Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Books Build

Amazon Stops Supporting Pre-2013 Kindles Today. Some Owners Turn to Jailbreaking (amzn.to) 42

Today Amazon ends support for first- and second-generation versions of Kindles and Kindle Fire tablets, along with the Kindle Touch, the 9.7-inch Kindle DX, and other devices released in 2012 or earlier.

Owners can continue reading ebooks that they've already downloaded, and they can also still sideload books using a USB cable (from, for example, Project Gutenberg). And PCMag points out that "There are plenty of e-stores where you can buy DRM-free novels legally, such as ebook.com and Smashwords. If you want to try this process for free, public-domain repositories such as the one at Standard Ebooks are a great place to start." (eBook files can be converted for the Kindle with the open source tool Calibre.)

New ebooks can no longer be purchased directly from Amazon. But most of Amazon's affected devices "have not received firmware updates for over a decade," notes the blog OMG Ubuntu, "and most lost on-device access the Kindle Store." Some Kindle owners are taking things even further: You can unlock the firmware of older devices to add extra functionality (custom screensavers, epub support) or run entirely different software. On the hardware hacks side, some choose to turn old Kindles into photo frames or online dashboards.
TechCrunch offers some caveats about jailbreaking: This process allows users to install custom fonts, new screensavers, alternative reading apps, and even third-party tools that expand the Kindle's functionality... [I]t's important to note that jailbreaking a Kindle might violate Amazon's terms of service. In many jurisdictions, jailbreaking isn't considered a criminal offense for personal use, but it may become a crime if it involves copyright infringement, illegal software distribution, or the sale of modified devices. Many Kindle owners who opt to jailbreak view it as a method to gain control over a device they purchased that is still functional, rather than being forced to buy a new device. However, jailbreaking is technical and carries risks, including the possibility of rendering the device unusable if something goes wrong. It also isn't possible on every Kindle model or firmware version, so before proceeding, Kindle owners should first spend some time researching if their device is compatible.
Alternately, PCMag notes, "If you're feeling particularly virtuous, you can donate your old Kindle to a local library or send it back to Amazon free of charge via its electronic recycling program."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon Stops Supporting Pre-2013 Kindles Today. Some Owners Turn to Jailbreaking

Comments Filter:
  • by SeaFox ( 739806 ) on Saturday May 16, 2026 @11:41PM (#66146937)

    I don't care where the term originated, but calling it "jailbreaking" just makes it sound like you're doing something illicit. No one would think twice about it if you said you were going to "enable expanded functionality mode" on their Kindle, since it's out of support now. Implying you're going to get in trouble for freely using hardware you paid for outright for is such a corpo psyop.

    • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Saturday May 16, 2026 @11:59PM (#66146963)

      Do you get equally upset when someone talks about a chroot jail on Linux? /j

      • Yeah and you can sue me for still not using main in my repos.
        • by shanen ( 462549 )

          Oh, just fsck off.

          Anyway this branch should be blamed on the Apple fanbois if'n I remember the history correctly.

          I bit surprised to see an Amazon story without "evil" in the comments. Not surprised there is no Funny.

    • I don't care where the term originated, but calling it "jailbreaking" just makes it sound like you're doing something illicit. No one would think twice about it if you said you were going to "enable expanded functionality mode" on their Kindle, since it's out of support now. Implying you're going to get in trouble for freely using hardware you paid for outright for is such a corpo psyop.

      When you're wrongfully imprisoned, jailbreak may be your only recourse.

      • by SeaFox ( 739806 )

        When you're wrongfully imprisoned, jailbreak may be your only recourse.

        Yes, and that's the source for the term from the modding community. But non-techie people don't associate "breaking out of jail" as being a morally right thing (because most of them think being wrongly imprisoned isn't a common occurrence). That translates to this and they then get skittish at even flipping an interface switch to allow install of apps from outside a walled garden. They are like the iOS dorks who think allowing side-loading means anyone can install anything on your device without your approv

    • "Jailbreak" definitely implied something illicit in 1974 when AC/DC performed the song, but in 2026?! No. Jailbreaking is totally legit 99 times out of a hundred.

      Jails were once respected because they were a product of society's consensus. When DRM appeared, jails became anyone's restrictions, with no societal inputs and no claims to legitimacy.

      If you break out of the county jail or federal prison, that's a whole other thing than breaking out of your neighbor's sex dungeon. And almost all the time we talk a

  • by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Sunday May 17, 2026 @12:55AM (#66147019)

    If you discontinue support for a device that prevents the user from accessing or modifying critical functions then it your company should be required to make a final update available that enables users to use the device as they please. Effectively destroying functional devices because it's not profitable is the worst kind of waste.

    • Just what I came here to say. Please vote the parent up.

  • It's all about DRM (Score:5, Interesting)

    by papafox_too ( 883077 ) * on Sunday May 17, 2026 @02:02AM (#66147063)
    First question: why is Amazon dropping support for old Kindles? Answer: Because older Kindles cannot ne updated to support mandatory new DRM. Almost all Kindle books are downloaded with DRM. Previously, the encryption key used was a function of the serial number of the Kindle device. This has be changed to a random number stored within the firmware. If a Kindle is unable to run the new DRM, it is unable to read most new ebooks. Older Kindles do not have enough memory to rin the newer firmware and Amazon has chosen not to backport just the new DRM. The second question is: why is Amazon changing the DRM? Yo be precise, Amazon appears to be changing only the encryption key, the other features of the DRM appear to be unchanged. That's less clear. The old keys were a hash of the serial number, so a customer who purchased a licensed copy could remove the DRM relatively easily. Amazon may have chosen to block this for their own reasons, or perhaps they were pressured by big publishers. It's not clear. Either way, Amazon is dropping support for older Kindles because they don't support the new version of Amazon's DRM.
  • And that's why (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Sunday May 17, 2026 @02:19AM (#66147075)

    I download all my books DRM-free from bittorrent.

    My ebook reader is an ancient Sony PRS-650 [the-ebook-reader.com], it still works fine and it has no trouble reading files that haven't been messed up by Amazon. What a concept eh?

    "What about the book's authors who aren't getting paid when you download their stuff for free?" I hear you say:

    Yes, I wish I could pay for what I downloaded. But I can't. The best option I could find was to buy the paperback as well, so some of my money would trickle back to them. But that's mighty stupid and totally not environmentally-friendly.

    I did try to pay an author directly once (the late Ian M. Banks [wikipedia.org]) but he send me an angry email back saying even if he got money from me, I was robbing his editor and distributor, and I should just buy his book normally - which I would, if that didn't entail leaving an undeserved cut to effing Amazon.

    So there we are: there's no mechanism to legally buy books that aren't hamstrung by DRM. So honest people who value their consumer rights can't be honest.

    • Buy the physical book for your local library. Libraries in USA regularly redistribute duplicates to other libraries, so no concerns if it is a common book.

      • Buy the physical book for your local library. Libraries in USA regularly redistribute duplicates to other libraries, so no concerns if it is a common book.

        This. Or buy it used.

        Honestly, there's no excuse to pirate stuff over BitTorrent when one can buy a book in print.

    • Your correct and honest course of action here would be to not buy it and not have it. But since that's not where you landed, your post is just a weird attempt to justify your theft. You're trying to invent yourself a moral basis for an immoral act.

      • Screw immoral. They have been pushing for years now to move from media ownership to it being a license (and a non-transferable one at that). So let's treat it like that. If I own a book in whatever form (physical, digitally, or perhaps stored on an e-reader that is broken and no longer supported), that means I have a license which should morally permit me to format-shift, and own that book in whatever other format exists, read it on any device that is capable, and obtain it by any means that does not amo
    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      Yes, I wish I could pay for what I downloaded. But I can't. The best option I could find was to buy the paperback as well, so some of my money would trickle back to them. But that's mighty stupid and totally not environmentally-friendly.

      I did try to pay an author directly once (the late Ian M. Banks) but he send me an angry email back saying even if he got money from me, I was robbing his editor and distributor, and I should just buy his book normally - which I would, if that didn't entail leaving an undese

  • AI claims that you can still buy AZW books and read them on one of these old Kindles. The claim is that if you buy from your PC account for the old Kindle it will be supplied as AZW, which will be readable on the device after transfer to it from the PC by USB.

    The claim is that what has changed is that you can no longer buy directly from the Kindle, because purchases are now KFX only. But that you can still buy books for it over the web using your PC and they will be supplied as AZW.

    If this is really true,

    • This used to be true. Older versions of the Kindle app on a PC would still download a AZW file for offline reading. That recently changed and when you try to download a book now it says that you need to update to a newer version of the app which presumably then downloads KFX files.
  • Amazon locked USB transfers in the new firmware. I don't agree with that. I bought it exactly because of this feature.
  • I have a Kindle from 2015. In one of the 'recent' updates â" I think it was released a year or two ago â" they made it impossible to read imported ebooks.

    You connect the Kindle to a PC, copy ePub files and then disconnect it. The files (books) are there. Check the reader a few hours later and all the books will have vanished. If you attach the reader again, the files are deleted. Fuck you, Amazon!

    • I have a Kindle from 2015. In one of the 'recent' updates â" I think it was released a year or two ago â" they made it impossible to read imported ebooks.

      You connect the Kindle to a PC, copy ePub files and then disconnect it. The files (books) are there. Check the reader a few hours later and all the books will have vanished. If you attach the reader again, the files are deleted. Fuck you, Amazon!

      Hmm, I have one newer than that. and my imported ebooks are there and persistent.

      Not necessarily easy to find though - the UI is horrific.

      (also, I think I used the "email it to your special Kindle email address" method rather than USB cable to get them on there)

  • Version 3.4 and I can plug the USB into a PC and it mounts like a thumb drive and I load it with free books from Gutenberg.org
  • by allo ( 1728082 ) on Sunday May 17, 2026 @06:46AM (#66147209)

    If a company stops supporting the devices, they should be obliged to make them usable without their support. They should have to allow root access and distribute the DRM keys required to access the licensed content.

  • by quonset ( 4839537 ) on Sunday May 17, 2026 @06:56AM (#66147217)

    You never have to worry about someone turning off access to a book you purchased thirty years ago.

    You don't have to find workarounds to get a book. They're available practically everywhere.

    Text within a book will never change. Once you have the book, it remains the same forever.

    No one can remotely remove access to your books.

    The only real benefit to Kindles and the like is you can have multiple books on you at the same time even though you can only read one at a time. Until your power runs out. Which doesn't happen when you have a book.

  • If buying isn't owning, downloading isn't stealing.
  • Most of this post seems to be about old Kindles. But one sentence is frightening: "New ebooks can no longer be purchased directly from Amazon." I hope that this should have been worded as "New ebooks can no longer be purchased directly from Amazon using an old Kindle." Yes?
    • New ebooks can no longer be purchased directly from Amazon using an old Kindle."

      Well, yes, but also, new ebooks can no longer be purchased from Amazon FOR a pre-2013 Kindle, since they did away with the "download & transfer via USB" option on the Amazon site last year.

  • I wouldn't call the current state "supported". Half the web already does not work on the provided Silk browser. My Kindle feels like it has been out of support for some time.
  • by Sloppy ( 14984 ) on Sunday May 17, 2026 @06:01PM (#66147865) Homepage Journal

    [I]t's important to note that jailbreaking a Kindle might violate Amazon's terms of service.

    Isn't the context here, that there is no service? I suspect that whatever terms the two parties came to agree upon, Amazon is the one who has initiated the violation of those terms, by ceasing to provide service!

    • They ceased service for specific devices (and I would bet there's something in the terms that makes the cessation of services for specific devices NOT a violation of the terms). But it's something to be aware of as many people will want to continue using Amazon's services on other devices.
  • by longbot ( 789962 )
    I have bought several Kindles over the years. I've used exactly NONE of them with purchased books from Amazon. They are strictly for reading ebooks I already had, and converted for it. Amazon can shut off all their servers tomorrow and it will not affect my use of these Kindles in the slightest. It's kind of funny how people are shitting their pants when it does not affect usability in a broad use case.

Neutrinos have bad breadth.

Working...