Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Social Networks

Is 'Brain Rot' Real? How Too Much Time Online Can Affect Your Mind. (msn.com) 20

Can being "very online" really affect our brains, asks the Washington Post: Research suggests that scrolling through short videos on TikTok, Instagram or YouTube Shorts is affecting our attention, memory and mental health. A recent meta-analysis of the scientific literature found that increased use of short-form video was linked with poorer cognition and increased anxiety...

In a 2025 study published in the journal Translational Psychiatry, researchers looked at longitudinal data from more than 7,000 children across the country and found that more screen use was associated with reduced cortical thickness in certain areas of the brain. The cortex, which is the outer layer that sits on top of our more primitive brain structures, allows for higher-level thinking, memory and decision-making. "We really need it for things like inhibitory control or not being so impulsive," said Mitch Prinstein, a senior science adviser to the American Psychological Association and professor of psychology and neuroscience at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in the study. The cortex is also important for controlling addictive behaviors. "Those seem to be the areas being affected by the reduced cortical thickness," he said, explaining that impulsivity can prompt us to seek dopamine hits from social media. In the study, more screen time was also associated with more attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms...

But not all screen time is created equal. A recent study removed social media from kids' devices but let them use their phones for as long as they wanted. The result? Kids spent just as long on their phones but didn't have the same harmful effects. "It's what you're doing on the screen that matters," Prinstein said.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is 'Brain Rot' Real? How Too Much Time Online Can Affect Your Mind.

Comments Filter:
  • by Sigma 7 ( 266129 ) on Saturday February 21, 2026 @12:52PM (#66002794)

    Really, the TikTok/Instagram/Shorts are meant for light engagement for a dopamine hit, being shallow on-par with what's found in Fahrenheit 451. Just completely shallow, no critical thinking, no discussion - and perhaps influenced towards sending young people weird videos simply because they're signed out.

    Also, it's the quality, not the quantity. The brain-rot algorithm is just as bad as a real-life social pool with endless bullying and bullshit drama - which also has the added effect of complex PTSD.

    • Okay FP as far as you went, but "Insightful"? Seems kind of shallow.

      I'd rather go for funny based on "cesspool of the vanities" to describe today's Internet. But there is no such thing as creativity, only synthesis of existing ideas? https://existentialcomics.com/... [existentialcomics.com] So therefore I have to give credit to the seminal cesspool formerly known as Twitter, now owned by the legendary inseminator-in-chief?

      So the motivational joke is that they are all suffering from the earworm "You're so vain. You think this [Inte

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      I'm more concerned about Facebook. Rather than banning social media for under 16s, we should ban it for over 60s. Facebook is full of AI slop that people think is real, racism, and fake news.

    • Looking at the past moral panics and media labeled harmful content genres, there seems to be a pattern of moral policing of genres consumed by boys and men...

      - rock and roll music
      - 1950s horror and science fiction movies
      - heavy metal music
      - rap music
      - dungeons and dragons
      - graphic horror movies ....

  • by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Saturday February 21, 2026 @01:05PM (#66002810)

    Kids didn’t suddenly read Kant. They migrated.

    Typical substitutions:

    YouTube in the browser
    Mobile web versions of TikTok/Instagram
    Discord via browser
    online games
    group chats
    streaming sites
    short-video aggregators

    In other words: the behavior remained even when the app disappeared.

    • by hey! ( 33014 )

      Well, that's one hypothesis. However since they saw a significant difference in the population where the social media apps were removed, then if your hypothesis is true, the data would suggest that delivering the service as a native app rather than a web app must have some harmful effect in itself. An alternative hypothesis is that their application usage patterns changed when the apps were removed.

      It's not altogether far fetched that web-delivered apps have a different psychological effect than native sm

  • Yes (Score:2, Offtopic)

    by PPH ( 736903 )

    Can being "very online" really affect our brains,

    Particularly when the owners of said brains wander aimlessly into moving traffic whilst fiddling with their thumb toys. These brains are tough to sweep off the pavement.

  • Too much time on Slashdot will rot your mind. Slashrot is real.

  • > A recent study removed social media from kids' devices but let them use their phones for as long as they wanted. The result? Kids spent just as long on their phones but didn't have the same harmful effects. "It's what you're doing on the screen that matters," Prinstein said.

    Does this include text messaging. Not to mention people walking down the street with their face buried in their phone tend to get run over. All screen time is harmful as your not engaging with the environment.
  • by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 ) on Saturday February 21, 2026 @05:28PM (#66003172)
    Social media has an interesting issue. It is heavily curated. There are people say on Facebook who post about their incredible, wonderful lives, full of upscale restraints, many vacation trips to exotic locations, and expensive fashions. And a lot of other people see that, and find their own lives greatly lacking and disappointing. And some even leave their partners to find that "better person." But curation is curation, many of the perfect couples are dissembling.

    TikTok has relationship "experts" that talk readers into testing their spouse with things like pretend breakups in public, or jealousy tests with friends with their phones out creating more content. It often backfires. Or improvement programs that are more akin to demands for domination.

    So susceptible people can fall into self destructive habits when the pretend breakups become real, or the other tests end the relationship.

    I don't know if that would be considered "brain rot", but it is certainly harmful.

    • by marcle ( 1575627 ) on Saturday February 21, 2026 @06:38PM (#66003256)

      "Upscale restraints?" Is that bondage for wealthy people?

      • "Upscale restraints?" Is that bondage for wealthy people?

        Yikes! Upscale restaurants.I think that spell correct is getting weird. It's been deciding to guess what word I am typing, puts periods in weird places and other bullshit I don't want.

        But yeah, there are a lot of susceptible people out their, and social media has them thinking their perfectly normal life is a failure, and end up leaving a loving stable partner because of some influencer telling them deserve only the very best.

        A human version of making perfect the enemy of good enough.

  • TDS all over and by that I mean delusional people driven to madness by Trump... obviously, it's his supporters who are delusional unless you are own of them; like most crazy people, they think the world is crazy.

  • by aaarrrgggh ( 9205 ) on Saturday February 21, 2026 @08:40PM (#66003364)

    I can't remember my wife's name but I know I have a 4 digit UID.

    (J/k. Her name is wifey poo.)

  • ...staying online will bring you offline!

God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner

Working...