Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Transportation

Vermont EV Buses Prove Unreliable For Transportation This Winter (vermontdailychronicle.com) 141

An anonymous reader writes:

Electric buses are proving unreliable this winter for Vermont's Green Mountain Transit, as it needs to be over 41 degrees for the buses to charge, but due to a battery recall the buses are a fire hazard and can't be charged in a garage.

Spokesman for energy workers advocacy group Power the Future Larry Behrens told the Center Square: "Taxpayers were sold an $8 million 'solution' that can't operate in cold weather when the home for these buses is in New England."

"We're beyond the point where this looks like incompetence and starts to smell like fraud," Behrens said.

"When government rushes money out the door to satisfy green mandates, basic questions about performance, safety, and value for taxpayers are always pushed aside," Behrens said. "Americans deserve to know who approved this purchase and why the red flags were ignored."

General manager at Green Mountain Transit (GMT) Clayton Clark told The Center Square that "the federal government provides public transit agencies with new buses through a competitive grant application process, and success is not a given."


This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Vermont EV Buses Prove Unreliable For Transportation This Winter

Comments Filter:
  • by ArchieBunker ( 132337 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @02:07PM (#65997128)

    Seem like a uniquely American problem. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/0... [cnbc.com]

    Are batteries different in Norway? This smells like typical corruption and incompetence.

    • Yup, considering how greedy American capitalists are they cheaped out on the EV busses in the manufacturing, the batteries should be kept in an insulated compartment and kept warm, I bet they are not even insulated from the weather, and how about summer heat how much heat can EV batteries take before failure of some sort
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by AleRunner ( 4556245 )

      Are batteries different in Norway? This smells like typical corruption and incompetence.

      Clearly the batteries delivered are somehow different and the ones delivered to Vermont weren't appropriate. This shouldn't be a question of the officials though. The basic function of a bus is to drive around the place and if it's sold in Vermont that means driving around the place in the cold. A bus that fails that is not of "merchantable quality" (look up the Uniform Commercial Code) and so the company that made them should have to fix them and until they do they have a duty pay for replacements.

      Now, US

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @03:26PM (#65997420) Homepage Journal

        I did a bit of digging. The busses are Canadian, and the batteries are German. A little surprising as you would expect both of those to be used to sub 5C temperatures.

        FWIW the ones in Norway use Chinese batteries, and many of the busses are made in China too. They have no issues with low temperatures, and in fact often use NMC batteries because they perform well in cold climates. I don't know what chemistry the ones in these busses are, but it sounds quite old if they can't charge below 5C.

        • Nothing surprising. Countries of production doesn't define environmental conditions or project boundaries. This isn't a Canada / German / China issue, it's a project requirements / acceptance testing issue.

          Charging batteries has nothing to do with old / new, it has to do with how packs are prepared, assembled and managed on a technical level. You most certainly can get batteries out of China that can't charge below 5C, and you most certainly will get batteries form Germany which can. All you need to do is s

          • Thanks. It's a bit of an indictment of moderation on here today that your comment is not voted higher than the one you responded to. Both Germany and China make lead acid batteries that would be useless in this application. Both of them also make new chemistry wide temperature range lithium batteries.

        • They DID use NMC batteries. That's the PROBLEM that resulted in them having to limit charge rates and levels. NMC is an INFERIOR chemistry in every way other than maximum capacity, which is MEANINGLESS if you can only charge to 75% (which is what they are doing now with these specific buses) because of a fire risk.

          Using NMC for EVs is a shit idea on all levels and anyone who presides over such a decision should be defenestrated instantaneously.

      • TFA says that the batteries have been recalled and are a fire hazard. Surely that fire risk has got nothing to do with indoor charging. The article doesnâ(TM)t go into any details about this at all and thus just reads as an attempt to attack the green agenda. If there wasnâ(TM)t a recall, I bet this would be a non-story. Itâ(TM)s like complaining that a batch of diesel buses are shit because of a recall on the fuel tank that means they canâ(TM)t be filled enough.

        • by sjames ( 1099 )

          The idea is that if they can catch fire when charging, that should happen outside.

          But since they were recalled, why haven't they serviced the recall so they are no longer a fire hazard?

        • Since the initial batteries can't/shouldn't be charged at temperatures below 41F, my guess is they use a pre-charge warming feature when the batteries are that cold. If the pre-charge cycle doesn't know to turn off at the right time, there is a small chance they might get TOO warm during charging.

          The first five busses they received had bad firmware. The later busses with different batteries work fine. Also, the GMT bus garage "does not have suitable fire mitigation equipment to store or charge an electri

          • Interesting thoughts. Great example where you're only getting a partial story and it's coming through a journalist who doesn't know enough to ask the right questions.

            Presumably the firmware is getting temperatures wrong, heating to the target temperature where it should actually heat just above the minimum and let the charging current do the rest of the battery heating.

        • by tragedy ( 27079 )

          They can't charge inside because of the fire hazard. Of course, charging inside is a bit of an odd solution anyway. The exterior temperature shouldn't matter, just the temperature of the battery pack itself. Taking it inside and saying "OK. It's 20 degrees C in here, fine to charge" is checking a box, not making sure that the battery has actually reached the proper temperature. Seems to me like the proper technical solution, whether the battery is inside or outside is some sort of battery heater that measur

    • Good point! Let's see just how poorly EVs are performing in the cold in Norway [motor.no].

      Just because they're selling doesn't mean they perform well in the cold. That isn't a direct correlation...

      • Norway subsidized EV purchases and taxes ICE vehicles, EVs are exempt from those taxes.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        They still managed decent range in extreme cold and snow, and charged up just fine. I don't see a problem.

        If you are buying an electric bus you simply make sure you specify a battery that is large enough to cover the route in the worst case scenario.

    • by caseih ( 160668 )

      No it's just that the temperatures in Norway's major cities, being coastal, are more moderate than a lot of the coldest climates in North America.

      Elektrotrucker just documented a long-haul electric semi trip through Scandinavian countries. In Sweden he had relatively warm temps, only -5 or so. By the time he ended up in Finland it was -35. He had a major problem keeping the cabin warm at those temps. Battery thermal management systems consumed a lot of power too. His efficiency dropped from about 1 kwh/

    • Not a uniquely American problem. It's a specific project related problem. Basic requirements not written down and not applied. Selection criteria not correctly selected.

      This shit happens the world over both in government and private industry. Whether you're buying trains in Spain that don't fit through tunnels (real thing which killed a project), or buying hydrogen charging stations without specifying how many vehicles need to be filled at a certain rate (a real thing which killed a project). Every place ha

    • by arcade ( 16638 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @04:51PM (#65997726) Homepage

      I'm afraid the battery powered busses in Oslo, Norway are dogshite during cold winters. We've been complaining about them for years. Same issue as described in this article. Pushed through before tech was properly ready.

      And I'm saying that as an electric car loving Norwegian who has two electric cars and wouldn't go back to fossil cars no matter what. :P

  • Astroturfing (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @02:18PM (#65997172)

    Not that these concerns aren't worth discussing but consider the narrative in this article and who is presenting it:

    "energy workers advocacy group Power the Future"

    Now for one thing "energy workers" pretty much means "oil and gas industry" and when you go the website of Power the Future it's full of them representing themselves on Fox news. "We believe America is blessed with abundant and reliable energy sources that have been the lifeblood of our national advancement and prosperity." Come on, that's a dog whistle as loud as a bullhorn.

    Second one is "Institute for Energy Research" and that itself has a Wikipedia entry "IER is often described as a front group for the fossil fuel industry.[3][4][5] It was initially formed by Charles Koch, receives donations from many large companies like Exxon, and publishes a stream of reports and position papers opposing any efforts to control greenhouse gasses."

    So is there a real issue here? Maybe but the article and how it's being presented is presenting a narrative, exactly the type of thing climate deniers accuse their opposition of doing all the time. Interesting aint it?

    • So is there a real issue here?

      You make some good points regarding the source and underlying agenda, but

      ...it needs to be over 41 degrees for the buses to charge, but due to a battery recall the buses are a fire hazard and can't be charged in a garage.

      rather sounds like an actual issue that needs investigating, irrespective of who reported it, or why.

      • Re:Astroturfing (Score:5, Informative)

        by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @02:39PM (#65997236)

        Sure but you're doing the same thing by leaving out the context of that issue: the trucks originally were working with charging in any temp and in the garage but then there was a fire risk issue with a recall on the batteries so the manufacturer did a software update for safety that places restrictions on charging to mitigate fire risk until the replacement.

        Now sure that kinda sucks in the winter sure but this is somewhat new tech but that is hardly showing the idea is failing or anywhere close to "fraud" as the narrative here is presented. Meanwhile the bus company already said they have more busses with newer batteries on order.

        If the article was called "new EV bus program experience growing pains in winter" that's more fair to whats happening.

        • Oh and the part i left out, this would have to be framed in comparison to traditional diesel busses. Do they never have safety recalls? Heres one of a tranditional bus model having to do recalls of 16000 units due to safety recalls. Does that means buses are a failed concept and the manufacturer should be charged with fraud? Have no diesels had recalls due to their DPF systems? Carbon coking or other ICE specific problems?

          https://news.buses.org/motor-c... [buses.org]

          • Fun fact: prior to the battery recall the biggest problem with GMT's electric busses was with the fuel-based heaters tha they have instead of heat pumps.

        • but this is somewhat new tech

          No it's not. We've been charging batteries for decades.

          That said it isn't fraud, it very well may be failure to deliver against the specification in the purchase order. The question is now, what were the terms.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        It sounds like extreme incompetence on the part of the designers, or at least someone in the chain.

        Lithium batteries can't be charged as fast when they are cold, which is why some EVs automatically heat their batteries when you navigate to a charger. They can still be charged slowly though, and the charging warms them up so that speed eventually improves. Given these are likely being charged overnight, it shouldn't be an issue.

        Maybe the problem is not the battery, but the inverter, if they are charging from

      • Read what you just wrote:

        due to a battery recall

        A battery recall does not equal incompetence or fraud from the people who bought them. That's just a blatantly partisan shill for the oil industry trying to push an agenda. A battery recall means the product turned out to have a manufacturing defect that the manufacturer is now addressing. Once it's fixed, they'll be able to charge the buses in a garage, which is presumably what they intended from the start, and the problem will go away.

    • Issues (Score:4, Interesting)

      by JBMcB ( 73720 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @03:01PM (#65997322)
      There are definitely groups pushing a narrative. There are also legitimate problems that need to be addressed. We have a hybrid and a pure EV, and there are definitely issues that would prevent us from going full EV. Several of them involve cold weather. Road trips in the summer aren't a problem. Road trips in the winter are. There needs to be a LOT more chargers in cold regions. Around us there are a ton of chargers going in the big metro areas, but none being built out on the boonies. If you want to drive more than a couple hundred miles out of town in the winter, it gets dicey quick.
    • The Vermont Daily Chronicle isn't what anyone would call a newspaper, more of a grindstone for axes.

      It's where you get to post your opinion piece and then link to it so it looks like you aren't just self-hosting. Not even conservative cite it.

  • by gurps_npc ( 621217 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @02:24PM (#65997192) Homepage

    Yes these busses do not work. Electric Busses in Canada DO work.
    https://en.byd.com/news/byd-el... [byd.com]

    Those Canadian busses are made in China. Trump hates China. The Vermont busses are made in America.

    The problem is NOT "government rushes money out the door to satisfy green mandates" The green mandates had nothing to do with the problem.

    The problem was incompetent people in the government that did not get a proven system.

    • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

      so no the problem was rushed green mandates actually. Buy American is and should be a high priority objective for government spending that green or efficiency targets. What should have happened is the state should have told the vendor, look we want to go EV but we need something we can charge outdoors in the Vermont winter where we generally expect to have X days per year around $(insert temp, below which it is acceptable to cancel bus service) you will get the contract when we can charge at that temperat

    • Lol you cite propaganda from an EV bus company as evidence that they are working? Toronto has tried them but they cannot be brought into full service without bringing a whole lot more charging all the way along routes. One bus died on route in Toronto showing 15% battery remaining.

    • "the federal government provides public transit agencies with new buses through a competitive grant application process, and success is not a given."

      This, right here, is the problem. Buy from the lowest bidder, but with no contracted requirement that what they provide is fit for purpose.

      I wonder who paid off whom to get this past oversight and scrutiny.

      That sounds like more of a Shelbyville idea...

  • by UnknowingFool ( 672806 ) on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @02:38PM (#65997230)

    The buses are fine to drive in winter. The issue is the buses cannot charge in temperatures under 41F at the moment. What is missing is that the buses were able at one point and why. From the article [vermontdai...onicle.com]:

    Clark also explained that the five electric buses were “operating well” until November 2025 when the batteries “were recalled for fire hazard.”

    The recall prompted a software update from New Flyer to “decrease the likelihood for fire” that “included only allowing the bus to charge to 75% and to not allow charging when the battery is below 41 degrees,” Clark explained.

    “Previously we could charge in any temperature to 100%,” Clark said.

    “Since the barrier to charging under 41 degrees is simply a software update, the manufacturer could find a technical solution that could resolve the problem this week,” Clark said. “We are seeking a financial remedy from New Flyer that could lead to litigation if not resolved.”

    “New Flyer has indicated that replacement batteries will be installed within 18-24 months,” Clark said.

    The actual problem: The buses need replacement batteries as the current ones pose a fire risk. To allow the buses to operate with existing batteries, software restrictions were installed to not allow the buses to charge under 41F. The software could be changed or the buses could get their replacement batteries sooner. The summary makes it seems like there are zero solutions to the issue.

    • The actual problem: The buses need replacement batteries as the current ones pose a fire risk. To allow the buses to operate with existing batteries, software restrictions were installed to not allow the buses to charge under 41F. The software could be changed or the buses could get their replacement batteries sooner. The summary makes it seems like there are zero solutions to the issue.

      Another solution: Get buses with proper thermal management systems in their batteries. The batteries should be able to warm themselves to the safe charging temperature using stored power, while driving to the charger.

      They may actually have that, and it's some bug in the thermal management system that creates the fire risk, or something similar. But if they don't, that's an actual issue that should be looked into: Why did Vermont buy buses without such a critical cold-weather feature? If that's what's

      • by spitzak ( 4019 )

        It's pretty f**g obvious the problem is with the thermal management.

        The company apparently broke the buses on purpose to avoid the problem, and is promising to replace the batteries in 2 years (!) so they can be used again.

    • So the problem is the buses are not meeting their original performance specifications (operating temperatures and range) and estimated fix is 18-24 months away. Sounds like someone missed a clause in a contract that specifies that the manufacturer is obligated to repair the buses back to their original specifications within some reasonable time, and the manufacturer has to cover the cost of substitute product (loaner buses?) for the entire duration of down-time, or lemon the buses back to the manufacturer.
  • And let the free market decide the best way to solve global warming. Full buses are so much more environmentally friendly you could run them on coal and be better for the environment than all the cars they replace, even if those cars were electric. Cities should only be deciding what busses are the cheapest to run. They shouldn't be betting on technologies or virtue signaling with their purchases.
  • The buses clearly need safer batteries, but in the meantime why not build a steel recharging shed off to one side and put in fire suppression. Then at least the vehicles can be charged.

    Whether they are safe to ride, that's another problem !

    • "why not build a steel recharging shed off to one side and put in fire suppression"

      a) It's a temporary problem, until the manufacture is done with the permanent fix
      b) Building a structure takes money that then cannot be spend on other things like providing service or buying buses.

  • ..of technical problems, the quote seems to be a political statement from an EV hater
    It would be more informative if the actual technical problems were discussed
    Given the political nature of the quote, methinks the problems were exaggerated

  • There is no such thing as a New Flyer SE40. They are model XE40.

    The spec sheet [californiahvip.org] tells us that "The battery chemistry is Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC), providing the best balance of energy, power, safety, and life."

    NMC is shit, especially for EVs.

    Not having a battery heater is shit, especially in climates where it regularly freezes, like Vermont... but also anywhere it can freeze.

    I agree that there is fraud involved, in that what New Flyer claims about NMC batteries is false. But they decided to buy t

    • A failure of judgement or lack of expertise on the part of the contracting organization doesn't mean they were engaged in fraud. I think we can apply Hanlon's Razor to this:

      Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by neglect.

      • I may just be a little pissy about buses because I cannot comprehend how lax the standards are. Many if not most buses still aren't crash tested. When they are, the results seem to be for informational purposes only. It only costs around $1500 to $2500 to add a fire suppression system (mostly closer to the lower end) and a single bus can cost $250k or more yet they are still not mandatory despite how rapidly a bus can burn up. Most of them have plywood floors FFS, including these buses we're talking about h

  • As much as I didn't want whatever questionable source that is to get anymore clicks, I had to dig in a little more on the recall.

    From what it says, a safety concern with the batteries prompted the initial "recall". The "fix" for that recall was a software update that then prevented charging below 41 deg and limited charging to 75% - and even that only "decreased the likelihood for fire". It didn't actually solve the problem.

    The transit GM guy says a fix for the 41 deg charge barrier is "simply a software up

    • by spitzak ( 4019 )

      Obviously if they put the software back to the old version it would fix the 41 degree charge barrier. So yes he is 100% correct that it is "simply a software update".

  • Don't laugh. Diesel heaters are a good solution to keep the batteries and cabin warm. I'm sure some say that's crazy and defeats the purpose of using an EV in the first place, and is an unacceptable compromise, but I strongly disagree. I'm really surprised EVs in cold climates don't embrace this. Sure burning diesel makes EV people uncomfortable, but it's a lot less diesel than an ICE bus would burn, and it lets the EV system work at its most efficient state all winter long. Such a hybrid system makes

    • Diesel heaters seem impractical. If I understand you correctly you want to burn the Diesel. That means you'll somehow need to put the Diesel inside the bus, or install overhead Diesel lines, or have huge Diesel tanks at every charging station.

      It seems easier to erect some sort of "shed" to put the bus in and heat that lightly.

      • Cannot park inside. A 5Amp extension cord at 120V and gallon of D can keep a bus warm and toasty for 8 hour of charging with proper planning. That is how you get any heavy truck started in the morning, from a WWII army truck, a 1980s short bus, to a new freightliner, you flex duct enough hot air under the right compartment and it is warm even if not got an internal heat source running. The ICE alternative was to keep one mechanic on duty and idle 8 buses all night at about 3 times the fuel flow. T
      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        Wow. Where to start. Huge diesel tanks? You do realize bus depos already have diesel tanks fill stations? Further we're not talking large tanks. 5 gallons that you can fill with a jerry can for goodness sake. Does Webasto mean anything to you? If not then you really don't know what I'm talking about. Also the web is full of cheap diesel air heaters (no I'm not talking about construction heaters) that work well and are quite efficient. In fact I've seen some redneck videos, probably intending to be anti-

      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        Actually it turns out it's not only been deemed practical, but Webasto is selling a product that does exactly this, made exclusively for EV vehicles such as vans: https://www.webasto.com/en-int... [webasto.com]

        This is the kind of thing I'm talking about. When you combine cabin heating with warming the entire battery system, you can get full EV range and fast charging at the coldest temperatures for the cost of a tiny amount of diesel per day. Seems like a great idea for the small amount of time each year it's necessary

        • by spitzak ( 4019 )

          That is for warming the cabin when the vehicle is on the road.
          If it is charging, there is an electric cord right there that can much more cheaply provide the energy to heat it.

    • "Diesel heaters are a good solution to keep the batteries and cabin warm. "

      Diesel heaters were the primary source of failures in the GMT electric buses before this battery recall.

      • by caseih ( 160668 )

        Diesel heaters have been used on ICE heavy trucks for decades for cold starting. Webasto made their name in North America selling such heaters. They are used on all sorts of heavy vehicles and agricultural machines where there's no electricity to run a block heater. Webasto isn't the only game in town either.

        • by spitzak ( 4019 )

          I think it will be pretty hard to charge an EV in a location "where there's no electricity to run a block heater". So an electric block heater will work if the purpose is to make charging work.

  • Who built these EVs without thermal management for the batteries? Lack of thermal management causes many problems with batteries (too hot = bad, too cold = bad). Thermal management systems are a standard piece of kit included in all but the cheapest crappiest EVs on the road. A warmer is standard kit on diesel trucks for cold weather regions since forever... even a company with no EV experience should know better.

    Was this a "lowest bidder" design? A cost saving decision?

  • Who cares what ambient temperature is? It has no bearing on battery temperature.

    Put it on the charger straight off the last trip and the battery never gets cold. After charging just keep the battery heater running. Less efficient than in the garage, but not a big problem.

The finest eloquence is that which gets things done.

Working...