Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Privacy Television Your Rights Online

Samsung Hit with Restraining Order Over Smart TV Surveillance Tech in Texas (texasattorneygeneral.gov) 59

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has secured a temporary restraining order against Samsung, blocking the company from continuing to collect data through its smart TVs' Automated Content Recognition technology.

The ACR system captured screenshots of what users were watching every 500 milliseconds, according to the state's lawsuit, and did so without consumer knowledge or consent. The District Court found good cause to believe Samsung's actions violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The TRO prohibits Samsung and any parties working in concert with the company from using, selling, transferring, collecting, or sharing ACR data tied to Texas consumers.

Samsung is one of five major TV manufacturers the Texas Attorney General's office has sued over ACR deployment. Paxton previously secured a similar order against Hisense.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Samsung Hit with Restraining Order Over Smart TV Surveillance Tech in Texas

Comments Filter:
  • Paxton's deceptive practices as a law enforcement official are some of the most egregious in the post-WWII era in America. They include:

    Whistleblower Complaints (2020): Eight senior aides reported Paxton to the FBI, accusing him of bribery, abuse of office, and retaliation for helping Nate Paul, a real estate investor and campaign donor.

    Extramarital Affair: Paxton admitted to an affair with a woman who was employed by Nate Paul, adding to the scandal and linking personal conduct to official duties. Imp

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by hdyoung ( 5182939 )
      Paxton is corrupt as f*&k and just generally an all-around bastard. He's pretty in-your face about it, as well. Which makes him a perfect fit for his current position.

      This is literally the first thing I've heard about him that I approve of.
  • by Quasar1999 ( 520073 ) on Thursday January 08, 2026 @01:40PM (#65910713) Journal
    Good luck buying a 'dumb' TV to try and avoid all this surveillance and advertising non-sense. I went looking and even TVs meant for digital signage and corporate use is near impossible to buy (they won't sell to individuals), and extremely expensive for mediocre quality (color correctness is crap).

    We're stuck with this AI infused, Ad-ridden, surveillance garbage.
    • by Sloppy ( 14984 ) on Thursday January 08, 2026 @01:44PM (#65910729) Homepage Journal

      What we call "Dumb TVs," the industry calls "monitors." Use that search term and you'll find plenty.

      • Yup, plenty out there in all the common sizes, just won't find them nearly as cheap as your average living room TV;

        Commercial Displays [bhphotovideo.com]

        • by Sloppy ( 14984 )

          Yeah, the prices are initially surprising. I guess all the spying, ads, and preloaded crapware/shovelware have massively increased the margins on Smart TVs, so that competitive pressures brought the price to way below benevolent TVs. That should give us all an idea how many dollars worth of fuckery a Smart TV inflicts.

          • To be fair these displays are generally built to higher quality standards as well, they're meant to go into environments to run 16/7 or 24/7 and are warrantied as such so they're just made different and they sell far less of them then the consumer sets.

            • ... And anyone who doubts this is invited to go into a sports bar and count the TVs where the picture is blue, or full of bright/dark spots, or half of it's dim, or ...

              • Yeah this is right in my industry so I have had to make this case to customers dozens if not hundreds of times when they ask "i can get a 55" TV at best buy for like $300"

                And yes you can can and that's even a viable plan but your warranty is DOA as soon as you hang it up in a store or restaurant so be prepared to replace when it fails. Sometimes that is the better value still!

                The commercial one is $1200 but it has a 3 or 5 or even 7 year warranty that the vendor will send someone to repair on-site. Just d

          • Costs are not prices.

            The shovelware allows you to discriminate* between your price-sensitive and non-price sensitive customers, essentially giving you two different demand curves and allowing you to clear those markets at separate prices. This does not tell you that the profit per unit is *matched* between the two, just that the total profit is *maximized*.

            *: Here discriminate is used in the value neutral "tell the difference".

      • The "monitors" are not dumb either.... both my Samsungs M8 are capable of streaming applications such as netflix, prime, hulu, etc... and Office365 all on its own, no need to attach it to a computer. You only need mouse/keyboard.
      • So, let me get this straight.. The TVs will monitor you. But the monitors won't monitor you. Brilliant!

      • What we call "Dumb TVs," the industry calls "monitors." Use that search term and you'll find plenty.

        I've found plenty. High price, poor performance, poor I/O, crap design. Not exactly a viable alternative in the living room.

        Can you suggest a better search term please?

    • by ichthus ( 72442 )
      Don't connect it to your wifi.
      • by Quasar1999 ( 520073 ) on Thursday January 08, 2026 @03:57PM (#65911087) Journal

        Don't connect it to your wifi.

        I have an LG C2 (circa 2019). I disabled everything I could through the menus. I never plugged in ethernet and had wifi disabled. One day my wife turned on the TV and it started doing an update. I flipped out on her for obviously having turned on wifi, how else could it update? Nearly (okay, not quite, but felt like it) got divorced over it, until I realized, no she really hadn't. The damn TV formed a mesh network with my neighbour's TV over bluetooth (I live in an apartment and apparently the concrete floor wasn't enough to block the signal).

        These TVs will stop at nothing to phone home and get connectivity. When I phoned LG and freaked out at them, they told me there was some setting about 6 menus deep, totally unrelated to anything mesh or network connectivity that if I disabled would prevent it from connecting to other TVs. It was not obvious, not mentioned anywhere in the documentation, or in the many many pages of EULA that I actually read through when I first turned on my TV after purchase.

        I want a TV that takes an HDMI (or DisplayPort) and displays it. No TV Tuner, built-in apps, or internet enabled anything. It aslo needs to support HDCP or else my AppleTV refuses to send video to it. Regular Monitors don't have HDCP support without being a smartTV. It's infuriating.

        • by MTEK ( 2826397 )

          Regular Monitors don't have HDCP support without being a smartTV.

          These days I would be surprised if any standard monitor lacks HDCP support over HDMI and DisplayPort. It's in most specs I see and I don't buy smart monitors.

        • I have often mused here, when people smugly say "just don't give it your wifi password", about how long it would take the idle processing power of a TV to crack your wifi password. It turns out that even I suffer from insufficient imagination.

        • by antdude ( 79039 )

          Where is this setting? Wait until TVs come with cellular modems. :(

    • by 0xG ( 712423 )

      Nothing connected to the internet is safe anymore.

      • Just don't connect it to the internet. Problem solved. Don't plug in an ethernet cable and don't allow it to connect to your wifi network. I guess they could still put a cellular modem in the device and have it phone home that way, but that seems like it would be quite expensive over the life of the device. I suppose if you want to consume streaming media, you'll ultimately have to deal with spying via whatever device is delivering that content to the TV.

        Best,

    • Haven't tried this myself, mind you. Just wondering how well this would work.
      • IME, not very well, assuming the objective is to block offensive functionality while still being able to use streaming services and whatnot. I've made a couple halfhearted attempts at this, and run into issues -- the only effective strategy is to block everything and whitelist specific hosts to allow things to work, and then every week some service or another changes something or pushes an update that breaks it. And some TVs, Samsung being notable for this, will keep popping up nags if they have a network

    • I went looking and even TVs meant for digital signage and corporate use is near impossible to buy (they won't sell to individuals)

      You didn't look very hard. They sell them on Amazon.

  • by DeanonymizedCoward ( 7230266 ) on Thursday January 08, 2026 @01:42PM (#65910721)

    While I don't agree with much that Ken Paxton does, I'll take this small win. It's bad enough when "smart" TVs snoop what's being watched through apps and network connections -- this bullshit, screen-capturing whatever's being fed in via HDMI etc. and doing analysis on it to come up with "insights" to sell, yeah, fuck you very much. I'd never connect a TV to the Internet anyway, but I'm in a small minority in that regard, and regular people have rights too.

    Now that we're working on getting invasive surveillance technology out of the lives of everyday Americans minding their own business, perhaps, Mr. Paxton, you'd like to have a word with Flock? *crickets*

  • I'm a high tech career engineer, but it doesn't mean all the "smart" stuffs are must have. For the TVs, nowadays I don't have a choice but to buy a smart TV. But there's no way in hell I'd allow it to access my local network. It can cry all it wants, no internet allowed. It doesn't matter if it takes screenshot, there's no way for it to send it home.
    • by Anonymous Coward

      Not until they put a cellular modem in 'em, which now that I think of it, would be dirt cheap for them to do.

      "Daddy, why is the TV covered in foil? Can we at least remove it from the screen side?"

      • It's unrealistic... about $10/month for the service. If they buy in mass, maybe $5. But after few years they'll rack up pretty much the cost of the whole TV.
  • Ken Paxton (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Local ID10T ( 790134 )

    Ken Paxton is running for US Senate in 2026.

    He desperately wants Texans to forget that he was impeached by his own party members on 20 counts of public corruption, bribery, abuse of power, obstruction of justice, and abuse of the public trust.

    Everything he is doing is to grab headlines and distract voters.

  • I have not used my Samsung TV remote in years, I control everything from my AppleTV. The TV has not been connected to the internet since I got it 4 years ago and installed updates back then.
    A few weeks ago I had to change a setting and had to dig out my remote. it had lost pairing for the remote, but what was really strange was that I got an error that the TVs storage was full and it said i had to do a factory reset or contact support.

    So what filled the internal storage in the years where it have not been c

  • Or twice a second, which is far more intuitive.

He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.

Working...