Mars Minerals Reveals an Ancient Ocean's Potential For Life - and a Possible Way to Make Oxygen (phys.org) 25
Researchers have identified a ring of minerals around the largest basin in the northern hemisphere of Mars (which past research suggests held a large body of water). Phys.org says the research provides new clues on when life may have been possible on Mars — and how future astronauts could make oxygen:
Manganese oxides and hydroxides (collectively written as manganese (hydr)oxides) can act as geological proxies for past oceans... The team involved in the new study analyzed short-wave infrared (SWIR) data from China's Zhurong rover, ESA's OMEGA orbiter and NASA's CRISM orbiter to identify and quantify manganese (hydr)oxides... The team says the placement of the ring indicates that the ring formed during the Hesperian epoch — a geologic period on Mars that occurred roughly 3.7 to 3.0 billion years ago. The Hesperian epoch marked the transition from the warmer, wetter, and volcanically active Martian world to a cold, dry, and dusty planet... [when "the potential for further prebiotic evolution on the surface was significantly reduced."]
"This yields a final estimated duration of 0.8-1.5 million years for the presence of stable aqueous conditions in Utopia Planitia. This timescale significantly exceeds what is typically expected for transient surface water activity on Mars, suggesting that Utopia Planitia hosted a long-lived and evolving aquatic system during the Hesperian epoch, rather than a short-lived or rapidly evaporating water body," write the study authors. The researchers say that although this does not provide direct evidence of early life, it does suggest that Mars may have provided an environment conducive to initiating early forms of life. The timeline of the ocean matches the minimal timescale required for prebiotic chemistry, and also temporally overlaps with the period on Earth in which scientists believe the earliest forms of life first arose, approximately 3.4 billion years ago. The study authors also note that the conditions for life may have also extended into the next Amazonian period on Mars. They write, "If MnOx formation or redistribution occurred during the Amazonian, this would suggest that Mars may have maintained episodic or localized liquid water environments significantly later than traditionally assumed."
Interestingly, the authors also bring up the potential for future human habitation on Mars. They suggest that oxygen can be produced by using the manganese (hydr)oxides for water-splitting reactions that generate oxygen through photocatalysis, potentially supporting human activities or even terraforming. Of course, this would be a long way off.
"This yields a final estimated duration of 0.8-1.5 million years for the presence of stable aqueous conditions in Utopia Planitia. This timescale significantly exceeds what is typically expected for transient surface water activity on Mars, suggesting that Utopia Planitia hosted a long-lived and evolving aquatic system during the Hesperian epoch, rather than a short-lived or rapidly evaporating water body," write the study authors. The researchers say that although this does not provide direct evidence of early life, it does suggest that Mars may have provided an environment conducive to initiating early forms of life. The timeline of the ocean matches the minimal timescale required for prebiotic chemistry, and also temporally overlaps with the period on Earth in which scientists believe the earliest forms of life first arose, approximately 3.4 billion years ago. The study authors also note that the conditions for life may have also extended into the next Amazonian period on Mars. They write, "If MnOx formation or redistribution occurred during the Amazonian, this would suggest that Mars may have maintained episodic or localized liquid water environments significantly later than traditionally assumed."
Interestingly, the authors also bring up the potential for future human habitation on Mars. They suggest that oxygen can be produced by using the manganese (hydr)oxides for water-splitting reactions that generate oxygen through photocatalysis, potentially supporting human activities or even terraforming. Of course, this would be a long way off.
Why the myopic obsession with O2? (Score:2)
Just because that's what powers a lit of life on earth doesnt mean it has to be the same elsewhere. Pretty much any reactive gas would do the job , eg chlorine, of which there is plenty in various salts and minerals.
Re: (Score:2)
Anaerobic life exists too (Score:2)
As far as we know, yes, O2 is required for life.
Anaerobic life exists too, from deep sea thermal vents to inside the human body. O2 may facilitate the development of complex life.
Re: Anaerobic life exists too (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Well, actually free oxygen would be poisonous for the early forms of life (anerobic) on Earth and potentially Mars. It was a toxic waste product of anerobic life for, oh, the billion years or so that aerobic life needed to figure out how to use it.
Nature tends to evolve towards the more efficient (Score:2)
Just because that's what powers a lit of life on earth doesnt mean it has to be the same elsewhere.
It's more about the chemistry than what we observe on earth. It's that oxygen generates more energy, and nature tends to evolve towards the more efficient. Its also believed the aerobic is more likely to produce complex life. We're more interested in finding the complex life. Not that finding anaerobic bacteria wouldn't be amazing, but it would be seen more as a stepping stone to the more complex. An intermediary goal.
Also, life on earth was not always aerobic. Anaerobic still exist, from deep sea therma
Re: (Score:2)
There's a lot of speculation about life as we don't know it. And that's what it is: speculation. While there are microbes that don't rely on oxygen, and one animal, they are utterly dependent on environments that do require oxygen. So no abiotic life origins here.
Without knowing for sure what to look for in a chlorine based life form even with it live in front of us, performing the forensic search with the body cold billions of years is all but impossible. We will get there some day but people are looking f
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The appeal of Mars is that it could theoretically be made Earthlike, with a bit of handwaving perhaps, but not wholly outside the realm of plausibility.
As the appeal is in sending humans someday, there's going to be little support for building a toxic atmosphere, especially one which is particularly unpleasant to die in.
OK, so you have a way to make oxygen. (Score:5, Insightful)
What are you gonna do for a magnetosphere?
Re: (Score:2)
What are you gonna do for a magnetosphere?
Spin iron. :-)
Re: OK, so you have a way to make oxygen. (Score:2)
This was the first thing that came to my mind, as well. What's the point of creating oxygen if there isn't a planetary system that keeps it from escaping into the void?
Shouldn't that really be the first thing they do to terraform Mars?
Re: (Score:1)
Supposed you have an atmosphere like on earth, by magic, over night: on Mars.
It would take half a billion years to deplete so much that Mars would become inhabitable. Probably a billion years.
Regarding magnetosphere: you put a satellite into L1 Langrange point between Mars and Sun, that provides an artificial magnetic field.
Re: (Score:2)
"Regarding magnetosphere: you put a satellite into L1 Langrange point between Mars and Sun, that provides an artificial magnetic field."
A pinkish unicorn at an L1 Lagrange point would work just as well. See, it doesn't have to be entirely pink. I'd lend you mine but he's usually pretty busy.
Re: (Score:1)
Unicorn as in Narwhale?
You lost me somewhere ...
Re: (Score:2)
This was the first thing that came to my mind, as well. What's the point of creating oxygen if there isn't a planetary system that keeps it from escaping into the void?
Shouldn't that really be the first thing they do to terraform Mars?
Yes, and it an ability we have now. Should be step one.
Re: (Score:3)
What are you gonna do for a magnetosphere?
That's not too difficult, place a couple Tesla magnets at Lagrange points and there ya go. Yes, without a viable magnetosphere, any atmosphere we generate will be stripped away by the solar wind.
Re: OK, so you have a way to make oxygen. (Score:2)
Not to mention irradiating yer astronauts.
Re: (Score:2)
Deez 'nauts!
Re: (Score:2)
The Sun's bombardment of rays on the Mars atmosphere got rid of that atmosphere. Mostly.
To my knowledge, there is still a little atmosphere left, so there should still be some magnetosphere as well, even if Mars' core isn't active.
So why not deploy a shield-like structure that looks and acts as Earth's stargate (incl. its iris). Strategic placement in space and opening/closing it would help out saving Mars' magnetosphere. And with less solar rays ravishing Mars' atmosphere It may have a chance of improving
Re: (Score:2)
"o why not deploy a shield-like structure that looks and acts as Earth's stargate (incl. its iris). Strategic placement in space and opening/closing it would help out saving Mars' magnetosphere."
You do not really understand interplanetary distances or radiation, do you?
Re: (Score:2)
Neither do you?
With strategically locating a large enough shield in space you can block excessive solar rays. There is a similar suggestion made, not by me, but officially recognized organizations to help out life on Earth with significant issues resulting from the global warming.
So why not do something similar to keep a Mars terraforming project viable?
Ok, links:
NASA
World Economic Forum
National Space Society
BBC article
Wikipedia entry
Re: (Score:2)
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/cita... [nasa.gov]
https://www.weforum.org/storie... [weforum.org]
https://nss.org/making-sun-sha... [nss.org]
https://www.bbc.com/future/art... [bbc.com]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
human habitation on Mars..stupid idea UNTIL..... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Establishing a Moon base is stupid also. Pure pork. It is orders of magnitude more expensive and dangerous than robotic missions.