Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Japan Space

Japan's Space Agency Conducts First Test Flight For Experimental Reusable Rocket (apnews.com) 9

"Japan's experimental reusable rocket took off and safely landed in a first test flight Saturday," reports the Associated Press, as Japan "seeks to achieve the technology key to cut launch costs and compete in the global space market dominated by SpaceX." The RV-X rocket lifted off, hovered and moved horizontally before landing [watch the video here] during its less than one-minute flight at the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's Noshiro Testing Center in northeastern Japan, which was livestreamed by the NVS, a group of space fans... Saturday's flight is a step forward for Japan in achieving the technology needed to develop a lower cost successor to the country's current mainstay, single-use H3 series.
Japan's test comes the same week that China recovered an orbital booster rocket for the first time.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Japan's Space Agency Conducts First Test Flight For Experimental Reusable Rocket

Comments Filter:
  • by Kisai ( 213879 ) on Monday July 13, 2026 @07:28AM (#66235742)

    If we expect to have a space industry for the next 20 years, we need to urgently get back to reusable launch vehicles. I'm not saying we need to go quite as far as the NASA space shuttle, but we need to get reusability of large vehicles to get the next space station or even build larger orbital space stations or spacecraft.

    But ultimately some kind of space catapult/electrically launched vehicle/space-plane is the final form of this. We know "technically" we can push a jet high enough that a space craft could then be launched from to have the first stage be a completely reusable by landing it right after the vehicle unmounts from the launch vehicle.

    • by LindleyF ( 9395567 ) on Monday July 13, 2026 @09:26AM (#66235948)
      The problem isn't altitude, at least not entirely. Atmospheric density does play a role. But the main problem is velocity. Jets cruise at around 600 MPH. Rockets to LEO need to reach thirty times that speed.
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      There are a few places trying catapults and planes, but they can't carry a lot of weight.

      The Soviet Buran spaceplane is probably the model to follow. Unlike NASA's Space Shuttle, it didn't have its own main engines. It only has orbital manoeuvring thrusters, and possible some jet engines for use in the atmosphere when returning to Earth. Instead the whole thing was lifted by a rocket and boosters.

      Well, now we can recover the boosters, so you can see where this is going. The rocket was needed for steering, b

    • by necro81 ( 917438 )

      We know "technically" we can push a jet high enough that a space craft could then be launched from to have the first stage be a completely reusable by landing it right after the vehicle unmounts from the launch vehicle

      There was an old commenter on Slashdot that like to point out that "Mach 6 at 60,000 ft altitude is only 6% of the way to orbit". The math is just approximate, but tells you something about the (poor) viability of air-launching to orbit. See this detailed video from Everyday Astronaut [youtube.com].

  • by necro81 ( 917438 ) on Monday July 13, 2026 @08:03AM (#66235778) Journal
    It's an awesome achievement - a really challenging problem, of depth and complexity beyond the ken of most armchair engineers, executed successfully.

    That said: what they have achieved is basically the same as the DC-X [wikipedia.org] from 30+ years ago! Let us sincerely hope this effort has a longer life ahead of it than that one did!

It is difficult to soar with the eagles when you work with turkeys.

Working...