials, at least it was only 45 seconds of bullshit.
Sometimes being bad is good for a commercial because it makes it memorable.
Re: The AI slop/backlash (Score:2)
garbage in, garbage out (Score:4, Insightful)
"We generated mountains of AI slop, and then spent countless hours turd-polishing and searching for clips that weren't completely terrible to bring you the best slop we could manage!"
Garbage in, Pyrite out (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, so they're doing it the same way I take "good" photographs: by taking a fuckton of mostly-shitty photographs and trawling through them for the rare few which actually look decent.
Re: Garbage in, Pyrite out (Score:3)
If you think that's new, think again :-) [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
"We generated mountains of AI slop, and then spent countless hours turd-polishing and searching for clips that weren't completely terrible to bring you the best slop we could manage!"
It's more fundamental than that. The problem isn't that they generated AI slop and curated it, that's literally an aspect of creative processes. The real problem is that the final result still looks like AI slop.
Now we know: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
That's what Mcdonalds is for.
Re: (Score:2)
I quit eating at mcdonalds (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
While I agree that the ad was awful, I don't get your take on McDonald's prices. That's the one thing they do have going for them.
Where else are you going to get a egg and sausage muffin for under $5? Chick-Fil-A sells them for over $7.
LOL (Score:3)
Well, OK, apart from the gratuitous use of AI to make it, I think the commercial is quite subversive and funny. Also, it's clearly intended for the Dutch market, and quite a bit of Dutch humour is subversive and a bit rude.
If they'd have made it without AI, I'd give it a 10/10 for creativity.
Re: (Score:3)
And if you're wondering, "December kan wel een beetje McDonald's gebruiken" means "December could use a little McDonald's".
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is it looks like AI slop. It would be a perfectly fine advert if it didn't look like uncanny valley rubbish.
Meh... (Score:2)
Meh. It seems like any other inoffensive ad.
But, fuck AI and McDonald's. Amirite?
Re: (Score:2)
YMMV. I don't eat there often but was hungry one morning and decided to get an egg mcmuffin and coffee. The sandwich was edible but kind of dry and chemical tasting. The coffee was equally as bad.
Tempest in a coffee pot? (Score:2)
I despise McDonald's, I despise advertisers, and I'm very wary and mistrustful of so-called AI. That said, when I watched the commercial I laughed. I thought there were some clever bits, and I'd watch it again.
I wonder if the negative response is akin to that of an otherwise-healthy immune system that has been faced with too many dire challenges in a short period of time and is over-reacting a bit. In this case that's not necessarily a bad thing, but it's worth keeping an eye on.
This add is really really funny. (Score:2)
How is this not hilarious? I mean I know someone who's favorite Christmas Greeting is "Merry Bah-Humbug." But Still !!!
ROTFLMAO (BBQ)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. If only it hadn't been made with AI, I would have loved it.
No such thing as bad engagement (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That is completely false in 2025. There definitely is bad engagement these days. There's a reason they pulled the advert rather than let it run its course. I don't think anyone here reading this has a sudden urge to go get a BigMac. Simply having a name doesn't make marketing in any way affective or positive.
AI Slop (Score:2)
AI slop advertising RL slop. Sounds about right.
Shot the film? (Score:1)
Did they, though? Did they actually shoot anything? Because ‘shooting’ implies a camera, and AI slop generators do not have cameras. If they’d shot the film, why would they “generate” their dailies?
not about AI (Score:2)
I watched it and I don't really see how the AI/slop aspect would be what makes it a crappy advert. It's not great, but it's not what sinks the ad. I think it backfired because they come across as profiting from anti-christmas and anti-holiday frustration. Whether the holidays suck for you or not, having a commercial that's effectively saying they'd like to profit from your suffering is distasteful. I would also say that my stress level definitely doesn't go *down* when I walk into a McD's.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Quality is quality, AI or not. If you hadn't told me it was AI-generated, I wouldn't have known. There's plenty of stuff like that out there, even before AI was a thing. Show me a funny / catchy ad made with AI, I don't care about the AI part of it.
Had Slashdot not told me it was AI (Score:2)
I would not have known. Commercials don't have to follow the laws of physics. Stuff can happen in them that can't actually happen.
With that said, I thought it was a good commercial. AI was used? And? AI is going to continued to be used all around our economy and in different ways. Hopefully our governments can figure it out with minimal suffering *lmao right*.
If we are critiquing AI itself, I thought the commercial was just fine. Certainly good enough for a commercial.
Luddites hordes can't appreciate AI. (Score:1)
Re: Luddites hordes can't appreciate AI. (Score:2)
And who's gatekeeping here? Creatives produce content with GenAI and it's the public who lets them know that they hate it. I guess you could call the audience the ultimate gatekeepers, but that makes it sound unnecessarily conspiratorial. Peo