Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
Sony Movies

Sony Deletes More Movies From Accounts of People Who 'Bought' Them (techdirt.com) 89

Posted by BeauHD from the you're-buying-a-license dept.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt: In 2022, due to "evolving licensing agreements" with distributor StudioCanal, German and Austrian users had hundreds of movies disappear from their PS accounts, long after buying them through Sony. Then in 2023, it happened again in America, specifically when Sony ended its licensing agreement with Discovery after the Warner Bros. merger, which, of course, has since been bought by Paramount Skydance. That resulted in customers having hundreds and hundreds of episodes of TV shows deleted from their accounts. Nowhere in any of this were there refunds, of course. No recompense at all, actually. Just a thing you thought you'd bought taken away from you by the very people you thought you bought it from.

And now it's happening again. Due to another licensing agreement fallout with StudioCanal, hundreds of movies and TV shows are being ripped from the accounts of PS Store customers, and there appears to be fuck all that they can do about it. [Kotaku reports:] "This news was brought to people's attention by X user somatyk, who posted the notification they had received from PlayStation this week. Along with the unapologetic news that the purchased movies would be deleted from their account on September 1, the message concluded with, 'Click here for a full list of affected titles that will no longer be supported. Thank you.' The same warning is now reproduced in full on the PlayStation website, along with the list of 551 films and TV series that are being pulled from people's libraries."

As Kotaku notes later in their post, part of what is striking in all of this is the sheer mundanity of the announcement. Because there have been no consequences, or any action at all from the public or government, Sony treats this all as if it's perfectly normal and no big deal. You can tell me all you want about how the Ts and Cs in these purchases do in fact note that the nature of the purchase is a temporary licensing of the content for an undetermined time period... but I can promise you that the public in general doesn't understand that. They think they're buying a thing, not a license.

Sony Deletes More Movies From Accounts of People Who 'Bought' Them More | Reply

Sony Deletes More Movies From Accounts of People Who 'Bought' Them

Comments Filter:

  • Same answers as before: (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Firethorn ( 177587 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:06PM (#66242046) Homepage Journal

    1. Sony should be forced to refund the original purchases, no matter how old they are. If the consumer was only "borrowing" the media, then Sony was only "borrowing" the money.
    2. Yo-ho-ho and a bottle of Rum. IE Piracy.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by toddz ( 697874 )
      Mod points, where are my mod points when I need them!

    • Re:Same answers as before: (Score:5, Informative)

      by Local ID10T ( 790134 ) <ID10T.L.USER@gmail.com> on Thursday July 16, 2026 @04:28PM (#66242202) Homepage

      1. adjusted for inflation + interest + inconvenience fee (sufficient to allow the customer to purchase the media from another vendor).

      Sony should feel a financial pressure (as well as political and social pressure) to do what is necessary to secure the license rights to what they previously promised their customers.

      • At least to be like Steam - it is understood that people who buy things get said license in perpetuity.
        IE they might buy a 10 year license for SELLING said titles, but they still get to provide said titles to those that purchased them after the license expired.
        It sounds like Sony, for what was probably a trivial savings, wrote bad contracts. Or their system can't handle not having something for sale yet still downloadable by those who have previously purchased it.

    • Re:Same answers as before: (Score:5, Informative)

      by torkus ( 1133985 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @05:13PM (#66242264)

      I've been on the 'bottle of rum train' for a LONG while now. It's simply not worth it to either maintain a half dozen monthly subs or try to "buy" movies that still can only be watched in certain specific ways.

      Especially when you can buy VPN per year for what netflix charges per month...and then watch nearly anything at any time on any device and share with anyone else who also wants to watch it.

    • *Holds up my cat looking sad*

      "If haz not own, why button sez 'Buy'?"

    • Refund WITH interest.

    • I used to be largely anti-piracy. The fact the corps have decided to abuse copyright at a level I never thought was possible means I don't give a stuff any more. Especially about movies, where the participants were paid already.

      Pass the rum.

      If they want to continue this "Digital downloads" shit, they can find a way to make it absolutely impossible for anyone to remove something from a library that was sold as being there indefinitely. Maybe allow people to download an encrypted version and put the key in es

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by dgatwood ( 11270 )

      1. Sony should be forced to refund the original purchases, no matter how old they are. If the consumer was only "borrowing" the media, then Sony was only "borrowing" the money. 2. Yo-ho-ho and a bottle of Rum. IE Piracy.

      3. Download it off a torrent site, wait to get threatened by the copyright owner, show them proof that you purchased the product. If they sue you anyway, counter-sue both the copyright owner and Sony for conspiracy to defraud. Ask for seven figures on account of their vexatious litigation.

      • This might not work out the way you think. Generally speaking, with torrenting, you are not prosecuted for downloading the media. The prosecution is for UPLOADING the media, at least fragments of it, to others.

        You'd need to set yourself up as an absolute leech - 0% upload. Might take a while to get the media file in that case. In which case one is unlikely to get the threatening letter in the first place.

        Yes, the court system is nitpicky enough for that to matter.

      • Download it off a torrent site, wait to get threatened by the copyright owner, show them proof that you purchased the product.

        Sorry but this is not only wrong, it's terribly embarrassing given your really low Slashdot ID. You don't download "off a torrent site" but using the bittorrent network, a p2p file-sharing thing. As such, you are also DISTRIBUTING the work and you certainly have no rights to do so, this is how they get you, and it's really risky, as they can claim really high damages.

    • And, again... I foresee a Buy VS Rent debate.

      If I rented the game, then it should be far cheaper than buying it and I get a receipt that says when I have to give it back. If I bought it, then it's mine to play or watch when I want to.

  • Slow learners (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ddtmm ( 549094 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:07PM (#66242048)

    You can tell me all you want about how the Ts and Cs in these purchases do in fact note that the nature of the purchase is a temporary licensing of the content for an undetermined time period... but I can promise you that the public in general doesn't understand that. They think they're buying a thing, not a license.

    People still don't realize if it's in the cloud, it can disappear anytime. Unless you have a playable copy in your hand, you have no permanent ownership. Games, movies, programs, any online service, it's all the same.

    Yet another lesson...

    • I used to feel the same but I've become more convinced over last 5 years that physical ownership is also precarious. It's highly likely that optical drives won't be generally available in the near future, and it's already an issue that physical media often has limited runs and isn't available at a reasonable price outside the release window

      • Re: (Score:3)

        by ukoda ( 537183 )
        Yes, bit rot and obsolete hardware is a real issue. What is interesting is how retro computing is dealing with old storage media. There are a lot of floppy disk drive emulators that use SD cards instead of spinning magnetic media. Same with tape drives and cartridges. Recently I brought an EPROM emulator that uses a RPi Pico and can be updated via USB, which is great because finding a working UV eraser and EPROM programmer that works with a modern OS is increasingly difficult to do.

        The key is getting

      • I used to feel the same but I've become more convinced over last 5 years that physical ownership is also precarious. It's highly likely that optical drives won't be generally available in the near future, and it's already an issue that physical media often has limited runs and isn't available at a reasonable price outside the release window

        I've honestly taken to purchasing extras of my physical players once I know they are quality and stashing the spare in a cool, dry place. Most of these last me a good long time, and there's no reason at all that one stored properly will break just sitting there. Don't ever attach them to the network, so they can't get over-the-wire update that intentionally break compatibility with various formats, and you should be set for at least a couple decades or more.

        • ... there's no reason at all that one stored properly will break just sitting there.

          That's probably a little closer to being true than it once was; but any electronic device which contains electrolytic capacitors should be powered up every once in a while to keep the dielectrics formed and the oxide layers intact.

          That's especially true of digital devices whose input voltage can't be raised slowly by using a Variac; theres's an (admittedly small) risk of damage or data corruption, as the different voltage rails may reach their spec'd voltages at different times.

        • Re: (Score:1)

          by Anonymous Coward

          ...and there's no reason at all that one stored properly will break just sitting there.

          So-called "rubber" belts perish over time whether they're used or not. Numerous "grease" products used on nylon mechanisms dry out over time and gets sticky or solid.

      • That's why i buy my games on GOG. For example. Unless computers and mass storage disappears, there will be backups for a long time. Music is also buyable. For the rest: The high seas.

      • I have 40 year old cassettes with games on that still load but I have them all backed up on different drives too.
        Cracked game installers run off your hard drive and never connect to their server (like old games as there was no servers!).
        I had to download "V for Vendetta" recently as my BluRay program wasn't happy about something. I had to pirate media that I actually paid for a physical version of.

      • There have been a few musicians that have been trying to redirect the kids away from cassette tape nostalgia to CD nostalgia. The reason is simple, in 2026 its cheaper to burn a CD than it is to manufacture a cassette tape. And CDs are vastly superior (the relative virtues of Vinyl and CD are a little more complicated, though on pure technicalities, CD still wins).

        The thing with CDs is a DIY home musician can do the whole manufacturing chain at home. You buy one of those cheap laser screen printer engravers

        • 60+ year old vinyl for the win!
          I'll take a vinyl of Jethro Tull - Songs From The Wood over a heavily remastered all to Hell CD copy any day.

      • There will always be optical media players (computer or stand-alone)... you can find new 3.5" drives still (and they work under Win11).
        You can still buy tape drives (and tapes... LTO-8 stores 30TB compressed).

    • Even the physical copy in hand doesn't guarantee continued possession. Besides just needing to protect the disc from things like fire, physical abuse, and more, an awful lot of DVDs only last a decade or two.

  • If you can't copy it... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by silentbozo ( 542534 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:07PM (#66242050) Journal

    You don't own it.

    You can extend this to hardware as well. If you're not allowed to repair or modify something... you don't own it.

    • That's why, as soon as I buy a hardware thing (TV, DVD player, anything that has a warranty), the first thing I do is break that seal and void that pesky warranty.

  • This (Score:5, Insightful)

    by RitchCraft ( 6454710 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:16PM (#66242066)

    This is why piracy is on the rise. If buying isn't owning then ... well you know the rest. Corporate fucktards.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by caseih ( 160668 )

      Is it, though? Seems like everyone I know is paying their monthly fees and just streaming what they want to watch. And indeed if you only plan to watch something once, there's no point in buying it on media.

  • I guess a customer with Altzheimers may want to watch a movie twice, but he won't remember that he already bought it.

  • Physical media (Score:3)

    by sit1963nz ( 934837 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:34PM (#66242112)
    Unless it is a physical product, you do NOT own it.
    And even then you only own it if you can resell it.
    '

  • so if I go to an sony store and delete stuff off the shift it's not shoplifting?

  • of the law.

    The only true way to guard against this is to have the physical DVD's. (Sorry Blu-ray, you're not completely decryptable yet).

    One day, those DVD's you find at the swap meet and on places like Craigslist are going to become valuable. This will happen once the general public has had enough of the shenanigans the movie industry is using against its customers.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by txsable ( 169665 )

      That's part of why I buy DVDs (and other physical media) still. The only real concern I have will be when my DVD/Bluray player dies - finding replacement hardware is getting more difficult. some of the major brands (samsung) have stopped selling that hardware, and most of what's left is either over-the-top expensive, or cheaply made, no-name tech.

      • Re: (Score:1)

        by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        Never mind all those DVDs from the mid 2000s that rotted on the shelf. Good luck getting anyone to replace those..

        Physical media does not provide any sort of certainty you'll be able to enjoy it a decade from now and don't say "but make backups" the value proposition of making a backup as in a real redundant copy to sit on self somewhere (or hardisk ... whatever) vs for piracy just isn't there. The time plus the cost of the media does not let that make sense for something you paid less than $20 for in the

        • I back them up with all my other backups, if you compress them they aren't any more egregious to store than the vacation photos. It isn't much harder than backing up my CDs was.

        • The time plus the cost of the media does not let that make sense for something you paid less than $20 for in the first place.

          I dunno. The twenty-bucks-plus-copying-time spent on something you value and care about - which may be MUCH more expensive or even simply unavailable a few years hence - sounds like the very definition of an appreciating asset.

  • You're not going to be taken seriously as a journalist by swearing in your articles. Not that I ever took Kotaku seriously, but this sort of thing is why.

    That said, Sony owes people refunds. Even if they, the reseller, lost their license to resell, that shouldn't impact the consumer who purchased their own license. If Pax8 was suddenly unable to sell M365 licenses, I'd expect my tenants to keep working regardless.

    I suspect this is the sort of thing that could garner bipartisan support if someone in

  • I thought it was more common to see survivorship clauses, where even if the licensing deal between the platform owner and the distributor ended, the platform was still authorized to service entitlements that were purchased on the platform (i.e. user who "bought" the content could still access it from their account, it just was no longer available for purchase).

    Has this become the norm? Or is this mostly just Sony entering into shite agreements because "fuck the users"?

    • Has this become the norm? Or is this mostly just Sony entering into shite agreements because "fuck the users"?

      It's the norm because it makes the licensing agreements slightly cheaper.

    • I'm sure they don't want to pay the hosting on the streaming files if they can't offset it by selling more

    • It is on Fandango (neé Vudu) and I believe Apple. But those are independent platforms, and at least in Vudu's case, streaming was their entire reason for existing. The Playstation X is a transient platform, never intended to be in operation more than a decade later. Sony's not going to pay for perpetual license when they plan to obsolete the entire platform ever 8 years.

  • Can't wait for the near-term future when everything is under siege this way. "You didn't actually own the money in your back account, we just granted you the temporary privilege of accessing it occasionally so that we could confiscate later it at our convenience'. 'The name you were given at birth was just a loan under our trademarking umbrella. Your identity has been revoked." So much winning!

    • Re: (Score:3)

      by DarkOx ( 621550 )

      There are already provisions for 'hair cuts' and similar theft.

      Dodd-Frank gave the FDIC the ability to treat similar seniority creditors differently in resolutions, for 'systemic stability' which is not well defined. So if you have a bond in a failing bank and the current administration does not like you... to bad....

      Temporary though it might be the pandemic legislation (cares act? I think it was) also created force majeure where if you'd owner financed a residence and the buy decided to just not pay, dea

  • Sony is committing piracy (Score:3)

    by xack ( 5304745 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @04:32PM (#66242216)
    Call it what it is. And they have drm on their disc drives so even physical media can be revoked by them.

  • It's just simple Big Data math (Score:3, Informative)

    by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @04:42PM (#66242232)
    This shit goes all the way back to the opening of fight club. You figure out how many users have actually used content and therefore are likely to notice and Sue and you figure out how likely they are to be able to sue in the first place since it's very difficult to do any sort of class action lawsuits in America anymore thanks to lobbying from large corporations. Then you figure out a dollar amount on all that and a dollar amount to pay for the licensing and Bob's your uncle whichever one is bigger wins.

    This is what happens when you vote for anti-consumer, anti-regulation, anti bureaucracy politicians for 50 years.

    The thing people don't seem to understand is all those bureaucrats are the white collar cops walking the beat of the corporations screwing you over.

    The only reason the DMV sucks, which is the only reason anyone hates bureaucrats, is because we intentionally underfunded because you can register the vote there. Several States just passed laws requiring the legislation to fund the DMV in order to create minimum wait times and as soon as they did that the DMV was fine and there was no complaints anymore about bureaucrats.

    Also more people registered to vote.

    Regulations are written in blood. And if you don't have somebody there to enforce those regulations the blood isn't going to stop. That somebody is definitionally a bureaucrat. Because we don't have cops policing corporations. Funny that when you and I do something we're not supposed to a guy with a gun and a stick shows up but when a multi-millionaire CEO does the same shit it's a guy in the suit with little or no power...

    • Several States just passed laws requiring the legislation to fund the DMV in order to create minimum wait times and as soon as they did that the DMV was fine and there was no complaints anymore about bureaucrats.

      Requiring that people would have to wait at least a few hours at the DMV seems like a costly and ineffective way to discourage voting, but if you think it will work, I'm willing to give it a shot.

      • You're not important enough to take away other people's right to vote.

        I don't think you're comment is a bot. You seem real.

        Once they take away my vote your vote no longer matters because they don't need you to vote for them to win because I'm not able to vote against them.

        That's kind of how this mess works. People you disagree with lose the right to vote. That means your side no longer needs elections to win. That means the people in charge of you get to tell you what to do and there's nobody a

  • Meh! A merkins (Score:2, Informative)

    by Growlley ( 6732614 )
    you wont vote for consumer rights because that's socalist!

  • And now we know (Score:5, Informative)

    by smooth wombat ( 796938 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @04:56PM (#66242246) Journal

    Why more people are buying DVDs/blu-ray. They have the movie. They own it. It can't be taken from them. It won't change.

    The same with books. No worrying that your digital copy will mysteriously disappear one night. You have the book. You bought it. It's yours. The words won't change.

  • It gets WORSE! (Score:3)

    by CEC-P ( 10248912 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @04:57PM (#66242248)
    Right next to "buy" they have another option to rent it. Just FYI, if you're never seen their purchase page.

  • "If buying isn't owning..... (Score:4, Informative)

    by Sebby ( 238625 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @05:38PM (#66242290) Journal

    ... then piracy isn't stealing."

  • This isn’t just Sony. The original rights owners decided not go renew licenses, and Sony had no choice but to yank them or likely pay far more for continued access than they were worth. Any purchase should include a permanent non irrevocable right to access the content so customers companies like Sony can still legally provide access to them even if they lose the fights to sell or stream it. If the seller goes out of business or shutters servers, they have a right to a downloadable digital copy.
  • Just sayin From the Apple Store "When you purchase access to this item, you can permanently download it to your iPhone, iPad, Mac, or PC. Once downloaded, you can access this without an internet connection, and Apple can't remove it from your device. If you purchase this from the Apple TV app on Apple TV, smart TVs, or other streaming devices, you can't download it on those devices, but you can easily download it on compatible devices."

  • I don't understand how this isn't being litigated (Score:3)

    by ianbnet ( 214952 ) on Thursday July 16, 2026 @08:04PM (#66242476)

    I guess it probably is. But surely there is either settled case law on this or active litigation?

  • Suppose, just suppose, that Sony strikes a deal at some point in the future to re-license any of this content. Does anyone for one second think that that would mean they would simply restore access to the users who have previously purchased those titles, versus making everyone have to buy the licenses over again? Take all the time you need with that one.

  • Sony publishes this on Jun 24, 2026, Ars Techinca (for example) picked up the news on Jun 29, 2026,

    https://arstechnica.com/gadget... [arstechnica.com]

    Other outlets picked it up around the same time... there was a hoopla online, youtube videos, outrage galore,

    Slashdot picks it up on Jul 16, 2026...

    And is not even a dupe...

    How low the mighty have fallen...

    What is the case to come here anymore?

  • ...Sony ought to be forced to change the "buy" or "purchase" buttons in their marketplace to say "rent a temporary time-limited license" instead, going forward.

    Any "purchase" that can be unilaterally revoked at any time (days or even years after the fact) at the sole discretion of the seller isn't a purchase at all, so labeling it as such is blatantly false advertising.

  • Sometimes a business deal does not work out.

    Just refund the purchase price plus interest and we'll call it even.

    This should motivate those "selling" licenses to have all their contracts in line so they can perform going forward.

  • Get a copy and back it up.

    Until then you only think you own things.
  • Please do not believe in any "cloud things"

    Whatever is in a possible "cloud" is not yours. The actual owner can do whatever it wants with it. Especially people who put "money" before "humans".

    I couldn't believe the message "Click here for a full list of affected titles that will no longer be supported. Thank you." . So I looked at the Playstation website [playstation.com]...

    This is really disgusting!

    The only decent explanation I could think of i sthat it has been generated by some Artificial "Intelligence".

Slashdot Top Deals

The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it. -- Franklin P. Jones

Close