Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Businesses SuSE Open Source Linux

EQT Eyes $6 Billion Sale of SUSE (reuters.com) 31

Private equity firm EQT AB is reportedly exploring a sale of SUSE that could value the open-source Linux pioneer at up to $6 billion, roughly doubling the valuation since EQT took the company private in 2023. Reuters reports: EQT "has hired investment bank Arma Partners to sound out a group of private equity investors for a possible sale of the company, said the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss confidential matters. The deliberations are at "an early stage and there is no certainty that EQT will proceed with "a transaction, the sources said. [...] The potential deal comes amid a broader selloff in software stocks, which has disrupted mergers and acquisitions activity. Investors are "concerned that new artificial intelligence tools could displace many existing software products, weighing on technology "valuations and making deals harder to price.

Some investors, however, see Luxembourg-headquartered SUSE as a potential beneficiary of AI adoption, arguing that demand for enterprise-grade infrastructure software is likely to grow as companies build and deploy more AI applications. The company generates about $800 million in revenue and more than $250 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and could fetch between $4 billion and $6 billion in a sale, the sources said.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EQT Eyes $6 Billion Sale of SUSE

Comments Filter:
  • But I wonder if there's really room for multiple professional support options for Linux in the enterprise. We've got IBM, Oracle, SUSE, Canonical, and a few others.

    Which is your favorite?

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Junta ( 36770 )

      There has been a push for EU 'tech sovereignty' on various fronts, and I could see SUSE benefiting from that. Currently I haven't seen a SUSE push in that, mainly because nvidia has pushed Ubuntu hard.

      • by deKernel ( 65640 )

        You are saying exactly what I have been thinking for some time. If the EU is looking for their own distribution free from outside influences, SUSE would be a perfect fit in my opinion.

        • I don't particularly want to see is a government of any sort - American, Chinese, or European - sticking their fingers into the Linux pie and stating "this is our distribution". Regardless, it's hard to see how them doing so would amount to anything more than performative theater.

          • Governments are already dictating features and code in Linux. Just like California is trying with "Age Gating" in Linux. Which with source code some bright 8 year old will defeat for themselves and all their friends.

      • Because SUSE is European, it really needs to be kept going as a viable distribution on an enterprise level. Otherwise, sovereignty is at risk. Ideally, some multi-national NGO can be made to handle SUSE patching, as well as OS design for future specifics. On one hand, this needs to be open that people can find bugs and patch quickly. On the other hand, it needs to be very much focused, so it doesn't languish in committee. For example, RHEL is moving towards an immutable Linux model, and it might be wis

      • by linuxguy ( 98493 )

        > There has been a push for EU 'tech sovereignty' on various fronts, and I could see SUSE benefiting from that.

        The urgency is mostly in moving away from American tech. Because we are currently being lead by a team of lunatics and can no longer be relied upon to do the right thing. However, Ubuntu Linux, owner of the current leading Linux distro is not American. It is based in the UK.

      • Pushing an established system out to put another in its place is like digging a giant boulder out of a garden, it won't be easy and will take more than one push just don't give up and eventually the boulder will be rolled away and the spot will be clear for the garden
    • by slaker ( 53818 )

      What big European player wants to put $6B on the table though? SAP is the biggest European software company I can name and that doesn't seem like a strategic fit to me.

      • Isn't SAP the largest global supporter of SUSE? I think 90% of SAP workloads run on SUSE. Stateside I don't think I've ever seen SUSE used for anything but SAP.
      • SAP could buy SUSE and use it to create a complete stack, perhaps with HANA.

      • by Anonymous Coward
        Ex-SUSE employee here.

        EQT already tried to sell SUSE to SAP in late 2020-early 2021 but SAP deemed it too expensive at exactly the same price: $6B (I can't remember exactly but I'd say it was 6B EUR, which is more like $7B today). Then EQT tried to sell it to others and failed too. Finally, SUSE went to the stock market and failed spectacularly, losing 70% value (from 30 EUR to 8 EUR) in a couple of years.

        SUSE will be sold but I don't think the $6B figure is right.
    • Each has a different take. RHEL is popular, but Ubuntu has been taking a lead over it since Ubuntu is very popular and tends to have newer tools to build on, while RHEL tends to be enterprise focused and fixes backported to it. Oracle Linux is a downstream of RHEL, and it works just as well as RHEL, but there is a lot of apprehension about Oracle Linux. It would (IMHO) be nice if Oracle ported official ZFS (TM) to Oracle Linux and supported it, or just adopted OpenZFS as the flagship standard.

      SUSE is a s

      • The Oracle business model is to trap customers on platforms they control in exchange for ongoing fees.

  • Revenue of $800M can't be all wrong, but if you sum up all the times I've installed OSs, SUSE is somewhere down there with various BSDs.

    Is it regional? "Zappa is God in Hungary / Czechoslovakia", sorta?

    • by ctilsie242 ( 4841247 ) on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @01:02PM (#66033546)

      You would be surprised where SUSE is used. It is used as an enterprise operating system in a lot of companies. It works well, and even though it is a RPM based OS, it is not a RHEL downstream.

      It is used everywhere, a lot in the US, and has a lot of management capability. It also has a SMIT-like management tool.

  • SUSEs new Chief Marketing Officer, Margaret Dawson, was previously the Vice President of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Red Hat (famous for discriminatory policies).

    Some affiliated people were talking about ditching the "four freedoms" and "cutting out" the "rot" of "fascists" from their licenses.

    Last I heard they couldn't get anybody to volunteer to stand for a board seat on the OpenSuSE Foundation, so no elections. Has that changed?

    I knew some local businesses that loved working with SuSE on HPC int

  • Who remembers with fondness the McBride times? Ah the shit show that was.

    • I remember well, and wasn't it discovered that Microsoft was the deep pockets that financed Darl McBride's attorneys? And the evidence SCO using found to be frivolous and open source or just some common code used on almost everything so it ended up being laughable and Darl was an embarrassment to all things high tech
  • It's gotten really hard for SUSE shops to be happy with running what is now an 8-year old base. Yes they update some things and deprecate things, but a lot of the bones are same as 2018 release, whereas before they refreshed every 4-5 years.

  • Private equity sharks gonna buy low, sell high, and not do much else except make things shittier.
  • To whom do they want to sell SUSE. And why is the Bavarian company suddenly headquartered in Luxembourg?

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...