Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Businesses

Uber Employees Have Built an AI Clone of Their CEO To Practice Presentations Before the Real Thing (businessinsider.com) 30

An anonymous reader shares a report: Some Uber employees have built an AI clone of CEO Dara Khosrowshahi -- internally dubbed "Dara AI" -- and have been using it to rehearse and fine-tune presentations before delivering them to the actual Khosrowshahi, he revealed on a recent podcast.

Khosrowshahi said a team member told him that some teams "make the presentation to the Dara AI as a prep for making a presentation to me," and that the bot helps them adjust their slides and sharpen their delivery. Asked by the podcast host whether employees might eventually show Dara AI to the board, Khosrowshahi laughed but noted that AI models still can't process and act on new information the way executives do. "When the models can learn in real-time, that is the point at which I'm going to think that, yeah, we are all replaceable," he said.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Uber Employees Have Built an AI Clone of Their CEO To Practice Presentations Before the Real Thing

Comments Filter:
  • And nobody has to go to work other than the poor morons who do gig work.
  • by KatherineTheGeek ( 2917449 ) on Thursday February 26, 2026 @02:43AM (#66010874)
    They should just replace the CEO with the AI clone and brag to investors about the efficiency this move brings.
    • by dddux ( 3656447 )

      ... and how this move could introduce great savings, or just split the CEOs wage to the workers.

    • by DarkOx ( 621550 ) on Thursday February 26, 2026 @10:40AM (#66011294) Journal

      The average CEO makes something on the order of 281 times the typical employee.

      I would hope as we explore genAI and the possibilities white collar work, boards of directors would take a hard look how much payroll it might save to get rid of some of these under performers.

      • The average CEO makes something on the order of 281 times the typical employee.

        I would hope as we explore genAI and the possibilities white collar work, boards of directors would take a hard look how much payroll it might save to get rid of some of these under performers.

        Boards of directors are too busy worrying about how easy it will be to replace them with AI.

        Talk about an overpaid group of seagulls in management who feed a CEO buddy system paid for by corporate write-offs.

    • What's next after that? Replace shareholder boards with AI too? hehehe.

  • by magamiako1 ( 1026318 ) on Thursday February 26, 2026 @02:51AM (#66010876)
    "but noted that AI models still can't process and act on new information the way executives do"

    Uh huh. I'd argue that the executive role is significantly more replaceable by AI than the janitor. So, time to go get yourself a mop and learn how to clean toilets, Mr. Exec.
    • You guys weren't here in the 90s and early 2000 when H1Bs were starting to come into tech. People would joke about how the CEO job oughta go to an H1B worker but they'd never do it. Well now 2026 and (according to the list I asked Gemini to make) the CEOs of Google, Microsoft, Adobe, IBM (which was a major tech company from the 50s to the 90s), Fedex, Albertsons, and even Chanel are Indians.

      AI will run most companies. Decision making will be AI driven.

      2035 - AI is able to replace every white collar job.
      2040

      • Why do you call probabilistic models for AI? Why are you ignoring physics, energy, and entropy?

      • by EvilSS ( 557649 )
        That's one of the more realistic timeline's I've seen. Along with better AI (we need a 'world' model that can blend vision, audio, physics, in addition to language) we need better battery tech for untethered humanoid robotics to really be viable. If it has to charge every couple of hours that really limits how they could be used. I think physical jobs requiring a lot of mobility like the ones you mentioned are still safe and will be for a good while. Well maybe not as long for some construction work that co
        • Humans eat ever few hours. Why can't a robot charge every few hours?
        • by cusco ( 717999 )

          Battery swapping systems are in use in several parts of the world, mostly Asia, for trucks and taxis. There's no reason it can't be applied to construction equipment. In fact there are fully automated and fully electric open pit mines in China already.

          • by EvilSS ( 557649 )

            Battery swapping systems are in use in several parts of the world, mostly Asia, for trucks and taxis. There's no reason it can't be applied to construction equipment.

            That still means the bots need to leave the spot they are working, move to a swap location, swap, and come back to where they were every hour or two (or less, depending on how much motion is required for the job). And that's a lot of packs. Two per if you can fully recharge faster than they discharge. In reality probably need 3 per robot.

            In fact there are fully automated and fully electric open pit mines in China already.

            With battery powered humanoid robots? And to be clear that's what I was referring to. I even called out specialized larger robots as an alternative in some phases of con

            • by cusco ( 717999 )

              I thought you meant the large equipment, such as excavators, cranes, dump trucks, cement mixers and the like. For the smaller humanoid bots I would not see an issue with another bot which just drove around and swapped batteries as the humanoids needed. Probably more efficient than the humanoid going to the station and back, since the battery swap is 1-2 minutes. We do need better batteries though.

      • by cusco ( 717999 )

        Your timeline is in the wrong order, AI and robotics have already replaced hoards of factory jobs, especially in China. Amazon, Uber, Waymo and others are replacing delivery drivers already. Retail is automating slower, but Amazon and others are experimenting with replacing cashiers, there are shelf stocking bots in testing now, and there are several systems for unloading trucks and managing inventory already. Automated excavators and cement pouring and smoothing machines are already in use, and automate

  • by fluffernutter ( 1411889 ) on Thursday February 26, 2026 @07:01AM (#66010958)

    So they made an AI that literally wants to enslave people by paying them just enough pennies to stay alive. I hear a lot about Skynet but this is surely the beginning of the end.

  • Just get rid of the CEO - CEOs tend to be little more than humongous expenses.
  • Bad signs for Uber (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Dr. Spork ( 142693 ) on Thursday February 26, 2026 @12:37PM (#66011576)
    If this is what they put so much energy into - internal presentations! - then the company must have a pretty poor culture. The companies who will beat Uber put their effort into engineering, with CEOs smart enough to know who's actually doing the good work by talking to employees in unstructured settings, not sitting through presentations. The whole thing has the whiff of "at Uber we work really hard at convincing our bosses that we're being productive."

God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner

Working...