Finland To Introduce 'Green Wave' Automated System For Emergency Vehicles (yle.fi) 64
alternative_right writes: Fintraffic's national traffic priority system, which is set to be introduced this summer, will recognize the location of an emergency vehicle and automatically change the lights to green to facilitate its passage.
(Why isn't everyone doing this already?)
(Why isn't everyone doing this already?)
Is anyone already doing this? (Score:2)
one of those things that seem obvious in hindsight
Re: (Score:1)
yes. the US and Canada (at least) have been doing this for a decade or more. rather than just sucking down the obvious bait in the article you could have given it a quick google, but nahhh lets just come here and repeat the same stupid bullshit.
Re: Is anyone already doing this? (Score:2)
Re: Is anyone already doing this? (Score:2)
There's a white strobe light on top of the traffic lights that goes off to indicate they've been triggered by an emergency vehicle. At least on the East Coast. I believe the actual signaling is over RF.
Re: Is anyone already doing this? (Score:4, Informative)
Infrared. Biggest name in the game is Opticom. There are a few outlier audio-based systems, but the big one is Opticom.
Re: Is anyone already doing this? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
So there is an optical system from the emergency vehicle to sensors on the traffic light?
The auditory signals bypass the traffic lights entirely and go to the sensor networks that normally respond to traffic light signals.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, eyes and ears and control mechanisms they guide.
Re: Is anyone already doing this? (Score:2)
That works at some intersections. At others, buildings and echoes make it pretty much impossible to tell if the siren you hear is an emergency vehicle about to cross the intersection in front of you where you have a green light, or there's some emergency somewhere else, which is often true. They could still go through red lights, but not at full speed. With the new system, they find that the light is green for them at every intersection, and they don't have to slow down.
Re: (Score:2)
I can confirm Canada has been doing it for a while too. Same strobes...
Re: (Score:2)
TFS asks:
(Why isn't everyone doing this already?)
The step up in complexity (and cost) from a light on a local timer (often with the local preemption via IR or visible strobe) to a centralized management is significant and the advantages are probably relatively limited in all but the most congested places.
They definitely do it in Macross and Evangelion though.
Re: (Score:2)
TFS asks:
(Why isn't everyone doing this already?)
The step up in complexity (and cost) from a light on a local timer (often with the local preemption via IR or visible strobe) to a centralized management is significant and the advantages are probably relatively limited in all but the most congested places.
They definitely do it in Macross and Evangelion though.
The other big consideration is that it may not help that much. Emergency vehicles still have to go slowly through every single intersection because assuming that all other drivers will pay attention to and obey a red light is apparently too much to ask. Also, if there is traffic congestion, a green light won't help that much. What helps is other drivers paying attention and pulling out of the way. In the US, this is often too much to ask for.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My city, and all the surrounding cities have been doing this for decades with an optical system that detects emergency lighting on vehicles and immediately stops all opposing traffic and gives green to everything in the direction the emergency vehicle is traveling (straight, left, right). I don't know the range of the system, but I have seen it activated many times.
Sometimes it is annoying, because it will throw off the cycle (start over). And if there is ANOTHER emergency vehicle not far behind, it will
Re: (Score:2)
>"My city, and all the surrounding cities have been doing this for decades with an optical system"
I should have mentioned this is in the USA.
Re: (Score:2)
It's also one of the things that seem dangerous with foresight. The question of introducing a system needs to ask whether and how the system can be misused to cause real chaos.
Why isn't everyone doing this? My question is why is your infrastructure so poorly designed that you need to do this? Where I live police and ambulances can already get around traffic. They are allowed to ride on road shoulders, on bike paths (which are ubiquitous), and have dedicated emergency highway on/off ramps allowing them to ge
Re: (Score:2)
It requires coordination not just been traffic light controls but also an interface to route planning for emergency vehicles.
This is feasible in the civilized world, but completely impossible in the United States.
Why isn't everyone doing this already? (Score:4, Funny)
When I was in college someone told me you could flip a traffic light green by flashing your headlights on and off. I found out instead it was a great way to get pulled over, especially if there was a police car nearby.
Re: (Score:3)
When I was in college someone told me you could flip a traffic light green by flashing your headlights on and off. I found out instead it was a great way to get pulled over, especially if there was a police car nearby.
If you have the right kind of strobe light, there are some traffic systems that'll turn green for you. You are correct that the police won't find it amusing.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
In one of the lower-tech, backward locations that I spend time, there is no centralized system of traffic lights, every crossing has a set working on its own.
Two or three years back the local govt fitted all emergency vehicles with some sort of radio transmitter and every traffic light with the corresponding gadget (one can tell, because they have this weird antenna and a solar battery), so now the ambulance or the fire truck can switch the lights from some distance away. Quite effective and must have cost
Re: (Score:2)
Your high beams had to be high enough to shine down the tube around the sensor, and obvs it was best done with no cops about. Today I would assume it won't be as easy to fool, and you would need LED headlights because nothing else will switch fast enough. Also, in a major city they might even be monitoring that.
Re: (Score:2)
Because there are way too many systems and sometimes it's just hard.
To do a green wave requires all traffic lights to be networked so they can do that. Most are not, because short range communications systems are expensive and WAN based ones even more so. In fact, many "green wave" systems rely on nothing more than the system clock being set correctly so you get a green wave until the clocks drift far apart enough that it stops working and someone goes out and resyncs the clocks again.
Adding emergency vehic
We do this in America (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Not really "binary" - just a flash rate: 10Hz is "low priority" 14Hz is "high priority." Yes, it has been hacked, but very easy to find out who is hacking it.
Re: (Score:2)
That can only control the next upcoming light.
Not new (Score:2)
This is known as "traffic signal preemption" or "emergency vehicle preemption" and has been in place in a number of countries for years.
Re: (Score:2)
This is known as "traffic signal preemption" or "emergency vehicle preemption" and has been in place in a number of countries for years.
As I recall, while in some locations it used an IR signal (which some people tried to spoof, until they got caught, and got a very very large fine), most places have migrated to an encoded RF signal, and others use GPS information to a more integrated traffic grid. And some places (NYC was a poster child; I don't think it has changed) it is not used due to the complexity of managing that cities traffic.
Re: Not new (Score:2)
Without reading the article I assume this is more advanced.
It uses route information and sets the greens sooner than line of sight.
This means the route will be green and clear.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That only trips the cycle for one light at a time.
Been in place for over 35 years in the US (Score:4, Insightful)
it's called Priority Green (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_signal_preemption) , and was pretty common before the early 1990. 10Hz IR beacon is "low priority" 14Hz is "high priority."
Re: Been in place for over 35 years in the US (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How do they expect me to finish my Slashdot post with a bunch of flashing lights in my fac[NO CARRIER]
Re: (Score:2)
The issues are range, and ease of abuse. Ideally you want the lights to go green long before the emergency vehicle gets there, to give traffic time to clear the junction out and queues to dissipate. The fact that it's just an IR sensor makes it easy for anyone to trigger.
"Green Wave" new name for old thing (Score:2)
Isn't Green Wave just what's always been called a donut run?
Not viable (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thank goodness nobody other than the Dutch gives a damned about priority for bicycles.
Re: (Score:2)
A green light won't make room for emergency vehicles
This.
It's easier for emergency vehicles to weave through stopped traffic than worry about morons turning left in front of fire trucks because "Oh good! The light turned green." A few towns around me flip all the lights to red upon emergency vehicle approach. Which also negates the benefits of hackers "blue boxing" the lights.
Signal Horns are there for a reason.
This is the Seattle area. We have opiate induced deafness.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, I used to work in Offenbach close to a firefighter base, they always switched all the traffic lights at the closest intersection to red before they went out.
Been here for a while now (Score:2)
In fact I once read an article some years back about people getting caught building black boxes to flip the lights and then getting caught doing it. I wonder if The Woz ever looked into that?
looked into it (Score:2)
I was pretty sure we already have the standard green wave stuff like busses getting priority. You can literally see the white diode start to blink on traffic lights when a bus approaches and such. So I went to take a look at details.
This is the official announcement from the relevant government bureau:
https://www.fintraffic.fi/fi/u... [fintraffic.fi]
It's exceptionally light on details of the implementation (likely intentionally to reduce hacking and hijacking of the system). However it does note that "data moves in the off
Why isnt it already being done? (Score:2)
Why isnt it already being done is a good question...
NZ already has it in place for public transport in most major cities, and the emergency services are switching over from a legacy system to using the same priority system for emergency vehicles as is currently used for public transport.
https://www.scats.nsw.gov.au/h... [nsw.gov.au]
\o/ (Score:1)
Could this be made available for police vehicles too? When there's a fake donut emergency in the presence of onerous traffic, a swift button press could double or triple the chances of the donuts being intercepted before they become too stale.
But.... (Score:2)
I've always thought those things should change ALL lights to red, that way no one is driving in either direction. Does anyone know why they don't do this?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And then the ambulance could drive on the opposite side of the street, like they always do at intersections.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Four way red is the fault mode.
Traffic lights also have a physical wire from every green light (the actual light bulb/led connector or socket) that comes back to the controller. The purpose is to detect a conflicting green and if such a thing happens (which should never occur) then the controller switches to four way red and locks out until it's reset.
Chrome Box? (Score:1)
Here in the UK ... (Score:2)
They then decided it was better to just turn all the lights red, leaving junctions clear for the emergency service divers to sort it out amongst them selves.
It is DEFINITELY BETTER this way.
I think I was told that the emergency service vehicle turns on something in the cab to make it happen, but I may be wrong about
There's been a US system in-place for decades (Score:2)
Emergency vehicles trigger sensors on stop lights using strobe light or RF. Traffic Signal Preemption has been rolling out in the US since at least the late 70's and early 80's. It might not be everywhere, but it's widely used.
It used acoustic triggering in some places and went to strobes. But now they're shifting to radio and GPS. A lot depends on the what the local infrastructure can support.
How is this different from the USA system (Score:2)
AFAIK in the USA cars give directly commands to traffic lights to turn the light green with infra red remote control.
The new system in Finland (HALI) on the other hand works like this:
1. The car receives GPS coordinates from the satellite
2. The car communicates the coordinates, moving angle and information for example about turn signals and hand brake via mobile network to the server
3. The server interprets this information to estimate where traffic lights need to switched and sends commands to traffic ligh
green? (Score:2)
Green? In the US, I believe what's usually done is change all lights to red. Seems to make more sense.
Why? (Score:2)
Because it's insane. If you have to change 100 lights at the right time, for lets say 10 calls per day, with, oh, let's say a .1% chance of failure somewhere in the grid.... basically chaos. We already have pressure plates signalling lights to turn green when someone needs to take a left turn, and I know a handful that are broken, and being "left turn on arrow only YOU WILL NEVER TURN. People have to turn right and do a Uey to get where they need to go. And guess what? It will never be fixed. Becaus
Re: (Score:2)