Internet Starts Coming Back In Iran After Months-Long Blackout (bbc.com) 185
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: Internet access has started to be restored in Iran after being cut off almost three months ago, the country's first vice-president has said. "The first step toward free and regulated access to cyberspace has been taken," Mohammad Reza Aref wrote on X on Tuesday. Internet monitoring groups Netblocks and Kentik reported "partial" restoration around 13:00 GMT, though the latter warned most networks were still down.
The Iranian government cut internet access following the launch of US and Israeli attacks on February 28. Officials suggested the aim was to prevent surveillance, espionage and cyber-attacks. It is one of the longest-running national internet shutdowns ever recorded worldwide. A content creator from Tehran told the BBC that he had been able to connect to the internet using his home WiFi on Tuesday. "The main point is, some of my income will come back," he said.
Netblocks said it was unclear whether the internet return would be sustained, and told the BBC it was consistent with what it had seen when previous blackouts were lifted -- where restoration could take hours. "Access is not universally back to its original state, with some regional variation," said the global internet tracker's research director Isik Mater on Tuesday. She added that there were signs of "more extensive filtering" than prior to January -- when a similar blackout was imposed during the regime's deadly crackdown on anti-government protests -- "including additional restrictions to messaging apps like WhatsApp."
The Iranian government cut internet access following the launch of US and Israeli attacks on February 28. Officials suggested the aim was to prevent surveillance, espionage and cyber-attacks. It is one of the longest-running national internet shutdowns ever recorded worldwide. A content creator from Tehran told the BBC that he had been able to connect to the internet using his home WiFi on Tuesday. "The main point is, some of my income will come back," he said.
Netblocks said it was unclear whether the internet return would be sustained, and told the BBC it was consistent with what it had seen when previous blackouts were lifted -- where restoration could take hours. "Access is not universally back to its original state, with some regional variation," said the global internet tracker's research director Isik Mater on Tuesday. She added that there were signs of "more extensive filtering" than prior to January -- when a similar blackout was imposed during the regime's deadly crackdown on anti-government protests -- "including additional restrictions to messaging apps like WhatsApp."
free and regulated? (Score:4, Informative)
Regulared? Yes. Free? Absolutely not.
Re: free and regulated? (Score:1)
Please, run the numbers for us - how could Musk "single-handedly" solve world hunger?
I once heard a kid at a sandwich shop say "Elon Musk could give everyone on the planet $1M and it wouldn't even affect him"... I explained to him that's not how math works, if there are 9 billion people on the planet and Musk has $90BN, he could give everyone $10 and be destitute.
But please, I'm all ears - how could Elon Musk end world hunger?
Re: (Score:2)
You don't need to "run the numbers," hunger is mostly driven by interfering with access, not by supply.
The whole premise of "ending world hunger" is stupid. It would require going to war in every place that hunger, and then once you have control of security, leaving a standing army in place to guard every bowl of rice.
There's huge amounts of food that goes bad in warehouses that would be distributed to poor regions for free if there was any confidence it wouldn't get stolen.
In fact, if they had physical sec
Re: (Score:2)
Nice typo.
Re: free and regulated? (Score:3)
Thanks to Trump (Score:5, Insightful)
When you're at attacked everybody just gathers around the existing power structures. That's what happened in America with 9/11. All of the sudden douche nozzles like George Bush Jr and Rudy Giuliani were considered great people. Both men were on the way out the door politically when 9/11 hit and had very successful careers because of the attack.
The exact same thing happened with the Iranian government. They had serious opposition because they can't feed their people and they were going to have to start giving real concessions and maybe even some semblance of democracy. Trump shit all over that with his staggering incompetence.
There's a thing called a chesterton's fence where you don't take down the fence unless you understand why it was put up. There is a damn good reason why even the stupidest fucking administration's imaginable did not attack Iran.
And now the reasons why are plain for anyone to see. Meanwhile Iran has now demonstrated complete control of the strait of Hormuz meaning they can shut down 1/5 of the world's traffic anytime they want. And we can do fuck all about it because Trump squandered basically all the Goodwill in the world for the United States so he could threaten Greenland and Canada.
Son, are you winning?
I am so fucking tired of winning.
Re: (Score:2)
Stop it with the bullshit. You'd be making excuses for Iran even if Israel and the US hunted down and killed every member of the IRGC. Iran is fucked. Their proxies are fucked.
Re:Thanks to Trump (Score:5, Insightful)
They had serious opposition because they can't feed their people and they were going to have to start giving real concessions and maybe even some semblance of democracy.
Yeah, their slaughtering of possibly tens of thousands of protesters was clearly a sign of upcoming concessions.
Dictators lose when they make concessions. They stay in power when they double down. That's the hard lesson of a hundred years or so of dipshits becoming big boss by military coup or revolution. Those who put absolutely every penny into propaganda and oppression tend to hang on to power the longest.
And given what the IRGC and the regime have done to the Iranian people and how much they're loved in the rest of the world, staying in power is literally a life-or-death matter for them. The day the regime falls, we'll see all the Ayatollahs and minions hanging from trees.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Trump shit all over that with his staggering incompetence.
That's one way to look at it. Another is that this is what Russia wants.
Re: (Score:2)
> Winning
You would like losing a LOT less.
I'm no highly respected scholar on the middle east like you clearly are but a nuclear-armed terrorist-state doesn't tickle my happy places.
Nuclear weapons would give them actual /control/ of the Strait of Hormuz vs the temporary interdiction while they ensure the rest of their middle-eastern 'brothers' want nothing to do with them.
Trump is good at making enemies, but they still need him for better or worse.
Iran is making lots of enemies, none of which want or nee
Re: (Score:2)
I'm no highly respected scholar on the middle east like you clearly are but a nuclear-armed terrorist-state doesn't tickle my happy places.
OK, but enough about the US and Israel. Iran is not and never has been a nuclear power. The US nuked Japan twice just because it would be a shame not to use both bombs.
Re: (Score:2)
That's not the reason that both bombs were dropped. They were dropped because the military saw them as just another tool in the toolbox, just like the bombs dropped on all the other cities that continued to be dropped on other cities until the surrender. Truman ended the military's control of atomic bombs after Nagasaki, when the USAAF was preparing to use a third bomb, establishing civilian control of atomic weapons. Firebombing continued, though, right up to Kumagaya, Akita, and Osaka getting hit in the 2
Re: (Score:2)
That's not the reason that both bombs were dropped.
You're right, we did it for science, because we are the inspiration for the Nazis and we didn't want to let the Axis be the only monsters in the war.
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:1)
Please tell us where the 40,000 dead Iranian protesters fit into this Trump-caused catastrophe...
Re: (Score:1)
Every country has problems with the Epstein class. Some more than others.
not *every* country at all. iran, china and russia for instance don't. unless you count the times those reptiles trash putin, which is (i assume) the straws the bbc clasped at to say epstein was, wait for it ... a russian agent. but that was so ridiculous even for their indocrinated populus that even the bbc stopped running that hoax after a week. tragicomical to the extreme.
Re: (Score:2)
A bunch of US states don't have any legal minimum.
Re: (Score:3)
Did someone say nationalize? https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/0... [cnbc.com]
In the spirit of trickle down economics, when do I get my share?
There is a difference between nationalization (Score:4, Insightful)
The big one is that a proper sovereign wealth fund has layers and layers of checks and balances to prevent the money from disappearing into people's pockets. Nothing Trump is done has any of those controls for what I should think are obvious reasons.
That's a sovereign wealth fund which is what you linked to or rather you linked to Trump's corrupt slush fund pretending to be a sovereign wealth fund.
Nationalization is something very different. When you nationalize something you're taking a universal public service that previously was being provided by private citizens and having a provided by the government instead. You don't for example nationalized Twinkie production because not everybody in the country has a desire for twinkies. You do nationalize electricity production because electricity is a universally desired commodity that has no easily fungible replacements. Electricity in the age of solar is a even better example of that because with enough investment you can basically produce effectively limitless amounts of it rendering profiting from it irrelevant unless you are artificially constraining supply... Which of course we are.
So be careful not to mix up the concept of a sovereign wealth fund which is the government investing in private businesses and profiting from it and the concept of nationalizing the production of a good for the providing of a service. They're different things and they need different controls and checks and balances to prevent them from becoming corrupt or breaking down.
Also remember if you build either of those things people are going to try to break them so that they can privatize them and steal all your money and you have to be prepared when they succeed and instead of just giving up you have to actually solve and fix the problems.
Re: (Score:1)
I think Trump is a pretty smart guy. And he is honest! I'm pretty smart myself, and not at all gullible, which is why I think that!
Now I'm off to buy a Trump phone and a Trump NFT. Those sound like smart investments! And I'm going to get some Ivermectin for the next time some virus breaks out!
Sincerely, ambrandt12
Re: (Score:2)
When exactly did I post using the whole anon thing?
I wanna know, precisely when it happened.
When I see a microwave out back, I can go out and get the thing, even though we aren't supposed to.
I can't remember the last thing I posted that was an "anon" post.
Re: (Score:2)
Either he's using the AC to make his unhinged posts, or it's a copycat troll trying to paint him as even more of an extremist than he is already.
Re: (Score:3)
Mark my words Iran will get so much money from this deal that will make a mere $1/2B seem quaint. Art of the deal baby.
Re: (Score:1)
There's a story from Ed McMahon where he was doing a real estate deal with Trump and he just let Trump go on and on and on and when Trump was done blathering he had given up everything and McMahon had gotten everything from the negotiations.
If the Democrats weren't so fucking useless
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's easy - it never happened.
Re: (Score:2)
Too bad agent Krasnov betrayed Ukraine even before he became president.
Remember how he orchestrated an 8-month long supply interruption back at the end of 2023, which lead directly to the largest loss of territory by VSU, from Avdiivka to Vugledar?
You hasbara bros are like the don, putin's traitorous little cunts.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah for sure, he's totally got them on the ropes now. Any day now they'll sign that great new deal he's been promising since 2018.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly, either he has to cut a deal or they just start again. Art of the deal!
Re: (Score:2)
Well Trump isn't about to start a ground invasion so the IRGC isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
What's kinda funny is while you cheer this on Trump is fucking your position as much as he is mine. All this bluster and we're at best back to 2018 and really, probably worse. As you've admitted it's just pushed the clock back a bit and when I'm proven right that Oran will end up in a better economic position... Well, I'll be laughing at you. Good luck backing the slow horse lil bro.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh man that cope, it's delicious
Re: (Score:2)
What do you think this proves?
But hey, keep taking the admin at their word it's going great for you!
Re: (Score:2)
And when Trump cuts a deal with them, will that also be "taking them at their word" or no, you'll say he capitulated?
Re: (Score:2)
Why should anyone try to explain to you that which you intentionally pretend to not understand.
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
All that effort and money spent on developing the best centrifuges and digging tunnels under mountains to put them...
FFS so many people are just completely braindead.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Do what I say or I'll commit a crime" is not necessarily a good negotiating tactic to protect your clubhouse. "There's dangerous illegal stuff in there, you better not ask me to submit to an inspection!"
It's a specious excuse, when you say shit like that there's no way I'm gonna believe that you don't know they're trying to build nukes.
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No evidence Iran was ever going to get nukes.
The evidence is that they are refining uranium far more than is needed for anything other than nukes.
There are two possibilities: 1) they want to eventually build nukes after building the missile range to hold off the US, or 2) They are getting as close to building a nuke as possible without actually building one.
Of course, it's more complicated because Iran is not monolithic. The religious leader seemed to not want nukes (for the time being), while the IRGC leadership seemed to want to really build the
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're old enough to know they started their nuclear program before Trump was even a politician.
Re: (Score:2)
We should now ask, what evidence is there to support the idea that Iran is enriching uranium to drag Trump into a foolish errand?
More importantly, we should also ask, what evidence is there that contradicts it?
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Thanks to Trump (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The $24bn cost of Trump’s capitulation on Iran [telegraph.co.uk]
Cope and seethe loser.
Re: (Score:2)
you can link to where anyone says it's good for Iran to have nukes in 2030.
See when you have to lie about other peoples positions you're just a bad-faith dipshit who deserves scorn and derision so get fucked loser
Re: (Score:2)
Why would i waste time to link shit you're not gonna read as you continue to lie. You've reached your conclusion, your cognitive dissonance is dependent on it not being challenged.
Also what country are you from?
Re: (Score:2)
You know what chief, you're right in a way, I don't actually gotta link shit. I mean my position has been proven more right then it was 30 days ago and it'll be even more correct whenever this deal get signed.
Please enlighten me as to what this new deal will contain that the 2015 deal was missing that is so important. .
Re: (Score:2)
Theres going to be a deal, Trump keeps saying it and it's the only way the conflict ends unless a ground war starts.
Stopping the bombs with no deal means the straight stays blockaded and that can't go on forever.
So, if you're the President and you're making a deal what does it contain that keeps Iran from starting nukes again?
Re: (Score:2)
They need to be replaced with one who can.
Uh huh, and how are you gonna do that without a ground war? 3 months of bombing didn't do it so who's "making stuff up" now?
Re: (Score:2)
Nice pivot. The regime is going to totally collapse any day now! Any day now!
Re:Thanks to Trump (Score:5, Insightful)
Trump gave them nukes by tearing up the JCPOA agreement in 2018. https://trumpwhitehouse.archiv... [archives.gov]
Re: (Score:3)
You realize that deal was happening but Trump didn't "feel" it so he started bombing? The news reports of the negotiations said Iran was willing to give up all of it's enriched uranium.
Re: (Score:3)
The agreement expired in 2030. It did not authorize Iran to pursue nuclear weapons at that time. There's a difference.
The agreement was the best available at the time. Diplomacy sometimes requires taking a temporary win, and it usually means that neither side gets everything they want. The hope was that Iran would find that they would not want or need to develop nuclear weapons. If they did go down that path, there were penalties for doing so. Future negotiations were planned to modify or extend the agreeme
Re: (Score:2)
Bomb them again?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
We need an actual deal to stop Iran from getting nukes at all. What is your plan for that?
Build a time machine, go back in time and assassinate trump before his first term as president?
Re: (Score:2)
Sure in your MAGA brain rot fantasy you can interpret international events like that.
Iran internet shutdown to quiet their own people (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
and those begging and pleading with the US to intervene stopped coming out.
Going to need a citation for that one.
Re: (Score:2)
I have no special knowledge of the situation, I just used a search engine.
Re: (Score:2)
With the cutting off of the internet the videos of killings, dead bodies, and those begging and pleading with the US to intervene stopped coming out.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Hmmm, why did the people who died not post their videos when there wasn't Internet access? I guess we'll never know.
We know about Israel sniping journalists despite their sniping journalists. You think there's a good reason for us not to know about people in Iran being killed?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you think Trump bragged about arming these 'protesters' with firearms months before while Bessent bragged about running a currency crash scheme?
Re: (Score:2)
We will see how much Iran has beaten down their people and if any resistance still remains with the internet now slowly being restored.
We likely won't.
They made it very clear that they are monitoring and restricting Internet access, and the fact that even during an active war they went on to sentence and hang protesters makes it abundantly clear what will happen to anyone sharing information with the world that they'd rather not see on the world news.
Misinformation (Score:5, Informative)
The Iranian government cut internet access following the launch of US and Israeli attacks on February 28. Officials suggested the aim was to prevent surveillance, espionage and cyber-attacks.
This is tantamount to misinformation. The regime cut the Internet on January 8th [wikipedia.org]. It was *never* turned back on for the general public. Iran started allowing some country-wide intranet only, with heavy censorship and *no* outbound communication (except for regime figures). There has been no way to communicate with people in Iran anytime since except (a) Starlink (illegal, extremely risky, and subject to jamming) (b) outbound telephone calls (monitored).
Because it started January 8th, it is clear the initial purpose is very different than this states. The protests themselves started in late December. The internet blackout corresponds with nothing else but the regime crackdown in which they murdered tens of thousands of Iranian civilians. The obvious main purpose has been to keep Iranians from sharing about the atrocities.
Is the war related? Of course. It has become only more important as Iran has sought to seize a diplomatic high-ground (or at least equivalency) to maintain full narrative control. And it is true there is an intelligence aspect as well, but more than cyber attacks (how is downing your *own* Internet a win there?) the concern is likely that the Iranian people have been happy to share information to help target the regime, as they did during the previous 12 Day War.
It is malpractice to quote "officials" - if those are indeed "Iranian officials" - and then offer their uncontested view, when they are the ones who blacked out the Internet specifically to be able to offer an uncontested view.
Re: (Score:1)
It's documented
orly
Uptick in bot activity (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I noticed an uptick on mongodb ads that take up acres of screen real estate.
Precision war isn't exactly batting a 1000 here (Score:1)
but it *is* cheaper than carpet bombing the whole jungle to take out one tent, at least.
Sigh...
Baby Boom in October? (Score:2)
Whatever will young people do if there's nothing to scroll?
Re: Baby Boom in October? (Score:2)
Months?! (Score:1)
Months?! I thought he said he'd solve it in a day, oh wait... that was years ago and about the Russia Ukraine war. Back on topic: Months!? I thought he said no new wars and then that the new war would be over in a week?!
Re: (Score:3)
Keep up. The war ended on day one. Each day was a new war that ended before it began. The wars are completely over. We're in a fighting cease fire. That's something completely different.
Trump has ended over 60 wars at this point. Give that man a prize!
lol (Score:2)
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: lol (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It was a day that showed why the Middle East’s generational hatreds are so often treacherous for American presidents. On Monday morning, US President Donald Trump’s brittle diplomatic push to get out of the Iran war suddenly seemed to buckle. The causes, this time, were an Israeli threat to strike Tehran-backed Hezbollah in Beirut’s southern suburbs and militia missile attacks on Israel. The sudden escalation prompted an outpouring from Trump that betrayed his frustration with a conflict he launched in February that has now stretched into June, defying his hopes for a swift and clear-cut victory.
Next time maybe?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: lol (Score:2)
Irony (Score:2)
The irony of this shit bag announcing this reduction in censorship on X is certainly something. I wonder if any of his citizens will be allowed to see it.
tracking connectivity (Score:1)