Arkansas Becoming 1st State To Sever Ties With PBS, Effective July 1 (apnews.com) 118
joshuark writes: Arkansas is becoming the first state to officially end its public television affiliation with PBS. The Arkansas Educational Television Commission, whose members are all appointed by the governor, voted to disaffiliate from PBS effective July 1, 2026, citing the $2.5 million annual membership dues as "not feasible." The decision was also driven by the loss of a similar amount in federal funding after the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) was defunded by Congress.
PBS Arkansas is rebranding itself as Arkansas TV and will provide more local content, the agency's Executive Director and CEO Carlton Wing said in a statement. Wing, a former Republican state representative, took the helm of the agency in September. "Public television in Arkansas is not going away," Wing said. "In fact, we invite you to join our vision for an increased focus on local programming, continuing to safeguard Arkansans in times of emergency and supporting our K-12 educators and students."
"The commission's decision to drop PBS membership is a blow to Arkansans who will lose free, over the air access to quality PBS programming they know and love," a PBS spokesperson wrote in an email to The Associated Press. The demise of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, is a direct result of President Donald Trump's targeting of public media, which he has repeatedly said is spreading political and cultural views antithetical to those the United States should be espousing. Trump denied taking a big should on television viewers.
PBS Arkansas is rebranding itself as Arkansas TV and will provide more local content, the agency's Executive Director and CEO Carlton Wing said in a statement. Wing, a former Republican state representative, took the helm of the agency in September. "Public television in Arkansas is not going away," Wing said. "In fact, we invite you to join our vision for an increased focus on local programming, continuing to safeguard Arkansans in times of emergency and supporting our K-12 educators and students."
"The commission's decision to drop PBS membership is a blow to Arkansans who will lose free, over the air access to quality PBS programming they know and love," a PBS spokesperson wrote in an email to The Associated Press. The demise of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, is a direct result of President Donald Trump's targeting of public media, which he has repeatedly said is spreading political and cultural views antithetical to those the United States should be espousing. Trump denied taking a big should on television viewers.
Sorry Big Bird (Score:4, Insightful)
Turns out you were a woke DEI hire all along.
Also let's not beat around the bush, when Trump says anithetical to the United States he means himself. Antithetical to him. Not allowed!
Re:Sorry Big Bird (Score:5, Insightful)
I went the entire day without thinking about trans people until you mentioned it. Why do you keep thinking about them?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Sorry Big Bird (Score:5, Interesting)
Damn right. I think its important we all band together and get more angry about made up bullshit that isn;'t true for some reason.
Re: (Score:3)
If you get angry about real things, you might end up in an awkward situation where you have to eat crow or change your mind based on objective reality, you know if you were wrong, misunderstood or something changes.
Starting from the position of completely made up shit is the ultimate luxury here: you will never have to climb down from your high horse.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
In Arlington, Virginia, a registered sex offender who identified as transgender, Richard Kenneth Cox, was charged with multiple counts of intentionally exposing his genitals in a girls’ locker room at a public highschool pool; parents reported that staff allowed him to keep using the girls’ facilities because he identified as transgender until police became involved.
In Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, parents and a legal group alerted police that a transgenderidentifying student, biologically male, joine
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Somehow, I don't think that realizing you have a problem and stopping there will actually fix said problem....
By contrast, over 5000 children have been abused in Pennsylvania public schools in the past five years. But yeah tell me again how this is a whataboutism problem.
Considering you just did it I don't think I should need to.
Re: (Score:2)
a registered sex offender
in a girls’ locker room at a public highschool pool
Stop the presses, that was the problem right there. Why the fuck was a registered sex offender allowed on a public school campus in the first place!? The offender's sexual preferences should have never even made the story, and was probably bait to lure the public away from demanding some very difficult answers from school officials. Congratulations, you fell for it.
Dozen of media reports and court documents describe other sex offenders who disguised themselves as women to gain access to women’s spaces.
Again, why are you using sex offenders to justify an attack on trans people? I think we know the answer. You're intentionally trying to confla
Re: (Score:1)
For posterity's sake: My comment above was downvoted two days after I made it. Someone waited until they had mod points and then came back to downvote it. What a child.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, Big Bird is a yellow chick. Unfortunately due to a natural aversion to education nobody in the administration realised that's a literal description.
Re: (Score:2)
The Black Eyed Peas called it.
[Sings] Whatcha gonna do with all that junk All that junk inside your trunk...
Re: (Score:2)
Congrats on provoking so much vacuous ire?
Not disagreeing with you on the substance, but seems increasingly pointless to me to worry about it. Not just out of my pay grade, but these days all of the crucial decisions are being made by selfish a-holes for stupid and shortsighted reasons. Can't even imagine why they are so concerned about dying with the most toys, but...
Re: (Score:2)
I certainly can't fault anyone for taking that outlook
For me I take the Frank Constanza stance: "I got a lot of problems with you people and now you're gonna hear about it!"
Re: (Score:2)
Just the ACK, though I want to remind you that "you people" aren't listening.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Even HBO wants nothing to do with Big Bird anymore:
https://www.npr.org/2024/12/17... [npr.org]
Re: (Score:3)
If you want to use David Zaslav as the arbiter of quality children's programming you go right ahead.
Re: (Score:2)
HBO went well out of their way to pull in Sesame Street/Sesame Workshop and take their programming off PBS, leaving PBS with rerun scraps. Several years later, that plan is dead and Sesame Workshop is out on the streets.
Take shots at whomever you please. The results are the same.
Re: (Score:3)
It was more a shot at you for your suggestion of "Well it doesn't turn a profit so, fuck them kids". My point is some things are more important than that. Perish the thought I know.
https://www.indiewire.com/news... [indiewire.com]
Even if the practical effects of this agreement aren’t that dramatic, on a philosophical level, this is a very big deal. At a time when both Democratic and Republican candidates are railing against the rising tide of inequality in America, one of our nation’s great equalizers —
What is this supposed to mean? (Score:4, Insightful)
At the tail end of the summary:
"Trump denied taking a big should on television viewers."
What in the What now?
Re:What is this supposed to mean? (Score:5, Funny)
"Trump denied taking a big shit on television viewers."
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that would be my guess as well. I'd imagine that the editors started their Friday evening drinking a bit early, but I'm hoping that it was supposed to be something slightly more intelligent sounding than that?
Re: (Score:1)
I was just joking, I'm curious about it too. If the summary was written by AI though, anything's possible...
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, that isn't in TFA - somewhat was editorializing, badly.
Re: What is this supposed to mean? (Score:2)
What do you mean? Didn't you see that AI video he posted awhile back with the jet? He certainly took a dump on people who coincidentally watch TV too.
Dumbing down (Score:4, Interesting)
$2.5 million doesn't even register on the state budget. PBS is incredible value for the money. I watched PBS frequently as a child and not just for the childrens shows. I learned to cook with Julia Child and Yan Can Cook. I learned home improvement from watching Bob Vila. I learned carpentry from Norm and his massive shop and also how it was done by hand with the Woodrights Shop. Not to mention all the science and documentary shows. But I guess all that stuff is woke and gay now for not kissing a certain orange individuals ring.
Re:Dumbing down (Score:5, Informative)
MAGA with mod points are already butthurt. The Arkansas budget is $ 6.49 billion. https://arkansasadvocate.com/2... [arkansasadvocate.com]
We're looking at what, 0.04% of the budget for PBS?
Re: (Score:3)
PBS is primarily (85%) privately funded. It will continue to produce shows like Masterpiece, Nova, Frontline, and Sesame Street and people in places like Boston or Philadelphia will continue to benefit from them.
What public funding does is give viewers in poorer, more rural areas access to the same information that wealthy cities enjoy. It pays for access for people who don't have it.
By opting out, Arkansas public broadcasting saves 2.5 million dollars in dues, sure. But it loses access to about $300 mill
Re:Dumbing down (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm thinking she did. ;)
https://britneyspears.ac/laser... [britneyspears.ac]
Re: (Score:1)
Well... maybe in Arkansas. It's not the most wealthy of states, after all. It's not a big surprise to me they're the first to fold. They would have been one of my top three guesses.
Re:Dumbing down (Score:5, Interesting)
Most of those shows that you mentioned were popular in the 1990's. You forgot to mention The Computer Chronicles, which probably helped me get interested in technology back then.
I'd imagine that conservatives probably think that PBS lost it's way in the 2010-2020's and became the "social justice network" instead. It really seemed to put a lot of it's focus on systemic racism around that time, and made some powerful enemies in the process.
Re:Dumbing down (Score:5, Interesting)
We had a similar thing in the UK with the BBC. Conservatives decided that it wasn't helping them win, so destroyed it. The formerly excellent news service, that held politicians to account and kept the other news services at least a little bit honest, was gutted.
The country is far worse off for it, in ways that cannot easily, if ever, be undone.
Trump and his ilk are doing the same thing in the US.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Dumbing down (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds like some good learnin', but Republicans, "Conservatives" and MAGA don't really want a well-rounded, well-educated electorate who can think for themselves, especially if it would disadvantage those in charge.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Republicans are also know-it-alls who claim they're "smarter" than scientists and know "what's best" for everyone with zero evidence and zero experience.
Our current President and his followers especially... Usually the smarter (more educated) someone is the more they realize how much they don't know. Sadly, the opposite is also often true. The dumber (less educated) often they know more than they do. See: Dunning–Kruger effect [wikipedia.org]
Trump thinks he knows everything and is the best at everything, which makes me believe this story about one of his former Wharton professors, as reported here [dailykos.com]:
“Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.” Dr. Kelley told me this after Trump had become a celebrity but long before he was considered a political figure. Dr. Kelley often referred to Trump’s arrogance when he told of this — that Trump came to Wharton thinking he already knew everything.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: Dumbing down (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
How much do you want to bet the "local programming" ends up costing more than $2.5 million, and half of it disappears into some Maggat's crypto account?
Re: Dumbing down (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And there is a story further down stating Americans are not leading when it comes to many critical research.
Sure, remove alot of TV shows that talk about science and tech. And education.
Don't complain if America becomes irrelavant when it comes to many STEM topics in the next few decades.
Maybe someone should tell the government that without a strong STEM education, you will not a harder time making your new fancy weapons. Once China matches the tech level of whatever American weapons there are, it's game ov
Re: (Score:1)
I'm sorry, but the PBS that you grew up with doesn't exist anymore. I wish it did. I honestly do. But PBS decided that it was just going to cater to the Liberal/Progressive wing and not ALL of the country. Every time I see Nature or Nova they have to sneak in "People/the country is bad to the environment". Every time they talk about the Government it always has to be bad. And they do not seem to have programs devoted to the 3/4 of the country that is Rural.
Listen, I understand that it is hard to get program
Re: (Score:2)
80% of the US population lives in urban areas:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Some shows from googling 'PBS programs rural America':
https://www.pbs.org/show/ameri... [pbs.org]
https://www.pbs.org/show/life-... [pbs.org]
https://video.pbs12.org/show/p... [pbs12.org]
https://www.pbs.org/show/roads... [pbs.org]
There are more.
The impact of people on the environment in fucking huge. Why would you want Nature documentaries to lie to you about that? Personally I think that most Natur
Re: (Score:2)
There are perfectly viable commercial alternatives. I learned home improvement from Tim Taylor, and I've only died 42 times so far.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
If you haven't seriously checked out anything on PBS since the 90's you're missing out. They've still been delivering excellent new educational content for adults and children up to the present, and their entertainment content is surprisingly good too. Back during the stupid actor's guild strike when nothing was on TV I took the time to give PBS a chance again for the first time since childhood and found it to be exemplary. Sure, maybe youtube howto videos might cover a lot of the fundamentals of this, but
Re:Dumbing down (Score:4, Interesting)
I watched all the stuff the GPP mentioned when I was young, and I actually watch a lot of PBS now; but not nearly as much and less and less all the time. Why because i am replacing it with youtube'ers who genuinely are better.
As great as Roy Underhill's or Norm Abrams' shows ever were, I learned more applicable wood working from Acorn to Arabella and Sampson Boat Co, or at least understood them finally. Same things with cooking, ATK is still amazing, and Julia and Pépin shaped me in the kitchen; but there is plenty out there now that is every bit as good and its not hard to find.
I loved PBS in the late 80s thru the late 90s, but the era is over.
Re: (Score:1)
I watched all the stuff the GPP mentioned when I was young, and I actually watch a lot of PBS now; but not nearly as much and less and less all the time. Why because i am replacing it with youtube'ers who genuinely are better.
No you don't no you didn't
Actually darkox is a russian who asked an llm about all that shit he just talked.
Don't believe me? Look through his post history and submissions.
Re: (Score:1)
Actually darkox is a russian who asked an llm about all that shit he just talked.
Don't believe me? Look through his post history and submissions.
Re:Dumbing down (Score:5, Insightful)
Certainly in the era before ubiquitous highspeed internet access and pick your self-publishing video platform, those things were great.
Who needs school when we have TikTok?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As nice as YouTube science content can be, shows like PBS Nova are still better because they had the budget to do better and the incentive to get it right.
Re: (Score:3)
A lot of their programs are Discovery-style drivel where half the show is devoted to disproven nonsense "some people believe," and even the parts that are accurate don't try to teach anything useful, but instead go through only the parts of the discussion that have wow-words.
Sometimes it is good, but there is generally better (and also worse) content on YT made without the big budget.
If PBS stopped making that content, perhaps local public broadcasters could make higher quality content on the same subjects
Re: (Score:3)
If PBS stopped making that content, perhaps local public broadcasters could make higher quality content on the same subjects with a lower budget.
Welcome to making science content for the masses and all ages, you do have to simplify things a bit.
I don't think it was PBS that was stopping local broadcasters from doing that up to this point, PBS exists because most places do not in fact produce such content given their own initiatives. Video production is more accessible today than anytime in history, nothing was stopping this.
Re: (Score:2)
Why should public television even try to make "science content for the masses?" The average person isn't interested in learning science.
Why not just make programs for whatever percent of people want educational content, and spend whatever those people are willing to donate?
Re: Dumbing down (Score:2)
Some of PBSes YouTube channels are quite good. Spacetime comes to mind.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
First off that's talking about guests, guests aren't typically paid for appearances you silly goose.
Also how many liberals are guests on Fox, Newsmax, OANN, etc? Also they don't mentioned if the I'm sure reputable journalists at... let's check, fucking Newsbusters (says a lot about your media diet) did their journalistic due diligence and asked PBS why that was the case. Maybe they ask a bunch of conservatives and they get turned down because so many of them prefer to go to their multitiude of safe spaces
Re: (Score:3)
Also how many liberals are guests on Fox, Newsmax, OANN, etc?
We can have that conversation when they are publicly funded.
Re: (Score:3)
We can have that conversation when they [FOX] are publicly funded.
Fox is publically funded. 66% of FOX TV revenue is from cable "must carry" channel fees even if you never watch 1 second of it. Last I bothered to check (three years ago) If you have cable TV you're paying on average $35 to Fox per year in "Must Carry" fees.
Military bases pay for FOX. So do VA hospitals and VA-VASH housing contracts require FOX be included. Don't remember if it's Dish or Direct-TV that will stop delivery of FOX programming, but again, the fee still is applied.
ESPN is another example of that
Re: (Score:2)
Of 18 total appearances by Republican officials, eight were coded as anti-Trump. Of 24 total appearances by Democratic officials, none were pro-Trump.
Just be honest. You don't think it's a jobs program for Democrats (since the articles says nothing to that effect).
You're just pissed off that they don't limit their Republican representation to pro-Trumpers.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't think it's a jobs program for Democrats (since the articles says nothing to that effect).
So much resistance to taking a tiny logical step from seeing mostly democrats getting invited to concluding it is democrats that are doing the inviting.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
As we can see here. Sinji is one of the least sincere posters on the site.
If you mark him as a "foe" right now he'll get a big red dot next to his name that you can use as a reminder that particular user tends to lie
Re: (Score:2)
I also use "foe" red dot as the idiot flag to remind me.
But in Snij's case I get a yellow dot which I take to be the turbo-idiot flag :)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm a pink deer and you go after my status as a bluesky user?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
This is the second time parody metal band Psychostick has foretold the future of US politics, first with "Political bum" [youtube.com] and then "Numbers" [youtube.com] - complete with muppets!
PragerU Funding Incoming (Score:5, Insightful)
Now that they've gotten rid of this woke DEI nonsense, they can spend 10x as much on some more wholesome and less-indoctrinating educational materials! /s
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I disagree the goals of the idiots pushing these changes, but local content is the part of public broadcasting that I find interesting. Keep in mind that a lot of the employees at public broadcasters, even in a red state, have the same values as public broadcasting employees in liberal states. It is quite possible that they will indeed have an increase in wholesome local content.
The big thing they're losing is wholesome children's content. Local art, history, and cultural programs can be made on a budget, b
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Now that they've gotten rid of this woke DEI nonsense, they can spend 10x as much on some more wholesome and less-indoctrinating educational materials! /s
I have some programming ideas...
Barney and friends hunt Dino the last dinosaur while spewing young earth idiocy and massacring any teletubbies found along the way.
A two part series I can't believe she's my cousin followed by I can't believe she's my sister with AI generated commentary in the voice of Jerry Springer.
Trumpet a cartoon red hat wearing maggot tours every third world shithole on the planet provides insightful commentary about the culture and customs of the locals along the way.
Re: Theme song for you. (Score:1)
Kill him dead
Smash his head
Stomp him till
He turns bright red
With a snap
And a crunch
And a solid meaty thud
Let's see some purple dino blood!
Apologies to the owner. Not myself.
Re: (Score:2)
If you didn't have bottom-third literacy you'd have just read the data in the chart. Since Arkansas starts with an A and the list is alphabetical you'd have found it very easily.
However, since you can barely read you resorted to looking at the pictures. And your geography knowledge is also bottom-third, so you failed to correctly identify Arkansas on the map.
They're a middle-third State, and the highest-ranked in the Deep South region.
Re: (Score:2)
This data is equivalent to fraction of black and hispanic students, and therefore says nothing about anything else.
Everybody I've met (Score:1)
Not the end of the world (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
There's nothing stopping the State of Arkansas from licensing individual programs from PBS and/or the associated production companies, either. They can pick and choose what they want, including older stuff that no longer airs.
Re: (Score:2)
I find youir more than a little amusing. Either your sarcasm game is very strong, or you actually believe competition has anything to do with this.
A little irony for ya (Score:2)
https://www.myarkansaspbs.org/... [myarkansaspbs.org]
Arkansas PBS is excited to announce that former State Rep. Carlton Wing has been selected as the agency’s new executive director and chief executive officer. Wing brings more than three decades of leadership experience in broadcasting, media and public service to the state’s only public media network. The Arkansas PBS commission and staff are looking forward to his first day in the office, on Tuesday, Sept. 30.
Maybe they should have been a little more nervous.
Filled with morons (Score:5, Informative)
Arkansas doesn't know the first thing about education. Nor does the child predator known as Carlton Wing - who has a degree in radio broadcasting. He knows nothing of politics, education, or running a business.
Arkansas Ranked:
33/50 for Pre-K - 12.
35/50 for higher education
47/50 for quality of education
45/50 for public schools
49/50 for rate of 4yr degrees earned
41/50 for reading proficiency
43/50 overall education
Re: (Score:2)
Soo.... (Score:2, Informative)
Paid for by taxpayer dollars. Oh, and the public funding drives. ...oh and $2.5 million per state? So a flat $125 mill annually?
(which of these is "the most important" depends on who's begging in front of whom)
"The commission's decision to drop PBS membership is a blow to Arkansans who will lose free, over the air access to quality PBS programming they know and love,"
IT'S CLEARLY NOT FREE.
A different perspective (Score:2)
I grew up in Northern New Jersey, 20 miles (as the crow flies) from mid-town Manhattan. But in the 70s and 80s, that might as well have been on another planet. TV news, weather, and content was decidedly New York-centric. New Yorkers always poked fun at New Jersey. Ironically, when they couldn't afford to live there anymore, they all moved to New Jersey... and proceeded to ruin the place.
Ok, states rights... (Score:2)
But how soon till California makes their own TV programming and this administration outlaws state published programming?
Not dumping PBS (Score:2, Informative)
https://apnews.com/article/ala... [apnews.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Damn!
And just as I was getting ready to post:
"Yeee-Hawww!
We is winnin' the race to the bottom,
just like Donny Trump promised."
But too many level headed Arkansans thought otherwise.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Not dumping PBS (Score:2)
and in a decade (Score:1)
The right wing needs total media control (Score:1)
So the only solution is total media control. Like they do in Russia or China. Otherwise we all see the emperor has no cloths and do away with our ruling class.
So right now in America 90% of media is owned by billionaires, but that's not enough. There's still truth and reality available. And that has to stop.
Does PBS still have educational content? (Score:1)
Arkansas - national leader in excellent governance (Score:1)
Have they not learned anything? I guess not because they complete screwed their educational system.